• 제목/요약/키워드: EVALUATION CRITERIA

검색결과 4,653건 처리시간 0.034초

가조작도를 이용한 소형 유압 쇼벨암의 기구평가에 관한 연구 (A Study on Kinematic Evaluation of Hydraulic Schovel Arms by Using a Manipulability Measure)

  • 강순동;원경;허만조
    • 한국정밀공학회지
    • /
    • 제14권1호
    • /
    • pp.52-57
    • /
    • 1997
  • The paper deals with kinematic evaluation of performance of a hydraulic shovel arm for deburrinhg task. First, a new criteria for evaluation is derived to evaluate accuracy of an ene-effector at each position with- in the movable area of the hydraulic shovel arm. Secondly a graphic evaluation system that displays a map of the criteria for evaluation and a map of the manupulability measure is build. Thirdly, by using by using the sas- tem, a hydraulic shovel arm is kinematically evaluated. Finally, from the comparison of the result obtained from the computer simulation and an experimental result, it is indicated that the derived criteria for evalu- ation and the graphic system are useful.

  • PDF

간호단위 성과평가도구 개발 (Development a Tool for Evaluating Nurses' Performance in Hospital Units)

  • 박성애;김진현;박광옥;김명숙;김세영
    • 임상간호연구
    • /
    • 제15권2호
    • /
    • pp.5-21
    • /
    • 2009
  • Purpose: This study was aimed to develop a tool for evaluating nurses' performance by using Balanced Score Card (BSC) in hospital units. Methods: Preliminary survey was done in 10 hospitals to investigate evaluation criteria for nurses' performance. For the main study, each of 14 nursing managers evaluated 2 nursing units (total of 28 nursing units) to verify the sensitivity of the tool criteria. The evaluation result drawn from the preliminary BSC tool was analyzed to verify the sensitivity and validity of the tool. Results: As a result, nurses' performance evaluation tool consisted of 4 categories, 8 objectives, and 14 criteria was developed. Conclusion: The BSC tool for nurses' performance evaluation provides meaningful data in evaluating nursing performance in hospital units.

환경영향평가중 삼림생태계 평가기법 개발 (I) : 지리산 산청 양수발전소 건설예정지를 중심으로 (Development of Forests Ecosystem Assessment Technique of Environmental Impact Assessment(I) : In the Case of the Sanchong Pumping-up Power Plant of Mt. Chiri)

  • 최송현;이경재
    • 환경영향평가
    • /
    • 제4권2호
    • /
    • pp.71-91
    • /
    • 1995
  • In order to develop an appropriate set of criteria applicable for environmental impact assessment (EIA) of natural forest 8 items are proposed. The criteria are vegetation distribution area (DA), distribution pattern (DP), size (S), diameter of breast height of tree (DBH), humus (H), sustainment (ST), successional stage (SS) and impact of adjacent ecosystem (IAE), Each criterion has an interval which minimum 1 score to maximum 5 score Forest Evaluation Index (FEI) was obtained as the sum of 8 criteria value. Above 70% is considered to be absolutely conservative and from 50% to 70% range of total score is to be considered conservative. In the case of the Sancho˘ng Pumping-up Power Plant of Mt. Chiri, 8 criteria were applied base on actual vegetation map. Pinus densiflora community got 73%(29 scores) and Quercus variabilis - Q. serrata community got 60%(24 scores). This may be said that this local vegetation has high ecological potentiality. These criteria cannot always be absolutely evaluation tool. So it is expected to take the more time to be developed further, and holistically added by the other field such as fauna, geological feature etc.

  • PDF

AHP를 이용한 의복평가기준의 우선순위 분석 (An Analysis on Priority of Clothing Evaluative Criteria using AHP)

  • 조윤주
    • 한국의류산업학회지
    • /
    • 제9권1호
    • /
    • pp.81-88
    • /
    • 2007
  • This study aimed to develop priorities alternatives based on relative rather than absolute assignments on clothing evaluative criteria. The relative comparison approach includes much redundancy and is thus less sensitive to judgemental errors common to techniques using absolute assignments. By deriving evaluative criteria for consumers in choosing clothing, and considering their relative important or value in the priority of evaluation elements. When the consumer selects clothing, it requires multi-criteria decision making exercise and needs to make trade-offs between different alternatives. With an application of the AHP's hierarchical structuring and pair-wise comparisons, this study will determine the weight and priorities of evaluation factor in clothing evaluative criteria in choosing cloth, which will eventually lead to improve management. Items for the setting priority were decided as 'symbol', 'practicality', 'economy', 'vogue', and 'aesthetic' by council. The data for this research were collected from respondents of 108 females in Busan. Data were analyzed by frequency and AHP. As the results, 'economy' was decided as a most important item. And 'a fashionable color' evaluated as that of first priority in the totality evaluation elements.

AHP를 활용한 SWG 조합기술 평가기준에 관한 연구 (A Study on the AHP based Evaluation Criteria for the Combinatorial Technology of Smart Water Grid)

  • 김윤중;곽동근;김원태;김정주;신흥섭;김용성;김상선;김채수
    • 상하수도학회지
    • /
    • 제28권1호
    • /
    • pp.103-110
    • /
    • 2014
  • In this study, the evaluation criteria of performance and applicability is developed to rank the combinatorial technologies for SWG (Smart Water Grid) system using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. Security, safety, solution, suitability and sustainability which are goals of SWG technology, are used as upper level hierarchy elements. And three detailed elements for each upper level hierarchy are adopted as the lower level hierarchy. The weighted value which represents the importance of each element, could be determined through questionnaires accomplished by groups of specialists who are engaged in relevant waster industry and research area. To assess the accuracy of the evaluation criteria developed in this study, a simulation on four decision alternatives for smart water grid was carried out as an evaluation. Consequently which showed 90 % of accuracy.

위탁급식전문업체 인증제도 도입을 위한 급식운영 평가 모형 기준항목 선정 (Identification of foodservice operation evaluation model′s criteria items for certifying contract foodservice management company)

  • 양일선;박문경;차진아;이경태;박상용
    • 한국식품조리과학회지
    • /
    • 제20권3호
    • /
    • pp.247-255
    • /
    • 2004
  • The foodservice industry is changing more and more from on-site foodservice management to contract foodservice management. However there are differences according to the level of management and operation of contract foodservice management company (CFMC). The necessity of certification on CFMC is increasing to enable fair discrimination of CFMC among most clients that want to contract with CFMC. This study was performed to identify the foodservice operation evaluation model's criteria items for certifying CFMC. The analysis research methods included literature review, content analysis, individual interview, Delphi technique, and brain storming. First, the following infrastructure items were prepared in the contractor's viewpoint: procurement, transparency of operation, menu development and operation system, nutrition service system, professional employee education, sanitation andsafety management system, customer satisfaction system, facility system, management information system (MIS), business and economics. Second, the evaluation criteria required by the contractor on the client's view point was similar to school foodservice, hospitalfoodservice, and business andindustry foodservice except extraordinary items of field. Third, evaluation criteria and detail categories and items were identified such as financial focus, customer focus, process focus, human focus, and renewal and development by grafting on intellectual capital evaluation methodology for CFMC.

소비자 관점의 의복 디자인 평가 요소에 대한 탐색적 연구 -20대 의류-패션 디자인 전공 여대생을 중심으로- (An Exploratory Study on Apparel Design Evaluation Criteria with Consumers' Perspectives -Focusing on Female College Students Majoring in Apparel-Fashion Design in their 20s-)

  • 김선우
    • 한국의류학회지
    • /
    • 제43권3호
    • /
    • pp.384-404
    • /
    • 2019
  • This study investigates the multidimensional structure of apparel design evaluation criteria and the details of each criterion by exploring how female college students majoring in apparel design in their 20s evaluate apparel design based on an exploratory approach. Data were analyzed through a categorization method of qualitative data after collecting from a literature review and three focus group interviews. The results identified the six evaluation criteria of apparel design (functional usefulness, convenience, aesthetics, psychological self suitability, social activity usefulness, and fashion trend). Functional usefulness and convenience assessed the extent to which primary features of apparel are reflected in apparel design, and aesthetics evaluated the aesthetic beauty of apparel design. Psychological self suitability estimated the extent to which apparel design expressed psychological self properly, and social activity usefulness appraised the extent to which apparel design contributed to the social activities of wearers. Last, fashion trend assessed the extent to which apparel design reflected fashion trend. The study results provide meaningful implications towards an apparel industry that wants to develop apparel design that appeals to consumers, educational institutions that aim to cultivate well-trained professionals in the apparel industry, and consumers who want to purchase clothes of satisfactory design.

인공지능 음성사용자 인터페이스 사용성 평가 기준 검증 : 중국 내비게이션 VUI를 중심으로 (Verification of AI Voice User Interface(VUI) Usability Evaluation : Focusing on Chinese Navigation VUI)

  • 주이모;상님여;임현찬;황미경
    • 한국멀티미디어학회논문지
    • /
    • 제24권7호
    • /
    • pp.913-921
    • /
    • 2021
  • After arranging the general usability evaluation criteria of existing VUI researchers, this study verified how appropriate these criteria are for AI VUI specialized in navigation and the priority of their suitability. The VUI used in this study was analyzed through a survey from a total of 195 Chinese users after analyzing the navigation VUI used in China. As a result of the analysis, the usability evaluation criteria of the navigation VUI were extracted from three sub-factors of 'task accuracy', 'function satisfaction', and 'information reliability' in verifying conformance with general VUI evaluation criteria. With the recent advent of self-driving cars, safety and response speed are becoming very important, so Chinese users also ranked responsiveness as the top priority in VUI design, and the importance was also found to be high. Also, both men and women have the highest reactivity and the lowest multiplicity. VUI requires a convenient and natural interface to understand the intention between two objects through usability evaluation and verification in order to have effective interaction between humans and machines.

CC와 CEM의 평가요구사항 분석 (Analysis of Evaluation Requirement for CC and CEM)

  • 강연희;방영환;최성자;이강수
    • 디지털콘텐츠학회 논문지
    • /
    • 제5권2호
    • /
    • pp.95-100
    • /
    • 2004
  • 정보보호 수준을 향상시키기 위해 정보보호시스템 평가$\cdot$인증에 대한 필요성이 높아지고 있으며 선진국에서는 정보화 역기능 위험 방지를 위해 제도적 일환으로 자국의 환경에 적합한 평가$\cdot$인증제도를 마련하여 정보보호시스템을 평가해 오고 있다. 그러나 상이한 평가기준의 적용으로 인한 시간 및 비용 소모의 문제점이 발생되었으며 이를 해결하기 위한 노력으로 현재 정보보호 시스템 평가를 위한 상호인증을 위해 공통평가기준(CC : Common Criteria)과 공통평가방법론(CEM : Common Evaluation Methodology)을 사용하고 있다. 선진화된 평가제도의 조기 정착과 효율적인 평가 준비 및 수행방법을 위한 정보보호시스템 평가 참여자들의 평가기준 및 방법론에 대한 유연하고 능동적인 해석이 필요하다.

  • PDF

제품디자인의 퍼지가중평가방법 개발 (Fuzzy-Weighted Evaluation Method of Product Design)

  • 정광태;박재희;김명석
    • 디자인학연구
    • /
    • 제13권1호
    • /
    • pp.131-138
    • /
    • 2000
  • 디자인된 결과가 얼마나 만족스럽게 디자인되었는지에 대한 평가는 디자인과정에 있어 필수적인 단계이다. 하지만 디자인 평가는 다른 부분에 비해 무시되어 온 측면이 있고, 또한 보통 디자이너의 주관적인 판단에 의하여 이루어졌기 때문에, 체계적인 방법론의 개발에 있어서는 별다른 관심을 얻지 못하였다. 본 연구에서는 퍼지이론과 다기준의사결정모델을 적용한 디자인 평가방법을 제안하였다. 제안된 방법은 두 개의 단계로 구성되어지는데, 첫 번째 단계는 디자인 평가기준의 상대적 중요도를 구하는 단계이고, 두 번째 단계는 각 기준에 대한 디자인 점수를 부여하고 그 점수를 통합하는 단계이다. 디자인 평가기준들의 상대적 중요도를 나타내는 가중치를 구하기 위하여 분석계층과정이 적용되었고, 각 기준들에 대한 제품의 디자인 점수를 구하기 위해서는 퍼지이론이 적용되었다. 본 연구에서 제안된 방법을 제품의 디자인 평가에 효과적으로 활용될 수 있음을 확인하였다.

  • PDF