DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Provisional Restorative and Filling Materials on Bond Strength of Adhesive Resin Cement between Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic and Dentin

Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic과 상아질 간의 접착성 레진 시멘트의 결합강도에 대한 임시 수복재와 임시 충전재의 영향

  • Oh, Sang-Chun (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental College, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Sim, Hun-Bo (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental College, Wonkwang University)
  • 오상천 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 심헌보 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2013.10.07
  • Accepted : 2013.11.15
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of temporary restorative and filling material on bonding strength between lithium disilicate glass-ceramic and dentin. 60 extracted human molars were cross-sectioned at occlusal third and were embedded into self-cure acrylic resin. Then the teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 15 each. Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic is cemented to dentin as follows: after no any application of the provisional materials (Group A), after application of ALIKETM (GC America Inc.)(Group B), after application of Luxatemp$^{(R)}$ Automix plus (DMG, Germany)(Group C), after application of Fermit$^{(R)}$ (Ivoclar Vivadent, Leichtenstein)(Group D). After the specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours, the shear bond strength of the specimens were measured using UTM (Zwick 1456 41, Zwick, Germany) at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The data were analysed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests. There were no statistically significant differences of bond strength among the groups. Fracture type was showed mixed type of adhesive and cohesive fracture in most of specimens. Within the limitation of this study, bond strength of adhesive resin cement between lithium disilicate glass-ceramic and dentin was not affected by provisional restorative and filling materials.

본 연구는 lithium disilicate glass-ceramic과 상아질 간의 결합력에 대한 임시 수복재와 임시 충전재의 효과를 평가하기 위함이 목적이었다. 60개의 발치된 치아를 자가중합형 레진에 포매한 후 교합1/3 부위를 절단하였고, 무작위로 15개씩 4그룹으로 나누었다. 그런 후 lithium disilicate glass-ceramic을 다음과 같이 그룹으로 나누어 상아질에 접착시켰다: 아무 처리도 하지 않은 그룹(그룹A), ALIKETM (GC America Inc.)를 적용한 그룹(그룹 B), Luxatemp$^{(R)}$ Automix plus (DMG, Germany)를 적용한 그룹(그룹 C), Fermit$^{(R)}$ (Ivoclar Vivadent, Leichtenstein)를 적용한 그룹(그룹 D). 모든 시편들을 24시간 증류수에 담가 보관한 후, 1 mm/min의 crosshead speed로 만능시험기(Zwick 1456 41, Zwick, Germany) 상에서 전단 결합 강도를 측정하였다. 모든 그룹 간에 결합력의 통계학적 유의성은 없었으며, 파절양상은 대부분 시편에서 접착성(adhesive)과 응집성(cohesive)이 복합적으로 보이는 혼합형(mixed type)을 보였다. 본 실험의 제한된 조건 하에서는 임상에서 lithium disilicate glass-ceramic을 상아질에 접착시, 임시 수복재나 임시 충전재의 영향이 그리 크지 않을 것으로 판단되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Holand W. Materials science fundamentals of the IPS Empress 2 glass-ceramic. Ivoclar Vivadent Report 1998;12:3-10.
  2. Severance G. Introducing a lithium disilicate glassceramic: IPS empress 2. Signature 1999;4:1-3.
  3. Sorensen JA, Cruz M, Mito WT. Research evaluations of a lithium disilicate restorative system: IPS Empress 2. Signature 1999;4:4-10.
  4. Oh SC, Dong JK, Luthy H, Scharer P. Strength and microstructure of IPS Empress 2 glass-ceramic after different heat treatments. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:468-472.
  5. Gwinnett AJ. Smear layer : Morphological considerations. Oper Dent 1984;3:3-12.
  6. Pashley DH. Clinical correlations of dentin structure and function. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:777-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90414-R
  7. Xavier L, David JB, Glen HJ. Retention of provisional crowns fabricated from two materials with the use of four temporary cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:469-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)80016-X
  8. Friedman MJ. A 15-years review of porcelain veneer failure-a clinician's observation. Compend Contin Edu Dent 1998;19;625-628.
  9. Dumfart H. Porcelain laminate veneers: A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10years of service: part II-clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13;9-18
  10. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:511-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010
  11. Xie J, Powers JM. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993;9:295-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90046-S
  12. Johnson ME, Burgess JO, Hermesch CB, Buikema DJ. Saliva contamination of dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent 1994;19:205-210.
  13. Paul SJ, Schaerer P. Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentin. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24;8-14 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00484.x
  14. Kaneshima T, Yatani H. The influence of blood contamination on bond strength between dentin and an adhesive resin cement. Oper Dent 2000;25:195-201.
  15. Lai YL, Chen YT, Lee SY, Shieh TM, Hung SL. Cytotoxic effects of dental resin liquids on primary gingival fibroblasts and periodontal ligament cells in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:1165-1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01355.x
  16. Lui JL, Setcos JC, Phillips RW. Related Articles, Links temporary restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1986;11:103-110.
  17. Cho GC, Chee WW. Custom characterization of the provisional restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:529-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90165-K
  18. Barier RE. Principles of adhesion. Oper Dent Supple 1992;5:1-9.
  19. Terata R, Nakashima K, Kubota M, Obara M. Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement. Dent Mater J 1994; 13:148-154. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.13.148
  20. Terata R, Yoshinaka S, Nakashima K, Kubota M. Effect of resinous temporary material on tensile bond strength of resin luting cement to tooth substrate. Dent Mater J 1996;15:45-50. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.15.45
  21. Terata R, Nakashima K, Kubota M. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resinmodified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth. Am J Dent 2000;13:209-211.
  22. Ganss C, Jung M. Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cements on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 1998;23:55-62.