DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cost Benefit Analysis on the Economic Effect of the Water Fluoridation Program in Some Area of Cheong-Ju City

청주시 일부지역의 수돗물불소화사업 비용-편익 분석

  • 정희웅 (고려대학교 보건대학원, 고려대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 안형식 (고려대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 박형근 (한국보건산업진흥원) ;
  • 문혁수 (서울대학교 치과대학 예방치학교실) ;
  • 조수헌 (서울대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 이희영 (고려대학교 보건대학원, 고려대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 윤석준 (고려대학교 보건대학원, 고려대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Published : 2003.03.01

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate economic effect of the water fluoridation program in Cheong-Ju City from 1982 to 2010. To study this economic effect, this study used cost-benefit analysis methodology from eight years old to fourteen years old in Cheong-Ju City. Major findings were as follows; First, total cost of fluoridation program in Cheong-Ju City was 1,384,164,734 korean won and total benefit was 15,057,426,621 Korean won from 1982 to 2010. Second, total cost which was converted by present value 2000 year was 1,687,412,718 won and total benefit which was converted by present value 2000 year was 14,582,548,519 Korean won. Cost-benefit ratio was 8.64. Net present value which happened from 1982 to 2000 was 7,990,710,155 Korean won and cost benefit ratio was 7.47. In conclusion, by the above result, economic impact of the water fluoridation program was very effective for children in some area of Cheong-Ju city.

Keywords

References

  1. 김광수. 불소와 구강건강. 서울, 건치, 1998
  2. 김종배, 백대일, 문혁수, 송연희, 박덕영. 도시관급수불화사업의 치아우식예방효과에 관한 2년간 추구조사연구, 대한구강보건학회지 1993; 17(2): 279-291
  3. 김종배, 백대일, 문혁수, 송연희, 박덕영. 청주시 관급수불화사업 효과에 관한 추구연구(IV). 대한구강보건학회지 1996; 20(2): 156-166
  4. 보건복지부. 2000 국민구강건강실태조사, 보건복지부 2001: 181
  5. 보건복지부. 구강보건업무편람. 2000: 112-169
  6. 서울특별시. 수돗물 불소화에 관한 공청회. 1998
  7. 송연희, 문혁수, 백대일, 김종배. 도시관급수불화사업의 우식예방효과에 관한 추구조사연구. 대한구강보건학회지 1992; 16(2): 452-473
  8. 신동근, 곽정민, 양승욱, 김용수, 권명호, 김의동, 한영철, 전동균, 박덕영, 이홍수, 이병욱. '98 구강보건현황 및 정책과제. 구강보건정책연구회, 1998
  9. 양봉민. 보건경제학. 서울, 나남출판, 1999: 403-427
  10. 이충섭, 성진효, 김동기. 진해지역 도시관급수불화사업효과에 관한 조사연구. 대한구강보건학회지 1996; 20(2): 271-290
  11. 조영수, 정상호, 김광수. 수돗물불소화사업기술. 서울, 건치, 1995
  12. Ast DB, Cons NC, Pollard ST, Garfinkel J. Time and cost factors to provide regular periodic dental care for children in a fluoridated and nonfluoridated area: final report. J Am Dent Assoc 1970; 80: 770-776 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1970.0102
  13. Attwood D, Blinkhorn AS. Reassessment of the effect of fluoridation on cost of dental treatment among Scottish schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989; 17: 79-82 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1989.tb00593.x
  14. Carr LM. Fluoridation in Canberra, Part I. Prefluoridation data: dental caries and mottled enamel. Aust Dent J 1966; 11: 248-57 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1966.tb03781.x
  15. Carr LM. Fluoridation in Canberra, Part II. Prefluoridation data: dental caries and mottled enamel. Aust Dent J 1972; 17: 335-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1972.tb04949.x
  16. Carr LM. Fluoridation in Canberra, Part III. Prefluoridation data: dental caries and mottled enamel. Aust Dent J 1976; 21: 440-4 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1976.tb05100.x
  17. Davies GN. Fluoride in the prevention of dental caries. A tentative cost-benefit analysis. Bri Dent J 1973; 7: 131-134
  18. Doessel DP. Cost-benefit analysis of water fluoridation In Townsville, Australia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1985; 13: 19-22 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1985.tb00412.x
  19. Dowell TB. The economics of fluoridation. Br Dent J 1976; 103-106
  20. Downer MC, Blinkhorn AS, Attwood D. Effect of fluoridation on the cost of dental treatment among urban Socttish schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1981; 9: 112-116 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1981.tb01040.x
  21. Elishauser, A. et al. "Health Care CBA/CEA: An update on the growth and composition of literature". Med Care 1993; 31(7): 1-11
  22. Enno A, Craig GG. Economics aspcets of the prolonged fluoride application method. Aust Dent J 1982; 27(2): 91-93 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1982.tb04055.x
  23. Kunzel W. The cost and economic consequences of water fluoridation. Caris Res 1974; 8(Suppl 1): 28-35 https://doi.org/10.1159/000260133
  24. Manau C, Cuenca E, Marinez-Carreero J, Salleras L. Economic evaluation of community programs for the prevention of dental caries in Catalonia, Spain. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1986; 14: 104-109 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1986.tb01507.x
  25. Niessen LC, Douglass Cw. Theoretical considerations in applying benefit-cost and cost-effectiveness analyses to preventive dental programs. J Public Health Dent 1984; 44(4): 156-168 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.1984.tb03077.x
  26. O'Mullane DM, Clarkson J, Holland T, O'Hickey S, Whelton H. Effectiveness of water fluoridation in the prevention of dental caries in Irish schoolchildren. Community Dent Health 1988; 5: 331-344
  27. Rugg-Gunn AJ, Carmichael CL, Ferrell RS. Effect of fluoridation and secular trend in caris in 5-year-old children living in Newcastle and Northumberland. Br Dent J 1988; 165: 359-364 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4806638
  28. White BA, Antczak-Bouckoms AA, Weinstein MC. Issues in the economic evaluation of community water fluoridation. J Dent Edu 1989; 53(11): 646-657
  29. Whittle JG, Downer MC. Dental health and treatment needs of Birmingham and Salford school children. Br Dent J 1979; 147: 67-71 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804282
  30. William N, J Michael S: Cost-benefit analysis of fluoridation in Houston, Texas. J Public Health Dent 1976; 36: 88-95 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.1976.tb02854.x