• 제목/요약/키워드: Cost-Benefit Analysis1

검색결과 447건 처리시간 0.022초

대학병원 영양부서 운영체계 변경의 비용.편익분석 (Cost , Benefit Analysis of Operation System Change in the Hospital Foodservice)

  • 김형미;양일선;박은철;임현숙
    • 대한영양사협회학술지
    • /
    • 제6권1호
    • /
    • pp.33-43
    • /
    • 2000
  • Environmental pressures from such sources an economic condition, the government and inter-institutional competition create managerial challenges. Economic pressures may be forcing dietetic dept, in hospital to utilize cost∙benefit analysis to assist them in their problem solving. Cost∙benefit analysis have been widely used in business, industry and many other fields with only limited application to foodservice. Due to the lack or this information the purposes of this study were to identify use of cost∙benefit analysis in hospital foodservice system to evaluate the economic efficiency of alternatives, and to make recommendation for operation system change. Using the cost∙benefit method, cash flows are separated into cost and benefits. For an alternative to be selected, indicators, such as NPV, benefit-cost ratio (B/C ratio) with 5% discount rate per annum. The sensitivity analysis was also conducted with difference rate 3%, 7% respectively and reduced employee payroll change. The result of this study can be summarized as follows : 1. The total cost of investment for operation system change was 390,570 thousand won and the total benefit through operation system change was 865,808 thousand won. 2. Net present value(NPV) for 5 years was 475,239 thousand won and benefit-cost ratio was 2.22. 3. In sensitivity analysis with different discount rate 3%, 7%, benefit-cost ratio was 2.25, 2.18 respectively, with total reduced employee payroll change, benefit-cost ratio was 2.86. In conclusion, total benefits were exceeded total costs. Therefore, the project of operation system change in hospital foodservice was found to be economically efficient.

  • PDF

비용편익분석을 이용한 일 재가노인간호센터의 고혈압 및 당뇨관리 효과평가 (An Evaluation of Effects on Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Management of a Community-Based Nursing Care Center Using Cost-Benefit Analysis)

  • 임지영;임정남;김인아;고수경
    • 간호행정학회지
    • /
    • 제16권3호
    • /
    • pp.295-305
    • /
    • 2010
  • Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the economic efficiency of a community-based nursing care center to help policy makers determine whether or not to invest in similar facilities. Methods: The subjects were 101 elderly people over 65 years who participated in a health management program from February 1 to July 31, 2007. Direct cost was estimated with center operations cost, medical cost for out-patients and pharmacy cost. Indirect cost was measured by transportation cost. Direct benefit was calculated by saved medical cost for out-patients, saved pharmacy cost, saved transportation cost, and reducing hospital charges. Indirect benefit was estimated with prevention of severe complications. Economic efficiency was evaluated by cost-benefit ratio and net benefit. Results: Operating a community-based nursing care center was found to be cost-effective. Specifically, the cost of operating the center evaluated here was estimated at 135 million won while the benefit was estimated at 187 million won. Benefit-cost ratio was 1.38. Conclusion: The Community-based nursing care center that was described here could be a useful health care delivery system for reducing medical expenditures.

청주시 일부지역의 수돗물불소화사업 비용-편익 분석 (Cost Benefit Analysis on the Economic Effect of the Water Fluoridation Program in Some Area of Cheong-Ju City)

  • 정희웅;안형식;박형근;문혁수;조수헌;이희영;윤석준
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제13권1호
    • /
    • pp.23-45
    • /
    • 2003
  • This study was performed to evaluate economic effect of the water fluoridation program in Cheong-Ju City from 1982 to 2010. To study this economic effect, this study used cost-benefit analysis methodology from eight years old to fourteen years old in Cheong-Ju City. Major findings were as follows; First, total cost of fluoridation program in Cheong-Ju City was 1,384,164,734 korean won and total benefit was 15,057,426,621 Korean won from 1982 to 2010. Second, total cost which was converted by present value 2000 year was 1,687,412,718 won and total benefit which was converted by present value 2000 year was 14,582,548,519 Korean won. Cost-benefit ratio was 8.64. Net present value which happened from 1982 to 2000 was 7,990,710,155 Korean won and cost benefit ratio was 7.47. In conclusion, by the above result, economic impact of the water fluoridation program was very effective for children in some area of Cheong-Ju city.

농작업 편이장비 안전인증의 비용-편익 분석 (Cost-benefit Analysis in Certification of Devices and Equipments Used in Farm Work)

  • 최기흥
    • 한국안전학회지
    • /
    • 제27권6호
    • /
    • pp.1-6
    • /
    • 2012
  • This study focuses on the benefit-cost analysis of certification of more than eight hundred devices and equipments used primarily in farm work. Specifically, EPA-suggested averting behavior approach was used for the analysis. Cost-benefit analysis indicates that there will be a net cost of 30 billion won for the first year since the introduction of the certification system. It is expected, however, that net benefit of 568 billion won after 11 years and the accumulated net benefit will reach to 3,867 billion won. These results validate the introduction of safety certification systems for devices and equipments used in farm work sites.

가스 공급기지에서 FMEA/HAZOP에 의한 안전관리 비용-편익분석 (Cost and Benefit Analysis for Safety Management Cost by FMEA/HAZOP at Governor Station)

  • 장서일;이헌창;조지훈;오신규;김태옥
    • 대한안전경영과학회지
    • /
    • 제3권4호
    • /
    • pp.1-9
    • /
    • 2001
  • Cost-benefit analysis was investigated to propose the analysis method of the effect of investment and the optimum investment level of safety management cost for preventing gas accident in the B governor station. From five classifications of safety management costs consisting of cost items with similar characters and potential accident costs calculated by risk assessments(FMEA/HAZOP), we found that the order of the benefit(the reduction cost of the potential accident cost) was the instrument increase and repair cost > the safety checking and inspection cost > the labor and training cost > the safety equipment and corresponding cost > the research and development cost. As the benefit was increased with increasing the investment cost, the effect of investment was increased with decreasing the Investment cost. As a result, the optimum safety management cost was estimated and the investment level was analyzed by the model of optimum investment level.

  • PDF

예방접종의 경제성 평가방법과 사례 (Economic Evaluation of Vaccinations - a Methodologic Review)

  • 천병철
    • Pediatric Infection and Vaccine
    • /
    • 제15권1호
    • /
    • pp.20-29
    • /
    • 2008
  • The basis of the economic evaluation of vaccination is the balance between the use of the resources (input) and the improvements that result from the vaccination (output). Techniques used for economic evaluation of vaccination are cost analysis, cost-minimization analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis and cost-benefit analysis. Cost analysis seeks to characterize the costs of a given vaccination program. Cost-effective analysis is to helps policy-makers decide on the best use of allocated resources, whether cost-benefit analysis is to helps policy-makers decide on the overall allocation of resources. Cost-utility analysis is a specific form of cost-effective analysis in which outcomes are reduced to a common denominator such as the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) or disability-adjusted life year (DALY). Many economic analyses have been conducted on vaccines in the world, but there have been a little studies on economic evaluation on vaccines in Korea. This paper reviewed the methodology used to economic evaluation on vaccines and immunizations and addressed some examples of the methods.

  • PDF

부품소재 산업 통합 정보화 비용 편익 분석 (Cost-Benefit Analysis of Integrated Information System for Materials & Parts Industry)

  • 김윤종;문영호
    • 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
    • /
    • 제2권1호
    • /
    • pp.52-58
    • /
    • 2002
  • 정부의 부품ㆍ소재 산업 육성 방침에 따라 중소기업의 비중이 높은 부품ㆍ소재 산업의 정보화 지원 사업에 대한 타당성을 비용편익분석으로 검토하였다. 비용편익분석에서 비용부문은 한국과학기술정보연구원의 사업내용과 예산을 인용하여 현가 계산하였고 편익부문은 각 산업별 생산액을 예측하고, 생산액 대비 정보화 투자비율을 이용하여 각 산업별 정보화 비용을 산출하여 현가 계산하였다. 비용편익 비율은 4.67로 계산되어 사업타당성이 있는 것으로 검토되었다.

  • PDF

치아우식증 예방을 위한 영구치 구치부 교합면 치면열구전색 및 정기검진의 비용 편익 분석 (The Study of Cost-benefit Analysis on Fissure Sealant and Regular Checkup for Prevention of Dental Caries)

  • 노희진
    • 치위생과학회지
    • /
    • 제2권2호
    • /
    • pp.53-62
    • /
    • 2002
  • 본 연구에서는 영구치 구치부 치아우식증을 예방하는 방법 중 영구치 구치부 치면열구저색과 정기검진을 통한 치아 우식증 예방에 대한 비용편익 분석을 통하여 영구치 구치부 치면열구전색과 정기검진으로 얻을 수 있는 경제적 타당성에 대한 평가를 하였다. 본 연구는 "2000 국민구강건강실태조사" 보건복지부를 근거로 비용편익분석을 시행하였으며, 영구치 구치의 맹출 1년 후 전 구치부 치아의 교합면 치면열구전색법을 시행하는 경우 영구치 구치부 고합면 치아우식증에 이환된 모든 사람이 적절한 치료를 받을 때 발생하는 비용과 편익을 분석하였다. 1. 2000년도 우리나라 6세부터 75세 이상의 연구를 대상으로 영구치 치면열구전색의 비용편익분석을 시행한 결과 인구 43,736천명의 치면열구전색의 비용은 1,610,994백만원 이었고 이에 대한 편익은 69,460,691백만원이었다. 2. 영구치 구치부 교합면 치면열구전색의 편익은 비용에 비해 약 39.51배인 것으로 조사되었다. 3. 연간 2회의 정기검진을 시행할 경우 정기검진비용은 전체 인구에서 직접비용 734,758백만원, 간접비용 1,943,786백만원, 총 2,678,544백만원으로 조사되었다. 4. 정기검진의 간접비용은 직접비용보다 2.6배 많은 것으로 조사되었다. 5. 영구치 구치부 교합면 치면열구전색과 6개월 간격의 정기검진의 비용과 편익은 각가 4,289,538백만원과 69,460,691백만원으로 조사되어 비용에 대한 약 16.2배의 편익이 발생됨이 조사되었다.

  • PDF

Comparison of Benefit Estimation Models in Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Case of Chronic Hypertension Management Programs

  • Lim, Ji-Young;Kim, Mi-Ja;Park, Chang-Gi;Kim, Jung-Yun
    • 대한간호학회지
    • /
    • 제41권6호
    • /
    • pp.750-757
    • /
    • 2011
  • Purpose: Cost-benefit analysis is one of the most commonly used economic evaluation methods, which helps to inform the economic value of a program to decision makers. However, the selection of a correct benefit estimation method remains critical for accurate cost-benefit analysis. This paper compared benefit estimations among three different benefit estimation models. Methods: Data from community-based chronic hypertension management programs in a city in South Korea were used. Three different benefit estimation methods were compared. The first was a standard deterministic estimation model; second, a repeated-measures deterministic estimation model; and third, a transitional probability estimation model. Results: The estimated net benefit of the three different methods were $1,273.01, $-3,749.42, and $-5,122.55 respectively. Conclusion: The transitional probability estimation model showed the most correct and realistic benefit estimation, as it traced possible paths of changing status between time points and it accounted for both positive and negative benefits.

선박교통관리제도의 비용편익분석모델에 관한 연구(II) (A Study on the Cost Benefit Analysis Model of Vessel Traffic Services(II))

  • 정재용;박진수
    • 해양환경안전학회지
    • /
    • 제7권3호
    • /
    • pp.29-40
    • /
    • 2001
  • The introduction of coastal vessel traffic services enables vessels in coastal waters to navigate in safety or to get her position with ease and prevents the vessel from becoming cause of casualties. But it needs relatively huge amount of cost to construct and operate and maintain. Thus we must be checked with economical adequacy of the the proposed coastal vessel traffic services by comparing the cost of the construction, operation and maintenance with the expected benefit made by the expected decrease in marine casualties. In previous paper, a proper cost-benefit analysis model for the Korean practice will be suggested. In this Paper, the proposed the cost-benefit analysis model of coastal vessel traffic services was applied to the Koje coastal waters 20mi1es from the top of Maemul-Do and Yokchi-Do. As the result, we confirmed the propriety of the cost-benefit analysis with the application of the proposed model to Koje waters. Also, it is verified that the introduction of coastal vessel traffic services, as proposed, is adequate and economical. The cost-benefit analysis model proposed in this study could be used to investigate the economic Propriety of new aids to navigation and traffic safety facilities in the future.

  • PDF