Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.388

Digital evaluation of axial displacement by implant-abutment connection type: An in vitro study  

Kim, Sung-Jun (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University)
Son, KeunBaDa (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Kyu-Bok (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.10, no.5, 2018 , pp. 388-394 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. To measure axial displacement of different implant-abutment connection types and materials during screw tightening at the recommended torque by using a contact scanner for two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty models of missing mandibular left second premolars were 3D-printed and implant fixtures were placed at the same position by using a surgical guide. External and internal fixtures were used. Three implant-abutment internal connection (INT) types and one implant-abutment external connection (EXT) type were prepared. Two of the INT types used titanium abutment and zirconia abutment; the other INT type was a customized abutment, fabricated by using a computer-controlled milling machine. The EXT type used titanium abutment. Screws were tightened at $10N{\cdot}cm$, simulating hand tightening, and then at the manufacturers' recommended torque ($30N{\cdot}cm$) 10 min later. Abutments and adjacent teeth were subsequently scanned with a contact scanner for 2D and 3D analyses using a 3D inspection software. RESULTS. Significant differences were observed in axial displacement according to the type of implant-abutment connection (P<.001). Vertical displacement of abutments was greater than overall displacement, and significant differences in vertical and overall displacement were observed among the four connection types (P<.05). CONCLUSION. Displacement according to connection type and material should be considered in choosing an implant abutment. When adjusting a prosthesis, tightening the screw at the manufacturers' recommended torque is advisable, rather than the level of hand tightening.
Keywords
Dental implant; Dental implant-abutment connection; Tightening torque; Axial displacement;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100.   DOI
2 Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410.   DOI
3 Branemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Branemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:227-31.   DOI
4 Sutter F, Weber HP, Sorensen J, Belser U. The new restorative concept of the ITI dental implant system: design and engineering. Int J Periodontic Restor Dent 1993;13:408-31.
5 Ugurel CS, Steiner M, Isik-Ozkol G, Kutay O, Kern M. Mechanical resistance of screwless morse taper and screw-retained implant-abutment connections. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:137-42.   DOI
6 Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
7 Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:290-8.   DOI
8 Maeda Y, Satoh T, Sogo M. In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33: 75-8.   DOI
9 Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:156-8.   DOI
10 Dailey B, Jordan L, Blind O, Tavernier B. Axial displacement of abutments into implants and implant replicas, with the tapered cone-screw internal connection, as a function of tightening torque. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:251-6.
11 Yilmaz B, Seidt JD, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL. Displacement of screw-retained single crowns into implants with conical internal connections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28: 803-6.   DOI
12 Winkler S, Ring K, Ring JD, Boberick KG. Implant screw mechanics and the settling effect: overview. J Oral Implantol 2003;29:242-5.   DOI
13 Lee JH, Kim DG, Park CJ, Cho LR. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:e83-9.   DOI
14 Spector MR, Donovan TE, Nicholls JI. An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:444-7.   DOI
15 Liu DY, Cader FN, Abduo J, Palamara J. Accuracy of different implant impression techniques: Evaluation of new tray design concept. J Prosthodont 2017 Dec 29. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12733. [Epub ahead of print].
16 Tan KB, Nicholls JI. The effect of 3 torque delivery systems on gold screw preload at the gold cylinder-abutment screw joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:175-83.
17 Dellinges MA, Tebrock OC. A measurement of torque values obtained with hand-held drivers in a simulated clinical setting. J Prosthodont 1993;2:212-4.   DOI
18 Kanawati A, Richards MW, Becker JJ, Monaco NE. Measurement of clinicians' ability to hand torque dental implant components. J Oral Implantol 2009;35:185-8.   DOI
19 Gilbert AB, Yilmaz B, Seidt JD, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL, Chien HH. Three-Dimensional Displacement of Nine Different Abutments for an Implant with an Internal Hexagon Platform. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30: 781-8.   DOI
20 Moon SJ, Kim HJ, Son MK, Chung CH. Sinking and fit of abutment of locking taper implant system. J Adv Prosthodont 2009;1:97-101.   DOI
21 Siadat H, Beyabanaki E, Mousavi N, Alikhasi M. Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:271-7.   DOI
22 Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81: 537-52.   DOI
23 Tagger Green N, Machtei EE, Horwitz J, Peled M. Fracture of dental implants: literature review and report of a case. Implant Dent 2002;11:137-43.   DOI
24 Kim KS, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB, Yang JH, Lee JB, Yim SH. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:834-9.   DOI
25 Shim HW, Yang BE. Long-term cumulative survival and mechanical complications of single-tooth Ankylos Implants: focus on the abutment neck fractures. J Adv Prosthodont 2015; 7:423-30.   DOI
26 Messias A, Rocha S, Calha N, Neto MA, Nicolau P, Guerra F. Effect of intentional abutment disconnection on the micromovements of the implant-abutment assembly: a 3D digital image correlation analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:9- 16.
27 Rhee YK, Huh YH, Cho LR, Park CJ. Comparison of intraoral scanning and conventional impression techniques using 3-dimensional superimposition. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7: 460-7.   DOI
28 Rebeeah HA, Yilmaz B, Seidt JD, McGlumphy E, Clelland N, Brantley W. Comparison of 3D displacements of screw-retained zirconia implant crowns into implants with different internal connections with respect to screw tightening. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:132-7.   DOI
29 Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility. Dent Mater 2012;28:320-6.   DOI
30 Rudolph H, Luthardt RG, Walter MH. Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology. Comput Biol Med 2007; 37:579-87.   DOI
31 Park JM. Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form. J Adv Prosthodont 2016; 8:354-62.   DOI
32 Park HN, Lim YJ, Yi WJ, Han JS, Lee SP. A comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanners using an intraoral environment simulator. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:58-64.   DOI
33 Hayama H, Fueki K, Wadachi J, Wakabayashi N. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intra-oral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62:347-52.   DOI
34 Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1687-94.   DOI
35 Dimitrova M. A 3D evaluation of the repeatability of accuracy in optical and contact scanners. Doctor's Thesis, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, Wales, UK; 2017. p. 1-36.
36 Persson A, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touchprobe scanner. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:194-200.   DOI