1 |
Tinschert J, et al.: Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 26: 367-374, 2001.
|
2 |
Rekow ED: High-technology innovations and limitations for restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 37: 513-524, 1993.
|
3 |
Christensen GJ: Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 140: 1301-1304, 2009.
|
4 |
Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D: Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 204: 505-511, 2008.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
May KB, et al.: Precision of fit: the procera all-ceram crown. J Prosthet Dent 80: 394-404, 1993.
|
6 |
Miyazaki T, et al.: A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 28: 44-56, 2009.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Khalid AA, Ayman E: The effect of adding a stone base on the accuracy of working casts using different types of dental stones. J Contemp Dent Pract 7: 575-586, 2006.
|
8 |
Anusavice KJ. Phillip's science of dental material. 11th ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp.621-654, 2003.
|
9 |
Millstein PL: Determining the accuracy of gypsum casts made from Type IV dental stone. J Oral Rehabil 19: 239-243, 1992.
DOI
|
10 |
Moser JB, Stone DG, Willoughby GM: Properties and characteristics of resin die material. J Prosthet Dent 34: 297-304, 1975.
DOI
|
11 |
Kasier DA, Nicholls JI: A study of distortion and surface hardness of improved artifical stone casts. J Prosthet Dent 36: 373-381, 1976.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Linke BA, Nicholls JI, Faucher RR: Distortion analysis of stone casts made from impression materials. J Prothet Dent 54: 794-802, 1985.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Gordon GE, Johnson Gh, Drennor DG: The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. J Prothet Dent 63: 12-15, 1990.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Creed B, et al.: Comparison of the accuracy of linear measurement obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models. Semin Orthod 17: 49-56, 2011.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
American Dental Association: Council on dental materials, ANSI/ADA specification No. 25 for Dental Gypsum Products. Am Dent Assoc, Chicago, pp.640-644, 1987.
|
16 |
Duke PD, et al.: Study of the physical properties of type IV gypsum, resin-containing and epoxy die materials. J Prosthet Dent 83: 466-473, 2000.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Stevens DR, et al.: Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129: 794-803, 2006.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Delong R, et al.: Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res 90: 434-440, 2003.
|
19 |
Christensen GJ: The state of fixed prosthodontics impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 136: 343- 346, 2006.
|
20 |
Santoro M, et al.: Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124: 101-105, 2003.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Keating AP, et al.: A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod 35: 191-201, 2008.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Quimby ML, et al.: The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 74: 298-303, 2004.
|
23 |
Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA: Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 73: 301-306, 2003.
|