• 제목/요약/키워드: Destruction of Form

검색결과 134건 처리시간 0.026초

치수 치근단 병소의 전구 위험요인으로서의 제 2 형 당뇨의 역할에 관한 소고 (THE ROLE OF TYPE 2 DIABETES AS A PREDISPOSING RISK FACTOR ON THE PULPO-PERIAPICAL PATHOGENESIS: REVIEW ARTICLE)

  • 김진희;배광식;서덕규;홍성태;이윤;홍삼표;금기연
    • Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
    • /
    • 제34권3호
    • /
    • pp.169-176
    • /
    • 2009
  • 당뇨(Diabetes Mellitus)란 혈당을 조절하는 인슐린의 분비나 기능에 장애를 야기하는 질환으로 인슐린 의존성 여부에 따라 제 1 형과 제 2 형으로 분류된다. 본 종설은 최근 증가 추세에 있는 제 2 형 당뇨가 치수 치근단 병소의 병인 과정에 전구 위험요인으로 작용할 수 있는지를 평가 하고자 문헌고찰을 통해 당뇨의 병인 과정에서 특징적으로 나타나는 혈관 합병증에 관해 알아보고, 부가적으로 제 2 형 당뇨 쥐 모델에서 인위적인 치수 감염 후 얻은 치근단 조직의 조직병리학적 분석을 시행하였다. 조직학적 관찰 결과 제 2 형 당뇨 쥐에서 대조군에 비해 치수 치근단 병소의 크기가 증가하였고, 치수 염증 반응도 심하게 나타난 것으로 보아 당뇨 자체가 숙주를 감염에 취약한 상태로 만드는 전구 위험요소로 작용하였음을 알 수 있었다. 이러한 이유로는 첫째, 당뇨 시 전반적으로 나타나는 혈관 내 죽상 침착(atheromatous deposits)에 의해 혈관내벽의 두께가 두꺼워져 미세 순환의 장애는 물론 탐식 세포의 기능 저하, 면역 세포의 혈류 이동이 차단되어 치수 감염 시 쉽게 치근단 병소로 이환될 가능성이 높고, 둘째 치수 혈관에서 특징인 측부 순환(collateral circulation)의 부재에 따른 살균성 다형핵 백혈구의 활동 억제를 포함한 미세 혈관계의 취약성으로 인해 치수 조직의 재생능이 저하되어 추가적인 감염원의 공격에 대한 방어 및 치유 저하를 더욱 심화시키기 때문인 것으로 사료된다. 따라서 제 2 형 당뇨 환자의 수복치료 시 치과의사는 당뇨조절 하에서 치수 조직의 자극을 최소화하기 위한 세심한 처치가 필요하다.

아연백법 및 공침공정을 이용한 복합 중금속-시안착염 폐수의 현장처리(II) (The Treatment of Heavy Metal-cyanide Complexes Wastewater by Zn$^{+2}$/Fe$^{+2}$ Ion and Coprecipitation in Practical Plant (II))

  • 이종철;이영만;강익중
    • 대한환경공학회지
    • /
    • 제30권5호
    • /
    • pp.524-533
    • /
    • 2008
  • 도금산업에서 배출되는 폐수는 독성이 강한 시안이온과 시안착화합물, 그리고 다양한 중금속이 함유되어 있다. 이러한 독성이 강한 시안이온 및 시안 착화합물의 처리는 알칼리염소법에 의한 시안 산화처리방법이 가장 일반적으로 잘 알려진 방법이다. 이는 시안이온은 분해 가능하나 시안 착화합물의 처리는 어려운 것으로 알려져 있고, 실제로 산업현장에서 수질환경보전법상 수질배출허용기준(나 지역) 1 mg/L을 초과하는 경우가 빈번하다. 본 연구에서는 앞서 밝힌 아연백법 및 공침공정을 이용한 복합 중금속-시안착염 폐수의 현장처리(I) (아래에서 "현장처리(I)"으로 표시 함)과 비교하여 크롬환원처리 후 Fe/Zn 공침공정을 적용하여 시안착염을 제거하고, 알칼리염소법에 의한 잔류시안 산화처리방법으로 검토하였다. 크롬처리는 6가 크롬을 3가 크롬으로 환원시 환원제로서 NaHSO$_3$를 사용하여 pH 2.0, ORP 250 mV, 반응시간 30 min.에서 99.9% 이상의 최대제거율을 얻을 수 있었다. Fe/Zn 공침에 의한 시안착염 제거실험은 pH 9.5, FeSO$_4$/ZnCl$_2$ 3.0 $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ mol, mixing rpm 240에서 시안이온의 제거효율은 98.24%(잔류시안농도: 4.50 mg/L)로 최대의 결과를 얻었다. 황화물 침전법에 의한 기타중금속(Cu, Ni)처리반응의 조건은 pH 9.0$\sim$10.0, 반응시간 30 min. mixing rpm 240에서 Cu의 경우 Na$_2$S 주입량 3.0 mol에서 99.9%, Ni의 경우 Na$_2$S 4.0 mol에서 93.86%의 최대결과를 얻었다. Fe/Zn공침처리 후 잔류시안농도 4.50 mg/L의 제거를 위하여 알칼리염소법을 실시한 결과 1차 산화반응은 pH 10.0 이상, ORP 350 mV, reaction time 30 min, 2차 산화반응은 pH 8.0 이하, ORP 650 mV, 반응시간 30 min.에서 제거효율 95.33%, 잔류시안농도 0.21 mg/L의 결과를 얻었다. 즉 (1) 크롬환원처리, (2) Fe/Zn 공침공정에 의한 시안착화합물 제거 및 기타 중금속(Cu, Ni) 처리, (3) 알칼리염소법에 의한 잔류시안 산화처리를 실시한 결과(아래에서 "현장처리(II)"로 표시 함) 시안의 잔류농도는 0.21 mg/L로서 수질 및 수생태계보전에 관한 법율의 수질배출허용기준(나 지역) 1 mg/L의 규제치 이하로 처리가 가능하다는 것을 현장 확인할 수 있었고 "현장처리(I)"보다 처리효율적인 측면이나 경제적인 측면에서 모두 양호한 결과를 얻을 수 있었다.

이종 심장 판막 이식편에서 효과적인 탈세포화 방법에 관한 연구; 저장성 용액(hypotonic solution)의 삼투압 처치법 효과 (A Study on an Effective Decellularization Technique for a Xenograft Cardiac Valve: the Effect of Osmotic Treatment with Hypotonic Solution)

  • 성시찬;김용진;최선영;박지은;김경환;김웅한
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • 제41권6호
    • /
    • pp.679-686
    • /
    • 2008
  • 배경: 조직판막에 남아있는 세포물질은 환자의 면역반응과 관련이 있고 석회화의 원인이 된다고 알려져 있으며 탈세포화 된 판막조직의 세포외 기질은 숙주세포(host cell)가 부착되고 내피화(endothelialization)되어 조직으로 재구성되게 하는 생물학적 지자체로도 사용될 수 있다. 그러므로 탈세포화는 조직판막의 면역반응 최소화와 지자체의 형성에 가장 중요한 부분이다. 탈세포화를 위해 많은 방법과 약제들이 개발 되어 왔다. 그러나 화학적 혹은 효소적 탈세포화 방법에 앞서 삼투압(osmolality)을 이용한 저장성 용액 처치에 대한 효과를 보여준 논문은 드물다. 본 연구는 탈세포화에 있어서 저장성 용액 처치의 효과를 밝히고 아울러 탈세포화 시 적절한 온도, 처치시간, sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS)의 농도를 밝히고자 시행되었다. 대상 및 방법: 돼지 판막을 여러 조건 즉 SDS농도(0.25%, 0.5%), 저장성용액 처치시간(6, 12, 24시간), 온도($4^{\circ}C$, $20^{\circ}C$)를 달리하여 일종의 이온세정 용매인 SDS를 이용하여 탈세포화를 하였다. 저장성 용액에 노출시키지 않은 군을 B군으로 하고 동 수의 돼지 판막을 같은 조건에서 SDS에 처치하기 전에 저장성용액에 노출 시켰다(A군). 저장성 용액에의 노출은 4, 7, 14시간, $4^{\circ}C$$20^{\circ}C$로 구분하여 각각 탈세포화의 정도를 조사하였다. 탈세포화와 세포외 기질의 보존 정도는 hematokylin-eosin (H-E) 염색으로 표본을 관찰하였다. 결과: SDS의 두 농도, 0.25%, 0.5%에서 탈세포화의 정도의 차이는 발견할 수 없었다. $4^{\circ}C$ 환경에서 24시간 SDS로 처치한 것이 A, B군 모두에서 가장 양호한 탈세포화를 소견을 보였고 $20^{\circ}C$에서는 탈세포화 정도에 차이가 없었다. 저장성 용액으로 처치한 A군 모두에서 같은 조건의 처치하지 않은 B군에 비래 더 양호한 탈세포화 소견을 보였다. $4^{\circ}C$, 14시간 저장성용액에 노출된 판막이 가장 좋은 탈세포화의 소견을 보였고, $20^{\circ}C$의 저장성 용액에 노출된 판막은 양호한 탈세포의 소견을 보였으나 심한 세포외 기질의 파괴를 관찰할 수 있었다. 결론: 판막조직의 탈세포화에 있어서 삼투압처리를 이용한 저장성 용액 처치는 매우 효과적인 방법으로서, 돼지 판막조직의 탈세포화에 꼭 적용되어야 할 방법으로 생각된다 저장성 용액에의 노출이 탈세포화에 필요한 화학적 세정제(chemical detergent)의 농도를 줄이고 이러한 세정제의 농도나 노출시간을 줄일 수 있는지 그리고 세포외 기질의 변화에 어느 정도 영향을 주는지에 대해 추가적인 연구가 필요할 것으로 생각된다.

한국전쟁의 교훈과 대비 -병력수(兵力數) 및 부대수(部隊數)를 중심으로- (The lesson From Korean War)

  • 윤일영
    • 안보군사학연구
    • /
    • 통권8호
    • /
    • pp.49-168
    • /
    • 2010
  • Just before the Korean War, the total number of the North Korean troops was 198,380, while that of the ROK(Republic of Korea) army troops 105,752. That is, the total number of the ROK army troops at that time was 53.3% of the total number of the North Korean army. As of December 2008, the total number of the North Korean troops is estimated to be 1,190,000, while that of the ROK troops is 655,000, so the ROK army maintains 55.04% of the total number of the North Korean troops. If the ROK army continues to reduce its troops according to [Military Reform Plan 2020], the total number of its troops will be 517,000 m 2020. If North Korea maintains the current status(l,190,000 troops), the number of the ROK troops will be 43.4% of the North Korean army. In terms of units, just before the Korean War, the number of the ROK army divisions and regiments was 80% and 44.8% of North Korean army. As of December 2008, North Korea maintains 86 divisions and 69 regiments. Compared to the North Korean army, the ROK army maintains 46 Divisions (53.4% of North Korean army) and 15 regiments (21.3% of North Korean army). If the ROK army continue to reduce the military units according to [Military Reform Plan 2020], the number of ROK army divisions will be 28(13 Active Division, 4 Mobilization Divisions and 11 Local Reserve Divisions), while that of the North Korean army will be 86 in 2020. In that case, the number of divisions of the ROK army will be 32.5% of North Korean army. During the Korean war, North Korea suddenly invaded the Republic of Korea and occupied its capital 3 days after the war began. At that time, the ROK army maintained 80% of army divisions, compared to the North Korean army. The lesson to be learned from this is that, if the ROK army is forced to disperse its divisions because of the simultaneous invasion of North Korea and attack of guerrillas in home front areas, the Republic of Korea can be in a serious military danger, even though it maintains 80% of military divisions of North Korea. If the ROK army promotes the plans in [Military Reform Plan 2020], the number of military units of the ROK army will be 32.5% of that of the North Korean army. This ratio is 2.4 times lower than that of the time when the Korean war began, and in this case, 90% of total military power should be placed in the DMZ area. If 90% of military power is placed in the DMZ area, few troops will be left for the defense of home front. In addition, if the ROK army continues to reduce the troops, it can allow North Korea to have asymmetrical superiority in military force and it will eventually exert negative influence on the stability and peace of the Korean peninsular. On the other hand, it should be reminded that, during the Korean War, the Republic of Korea was attacked by North Korea, though it kept 53.3% of troops, compared to North Korea. It should also be reminded that, as of 2008, the ROK army is defending its territory with the troops 55.04% of North Korea. Moreover, the national defense is assisted by 25,120 troops of the US Forces in Korea. In case the total number of the ROK troops falls below 43.4% of the North Korean army, it may cause social unrest about the national security and may lead North Korea's misjudgement. Besides, according to Lanchester strategy, the party with weaker military power (60% compared to the party with stronger military power) has the 4.1% of winning possibility. Therefore, if we consider the fact that the total number of the ROK army troops is 55.04% of that of the North Korean army, the winning possibility of the ROK army is not higher than 4.1%. If the total number of ROK troops is reduced to 43.4% of that of North Korea, the winning possibility will be lower and the military operations will be in critically difficult situation. [Military Reform Plan 2020] rums at the reduction of troops and units of the ground forces under the policy of 'select few'. However, the problem is that the financial support to achieve this goal is not secured. Therefore, the promotion of [Military Reform Plan 2020] may cause the weakening of military defence power in 2020. Some advanced countries such as Japan, UK, Germany, and France have promoted the policy of 'select few'. However, what is to be noted is that the national security situation of those countries is much different from that of Korea. With the collapse of the Soviet Unions and European communist countries, the military threat of those European advanced countries has almost disappeared. In addition, the threats those advanced countries are facing are not wars in national level, but terrorism in international level. To cope with the threats like terrorism, large scaled army trops would not be necessary. So those advanced European countries can promote the policy of 'select few'. In line with this, those European countries put their focuses on the development of military sections that deal with non-military operations and protection from unspecified enemies. That is, those countries are promoting the policy of 'select few', because they found that the policy is suitable for their national security environment. Moreover, since they are pursuing common interest under the European Union(EU) and they can form an allied force under NATO, it is natural that they are pursing the 'select few' policy. At present, NATO maintains the larger number of troops(2,446,000) than Russia(l,027,000) to prepare for the potential threat of Russia. The situation of japan is also much different from that of Korea. As a country composed of islands, its prime military focus is put on the maritime defense. Accordingly, the development of ground force is given secondary focus. The japanese government promotes the policy to develop technology-concentrated small size navy and air-forces, instead of maintaining large-scaled ground force. In addition, because of the 'Peace Constitution' that was enacted just after the end of World War II, japan cannot maintain troops more than 240,000. With the limited number of troops (240,000), japan has no choice but to promote the policy of 'select few'. However, the situation of Korea is much different from the situations of those countries. The Republic of Korea is facing the threat of the North Korean Army that aims at keeping a large-scale military force. In addition, the countries surrounding Korea are also super powers containing strong military forces. Therefore, to cope with the actual threat of present and unspecified threat of future, the importance of maintaining a carefully calculated large-scale military force cannot be denied. Furthermore, when considering the fact that Korea is in a peninsular, the Republic of Korea must take it into consideration the tradition of continental countries' to maintain large-scale military powers. Since the Korean War, the ROK army has developed the technology-force combined military system, maintaining proper number of troops and units and pursuing 'select few' policy at the same time. This has been promoted with the consideration of military situation in the Koran peninsular and the cooperation of ROK-US combined forces. This kind of unique military system that cannot be found in other countries can be said to be an insightful one for the preparation for the actual threat of North Korea and the conflicts between continental countries and maritime countries. In addition, this kind of technology-force combined military system has enabled us to keep peace in Korea. Therefore, it would be desirable to maintain this technology-force combined military system until the reunification of the Korean peninsular. Furthermore, it is to be pointed out that blindly following the 'select few' policy of advanced countries is not a good option, because it is ignoring the military strategic situation of the Korean peninsular. If the Republic of Korea pursues the reduction of troops and units radically without consideration of the threat of North Korea and surrounding countries, it could be a significant strategic mistake. In addition, the ROK army should keep an eye on the fact the European advanced countries and Japan that are not facing direct military threats are spending more defense expenditures than Korea. If the ROK army reduces military power without proper alternatives, it would exert a negative effect on the stable economic development of Korea and peaceful reunification of the Korean peninsular. Therefore, the desirable option would be to focus on the development of quality of forces, maintaining proper size and number of troops and units under the technology-force combined military system. The tableau above shows that the advanced countries like the UK, Germany, Italy, and Austria spend more defense expenditure per person than the Republic of Korea, although they do not face actual military threats, and that they keep achieving better economic progress than the countries that spend less defense expenditure. Therefore, it would be necessary to adopt the merits of the defense systems of those advanced countries. As we have examined, it would be desirable to maintain the current size and number of troops and units, to promote 'select few' policy with increased defense expenditure, and to strengthen the technology-force combined military system. On the basis of firm national security, the Republic of Korea can develop efficient policies for reunification and prosperity, and jump into the status of advanced countries. Therefore, the plans to reduce troops and units in [Military Reform Plan 2020] should be reexamined. If it is difficult for the ROK army to maintain its size of 655,000 troops because of low birth rate, the plans to establish the prompt mobilization force or to adopt drafting system should be considered for the maintenance of proper number of troops and units. From now on, the Republic of Korean government should develop plans to keep peace as well as to prepare unexpected changes in the Korean peninsular. For the achievement of these missions, some options can be considered. The first one is to maintain the same size of military troops and units as North Korea. The second one is to maintain the same level of military power as North Korea in terms of military force index. The third one is to maintain the same level of military power as North Korea, with the combination of the prompt mobilization force and the troops in active service under the system of technology-force combined military system. At present, it would be not possible for the ROK army to maintain such a large-size military force as North Korea (1,190,000 troops and 86 units). So it would be rational to maintain almost the same level of military force as North Korea with the combination of the troops on the active list and the prompt mobilization forces. In other words, with the combination of the troops in active service (60%) and the prompt mobilization force (40%), the ROK army should develop the strategies to harmonize technology and forces. The Korean government should also be prepared for the strategic flexibility of USFK, the possibility of American policy change about the location of foreign army, radical unexpected changes in North Korea, the emergence of potential threat, surrounding countries' demand for Korean force for the maintenance of regional stability, and demand for international cooperation against terrorism. For this, it is necessary to develop new approaches toward the proper number and size of troops and units. For instance, to prepare for radical unexpected political or military changes in North Korea, the Republic of Korea should have plans to protect a large number of refugees, to control arms and people, to maintain social security, and to keep orders in North Korea. From the experiences of other countries, it is estimated that 115,000 to 230,000 troops, plus ten thousands of police are required to stabilize the North Korean society, in the case radical unexpected military or political change happens in North Korea. In addition, if the Republic of Korea should perform the release of hostages, control of mass destruction weapons, and suppress the internal wars in North Korea, it should send 460,000 troops to North Korea. Moreover, if the Republic of Korea wants to stop the attack of North Korea and flow of refugees in DMZ area, at least 600,000 troops would be required. In sum, even if the ROK army maintains 600,000 troops, it may need additional 460,000 troops to prepare for unexpected radical changes in North Korea. For this, it is necessary to establish the prompt mobilization force whose size and number are almost the same as the troops in active service. In case the ROK army keeps 650,000 troops, the proper number of the prompt mobilization force would be 460,000 to 500,000.

  • PDF