DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel with a self-etching primer after bleaching and desensitizer application

미백과 탈감작제 도포 후 셀프 에칭 프라이머를 이용한 브라켓 접착 시 법랑질과 브라켓 간의 결합 강도

  • Attar, Nuray (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University) ;
  • Korkmaz, Yonca (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University) ;
  • Kilical, Yasemin (College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University) ;
  • Saglam-Aydinatay, Banu (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University) ;
  • Bicer, Ceren Ozge (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University)
  • Received : 2010.05.31
  • Accepted : 2010.06.26
  • Published : 2010.10.30

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strengths (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel with a self-etching primer after bleaching, desensitizer application and combined treatment. Methods: Forty-eight premolars were randomly divided into four groups, each with n = 12 premolar samples. The four groups were; Group1: 15% hydrogen-peroxide office bleaching agent (Illumin$\acute{e}$ Office-IO), Group 2: IO + BisBlock Oxalate Dentin-Desensitizer, Group 3: Bis Block Oxalate Dentin-Desensitizer, Group 4: No treatment (control). Twenty-four hours after bonding, the specimens were tested in SBS at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min until the brackets debonded. The failure mode of the brackets was determined by a modified adhesive remnant index. Results: Bleaching, bleaching and desensitizer treatment, and desensitizer treatment alone all significantly reduced SBS of the orthodontic brackets ($p$ = 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3 (Group 1-Group 2, $p$ = 0.564; Group 1-Group 3, $p$ = 0.371; Group 2-Group 3, $p$ = 0.133). The predominant mode of failure for the treatment groups (Group1, Group 2 and Group 3) was at the enamel-adhesive interface leaving 100% of the adhesive on the bracket base. Conclusions: Bleaching and desensitizer treatment should be delayed until the completion of orthodontic treatment.

본 연구는 미백, 탈감작제 도포 후, 셀프 에칭 프라이머를 이용하여 브라켓 접착 시 법랑질에 대한 전단결합강도를 비교하기 위해 시행되었다. 48개의 소구치를 무작위로 12개씩 4개의 그룹으로 분류하였다. Group 1: 15% hydrogen-peroxide office bleaching agent (Illumine Office-IO), Group 2: IO + BisBlock Oxalate Dentin-Desensitizer, Group 3: Bis-Block Oxalate Dentin-Desensitizer, Group 4: 아무것도 하지 않음(대조군). 브라켓 접착 24시간 후 전단결합강도를 측정하였으며, 만능시험기의 속도를 5 mm/min로 하여 브라켓이 탈락할 때까지 시행하였다. Modified adhesive remnant index를 이용하여 탈락 양상을 분석하였다. 미백만 시행, 미백과 탈감작제 도포, 탈감작제만 도포한 경우 모두 브라켓의 전단결합강도를 현저히 감소시켰으며 ($p$ = 0.001), 이 세 실험군 간에는 통계적으로 유의성 있는 차이를 관찰할 수 없었다 (Group 1-Group 2, $p$ = 0.564; Group 1-Group 3, $p$ = 0.371; Group 2-Group 3, $p$ = 0.133). 세 실험군에서 브라켓의 탈락은 주로 법랑질-접착제 계면에서 발생하여 브라켓 베이스에 접착제의 100%가 남아있었다. 따라서 미백과 탈감작제 도포는 교정치료 후에 시행하는 것이 바람직하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Shinohara MS, Peris AR, Rodrigues JA, Pimenta LA, Ambrosano GM. The effect of nonvital bleaching on the shear bond strength of composite resin using three adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:205-9.
  2. Unlu N, Cobankara FK, Ozer F. Effect of elapsed time following bleaching on the shear bond strength of composite resin to enamel. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;84:363-8.
  3. Marshall MV, Cancro LP, Fischman SL. Hydrogen peroxide: a review of its use in dentistry. J Periodontol 1995;66:786-96. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.9.786
  4. Leonard RH Jr, Austin SM, Haywood VB, Bentley CD. Change in pH of plaque and 10% carbamide peroxide solution during nightguard vital bleaching treatment. Quintessence Int 1994;25:819-23.
  5. Josey AL, Meyers IA, Romaniuk K, Symons AL. The effect of a vital bleaching technique on enamel surface morphology and the bonding of composite resin to enamel. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:244-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb00848.x
  6. Gurgan S, Bolay S, Alacam R. In vitro adherence of bacteria to bleached or unbleached enamel surfaces. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:624-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00534.x
  7. Canay S, Cehreli MC. The effect of current bleaching agents on the color of light-polymerized composites in vitro. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:474-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00168-9
  8. Crim GA. Post-operative bleaching: effect on microleakage. Am J Dent 1992;5:109-12.
  9. Perdigao J, Francci C, Swift EJ Jr, Ambrose WW, Lopes M. Ultra-morphological study of the interaction of dental adhesives with carbamide peroxide-bleached enamel. Am J Dent 1998;11:291-301.
  10. Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Perokontol 1997;24:808-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb01194.x
  11. Walters PA. Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005;6:107-17.
  12. Turkkahraman H, Adanir N. Effects of potassium nitrate and oxalate desensitizer agents on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2007;77:1096-100. https://doi.org/10.2319/101906-431.1
  13. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994;73:1212-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730061301
  14. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives--a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001;17:373-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00084-1
  15. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-35.
  16. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1621-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0109
  17. Attar N, Korkmaz Y. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8:80-8.
  18. Gokcelik A, Ozel Y, Ozel E, Arhun N, Attar N, Firatli S, et al. The influence of Er:YAG laser conditioning versus self-etching adhesives with acid etching on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Photomed Laser Surg 2007;25:508-12. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2007.2096
  19. Miller RA. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:42-5.
  20. Oliver RG. The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:196-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(88)80003-9
  21. Lai SC, Tay FR, Cheung GS, Mak YF, Carvalho RM, Wei SH, et al. Reversal of compromised bonding in bleached enamel. J Dent Res 2002;81:477-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100709
  22. Lai SC, Mak YF, Cheung GS, Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, et al. Reversal of compromised bonding to oxidized etched dentin. J Dent Res 2001;80:1919-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800101101
  23. Titley KC, Torneck CD, Smith DC, Adibfar A. Adhesion of composite resin to bleached and unbleached bovine enamel. J Dent Res 1988;67:1523-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670121601
  24. Turkkahraman H, Adanir N, Gungor AY. Bleaching and desensitizer application effects on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2007;77:489-93. https://doi.org/10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0489:BADAEO]2.0.CO;2
  25. Uysal T, Sisman A. Can previously bleached teeth be bonded safely using self-etching primer systems? Angle Orthod 2008;78:711-5. https://doi.org/10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0711:CPBTBB]2.0.CO;2
  26. Uysal T, Basciftci FA, Usumez S, Sari Z, Buyukerkmen A. Can previously bleached teeth be bonded safely? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:628-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00151-3
  27. Eminkahyagil N, Korkmaz Y, Gokalp S, Baseren M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with newly developed antibacterial self etch adhesive. Angle Orthod 2005;75:843-8.
  28. Cavalli V, Reis AF, Giannini M, Ambrosano GM. The effect of elapsed time following bleaching on enamel bond strength of resin composite. Oper Dent 2001;26:597-602.
  29. Sung EC, Chan SM, Mito R, Caputo AA. Effect of carbamide peroxide bleaching on the shear bond strength of composite to dental bonding agent enhanced enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:595-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70060-0
  30. Aranha AC, Siqueira Junior Ade S, Cavalcante LM, Pimenta LA, Marchi GM. Microtensile bond strengths of composite to dentin treated with desensitizer products. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:85-90.
  31. Pashley DH. Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treatment through tubule occlusion. J Endod 1986;12:465-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80201-1
  32. Camps J, Pashley D. In vivo sensitivity of human root dentin to air blast and scratching. J Periodontol 2003;74:1589-94. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.11.1589
  33. Gillam DG, Mordan NJ, Sinodinou AD, Tang JY, Knowles JC, Gibson IR. The effects of oxalate-containing products on the exposed dentine surface: an SEM investigation. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:1037-44. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00775.x
  34. Gillam DG, Khan N, Mordan NJ, Barber PM. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) investigation of selected desensitizing agents in the dentine disc model. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999;15:198-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1999.tb00774.x
  35. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Mak YF, Carvalho RM, Lai SC, Suh BI. Integrating oxalate desensitizers with total-etch two-step adhesive. J Dent Res 2003;82:703-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200909
  36. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666

Cited by

  1. In vitroantibacterial activity of various adhesive materials against oral streptococci vol.30, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2015.1090296
  2. An in vitro comparison of ultraviolet versus white light in the detection of adhesive remnants during orthodontic debonding vol.89, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2319/072018-526.1