• Title/Summary/Keyword: Covid-19 vaccine

Search Result 198, Processing Time 0.025 seconds

COVID-19 Vaccination and Clinical Outcomes at a Secondary Referral Hospital During the Delta Variant-dominant Period in West Sumatra, Indonesia

  • Didan Ariadapa Rahadi;Elfira Yusri;Syandrez Prima Putra;Rima Semiarty;Dian Pertiwi;Cimi Ilmiawati
    • Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
    • /
    • 제56권3호
    • /
    • pp.221-230
    • /
    • 2023
  • Objectives: The second wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in Indonesia, during which the Delta variant predominated, took place after a vaccination program had been initiated in the country. This study was conducted to assess the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on unfavorable clinical outcomes including hospitalization, severe COVID-19, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death using a real-world model. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study involved patients with COVID-19 aged ≥18 years who presented to the COVID-19 emergency room at a secondary referral teaching hospital between June 1, 2021 and August 31, 2021. We used a binary logistic regression model to assess the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on unfavorable clinical outcomes, with age, sex, and comorbidities as confounding variables. Results: A total of 716 patients were included, 32.1% of whom were vaccinated. The elderly participants (≥65 years) had the lowest vaccine coverage among age groups. Vaccination had an effectiveness of 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25 to 66) for preventing hospitalization, 97% (95% CI, 77 to 99) for preventing severe COVID-19, 95% (95% CI, 56 to 99) for preventing ICU admission, and 90% (95% CI, 22 to 99) for preventing death. Interestingly, patients with type 2 diabetes had a 2-fold to 4-fold elevated risk of unfavorable outcomes. Conclusions: Among adults, COVID-19 vaccination has a moderate preventive impact on hospitalization but a high preventive impact on severe COVID-19, ICU admission, and death. The authors suggest that relevant parties increase COVID-19 vaccination coverage, especially in the elderly population.

Progress and Challenges in the Development of COVID-19 Vaccines and Current Understanding of SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Responses

  • Kim, Kyun-Do;Hwang, Insu;Ku, Keun Bon;Lee, Sumin;Kim, Seong-Jun;Kim, Chonsaeng
    • Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
    • /
    • 제30권8호
    • /
    • pp.1109-1115
    • /
    • 2020
  • The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is spreading globally, and the WHO has declared this outbreak a pandemic. Vaccines are an effective way to prevent the rapid spread of COVID-19. Furthermore, the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 infection needs to be understood for the development of an efficient and safe vaccine. Here, we review the current understanding of vaccine targets and the status of vaccine development for COVID-19. We also describe host immune responses to highly pathogenic human coronaviruses in terms of innate and adaptive immunities.

국내 5-11세 소아의 코로나19 백신 접종에 대한 델파이 연구 (Delphi Survey for COVID-19 Vaccination in Korean Children Between 5 and 11 Years Old)

  • 최영준;이영화;최재홍
    • Pediatric Infection and Vaccine
    • /
    • 제29권1호
    • /
    • pp.37-45
    • /
    • 2022
  • 본 델파이 연구에서는 5-11세 소아청소년의 코로나19 백신 접종과 관련하여 소아청소년 감염 분과 전문의와 코로나19 백신 전문가들을 대상으로 온라인 설문 조사를 시행하였다. 총 20문항에 대해 두 라운드 동안 각각 46명, 38명이 설문에 응답하였다. 패널들은 5-11세 소아청소년들이 코로나19에 쉽게 감염되지만 중증 진행의 위험도는 여전히 낮은 것으로 판단하였고, 만성 질환을 가진 소아는 중증 진행 위험도가 약간 있는 것으로 평가하였다. 코로나19 백신은 5-11세 소아에게 대체로 위험하지 않다고 응답하였고, 백신 접종의 기대 이익과 잠재적인 위해에 대한 비교는 대체적으로 중립적인 견해를 보였다. 또한 현재 소아에게 유일하게 허가된 mRNA 백신 플랫폼은 지속 가능하겠지만 소아에게는 재조합 단백질 플랫폼 백신이 추후 가장 적절할 것으로 평가되었다. 최종적으로 5-11세 소아에게 코로나19 예방 접종 권장에 대해서는 중립적인 입장을 보였다. 이에 모든 소아청소년들에게 일괄적인 접종 보다는 개별화된 선별 접종이 더 바람직할 것으로 보이며, 소아의 코로나19 백신 접종에 대한 과학적 근거 마련을 위한 지속적인 모니터링이 필요할 것으로 보인다.

Influencing Factors on Intention to Vaccinate Against COVID-19 in College Students

  • Lee, Se Hyun;Park, Seo Rin;Kim, Hye Min;Ko, Da Yeon;Kang, Min Seong;Choi, Eun Chae;Shin, Da Som;Kim, Se Yeon;Seo, Eun Ji
    • Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science
    • /
    • 제23권4호
    • /
    • pp.330-338
    • /
    • 2021
  • Purpose: This cross-sectional study aimed to identify factors affecting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination intention. Methods: For an anonymous online survey, recruitment notices were posted on an anonymous community by each university, and an online survey was conducted through online form from June to July 2021. COVID-19 knowledge and health-protective behavior were measured using a questionnaire based on previous literature and reflecting the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's COVID-19 Response Guidelines. The psychological antecedents of vaccination were measured by 5C scale. Results: Two-hundred and ninety-four college students (women 67.3%) answered the survey; 179 (60.9%) reported that they would accept a COVID-19 vaccine. The mean scores for COVID-19 knowledge and health-protective behavior were 22.97±5.33 (out of 35) and 9.92±2.22 (out of 12), respectively. For the psychological antecedents of vaccination, the mean scores for confidence, collective responsibility, calculation, complacency, and constraints were 4.45 (± 1.24), 5.61 (± 1.09), 5.09 (± 1.18), 2.42 (± 1.11), and 2.37 (± 1.19) out of 5 points, respectively. The confidence, calculation, and collective responsibility were associated with vaccination intention. Additionally, the top reason for those who were less prone to accept vaccination against COVID-19 was concern about vaccine safety. Conclusion: The higher the confidence in the vaccine and the higher the collective responsibility, the higher the vaccination intention. As it is a factor related to an individual's perception of COVID-19 information, it is necessary to increase confidence in the vaccines through obtaining accurate information on the safety, effectiveness, and side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination.

Psoriasis flares after COVID-19 vaccination: adherence to biologic therapy reduces psoriasis exacerbations: a case-control study

  • Martina Burlando;Astrid Herzum;Emanuele Cozzani;Aurora Parodi
    • Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
    • /
    • 제12권1호
    • /
    • pp.80-81
    • /
    • 2023
  • This study aimed to evaluate if patients under biologics have a lower risk of psoriasis flares after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination than other psoriatic patients. Of 322 recently vaccinated patients admitted for psoriasis at the Dermatological Psoriasis Unit during January and February 2022, 316 (98%) had no psoriasis flares after COVID-19 vaccination (79% under biologic treatment, 21% not biologically treated) and 6 (2%) presented psoriasis flares after COVID-19 vaccination (33.3% under biologic treatment, 66.6% not biologically treated). Overall, psoriasis patients under biologic treatment, developed fewer psoriasis flares after COVID-19 vaccination (33.3%), than patients not under biologic treatment (66.6%) (p=0.0207; Fisher's exact test).

Acute abdomen following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review

  • Nelson Luis Cahuapaza-Gutierrez;Renzo Pajuelo-Vasquez;Cristina Quiroz-Narvaez;Flavia Rioja-Torres;Maria Quispe-Andahua;Fernando M. Runzer-Colmenares
    • Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
    • /
    • 제13권1호
    • /
    • pp.42-53
    • /
    • 2024
  • Purpose: Conduct a systematic review of case reports and case series regarding the development of acute abdomen following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, to describe the possible association and the clinical and demographic characteristics in detail. Materials and Methods: This study included case report studies and case series that focused on the development of acute abdomen following COVID-19 vaccination. Systematic review studies, literature, letters to the editor, brief comments, and so forth were excluded. PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched until June 15, 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool was used to assess the risk of bias and the quality of the study. Descriptive data were presented as frequency, median, mean, and standard deviation. Results: Seventeen clinical case studies were identified, evaluating 17 patients with acute abdomen associated with COVID-19 vaccination, which included acute appendicitis (n=3), acute pancreatitis (n=9), diverticulitis (n=1), cholecystitis (n=2), and colitis (n=2). The COVID-19 vaccine most commonly linked to acute abdomen was Pfizer-BioNTech (messenger RNA), accounting for 64.71% of cases. Acute abdomen predominantly occurred after the first vaccine dose (52.94%). All patients responded objectively to medical (88.34%) and surgical (11.76%) treatment and were discharged within a few weeks. No cases of death were reported. Conclusion: Acute abdomen is a rare complication of great interest in the medical and surgical practice of COVID-19 vaccination. Our study is based on a small sample of patients; therefore, it is recommended to conduct future observational studies to fully elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this association.

The Impact of Brand Equity on Consumer Intention: A Case Study for COVID-19 Vaccine Products in Vietnam

  • VO, Minh Sang;NGUYEN, Trung Hau;THACH, Thao Vy;TRAN, Doan Vy;HOANG, Nguyen Huong Giang;PHAM, Ngoc Phuong Trang
    • The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
    • /
    • 제9권7호
    • /
    • pp.239-247
    • /
    • 2022
  • Maintaining and expanding brand equity is regarded as an essential component of brand development. Effective management of brand equity leads to more opportunities for brand extension and the ability to draw in more customers. Brand equity, in particular, has a positive impact on consumer purchase intention. The purpose of this study is to look into the relationships between brand equity and consumption intention from the perspective of Vietnamese customers of India's COVID-19 vaccine products. Primary data is aggregated from 475 Vietnamese citizens with different occupations and backgrounds 18 years of age or older. The findings of the study show that consumption intention is positively inspired by brand equity, including brand association and brand quality. If consumers perceive high brand equity, it will have a higher impact on promoting consumption intention to the brand. India's COVID-19 vaccine needs to invest more in building brand equity in the Vietnamese market if it wants to increase the consumption choices of Vietnamese people. To create a good brand association and brand quality for India's COVID-19 vaccine, it is necessary to focus on communicating the good properties of the Indian-made vaccine such as safe, high protective effect, high immunity and protection, and long duration of immunity of vaccines.

Mathematical modeling of the impact of Omicron variant on the COVID-19 situation in South Korea

  • Oh, Jooha;Apio, Catherine;Park, Taesung
    • Genomics & Informatics
    • /
    • 제20권2호
    • /
    • pp.22.1-22.9
    • /
    • 2022
  • The rise of newer coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) variants has brought a challenge to ending the spread of COVID-19. The variants have a different fatality, morbidity, and transmission rates and affect vaccine efficacy differently. Therefore, the impact of each new variant on the spread of COVID-19 is of interest to governments and scientists. Here, we proposed mathematical SEIQRDVP and SEIQRDV3P models to predict the impact of the Omicron variant on the spread of the COVID-19 situation in South Korea. SEIQEDVP considers one vaccine level at a time while SEIQRDV3P considers three vaccination levels (only one dose received, full doses received, and full doses + booster shots received) simultaneously. The omicron variant's effect was contemplated as a weighted sum of the delta and omicron variants' transmission rate and tuned using a hyperparameter k. Our models' performances were compared with common models like SEIR, SEIQR, and SEIQRDVUP using the root mean square error (RMSE). SEIQRDV3P performed better than the SEIQRDVP model. Without consideration of the variant effect, we don't see a rapid rise in COVID-19 cases and high RMSE values. But, with consideration of the omicron variant, we predicted a continuous rapid rise in COVID-19 cases until maybe herd immunity is developed in the population. Also, the RMSE value for the SEIQRDV3P model decreased by 27.4%. Therefore, modeling the impact of any new risen variant is crucial in determining the trajectory of the spread of COVID-19 and determining policies to be implemented.

아스트라제네카 코로나19 백신(ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222)을 접종한 환자에서 한방 치료의 안전성 : 사례군 연구 (Safety of Korean Medicine Treatment in Patients Vaccinated with the AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222): A Case Series)

  • 강성우;홍성은;박지원;권승원;윤상협;김관일;이범준;정희재
    • 대한한방내과학회지
    • /
    • 제42권4호
    • /
    • pp.590-604
    • /
    • 2021
  • Objectives: The purpose of this study is to examine the safety of Korean medicine treatment in patients vaccinated with the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222). Methods: We investigated patients at Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital who were vaccinated with the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine between June 1, 2021 and June 30, 2021. The safety of Korean medicine treatment was evaluated by examining adverse events that occurred within seven days of vaccination, including liver function and kidney function testing, assessment of the severity of adverse events, and examination of causality to vaccines and Korean medicine treatment. Results: Eleven patients vaccinated with the first dose of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine were included. A total of 19 adverse events were reported: 15 systemic adverse events, three local adverse events, and one alanine aminotransferase increase. The most commonly reported systemic adverse events were fatigue (4 cases, 36.4%), headache (4 cases, 36.4%), and myalgia (4 cases, 36.4%). All adverse events were rated below moderate (grade 2) in severity. Systemic and local adverse events were evaluated as definitely related to vaccination and unlikely to be related to Korean medicine treatment, while alanine aminotransferase increase was evaluated as unlikely to be related to either the vaccine or Korean medicine treatment. Aspartate transaminase, Blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine were measured within the reference range after vaccination. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the severity and frequency of adverse events in patients vaccinated with the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine did not increase after Korean medicine treatment.

Low Neutralizing Activities to the Omicron Subvariants BN.1 and XBB.1.5 of Sera From the Individuals Vaccinated With a BA.4/5-Containing Bivalent mRNA Vaccine

  • Eliel Nham;Jineui Kim;Jungmin Lee;Heedo Park;Jeonghun Kim;Sohyun Lee;Jaeuk Choi;Kyung Taek Kim;Jin Gu Yoon;Soon Young Hwang;Joon Young Song;Hee Jin Cheong;Woo Joo Kim;Man-Seong Park;Ji Yun Noh
    • IMMUNE NETWORK
    • /
    • 제23권6호
    • /
    • pp.43.1-43.10
    • /
    • 2023
  • The continuous emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants has provided insights for updating current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. We examined the neutralizing activity of Abs induced by a BA.4/5-containing bivalent mRNA vaccine against Omicron subvariants BN.1 and XBB.1.5. We recruited 40 individuals who had received a monovalent COVID-19 booster dose after a primary series of COVID-19 vaccinations and will be vaccinated with a BA.4/5-containing bivalent vaccine. Sera were collected before vaccination, one month after, and three months after a bivalent booster. Neutralizing Ab (nAb) titers were measured against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron subvariants BA.5, BN.1, and XBB.1.5. BA.4/5-containing bivalent vaccination significantly boosted nAb levels against both ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron subvariants. Participants with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection had higher nAb titers against all examined strains than the infection-naïve group. NAb titers against BN.1 and XBB.1.5 were lower than those against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and BA.5 strains. These results suggest that COVID-19 vaccinations specifically targeting emerging Omicron subvariants, such as XBB.1.5, may be required to ensure better protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in high-risk groups.