• 한국정보통신학회논문지
• /
• 제17권5호
• /
• pp.1233-1238
• /
• 2013

대부분의 대학에서 실시되고 있는 강의평가는 교과목의 특성에 따라 많은 차이가 있음에도 불구하고 강의평가의 절대점수를 활용하여 교수평가를 하고 있다. 강의평가의 신뢰성 확보는 교육의 질 향상을 위해 학생들의 의견을 교수에게 피드백한다는 점에서 매우 중요하다. 본 논문에서는 신뢰성 있는 강의평가 결과를 얻기 위해 고려해야할 여러 요소 가운데 학생들의 출석률과 강의평가의 관계를 살펴보고자 한다.

• 대한약학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한약학회 2001년도 Proceedings of the Pharmaceutical Society of Korea
• /
• pp.243.2-243.2
• /
• 2001

• 대한약학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한약학회 2003년도 Proceedings of the Convention of the Pharmaceutical Society of Korea Vol.2-2
• /
• pp.100.1-100.1
• /
• 2003

Tissue engineering has arisen to address the extreme shortage of tissues and organs for transplantation and repair. One of the most successful techniques has been the seeding and culturing cells on three-dimensional biodegradable scaffolds in vitro followed by implantaion in vivo. We used PLA and PLGA as biodegradable polymers and rabbit chondrocytes were isolated and applied to PLA and PLGA to make artificial cartilage. To evaluate the biocompatibility and biological safety of polymers, in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo animal tests were investigated. (omitted)

• 대한약학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한약학회 2002년도 Proceedings of the Convention of the Pharmaceutical Society of Korea Vol.2
• /
• pp.267.1-267.1
• /
• 2002

The potential allergenicity of the transgene products in genetically modified organisms (GMOs). has been an important issue. As a part of the risk assessment of GMOs. we investigated the physicochemical stability and the immunogenicity of food allergens to determine their allergenicity. We have systematically evaluated the stability of food allergens in the gastrointestinal tract by using simple models of gastric (Stimulated gastric fluid) and intestinal (Stimulated intestinal fluid) digestion. (omitted)

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제39권6호
• /
• pp.913-921
• /
• 2019

정부는 최고 가치와 글로벌 스탠다드를 추구한다는 목표 아래 2016년 종합심사낙찰제도를 도입하였다. 하지만 종합심사낙잘체도에 반영되는 시공평가의 평가기준은 객관성 부족, 주관적 평가 항목 다수 포함, 평가 항목별 가중치 비합리성 등의 문제가 지속적으로 제기 되고 있으며 중앙부처, 지자체, 관련 업계, 전문가 집단 모두 그 인식을 같이하고 있으나 해결 방안을 도출하지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구는 시공평가의 객관성 확보를 위해 개선이 필요한 주요 평가항목을 도출하고 그 특성을 분석하였다. 분석 방법은 시공평가 평가기준이 모두 4점 척도(우수, 보통, 미흡, 불량)로 구성된 특성을 활용하여 표준편차, Fleiss Kappa 분석 방법을 활용하였으며, 그 결과 총 25개로 구성된 시공평가의 평가항목 중 10개의 평가항목이 개선이 필요한 평가항목으로 도출되었다. 도출된 평가 항목의 주요 특성을 분석한 결과 세부 평가지침에 '매우적정', '적정'과 같은 정성적 평가 기준이 공통으로 포함된 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 따라서, 향후 시공평가의 평가기준은 정성적 평가기준은 지양하고 객관성 확보가 가능한 정량적 평가기준 중심으로 개선되어야 할 것으로 판단된다.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 1998년도 제13회 하계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.131-163
• /
• 1998

The interest in the evaluation of government-sponsored research institutes (GRIs) has increased markedly in Korea in 1990s; this is mainly because of the increasing needs 1) to improve the quality of R&D at GRIs, and 2) to reorient the GRIs' strategic position in Korean national innovation systems due to the enhancement of R&D capabilities of private companies and universities during last decade. As a first attempt to diagnose the managerial and strategic issues of GRIs, a Multi-Ministerial Evaluation Committee was established as an ad hoc task force under the Prime Minister's Office in 1991. According to the recommendations of the committee, the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) to which most of GRIs were affiliated, made it a rule to evaluate the annual performance of GRIs since 1992. This paper examines the recent experience of MOST's evaluation of Government-sponsored Research Institute in Korea. After several years'efforts of Science & Technology Policy Institute(STEPI) to build prospective evaluation systenL MOST decided to apply two supplementary approaches for the evaluation of GRIs; one is summative annual evaluation and the other is formative 3-year evaluation. The annual evaluation system that is designed as a temporary measure is to monitor and to guide the self-evaluation activities of GRIs. In the process of annual evaluation, MOST tries to minimize its direct involvement, and allows each GRI to develop self-evaluation system that is most appropriate for the unique characteristics of the institute. If there exist urgent issues under scrutiny, however, it can be incorporated and examined by a group of external experts as special issues in the annual evaluation system. The aim of 3-year evaluation is both to examine the past performance of each GRI and to investigate whether the strategic role of each GRI is viable in the future. Its major focus, however, lies not on auditing past performance but on strengthening future strategic position of each GRI. The MOST designates a group of evaluation experts with appropriate knowledge and competence as members of the General Evaluation Committee for one year. With the help of STEPI, a specialized research institute for R&D evaluation, the General Evaluation Committee develops methodology and procedures for the actual evaluation of GRIs. Based on the evaluation reports and recommendations from the General Evaluation Committee, the MOST develops various policy measures for strengthening GRIs.

• 디지털산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.129-144
• /
• 2013

Recognizing a limits on quantitative evaluation of cultural contents' and for its betterment, study aims developing a qualitative evaluation model. For this study, Reception Theory, Semiotics and Psychology were derived for epistemological dimension to contemplate culture contents' essential attribute. To be concrete, cultural contents was examined as experiential products, emotional products, rememberable products and texts. Also, codes of fun, emotion and culture were discussed as intrinsic attributes for cultural contents and how those attributes were expressed or composed in cultural contents was discussed as well. Evaluation items were extracted based on final discussion at the epistemic level, set up the final evaluation model by taking experts' advices on each items. With all those outcomes, qualitative evaluation model for cultural contents was developed. For the importance of each index in the model, priority was granted by weighting on each index. Lastly, evaluation scale was developed for each index. The culture contents' evaluation model developed in study is meaningful not only in drawing qualitative evaluation items of video(image) contents and developing the index and model for the first time, but also its possibility of wide use for other genres.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.59-77
• /
• 2018

Software process (SP) authentication is a certification system designed in order to improve software process and ensure software reliability of the Korean small and medium enterprises (SMEs). It is composed of 3 grades, 17 evaluation items and 70 detailed evaluation items (software process). In order to certificate grade 2, 42 detailed evaluation items must be satisfied. In order to certificate grade 3, all 70 detailed evaluation items must be satisfied. SMEs are more vulnerable to manpower and material resources than the major company. Therefore, it is difficult for SMEs to invest in the long term to improve the software process. If we can provide the core evaluation items to SMEs, SMEs will be able to improve software quality more efficiently and effectively. It can be used as a short way to acquire SP authentication. The evaluation items of SP are defined as influencing each other. Therefore, the core evaluation items might be established using related techniques. Although we searched for previous researches and related informations, the associated study was insufficient. In this study, ANP (Analytic Network Process) technique was applied, and the core evaluation items of SP authentication were established. SMEs will be able to acquire SP authentication more easily using the core evaluation items. Finally, we expect that this study will be used as a basis material for creating the SP 2.0 version.

• 한국컴퓨터산업학회논문지
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.147-154
• /
• 2007

각 급 학교에서는 학습이 끝난 후에 실시하는 총괄평가의 결과만으로 학습평가를 하고 있는데 이러한 평가 방식은 학습자의 학습능력의 형성과정을 고려하지 않는 결과위주의 학습평가로 볼 수 있다. 또 기존의 학습평가는 학습 수행능력을 판정하기 위한 진단평가와 학습능력의 향상 정도를 측정하기 위한 형성평가를 각기 개별적으로 수행하여 평가하기 때문에 학습 수행능력을 보다 명확하게 처리하기 곤란한 점이 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 학습자의 능력을 보다 객관적으로 평가하기 위한 방안으로 퍼지 추론을 이용하여 진단평가와 형성평가를 통합 평가할 수 있는 학습평가 방법을 제안한다.

• 대한약학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한약학회 2002년도 Proceedings of the Convention of the Pharmaceutical Society of Korea Vol.2
• /
• pp.272.2-273
• /
• 2002

The safety of blood and blood products is ensured by careful selection of donors. screening of donated blood and the use of validated viral inactivation and/or removal steps during the manufacture of blood products. Serologic screening procedures have substantially reduces the risk of transmission of blood-bone viruses. However, there are still residual risks despite these measures due to the inclusion of 'window period'donations. (omitted)