1 |
Park, K., Ryu, C., & Choi, J. (2017). An Analysis of Learning Objective Characteristics of Educational Programs of Centers for the University Affiliated Science-Gifted Education Using Semantic Network Analysis. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 27(1), 17-35.
DOI
|
2 |
Shin, J., Min, J., Kim, S., & Kwon, S. (2013). The Principles of Effective Higher-Thinking Programs and Limitations of Their Implementation in Schools. The Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 9(2), 71-98.
|
3 |
Son, J. (2006). A Science Writing Teaching Method Based on Scientific Thinking for Improving Scientific Essay Writing Ability. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 9(2), 333-355.
|
4 |
Song, S., Kil, J., & Shim, K. (2015). A Case Study on the Evaluation of Scientific Inquiry Ability of Elementary Scientifically Gifted Students : Observing and Inferring, Designing an Experiment, and Concluding. Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 376-388.
DOI
|
5 |
Sung, I., Kwak, B., Park, T., Im, S., Yang, M., Han, S., Kim, J., & Yi, H. (1987). A study of thinking ability development program. KEDI Research Report RR 87-37.
|
6 |
Brookhart, S. M. (2010) How to assess higher order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD product#109111
|
7 |
Cho, H. (2014). Theory of Science Education. Seoul: Kyoyookbook..
|
8 |
Cho, H., & Choi, K. (2008). Theory and Practice of Science Education (2nd ed). Seoul: Kyoyookbook..
|
9 |
Anderson, L. W & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds). (2001). A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete ed.). New York: Longman.
|
10 |
Bloom, B Engelhart, M. D., J, Hill, w. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook Cognitive domain. White Plains, NY: Longman.
|
11 |
Cho, Y., Choi, K., & Cho, D. (1997). Focusing on the 6th national curriculum, textbooks, teacher's guide and classroom observations = A study for the elementary science curriculum to enhance creative problem solving abilities. The Journal of Elementary Education, 11(1), 185-211.
|
12 |
Davis, G. A., Rimm, S., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the Gifted and Talented (6th ed). (Translated by Lee, M., Ryu, J., Lee, Y., Lee, H., and Chae, Y.). Seoul: Bakhaksa.
|
13 |
Huh, K., Kim, H., Cho, Y., Im, S.(1990). A Study of Thinking Ability Development Program(IV). KEDI Research Report, RR 90-17.
|
14 |
Kim, H. & Song, J. (2003). Middle School Students' Ideas about the Purposes of Laboratory Work. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(3), 254-264.
|
15 |
Kim, Y. (2002). Thinking & Problem Solving Psychology. Seoul: Parkyoungsa.
|
16 |
Kim, Y. & Kim, Y. (2012). The Development of a Free-response Test for the Assessment of Science Process Skills. Biology Education, 40(1), 167-177.
DOI
|
17 |
Kim, K., Kim, A., & Cho, S. (1997). Conceptualization of Creative Problem Solving for the Development of Curriculum for School Subjects. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 15(2),129-153.
|
18 |
Lee, B., Son, J., & Jung, H. (2006). The development of an online scientific inquiry learning system. The Korean Society of Elementary Science Education, 25(3), 271-280.
|
19 |
Lee, J., & Jeong, E. (2013). Development of an Evaluation Tool for Assessing Scientific Thinking Ability Using Science Writing. Teacher Education Research, 52(3), 575-588.
DOI
|
20 |
Lee, S., Chae, Y., & Sung, E.(2017). A Comparison study of self-directed learning competency between high-achiever of high school students and gifted learners. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 27(2), 123-137.
DOI
|
21 |
Lee, S, Kim, I. (2010). The development of assessment tool about science inquiry performance ability based on science gifted students. Journal of Science and Science Education 26(1), 25-39.
|
22 |
Lee, S., You, M., & Choi, B. (2008). The differences of attribution tendency and self-regulated learning strategy between gifted students and general students in elementary School. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 18(3), 425-442.
|
23 |
Weisberg, R. W. (2009). Creativity (Translated by Kim, M.). Seoul: Sigma Press.
|
24 |
Yang, T. (2003). A comparative study on cognitive and affective characteristics of scientifically gifted and non-gifted students. Graduate School, Incheon National University, Master's thesis.
|
25 |
Orpwood, G. (2001). The role of assessment in science curriculum reform. Assessment in Education, 8(2), 135-151.
DOI
|
26 |
Lee, S, & Hong, J. (2011). A comparison of psychological, physical and environmental characteristics of the general students and gifted students, and among gifted students' specific gifted areas. The Korea Educational Review, 17(1), 351-371.
|
27 |
Lee, Y., Park, J., & Lee, B.(2004). Analysis and Evaluation of the Science Content Relevance in the National Science Curriculum. RRC 2004-1-6, Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation.
|
28 |
Lim, B. (2003). Experiences of college students in online inquiry-based learning environment: Implications for design of inquiry on the web. Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 69-99.
DOI
|
29 |
Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Internet environments for science education. Lawrence Erlbaum.
|
30 |
Ministry of Education. (2015). Elementary education curriculum. Notification No. 2007-74 of MOE. Seoul: MOEHRD.
|
31 |
Park, I. (2010). Development and implementation of science programs enhancing creative problem solving skills applying meta-cognition. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ewha Womans University.
|
32 |
Park, I. & Kang, S. (2011). Science Teachers' Perceptions on Scientific and Creative Problem Solving. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 31(2), 314-327.
|
33 |
Park, I. & Kang, S. (2012). The Development of Assessment Tools to Measure Scientific Creative Problem Solving ability for Middle School Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(2), 210-235.
DOI
|
34 |
Park, H. & Kim, Y. (2013). Correlations between Scientific Knowledge, Science Process Skill, Creativity, and Science Related Attitudes of the Gifted Middle School Students in Science, Biology Education, 41(3), 459-469.
DOI
|