• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제54권3호
• /
• pp.210-217
• /
• 2016

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 실제 환자에서 디지털 구강스캐너로 모형 없이 제작한 보철물의 변연 및 내면 적합도를 평가하는 것이다. 대상 및 방법: 전향적 임상시험으로 시행한 본 예비 연구는 총 11개의 수복물을 대상으로 하였다. 구강스캐너(TRIOS, 3shape, Copenhagen, Denmark)로 디지털 구강인상을 채득한 후, 캐드 디자인 및 밀링 가공 과정을 통해 전부지르코니아 수복물을 제작하였다. 완성된 지르코니아관을 환자 구강 내에 시적하였고, 레플리카 술식으로 보철물-지대치 복제물을 얻었다. 이를 근원심, 협설 방향으로 잘라 변연오차, 변연간극과 축벽부, 선각부, 교합면부의 내면간극을 측정하였다. 통계처리는 Kruskal-Wallis 검정과 Mann-Whitney U 검정을 이용하여 통계적 유의성을 분석하였다(${\alpha}=.05$). 결과: 복제물을 통한 적합도 분석 결과, 근원심, 협설 절편 사이에는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다(P>.05). 변연간극에 불일치가 있었으며, 변연 오차가 변연간극 보다 컸다(P<.01). 결론: 본 연구의 한계 내에서, 구강스캐너로 모형 없이 제작한 전부지르코니아 수복물의 적합도는 임상적으로 허용할만한 결과를 보였다. 그러나 지르코니아관의 변연부위가 과풍융되는 경향이 있었으므로 주의 깊은 임상 적용 및 추적 연구가 요구된다.

• 치위생과학회지
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.617-623
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 치과용 모형재 중 4형(type IV)석고와 스캔용(scannable)석고를 이용하여 작업모형을 제작한 후, 치과용 백색광 스캐너를 이용하여 3차원 디지털 모형으로 전환한 데이터의 계측지점간 거리를 측정하여, 그 결과 값을 토대로 이종의 치과용 석고가 3차원 디지털 모형의 크기재현 시 정확성여부를 비교하였다. 본 실험을 통하여 치과용 모형재에 따른 3차원 디지털 모형의 정확도를 확인함으로써 임상 적용의 가능성을 평가하였으며, 제한된 조건 하에서 수행된 본 연구에서 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 치과용 백색광 스캐너를 사용하여 주 모형과 두 종류의 모형재로 제작한 작업모형을 3차원 디지털 모형으로 전환한 후, 선계측의 값을 비교한 결과 전체적인 계측지점에서 모두 모형재로 제작된 작업모형이 작게 계측되는 경향을 보였다. 2. 각 모형별 동일한 계측지점의 계측값의 차이가 있는지 알아보기 위해 paired t-test의 시행결과, 모든 계측지점에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 결론적으로 두 가지 석고 모두 통계적으로 적정한 수준의 정확성을 나타내지 않았으나, 오차 수준이 선행연구에 비추어 볼 때 임상적으로 수용 가능한 수준이라 생각된다. 전악 인상채득을 통한 디지털 모형의 정확성은 검증이 되었으나, 스캔용(scannable)석고에 대한 임상 효용성을 판단하기 위해 타 제품과의 성분 분석 비교연구나 실질적인 보철물 제작을 통한 적합도 평가를 통해 CAD/CAM 보철물 제작 시장점을 부각할 수 있는 연구가 뒷받침되어야 할 것으로 사료된다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.388-398
• /
• 2022

PURPOSE. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 14 different intraoral scanners for the All-on-4 treatment concept. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four implants were placed in regions 13, 16, 23, and 26 of an edentulous maxillary model that was poured with scannable Type 4 gypsum to imitate the All-on-4 concept. The cast was scanned 10 times for each of 14 intraoral scanners (Primescan, iTero 2, iTero 5D, Virtuo Vivo, Trios 3, Trios 4, CS3600, CS3700, Emerald, Emerald S, Medit i500, BenQ BIS-I, Heron IOS, and Aadva IOS 100P) after the polyether ether ketone scanbody was placed. For the control group, the gypsum model was scanned 10 times with an industrial scanner. The first of the 10 virtual models obtained from the industrial model was chosen as the reference model. For trueness, the data of the 14 dental scanners were superimposed with the reference model; for precision, the data of all 14 scanners were superimposed within the groups. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Shapiro-Wilks, and Dunn's tests. RESULTS. Primescan showed the highest trueness and precision values (P < .005), followed by the iTero 5D scanner (P < .005). CONCLUSION. Some of these digital scanners can be used to make impressions within the All-on-4 concept. However, the possibility of data loss due to artifacts, reflections, and the inability to combine the data should be considered.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.236-249
• /
• 2022

PURPOSE. The present study compared the accuracy between digital and conventional implant impressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The experimental models were divided into six groups depending on the implant location and the scanning span. Digital impressions were captured using the intraoral optical scanner TRIOS (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). Conventional impressions were taken with the monophase impression material based on addition-cured silicones, Honigum-Mono (DMG, Hamburg, Germany). A high-precision laboratory scanner D900 (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to obtain digital data of resin models and stone casts. Surface tessellation language (STL) datasets from scanner were imported into the analysis software Geomagic Qualify 14 (3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA), and scan body deviations were determined through two-dimensional and three-dimensional analyses. Each scan body was measured five times. The Sidak t test was used to analyze the experimental data. RESULTS. Implant position and scanning distance affected the impression accuracy. For a unilateral arch implant and the mandible models with two implants, no significant difference was observed in the accuracy between the digital and conventional implant impressions on scan bodies; however, the corresponding differences for trans-arch implants and mandible with six implants were extremely significant (P<.001). CONCLUSION. For short-span scanning, the accuracy of digital and conventional implant impressions did not differ significantly. For long-span scanning, the precision of digital impressions was significantly inferior to that of the traditional impressions.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.60-69
• /
• 2016

목적: 본 연구에서는 실제 환자의 석고모형의 콘빔CT (Cone Beam Computed Tomography)이미지로 디지털 모델을 제작하고 이 디지털 모델을 동일한 석고모형을 3차원 광학 스캐너로 스캔 하여 얻은 디지털 모델과 비교하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 총 11쌍의 석고모형에 대하여 실험을 진행 하였다. 콘빔CT를 이용하여 CT 영상을 촬영하여 디지털 모델을 제작 하였고 3차원 광학 스캐너를 사용해 대조군이 되는 디지털 모델을 제작하였다. 이를 이용해 각 석고모형에 대하여 콘빔CT와 3차원 광학 스캐너를 이용하여 만든 디지털 모델을 한 쌍으로 묶어 상, 하악 11개의 비교 쌍을 구성하고 각 쌍에 대하여 차이점을 분석하였다. 결과: 대조군과 비교 시 콘빔CT 영상으로부터 구성된 디지털 모델이 대조군 보다 과다 추정된 부분인 양의 오차의 평균은 0.059 - 0.117 mm, 과소 추정된 부분인 음의 오차의 평균은 0.066 - 0.146 mm의 범위 내에 존재했다. 또한 유의수준 0.05에서 양의 오차의 평균은 $70-100{\mu}m$, 음의 오차의 평균은 $100-120{\mu}m$ 내에 존재 함을 확인하였다. 결론: 석고모형의 콘빔CT 영상으로부터 구성된 디지털 모델은 최종 수복물 제작에는 부적합하나 임시수복물 제작 및 교정 진단 과정에 활용될 수 있는 가능성이 있다.

• 한국공작기계학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국공작기계학회 2004년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.201-206
• /
• 2004

Laser scanner are getting used for inspection and reverse engineering in industry such as motors, electronic products, dies and molds. However, due to the lack of efficient scanning technique, the tasks become limited to the low accuracy purpose. The main reasons for this limitation for usefulness are caused from the optical drawback, such as irregular reflection, scanning direction normal to measuring surface, the influence of surface integrity, and other optical disturbances. To overcome these drawback of laser scanner, this study propose the mechanism to reduce the optical trouble by using the 2 kinds of rotational movement axis and by composing the spherical coordinate to scanning the surface keeping normal direction consistently. So, it could be designed and interfaced the measuring device to realize that mechanism, and then it could acquisite the accurate 3D form cloud data. Also, these data are compared with the standard master ball and the data acquisited from the touch point sensor, to evaluate the accuracy and stability of measurement and to demonstrate the implementation of an dental tooth purpose system

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.1067-1075
• /
• 2019

Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks fabricated by selective laser sintering (SLS) before and after electropolishing. Methods: A partially edentulous mandibular model was used as the working model. Scanning of the model was performed using a dental scanner. The framework was designed using CAD software. The metal framework was formed using an SLS 3D printer. 3D scans of the two fabricated prototypes produced before and after electropolishing were overlapped with reference data. The fit was calculated based on Root Mean Square (RMS). Fabrication accuracy was verified using the paired t-test to compare the discrepancy before and after electropolishing. Results: The mean (SD) values of RMS before and after electropolishing were 126.6 (34.19) and 75.86 (21.36), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference before and after electropolishing (p<0.05). Conclusions: Metal frameworks made with SLS 3D printers showed clinically acceptable fit after electropolishing.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제10권5호
• /
• pp.388-394
• /
• 2018

PURPOSE. To measure axial displacement of different implant-abutment connection types and materials during screw tightening at the recommended torque by using a contact scanner for two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty models of missing mandibular left second premolars were 3D-printed and implant fixtures were placed at the same position by using a surgical guide. External and internal fixtures were used. Three implant-abutment internal connection (INT) types and one implant-abutment external connection (EXT) type were prepared. Two of the INT types used titanium abutment and zirconia abutment; the other INT type was a customized abutment, fabricated by using a computer-controlled milling machine. The EXT type used titanium abutment. Screws were tightened at $10N{\cdot}cm$, simulating hand tightening, and then at the manufacturers' recommended torque ($30N{\cdot}cm$) 10 min later. Abutments and adjacent teeth were subsequently scanned with a contact scanner for 2D and 3D analyses using a 3D inspection software. RESULTS. Significant differences were observed in axial displacement according to the type of implant-abutment connection (P<.001). Vertical displacement of abutments was greater than overall displacement, and significant differences in vertical and overall displacement were observed among the four connection types (P<.05). CONCLUSION. Displacement according to connection type and material should be considered in choosing an implant abutment. When adjusting a prosthesis, tightening the screw at the manufacturers' recommended torque is advisable, rather than the level of hand tightening.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제11권6호
• /
• pp.331-340
• /
• 2019

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of three intraoral scanners along the complete dental arch and evaluate the feasibility of the assessment methodology for further in vivo analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A specific measurement pattern was fabricated and measured using a coordinate measuring machine for the assessment of control distances and angles. Afterwards, the pattern was placed and fixed in replica of an upper jaw for their subsequent scans (10 times) using 3 intraoral scanners, namely iTero Element1, Trios 3, and True Definition. 4 reference distances and 5 angles were measured and compared with the controls. Trueness and precision were assessed for each IOS: trueness, as the deviation of the measures from the control ones, while precision, as the dispersion of measurements in each reference parameter. These measurements were carried out using software for analyzing 3-dimensional data. Data analysis software was used for statistical and measurements analysis (α=.05). RESULTS. Significant differences (P<.05) were found depending on the intraoral scanner used. Best trueness values were achieved with iTero Element1 (mean from 10 ± 7 ㎛ to 91 ± 63 ㎛) while the worst values were obtained with Trios3 (mean from 42 ± 23 ㎛ to 174 ± 77 ㎛). Trueness analysis in angle measurements, as well as precision analysis, did not show conclusive results. CONCLUSION. iTero Element1 was more accurate than the current versions of Trios3 and True Definition. Importantly, the proposed methodology is considered reliable for analyzing accuracy in any dental arch length and valid for assessing both trueness and precision in an in vivo study.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.321-325
• /
• 2020

Purpose: This study is to evaluate the accuracy of gypsum replica models made from various gypsum products. Methods: One main model was made of stainless steel by CNC milling process. Molds were formed from the main model, and the gypsum replica models were made using 8 types of type IV gypsum, 10 pieces each. The main model was digitized by a contact scanner (Incise; Renishaw) and the gypsum replicas were digitized by an optical scanner (E4; 3Shape A/S). The difference between the main model and the gypsum replicas were measured by inspection software (3D Systems). One-way ANOVA was performed to evaluate the statistical significance of differences between groups. In addition, the independent sample T test was performed to determine the difference between the conventional and scannable stone group (n=10, α=0.05). Results: The root mean square of the stone models were 7.24 ㎛ to 10.78 ㎛, and statistical significance was found between the two groups (SR, FR) and the other 6 groups (IS, SG, CA, CS, ER, EBG) (p<0.05). The accuracy of the gypsum replicas was 9.04 ㎛ and 7.62 ㎛ in the conventional and scannable stone group, respectively. There was statistical significance between the two groups (p<0.01). Conclusion: In the limited results of this study, the product with low setting expansion and the scannable showed high accuracy. Therefore, in order to obtain a stable and accurate scan model, it is more effective in terms of accuracy to use a scannable stone with a low setting expansion.