• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.239-245
• /
• 2018

지금까지 이러닝 소프트웨어 평가에 관한 다양한 연구가 진행되었으나 관련 표준에 따라 체계화된 형태가 아닌 연구자의 시각에서 제시된 분류에 따라 주관적인 평가 기준을 구성하고 있다. 또한 소프트웨어 평가 관련 표준도 실질적인 활용을 위해 지속적으로 보완되고 있으므로 이에 부합하는 평가 기준의 마련을 통해 평가 근거의 확보 및 체계화가 절실하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 이러닝 소프트웨어의 품질평가 기준을 구축하기 위해 소프트웨어 제품평가 표준인 ISO/IEC 25000 시리즈의 품질특성 중 사용성에 관한 체계를 근간으로 하고 이러닝 소프트웨어의 품질 요구사항을 분석하고 체계화하여 사용성의 부특성에 따른 평가 기준을 구축하였다. 본 평가 기준은 지속적으로 변화하는 관련 최신 표준화 동향을 반영한 이러닝 소프트웨어 평가기준을 구축하여 실질적인 활용도를 제고했다는 점에서 차별화된다. 향후 이러닝 소프트웨어의 품질평가 및 인증에 효과적인 활용이 가능할 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제37권5호
• /
• pp.879-889
• /
• 2017

본 연구에서는 문제기반 탐구학습으로 설계된 초등학교 및 중학교 온라인 과학 과목을 대상으로 고차적인 사고력을 평가할 수 있도록 개발된 평가문제에 대해 목표 분류학에 기반하여 평가하고자 하는 사고력을 도출하고 이를 구조화함으로써 평가준거를 개발하고자 하였다. 평가준거의 개발 과정은 다음과 같다. 먼저, 선행 연구 및 문헌분석, 전문가 타당화를 거쳐 6개의 평가요소 즉, 지식, 논리 분석적 사고, 비판적 사고, 탐구능력, 문제해결, 창의적 사고를 도출하였다. 다음으로, 평가요소의 정의, 하위 요소 및 평가 기준 등을 연구진이 수립하였고 2차에 걸친 전문가 타당화를 통해 수정, 보완하여 평가 기준안을 개발하였다. 마지막으로, 이와 같이 개발된 평가 기준안을 실제 온라인 탐구 과제 24종에 적용하여 과제별 평가 루브릭을 개발하였으며, 이 과정에서 수정, 보완할 영역을 도출하고, 개선하여 최종 평가 기준안을 완성하였다. 본 연구에서 개발한 평가 기준안은 평가문제가 평가하고자 하는 내용과 함께 그 문제가 요구하는 사고기능이 무엇인지 확인함으로써 내용 영역의 학습과 함께 사고기능의 개발효과를 확인할 수 있는 평가준거가 될 것이며, 다양한 탐구 중심의 학습 방법과 과학적 사고력, 과학적 문제 해결력 등의 핵심역량을 요구하는 교육 현장에 유용하게 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.107-127
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study was to develop an evaluation tool for the quality of nursing care in abdominal surgery patient. The target subjects of the tool were adult patients having abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Process-outcome framework was selected for the development of the tool in this study. The results were as follows. 1. Nine standards. 40 criteria and 88 indicators were developed. A standard was summary statement of the ideal level of excellencein a dimension of quality of nursing care. which could be evaluated by criteria. Several criteria indicated a specific standard and each criterion could be measured by observable and measurable indicators. 2. The standards were divided into two dimensions. One was process dimension which contained four standards(23 criteria), the other was outcome dimension which contatined five standards(17 criteria). 3. Average CVI was .985 at 9 standards. .947 at 40 criteria. and .987 at 88 indicators. 4. The evaluation tool for the quality of nursing care in abdminal surgery patients was a criterion-referenced tool. And data collection methods of the tool were investigation of patient's record and interview( or questionnaire) with the patients. 5. Interrater reliabilities of the tool were ; r= .7572 (agreement between two raters), and pI=.8487 (intraclass correlation between five raters who rated the 84 patients). 6. Internal consistency reliability ${\alpha}$ was .6194, which was obtained from 32 criteria. Eight criteria were missed in the analyzing process because of data omission. 7. Scores of the process and the outcome dimensions showed significant. but low correlation(r= .3759, p < .001). 8. There were significant differences in total scores between the hospitals and the departments of surgery(F = 15.233. p .0001). There was also significant interaction effect between hospitals and departments to total score(F = 8.396. p = .0001). Construct validity of the toool was verified by the known-group method. these kinds of difference were expected by the nursing experts participated in the study. From these results, more specific patient classification is suggested for the development of evaluation tool of the quallity of nursing care. And indicators to be used for objective measurement for the quality of nursing care must be developed.

• Journal of Forest and Environmental Science
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.163-172
• /
• 2020

The objective of this study was to develop evaluation criteria for forest education using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model. To this end, we designed a survey based on expert advice and content analysis of previous studies on the CIPP model and forest education. The survey was conducted on 393 forest education specialists, and Cronbach's α coefficient was set as 0.6 or higher to verify reliability and validity, and to determine reliability by factor. Eventually, 52 out of 57 evaluation items were extracted, and the evaluation indexes were selected through factor analysis as follows: four evaluation indexes for the context dimension, namely "Clarity of goal setting," "Developing conditions for education," "Meeting of requirements," and "Institutional drive"; three evaluation indexes for the input dimension, namely "Acquisition of education infrastructure," "Establishment of operational support," and "Adequacy of assigned manpower"; four evaluation indexes for the process dimension, which were "Adequacy of budget allocation," "Expertise of forest education instructors," "Diversity of programs," and "Public-private academic partnership"; and five evaluation indexes for the product dimension, namely "Effectiveness of perception change," "Influence over the society," "Continuity of improvement in evaluation," "Continuity of education," and "Verification of the effects of education."

• Journal of Biosystems Engineering
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.314-325
• /
• 1992

This paper reviews some relevant criteria for the evaluation of ride quality of agricultural tractors. Although there still exist many deficiences and shortcomings, ISO 2631 'Guide for the evaluation of human exposure to whole body vibration' may be the most pertinent criterion to the ride quality evaluation of tractors. The effects of ride vibrations on the human health and performance were also reviewed and summarized in general terms.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제21권8호
• /
• pp.1323-1333
• /
• 1997

The objectives of this study were to identify 1) the steps of information processing and evaluation in clothing purchase decision making, 2) evaluative criteria and determinant attributes at each step, 3) decision making rule, and 4) the effect of clothing involvement on information processing and evaluation. The data were obtained 71 female adults using questionnaire, observation and protocol in real shopping behavior. Consumer's information processing and evaluation was a circulated process composed of multi-steps. Consumer considered aesthetic and intrinsic evaluative criteria to be important and used compensatory and noncompensatory rule together at each decision making step. Clothing involvement had an partial effect on information processing and evaluation.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2005년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.1276-1280
• /
• 2005

The Maglav system project affects communities and are usually funded by public agencies. Evaluation of this project that considerably impact whole communities requires public involvement. This specific requirement of transportation projects determines the method of their evaluation as the impacts are estimated from the transportation economic point of view. Especially evaluation criteria must reflect the needs of the interested parties and should consider all foreseeable benefits and losses caused by the Maglav project. To select evaluation criteria and evaluation method may help a decision--maker in making a best selection for a Maglav project.

• 대한인간공학회지
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.287-296
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this research is to analyze priority of the elderly user interface (UI) evaluation criteria based on user's lifestyle. Since the elderly population will occupy over 20% of the all Korean population in the near future, we need to know older users' needs and information because elderly users will be main customers in the super-aged society. This paper investigated the definition of elderly users and characteristics demographically, socio-economically, and physically/cognitively. A total of 238 questionnaires from older users were analyzed based on a segmentation table for the elderly developed by the previous study. According to factor analysis and cluster analysis, 6 types of lifestyle and 4 groups of the elderly users were classified, respectively. The priority of UI evaluation criteria for large electronic home appliances and mobile products was analyzed by analyses of variance (ANOVAs). The results indicated that the priority of (physical, emotional, and cognitive) UI criteria was significantly different among elderly users' lifestyles for both home appliances and mobile products. Consequently, the results of this study may help the company develop some competitive silver products and give higher satisfaction to the elderly users by suggesting different priority of UI evaluation criteria according to the target elderly group. The results may also contribute to revitalize national economy by significantly increasing senior market shares.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제51권3호
• /
• pp.15-24
• /
• 2009

This study tried to develop a tentative evaluation system on greentourism potentials(GTP) of rural villages. The GTP evaluation system consisted of 45 detail criteria within three kinds of large scale criteria, which are human resources of residents capability, amenity resources of tourists attraction, and income resources through exchange activity between rural and urban areas. The evaluation criteria were adapted from several decades existing studies considering the hardware(facility and amenity resources) and software(human resources and programs on tourism)resources in rural villages. Two kinds of test study areas, which are subdivisions of county in a typical rural area(Boori) and an suburbanized area surrounding a big city(Chooboo), located on Keumsan county in Chungnam province, were selected to test the GTP evaluation system. The results showed that the average GTP values of each village in Boori are higher than those of Chooboo, due to higher values in criteria on amenity resources and income resources, which the typical rural area may have higher value in such criteria.

• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.1-20
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to identify the criteria of evaluating a price-comparison website, and to investigate the consumers' perceived importance and satisfaction of each criterion. Also, it compared both the importance and satisfaction levels based on consumers' socio-economic and Internet-usage characteristics. Data for this study came from a questionnaire completed by consumers (n=417), who had used the price-comparison website, and were analyzed through factor analysis, t-test, and ANOVA. The findings of the study were as follows: First, the evaluation criteria of the price-comparison website were categorized into five variety of information, accuracy, convenience, credibility, and the website system. Second, convenience of searching information was seen by consumers as both the most important and most satisfactory criterion. Variety of information was also considered important. For most of the evaluation criteria, the level of consumers' satisfaction was significantly lower than the level of consumers' recognized importance. Third, consumers in their 20s, students, and housewives were less likely to be satisfied by the price-comparison website overall. Older people were less likely to be satisfied with the convenience of the website, and the higher-income group was less likely to be satisfied with the variety of information on hand.