• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.581-592
• /
• 2003

본연구는 유치와 영구치의 우식상아질을 제거하는 방법에 따른 상아질표면의 변화와 산부식양상, 혼성층의 양상, 그리고 이들이 상아질에 대한 복합레진의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향을 평가할 목적으로 시행되었다. 92개의 유구치와 92개의 영구 구치를 준비하여 상아질 표면을 노출시키고 인공우식을 유발시켰다. 이중 32개의 유구치와 32개의 영구구치는 $Carisolv^{TM}$과 bur로 삭제후 상아질표면을 SEM관찰하였으며 나머지 치아에서는 레진-상아질간 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 두가지 접착시스템(Single bond system, self-etching bonding system)과 한 종류의 레진(Z250, 3M)을 사용하였으며 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. $Carisolv^{TM}$의 우식치질 제거효과는 영구치보다 유치에서 더 우수하였으며, bur로 제거한 경우보다 더 거친 상아질 표면이 관찰되었다. 2. 산부식처리한 경우 유치와 영구치 모두 우식제거방법과 관계없이 도말층이 제거된 양상을 보였다. 3. Single bond system을 이용한 경우 두터운 $2-4{\mu}m$의 혼성층과 $10-15{\mu}m$의 adhesive layer가 관찰된 반면, self-etching bonding system에서는 비교적 얇은($1-2{\mu}m$) 혼성층만이 형성되었다. 4. 전단결합강도는 유치와 영구치 모두 우식제거방법에 관계없이 Single bonding agent를 적용한 경우에 self-etching bonding agent를 적용한 군보다 유의하게 높게 나타났다(P<0.05). 5. $Carisolv^{TM}$와 self-etching bonding agent 처리군에서 bur와 self-etching system 처리군보다 다소 높은 전단결합강도를 보였으나 유의성은 없었다(P>0.05).

• 대한치과보존학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보존학회 2001년도 추계학술대회(제116회) 및 13회 Workshop 제3회 한ㆍ일 치과보존학회 공동학술대회 초록집
• /
• pp.556-556
• /
• 2001

The application of the laser to the tooth hard tissue started from the removal of carious dentin with the laser performed by Goldman in 1964. With the development of the laser technology, the laser treatment with less descomfort such as pain, vibration, and noise, etc. has been attempted. Since it is difficult to give a suitable form for inlay restoration to a cavity prepared with laser, it has to be restored with adhesive resinous materials. However, various evaluation of adhesive properties of the resinous materials to lased tooth surface on the various conditions such as adgerent, irradiation condition, procedure of bond test, and adhesive materials used, etc. have been reported.(omitted)

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.23-29
• /
• 2015

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pre-etching on the bond strength of silorane-based composite specific adhesive system to dentin. Materials and Methods: Thirty human molars were randomly divided into 5 groups according to the different bonding strategies. For teeth restored with silorane-based composite (Filtek Silorane, 3M ESPE), the specific self-etching adhesive system (Adhesive System P90, 3M ESPE) was used with and without pre-etching (Pre-etching/Silorane and Silorane groups). Teeth restored with methacrylate based-composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE) were hybridized with the two-step self-etching system (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray), with and without pre-etching (Pre-etching/Methacrylate and Methacrylate groups), or three-step adhesive system (Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, 3M ESPE) (Three-step/Methacrylate group) (n = 6). The restored teeth were sectioned into stick-shaped test specimens ($1.0{\times}1.0mm$), and coupled to a universal test machine (0.5 mm/min) to perform microtensile testing. Results: Pre-etching/Methacrylate group presented the highest bond strength values, with significant difference from Silorane and Three-step/Methacrylate groups (p < 0.05). However, it was not significantly different from Pre-etching/Silorane and Methacrylate groups. Conclusions: Pre-etching increased bond strength of silorane-based composite specific adhesive system to dentin.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.243-253
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate dentin bonding by two different dentin bonding systems(DBS) using acetone based primer or adhesive [All Bond 2(AB2), One Step(OS)] when they were applied by wet or dry bonding technique. Morphology of resin-dentin interface and hybrid layer thickness(HLT) were investigated using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope(CLSM) and compared to shear bond strength(SBS). 72 extracted sound human molars were randomly divided into 4 groups of 18 teeth each - Group 1.(AW); AB2 by wet bonding. Group 2(AD); AB2 by dry bonding. Group 3.(OW); OS by wet bonding, Group 4.(OD); OS by dry bonding. In 6 teeth of each group, notch-shaped class V cavities(depth 2mm) were prepared on buccal and lingual surface at the cementoenamel juction(12 cavities per group). To obtain color contrast in CLSM observation, bonding resins of each DBS were mixed with rhodamine B and primer of AB2 was mixed with sodium fluorescein. Prepared teeth of each group were treated with AB2, OS, respectively according to the manufacturer's instructions except for dentin surface moisture treatment after acid etching. In group 1 and 3, after acid etching, excess water was removed with wet tissue(Kimwipes), leaving consistently shiny, visibly hydrated dentin surface. In group 2 and 4, dentin surface was dried for 10 seconds at 1 inch distance. The treated teeth were then packed with composite resin(${\AE}$litefil) and light-cured. 12 microscopic samples($60{\sim}80{\mu}m$ thickness) of each group were obtained after longitudinal section and grinding(Exakt cutting and grinding system). Morphological investigation of resin-dentin interface and HLT measurement using CLSM were done. For measurement of SBS, remaining 12 teeth of each group were flattened occlusally to remove all enamel and grinded to 500 grit SiC(Pedemet Specimen Preparation Equipment). After applying DBS on the exposed dentin surface, composite resin was applied in the shape of cylinder, which has 5mm diameter, 1.5mm thickness, and light cured. SBS was measured using Instron with a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min. It was concluded as follows, 1. HLT of AW(mean: $2.59{\mu}m$) was thicker than any other group, and followed by AD, OW, OD in descending order(mean; 2.37, 2.28, $1.92{\mu}m$). Only OD had statistically significant differences(p<0.05) to AW and AD. 2. There were intimate contact of resin and dentin at the interface in wet bonding groups, but gaps or irregular interfaces were observed in dry bonding groups. 3. The length, diameter, density of resin tags were various even in the same group without significant differences between groups and lots of adhesive lateral branches were observed. 4. There were no statistically significant difference of SBS between AB2 and OS, but SBS of wet bonding groups were significantly higher(p<0.05) than dry bonding groups. 5. There were no consistent relationships between HLT and SBS.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.409-417
• /
• 2001

상아질접착제의 광조사가 상아질접착에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위하여 in vitro에서 접착실험을 하였다. 120개의 발거된 소의 전치 협면 상아질을 노출시키고 산 부식 한 다음 self-priming형 상아질접착제 Prime&Bond$^{\circledR}$NT (Dentsply DeTrey, GmbH, Konstanz, Germany)를 도포 하였으며 600 mW/$\textrm{cm}^2$의 일반광도 또는 1930 mW/$\textrm{cm}^2$의 초고광도 광조사를 각각 20초 및 3초간 시행한 군과 시행하지 않은 군으로 나누어 복합레진 첨가후 광조사하였다. 접착제에 대한 광조사를 시행하지 않은 경우에는 복합레진 첨가 후 초고광도로 3초, 6초 및 12초간 광조사하였다. 접착양상 평가를 위해 만능시험기로 전단접착강도를 측정하고 파단면을 입체 현미경으로 관찰한 바를 일원 및 이원 변량분석법과 카이제곱검사법으로 통계 분석하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 상아질접착제를 광조사한 군이 광조사하지 않은 군에 비해 유의하게 높은 전단접 착강도를 나타내었다 (p<0.05). 2. 일반 광도 및 초고광도 광조사에 따른 전단접착강도에는 유의한 차이가 나타나지 않았다 (p>0.05). 3. 상아질접착제를 광조사하지 않고 복합레진 첨가 후 초고광도로 광조사한 군간에 조사시간에 따른 전단접착강도에는 유의 한 차이가 나타나지 않았다 (p>0.05). 4. 파단면 관찰 결과, 모든 군에서 접착계면에서의 파절을 포함하는 혼합파단양상이 가장 많이 나타났으며 군간에는 유의한 차이가 없었다 (p>0.05).

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.359-365
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 lithium disilicate glass-ceramic과 상아질 간의 결합력에 대한 임시 수복재와 임시 충전재의 효과를 평가하기 위함이 목적이었다. 60개의 발치된 치아를 자가중합형 레진에 포매한 후 교합1/3 부위를 절단하였고, 무작위로 15개씩 4그룹으로 나누었다. 그런 후 lithium disilicate glass-ceramic을 다음과 같이 그룹으로 나누어 상아질에 접착시켰다: 아무 처리도 하지 않은 그룹(그룹A), ALIKETM (GC America Inc.)를 적용한 그룹(그룹 B), Luxatemp$^{(R)}$ Automix plus (DMG, Germany)를 적용한 그룹(그룹 C), Fermit$^{(R)}$ (Ivoclar Vivadent, Leichtenstein)를 적용한 그룹(그룹 D). 모든 시편들을 24시간 증류수에 담가 보관한 후, 1 mm/min의 crosshead speed로 만능시험기(Zwick 1456 41, Zwick, Germany) 상에서 전단 결합 강도를 측정하였다. 모든 그룹 간에 결합력의 통계학적 유의성은 없었으며, 파절양상은 대부분 시편에서 접착성(adhesive)과 응집성(cohesive)이 복합적으로 보이는 혼합형(mixed type)을 보였다. 본 실험의 제한된 조건 하에서는 임상에서 lithium disilicate glass-ceramic을 상아질에 접착시, 임시 수복재나 임시 충전재의 영향이 그리 크지 않을 것으로 판단되었다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.310-321
• /
• 1999

In this in vitro study, confocal laser scanning microscopic morphology of dentin-resin interface and its relationship to shear bond strength were investigated after the exposed dentin surfaces were treated with 3 different kinds of dentin adhesive systems[three-step; Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus(SMPP), self-priming bonding resin; Single Bond(SB), self-etching primer; Clearfil Liner Bond 2(LB2)]. 52 extracted human molar teeth without caries and/or restorations. The experimental teeth were randomly divided into three groups of seventeen teeth each. In five teeth of each group, class V cavities(depth: 1.5mm) with 900 cavosurface angles were prepared at the cementoenamel junction on buccal and lingual surfaces. Bonding resins of each dentin adhesive system were mixed with rhodamine B. Primer of SMPP was mixed with fluorescein. In group 1. the exposed dentin was conditioned with etchant, applied with above primer and bonding resin of SMPP. In group 2, with etchant and self-priming bonding agent of SB. In group 3, with self-etching primer and bonding agent of LB2. After treatment with dentin adhesive systems, composite resin were applied and photocured. The experimental teeth were cut longitudinally through the center line of restoration and grounded so that about $90{\mu}m$-thick wafers of buccolingually orientated dentin were obtained. And, $70{\sim}80{\mu}m$-thick wafers sectioned horizontally, thus presenting a dentinal tubules at 900 to the cut surface of a remaining tooth, were obtained. Primer of SMPP mixed with rhodamine B was applied to these wafers. Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigations of these wafers were done within of 24 hours after treatment. To measure shear bond strength, the remaining twelve teeth of each group were grounded horizontally below the dentinoenamel junction, so that no enamel remained. After applying dentin adhesive systems on the dentin surface, composite was applied in the shape of cylinder. The cylinder was 5mm in diameter, and 2mm in thickness. Shear bond strength was measured using Instron with a cross-head speed of 0.5mm/min. It was concluded as follows ; 1. Hybrid layer of SMPP(mean: $4.56{\mu}m$) was thicker than that of any other groups. This value was not statistically significant thicker than that of SB(mean: $3.41{\mu}m$, p>0.05), and significant thicker than that of LB2(mean: $1.56{\mu}m$, p<0.05). There was a statistical difference between SB and LB2(p<0.05). 2. Although there were variations in the length of resin tag even in a sample, and in a group, most samples in SMPP and SB showed resin tags extending above $20{\mu}m$. But samples in LB2 showed resin tags of $10{\mu}m$ at best. 3. Besides primer's infiltration into demineralized peritubular dentin and dentinal tubules, fluorophore of primer was detected in the lateral branches of dentinal tubules. 4. All groups demonstrated statistically significant differences from one another(p<0.05), with shear bond strengths given in descending order as follows: SMPP(18.3MPa), SB(16.0MPa) and LB2(12.4MPa). 5. LB2 having thinnest hybrid layer($1.56{\mu}m$) showed the lowest shear bond strength(12.4MPa).

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제40권5호
• /
• pp.342-348
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 미백, 탈감작제 도포 후, 셀프 에칭 프라이머를 이용하여 브라켓 접착 시 법랑질에 대한 전단결합강도를 비교하기 위해 시행되었다. 48개의 소구치를 무작위로 12개씩 4개의 그룹으로 분류하였다. Group 1: 15% hydrogen-peroxide office bleaching agent (Illumine Office-IO), Group 2: IO + BisBlock Oxalate Dentin-Desensitizer, Group 3: Bis-Block Oxalate Dentin-Desensitizer, Group 4: 아무것도 하지 않음(대조군). 브라켓 접착 24시간 후 전단결합강도를 측정하였으며, 만능시험기의 속도를 5 mm/min로 하여 브라켓이 탈락할 때까지 시행하였다. Modified adhesive remnant index를 이용하여 탈락 양상을 분석하였다. 미백만 시행, 미백과 탈감작제 도포, 탈감작제만 도포한 경우 모두 브라켓의 전단결합강도를 현저히 감소시켰으며 ($p$ = 0.001), 이 세 실험군 간에는 통계적으로 유의성 있는 차이를 관찰할 수 없었다 (Group 1-Group 2, $p$ = 0.564; Group 1-Group 3, $p$ = 0.371; Group 2-Group 3, $p$ = 0.133). 세 실험군에서 브라켓의 탈락은 주로 법랑질-접착제 계면에서 발생하여 브라켓 베이스에 접착제의 100%가 남아있었다. 따라서 미백과 탈감작제 도포는 교정치료 후에 시행하는 것이 바람직하다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.569-584
• /
• 1996

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the effect of benzalkonium chloride on tensile bond strength of BPDM/HEMA dentin bonding. One hundred sixty dentin specimens from freshly extracted bovine mandibular incisors were used, and 0, 0.02, 0.1 or 0.5% benzalkonium chloride solution was applied to the dentin specimen with/after phosphoric acid. 32% phosphoric acid was used when the specimens were bonded with One-Step$^{TM}$, a BPDM/HEMA system and 10% was used when bonded with All-Bond$^{(R)}$ 2, a NTG-GMA/BPDM system. Aelitefil$^{TM}$ composite resin was bonded to the pretreated dentin specimen with the use of All-Bond$^{(R)}$ 2 or One-Step$^{TM}$ dentin bonding agent. After the bonded specimens were stored in $37^{\circ}C$ distilled water for 24 hours, tensile bond strength was measured. The fractured dentin specimens were examined under the scanning electron microscope. The results were as follows : Benzalkonium chloride application after acid-treatment resulted in decrease of dentin bond strength of One-Step$^{TM}$, a BPDM/HEMA system (p>0.05). Benzalkonium chloride application did not exert any influence on dentin bond strength of All-Bond$^{(R)}$ 2, a NTG-GMA/BPDM system (p>0.05). There was no relationship between the concentration or application method of benzalkonium chloride and the dentin bond strength of One-Step$^{TM}$ or All-Bon$^{(R)}$ 2 (p<0.05). On SEM examination of the fractured dentin-resin interface, while mixed failure was prominent in dentin bonding with One-Step$^{TM}$, adhesive and mixed failures were seen together in dentin bonding with All-Bond$^{(R)}$ 2 regardless of the concentration and application method of benzalkonium chloride.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제45권3호
• /
• pp.36.1-36.10
• /
• 2020

Objectives: This study aims to assess the effect of universal adhesives pretreatment on the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to dentin. Materials and Methods: Fifty caries-free human third molars were employed. The teeth were randomly assigned into five groups (n = 10) based on dentin surface pretreatments: Single Bond Universal (3M Oral Care), Gluma Bond Universal (Heraeus Kulzer), Prime&Bond Elect (Dentsply), Cavity Conditioner (GC) and control (no surface treatment). After Fuji II LC (GC) was bonded to the dentin surfaces, the specimens were stored for 7 days at 37℃. The specimens were segmented into microspecimens, and the microspecimens were subjugated to microtensile bond strength testing (1.0 mm/min). The modes of failure analyzed using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Duncan tests (p = 0.05). Results: The surface pretreatments with the universal adhesives and conditioner increased the bond strength of Fuji II LC to dentin (p < 0.05). Single Bond Universal and Gluma Bond Universal provided higher bond strength to Fuji II LC than Cavity Conditioner (p < 0.05). The bond strengths obtained from Prime&Bond Elect and Cavity Conditioner were not statistically different (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The universal adhesives and polyacrylic acid conditioner could increase the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to dentin. The use of universal adhesives before the application of RMGIC may be more beneficial in improving bond strength.