• Computers and Concrete
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.459-470
• /
• 2019

Apart from strength properties, durability, toughness and workability are also important criteria in defining the performance of a concrete structure. Hence "High Performance Concrete (HPC)" is introduced. It is different from high strength concrete and can have various applications. In this paper, the properties (Mechanical and Durability) of High Performance Concrete blended with bagasse ash at 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% are studied. However, it is difficult to analyze the performance based on different properties obtained from different experiments. Hence it is necessary to combine all the criteria/properties into a single value to obtain a result by a technique called Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).It is an effective tool for dealing with complex decision making, and may aid the decision maker to set priorities and make the best decision. In addition, the AHP incorporates a useful technique for checking the consistency of the decision maker?s evaluations, thus reducing the bias in the decision making process.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.23-37
• /
• 2005

On the situation cooperating with business partners on the supply chain, systematic decision making process is a critical issue for them. The two major issues of purchasing strategy such as selecting vendors and managing them are important part of their overall business activities. This study mainly focus on the former issue of the vendor selection. Through the empirical study, analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method was applied to select vendors among supplier vendors based on four selection criteria such as the level of quality, product on management ability, delivery, and price. The results of study showed the main criteria of vender selection was the ability of quality management. The vender selected based on AHP and the current selection method was different, but implicitly projected the dilemma situation between quality and price which occurs in decision making process of real life.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2005년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.367-381
• /
• 2005

On the situation cooperating with business partners on the supply chain, systematic decision making process is a critical issue for them. The two major issues of purchasing strategy such as selecting vendors and managing them are important part of their overall business activities. This study mainly focus on the former issue of the vendor selection. Through the empirical study, analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method was applied to select vendors among supplier vendors based on four selection criteria such as the level of quality, product on management ability, delivery, and price. The results of study showed the main criteria of vender selection was the ability of quality management. The vender selected based on AHP and the current selection method was different, but implicitly projected the dilemma situation between quality and price which occurs in decision making process of real life.

• 한국추진공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국추진공학회 2017년도 제48회 춘계학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.1104-1107
• /
• 2017

본 논문에서는 액체로켓엔진 개발과정에서 제기될 수 있는 주요 이슈에 대한 의사결정의 효율적 수단으로써 계층분석방법(AHP)에 주목하였으며, 액체로켓엔진의 추진제 선정 문제를 통하여 계층분석 방법의 유효성 및 적용가능성을 검토하였다.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.81-97
• /
• 2001

The main objective of this research is to identify the evaluation criteria of the local governments' projects for the fisheries industry development (LGPFID) and to develop the evaluation software prototype applicable to LGPFID. This research does not try to develop the whole evaluation processes and programs for LGPFID, but just to outline the approach to managing LGPFID. The evaluation processes and programs developed in this study is based on the group decision support systems(GDSS), which is a collaborative, system-oriented, and objective system useful in evaluating LGPFID. Specifically the goals of the programs are to : (1) enhance the quality of evaluation process for LGPFID; (2) provide the local government decision makers' and interest groups' access to comprehensive evaluation information; (3) support private-public collaboration in government's decision making. We used analytic hierarchy process model as a group decision making model and programmed the application software prototype with Visual Basic language.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.107-115
• /
• 2006

It is the purpose of this study that propose method to estimate weights of decision-making for design concepts considering characteristics of places. In order to acquire these weights of concepts, the investigation with questionnaire by AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) is employed as a mean. Targets of this investigation was 63 respondents which were graduate students(21) and experts of design field(42). As a result, we could find differences between these weights of the relative concepts and know the differences in the weights of design concepts as characteristics of places were reflected. These weights of concepts will be take opinions about concept from design-related members into consideration. Therefore, In design process, the weights of design concepts will help for designer to verify the concepts in design initially, and finally be used by a criteria in decision-making. The Weights of decision-making for design concepts as a result of this study will be used as a guideline for the systematical and conceptual approach in design practice.

• 한국국방경영분석학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.212-222
• /
• 2006

21세기 선진 정예 강군을 위해 군이 지향해야 할 국방개혁 2020의 과제들은 2020년 전후 국방환경과 국방개혁 4대 중점사항을 토대로 총 21개 대과제와 80개 소과제를 선정하여 국방개혁을 추진해 나간다는 내용을 주요 골자로 하고 있다. 국방기본정책서를 기초로 추진하게 될 '국방개혁 2020' 은 기획단계인 초기단계로서 과제들에 대한 의사결정이 필요로 하나, 군은 현재 2단계인 계획단계에 이르러서야 비로소 기획과 예산을 연결시켜 의사결정을 구체화하고 있다. 과제들의 우선순위에 대한 의사결정이 계획단계에 이르러서야 비로소 결정되기 때문에 최초 기획단계부터 의사결정이 이루어진다면 현재보다 효율적인 과제수행이 이루어질 것이다. 본 연구는 국방부에서 발표한 '국방개혁 2020' 추진과제들을 가지고 기획단계에서부터 계층분석적 의사결정방법을 적용하여 과제들의 대한 그룹의사결정을 실시하였다. 또한, 추진과제 들의 가중치가 동일할 경우 15개 과제들의 가중치가 어떻게 변화하는가에 대한 민감도 분석을 실시하였고, 내 외부 평가자들의 과제들에 대한 가중치를 그룹의사결정을 통해 분석함으로서 과제들의 우선순위를 제시하였다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제18권6호
• /
• pp.367-376
• /
• 2009

This paper proposes an application methodology of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) based decision making theory for improvement priority by assessment of various risk factors affecting on deterioration of water supply systems, as major social infrastructure. AHP method is organized with three level of hierarchy which is introduced for multi-criteria decision making in this study. In the first level, assessment outputs are calculated by AHP for each affecting factor. In the second level, criteria are estimated by using assessment results with respect to structural and environmental factors. Consequently, ranking decision is performed in the third level. In order to present the effectiveness, a proposed method is compared with FCP(Fuzzy Composite Programming) for decision making. Since the results of the proposed method show better performance with consistent results, it can be applied as an efficient information for the determination for improvement priority of the study infrastructure.

• KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS)
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.647-669
• /
• 2016

Multiple attribute for decision making including user preference will increase the complexity of route selection process. Various approaches have been proposed to solve the optimal route selection problem. In this paper, multi attribute decision making (MADM) algorithms such as Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Weighted Product Method (WPM), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and Total Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods have been proposed for acoustic signature based optimal route selection to facilitate user with better quality of service. The traffic density state conditions (very low, low, below medium, medium, above medium, high and very high) on the road segment is the occurrence and mixture weightings of traffic noise signals (Tyre, Engine, Air Turbulence, Exhaust, and Honks etc) is considered as one of the attribute in decision making process. The short-term spectral envelope features of the cumulative acoustic signals are extracted using Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Classifier (ANFC) is used to model seven traffic density states. Simple point method and AHP has been used for calculation of weights of decision parameters. Numerical results show that WPM, AHP and TOPSIS provide similar performance.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회 2003년도 추계학술대회 및 정기총회
• /
• pp.148-151
• /
• 2003

Recently school food service operations are confronted with the wide spread pressures for accountability and the need to increase productivity. This paper is concerned with the make-or-buy decision framework for school food service systems considering the multi-attributes in the decision making. For the purpose of considering the multi-attributes analysis method in decision making for the school foodservice, we developed a make-or-buy decision framework using the multi-attribute analysis method, analytic hierarchy process, AHP method for school food service system. Finally, we developed a systematic and practical solution builder for a three-step decision support system in the view of 1) brainstorming for the idea generation, 2) analytic hierarchy process, AHP as a multi-attribute structure ed analysis method, and 3) aggregation logic model to integrate the results of reviewers. We developed web based program and applied it to a school foodservice problem.