• 의료법학
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.145-173
• /
• 2016

우리나라에서 전통적으로 환자의 자기결정권 내지 자율권은, 의사의 보고성 설명의무에 대응하는 알 권리 그리고 의사의 기여적 설명의무에 대응하는 수진 동의권 및 수진 거절권, 양자를 '중심'으로 해서 논의되어 왔다. 환자의 자율적 결정의 내용으로서 형성 피력되는, 자기 신체 및 의료 상황에 대해 알고 싶지 않은 희망과 그로 인한 이익에 관한 지위- 도덕적 법적 지위 - 는 환자로부터의 알 권리와 동의권의 포기 또는 (의사가 부담하는) 설명의무의 면제라는 소극적 지위 차원에서 인식되었다. 그리고 설명 동의 원칙 도그마의 적용에 의한 역기능 문제는 설명 동의 원칙의 적용 배제 및 그에 따른 의사의 책임 부인이라는 역시 소극적 접근법에 의해 '주로' 인식되었다. 즉 환자의 그러한 알고 싶지 않다는 '무지(無知)의 희망'을 실현시켜 줄 법적 수단이 환자의 '모를 권리' 및 의사의 '부작위 배려의무'라는 '적극적 지위'로 이해되고 인정되지 않았던 것이다. 이러한 당사자의 적극적 지위 설정이 전제되지 않으면 실제상 및 이론상 문제가 제기된다. 환자가 동의권을 포기한다고 선언하거나 의사의 설명의무를 면제한다고 표명했음에도 불구하고, 의사가 굳이 환자를 상대로 설명 내지 보고를 행하여 환자에게 큰 손해가 발생한 경우에, 의사의 그 행위를 규범적으로 어떻게 평가할 것인가가 문제인 것이다. 한편 의사가 설명의 역기능을 우려하여 설명을 행하지 않았고, 그 행태에 대해 적절한 것이란 평가가 가능한 경우에, 그 재량적 불설명의 적법성을 인정할 직접적 근거가 무엇인지를 밝히는 것 또한 문제이다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 근본적으로 환자에게 '모를 권리'라는 지위를, 의사에게 '배려의무'라는 지위를 인정할 필요가 있다. 요컨대 이 권리와 의무 개념은 환자의 자율성 관념의 충실화와 설명역기능 현상의 적정한 방지라는 법규범적 요구를 충족시키는 데에 매우 유용한 도구로서 수용할 수 있다.

• 한국정보통신학회논문지
• /
• 제16권8호
• /
• pp.1587-1592
• /
• 2012

TV주파수 대역을 효율적으로 이용하기 위해 방송대역 공용파라미터 분석은 필수적인 사항이다. 간섭 송신기의 전송확률은 채널을 공용하는 시스템들의 성능분석의 척도로 사용될 수 있다. TV 방송 대역내의 동일채널을 이종시스템이 공용할 방안을 얻기 위한 파라미터로 duty cycle을 고려하였다. 간섭 송신기의 전송확률을 전체 전송 시간 중에서 개체가 활동중인 비율을 의미하는 duty cycle 값으로 가정하여 분석을 수행하였다. 두 시스템간의 duty cycle과 성능 관계를 분석하기 위해 간섭 송신기가 WiBro이고 WLAN이 희생 수신기인 경우를 고려하였다. 분석된 상호공존 결과는 향후 동일 주파수 환경에서 다양한 통신 프로토콜을 이용하는 무선기기에 대한 상호 공존 조건을 마련하는 기술개발에 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

• 전기전자학회논문지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.1210-1213
• /
• 2018

In this paper, we propose a method to reduce the amount of current through the Timing Control of the duty cycle and the Report Attribute Control at the MAC Layer in consideration of the Sleep Mode under the IoT wireless environment. The use of a duty cycle is an effective way to reduce energy consumption on wireless sensor networks where the node is placed in sleep mode periodically. In particular, we studied how to control power efficiency through duty rate in Short Transition Time and ACK Time processing while satisfying radio channel limitation criterion. When comparing before and after the improvement considering the delay time constraint, we validated the correlation of the electrical current reduction.

• 한국정보통신학회논문지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.222-227
• /
• 2012

본 논문에서는 이기종 시스템에서 간섭 송신기 신호의 duty cycle에 따른 전체 성능의 결과를 분석하였다. 기준치 설정에 대한 분석은 이기종 시스템들이 동일 주파수 대역을 공유하는 경우의 상호 공존을 위한 파라미터로 수행되었다. 두 시스템간의 duty cycle과 성능 관계를 분석하기 위해 간섭 송신기가 WLAN이고 WiBro가 희생 수신기인 경우를 고려하였다. 분석된 상호 공존 결과는 향후 동일 주파수 환경에서 다양한 통신 프로토콜을 이용하는 무선기기에 대한 상호 공존 조건을 마련하는 기술개발에 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제14권10호
• /
• pp.47-57
• /
• 2016

Purpose - This study's purpose is to investigate the market structure of the Korean duty free shop industry that has received recent attention from researchers and practitioners. By raising the question of whether or not the Korean duty free shop industry is unequivocally monopolistic, a wider viewpoint is provided. The study seeks to offer insights and managerial implications for marketers and policy makers who are in charge of regulating major Korean duty free shops. Research design, data, and methodology - The authors use secondary data from various sources, including Korea Customs Service and the Moodie Report, to investigate the structure of the duty free shop industry of Korea. Based on several theories, they present various criteria and statistical evidence such as K-firm concentration ratio, HHI, consumer substitutability, excess profit, and marketing costs. Results - In terms of consumer substitutability, it is difficult to confirm whether or not the Korean duty free shop industry is monopolistic. Notwithstanding monopoly characteristics in terms of market share, neither the company Lotte nor Shilla appear to have market dominating power. It is not easy for either of them to control prices or to achieve a much lower operational profit ratio due to a dominant bargaining power. Moreover, the license is not an economic rent. In this situation, it is not easy for these companies to obtain an excessive profit. Conclusions - Considering that most global duty free shops are trying to go upscale to improve bargaining power, it does not seem likely that rigid regulations are needed in the industry. Even though the Korean duty free industry ostensibly has a monopolistic structure, government and policy-makers should look beyond the surface. They should take global and other reasonable criteria into consideration when they establish or change regulation policies. Thorough understanding and appropriate support are needed for the Korean duty free shop industry. Additionally, duty free shops should position themselves as global companies struggling against unlimited international competition, rather than Korean domestic companies. At the same time, they need to give customers appropriate information about the benefits they provide.

• 한국병원경영학회지
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.76-110
• /
• 2003

This study analyzed and investigated of positivism to set up a hypothesis with a model of study based on a theoretical consideration to analyze a structural empowerment, a psychological empowerment, an immersion of duty, and a devotion of organization. which made the dental hygienists an object of study of investigation and analyzation in order to understand relation to elements that have an effect on a business result, effect and degree in a dental hygienist's organization. The results of positive analysis in the study are as follows. A psychological empowerment is influenced by a level of satisfaction for their duty, educational level, and types of main duty. A structural empowerment is influenced by a level of satisfaction for their duty, total years of work, a level of salary, type of work place. Organizational devotion is influenced by the structural empowerment, total year of work, type of workplace, and a level of satisfaction for their duty. Devotion for their duty is influenced by the psychological empowerment, total year of work, type of main duty, main duty that they want in the future, and specialization for amin duty.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.45-57
• /
• 1994

One of the fundamental duty of the assured in a marine insurance contract is maintaining seaworthiness of the ship insured. Since duty of the seaworthiness of ship is a shipowners implied warranty in the marine insurance, the breach of the duty of seaworthiness by assured is recognized as immunity for the underwriter. This is a measure to protect the underwriter through prevention of unexpected casualties which may be occurred from the unseaworthiness. In the Korean Marine Insurance Act the legal character of the assured's duty of seaworthiness is not clear whether it is a legal duty or contracted one. Accordingly, in this paper the author pointed out that the duty of seaworthiness of the ship should be interpreted according to the English Law. As a conclusion, the hull insurance does not require even implied warranty concerning seaworthiness, since it is recognized as one of implied fundamental warranty of the English Marine Insurance Act. Especially, this issue pointed out is very meaningful and advisable under the consideration of the existing conditions of the marine insurance regime for the distant-water fishing vessels and the catch carriers in Korea.

• 한국자동차공학회논문집
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.165-173
• /
• 2014

The method of emission inspection for Heavy-duty diesel vehicles has been engine speed type Lug-down 3mode. This method could bring damage to decrepit vehicles under high speed and high load condition and it could not apply the driving pattern on the road. For these reasons, this study has started to create new emission inspection which is appropriate for Korea's road infrastructure. KD 147 would be applied to light-duty diesel vehicles from july 2010 after model operations. Therefore, this study has investigated new emission inspection system for heavy-duty diesel vehicles, except for light-duty diesel vehicles. In consideration of domestic conditions to meet the new load test method in this study, the Lug-down3 mode vehicle speed method was developed for the first time in korea.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.285-317
• /
• 2008

To accept the doctor's professional negligence in the medical malpractice, the mistakes, by which the doctor did not foresee the production of the results in spite of the possibility of foresight and did not avoid the production of the results in spite of the possibility of avoidance, must be considered, and to decide the presence of the doctor's professional negligence, the standard must be the attention standard of general-common doctor engaged in the same business and the same function, and the medical enviornments, the conditions, the extraordinary nature of medical behavior, and etc should be considered by the general level of medical science at the time of accident. This principlel must be applied to the medical malpractice case occurred being on duty without exception. But, because of the extraordinary nature of duty work, it is difficult for any doctor to do one's best technical practice by making all diagnosis, medical treatment with all the equipment on the same plane as the ordinary times. That cannot be also expected for any doctor to do one's best technical practice in the terms of a social idea. From this point of view looking into The Precedent case related to Medical-service person being on duty sentenced by The Supreme Court, unlike the general medical malpractice case, the presence of the professional negligence in the medical malpractice occurred being on duty seems to be decided with more consideration on the general level of medical science, the medical enviornments and the conditions, particularities of medical practice at the time of accident. Especially, the extraordinary nature of medical behavior of the medical service person being on duty in the emergency room seems to be admitted compared to that of the medical service person being on duty in ward.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.389-420
• /
• 2009

Main Issue of Supreme Court Decision 2005Da16713 Delivered on June 24, 2005 is about the duty of medical care in the interhospital transfer of patients. According to the above Supreme Court Decision, in the interhospital transfer of patients, the decision to transfer should make from the aspect of medical treatment. The hospitals and doctors keep the duty of medical care. In addition to the duty for hospitals/doctors to check the capacity and availability of the hospital to which the patient is transferred, there are also duties to inform about emergency medical service and to sufficiently explain the need for the transfer, the medical conditions of the patient to be transferred and the hospital from which the patient is transferred. The hospital to which the patient is transferred must be thoroughly informed about matters such as the patient's conditions, the treatment the patient was given and reasons for transfer. including information upon referral, completeness of medical records, patient monitoring and so on. The interhospital transfer requires the consent of doctor belonging to the hospital to which the patient is transferred after the consideration of capacity and availability of the hospital and the informed consent of patients or legal representatives.