• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제18권11호
• /
• pp.347-354
• /
• 2020

이 연구의 목적은 W치과대학의 역량기반 치의학 교육과정 개편을 위한 역량모델을 개발하는데 있다. 이를 위해 이 연구방법은 역량모델 개발절차를 3단계로 진행하였다. 역량모델 준비 단계는 구성원의 인식조사를 분석하고, 개발단계는 역량수준 등을 개발하였다. 평가단계는 전문가에게 내용타당도를 검증받았다. 그 결과 내용타당도지수(CVI: content validity index)는 .91로 높은 CVI를 나타났으며, 대학차원의 공통역량인 4개의 핵심역량과 전공역량인 직무역량을 연계한 역량모델을 개발하였다. 이러한 절차를 걸쳐 개발된 W치과대학의 역량모델 개발 사례는 앞으로 역량모델 개발이 필요한 연구에 기초자료를 제공할 수 있으며, W치과대학의 역량 기반 교육과정 개편에도 반영할 예정이다.

• 중환자간호학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2016

Purpose: This study aimed to develop a nursing handoff protocol for intensive care units and test its relevance. Methods: This is a methodological research to develop a protocol. A preliminary protocol was developed by composing items and testing content validity through literature review and experts' review. We revised and complemented the preliminary protocol following practical relevance assessment of 38 intensive care unit nurses at a university hospital to test content validity and to assess practical relevance of the final protocol. Results: On the basis of the content validity test for the final protocol, 40 items were adopted. The scores for the practical relevance of the final protocol increased significantly for items such as accuracy of handoff, reduction of handoff-related errors, convenience in using the protocol, reduction in handoff time, and simplification of handoff. Conclusions: The nursing handoff protocol for intensive care units in this study is expected to improve nursing performance with a standardized handoff in intensive care units, promote patient safety, and improve communication among the medical staff.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.285-300
• /
• 2001

To meet standards for high quality of care and satisfied customers, an evaluation tool about nursing care is necessary. And, We need to evaluate our practice continuously for the improvement in quality and outcomes. This study was intended to develop an evaluation tool about nursing care in NSICU, and was progressed of 3 steps; development, content validity verification and reliability verification. Data were obtained and analysed from Feb. To April, 2000. Development process of the study was as follows A preliminary list was made item by item on the basis of clinical Experience, literature review and patients' record review. Then the standards, criteria and indicators of preliminary evaluation tool were set by 5 clinical nursing panel, and their content validity was reviewed by 27 ICU nurses. Finally, an evaluation tool was developed and verified the reliability at c-university hospital located in Kwang-Ju. The results of this was as follows 1) The evaluation tool of this study developed 8 standards, 39 criterias and 106 indicators. The standards were divided into two dimensions. One was process dimension which contained 4 standards(26 criteria), The other was outcome dimension which contained 4 standards(13 criteria). 2) the Average content validity of the tool was 3.39 at standards, 3.55 at criteria and 3.51 at indicators. 3) Interrater reliability of the tool is r=.7993(p<.001) & internal consistency reliability ${\alpha}$ is .6031 4) Scores of NSICU Patients who participated in this study were 57 at total mean score, 58 at process mean score and 56 at outcome mean score The evaluation tool developed in this study seems to be useful in evaluation nursing practice appropriately for the improvement of nursing care in NSICU. I hope that this evaluation tool can be used effectively in NSICU as an intervention for the improvement of quality control.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.37-44
• /
• 2021

이 연구는 대학생들의 인공지능 소양을 신장하기 위한 교육 콘텐츠의 설계와 개발에 관한 것이다. 우선 인공지능 교육 콘텐츠를 설계하고 교육 프로그램을 구성하였다. 콘텐츠는 8개의 인공지능 영역에서 총 15차시로 구성되었다. 콘텐츠는 지식-기능-태도의 내용을 함께 담고 있으며 학습단계는 5단계로 구성하였다. 콘텐츠의 개발은 온라인 자료의 형태로 구성하고 시뮬레이션과 워크시트를 포함하였다. 또한 교수학습방법을 제공하고 각 콘텐츠별로 평가 문항을 개발하였다. 콘텐츠의 적합성을 살펴보기 위해 전문가 대상으로 타당도 검사를 실시하였다. 설계 내용에 대한 내용타당도 검사 결과 전체 평균은 .71이상을 나타냈고, 개발된 콘텐츠의 수업 적합도의 CVI값은 .82로 타당성이 높게 나왔다. 본 연구에서 개발된 콘텐츠들이 대학 교양교육에서 인공지능 소양을 향상시키기 위한 효과적인 프로그램으로 활용될 것으로 기대된다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제45권3호
• /
• pp.412-419
• /
• 2015

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Person-centered Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT). Methods: The English P-CAT was translated into Korean with forward and backward translation. Survey data were collected from 458 staff in 17 long-term care facilities in Korea. Construct validity and criterion related validity were evaluated. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess reliability. Results: The Korean version of P-CAT was shown to be valid homogeneously by factor, item and content analysis. Internal consistency reliability was satisfactory in which the values of factor 1, factor 2 and the total scale were .84, .77 and .86 respectively. Exploratory factor analysis supported the construct validity with a two-factor solution. Factor loadings of the 13 items ranged in .34~.80. Criterion validity to the Person-centered Climate Questionnaire-staff (PCQ-S) was .74 (p<.001). Conclusion: The Korean version of the P-CAT was found to be an applicable instrument with satisfactory reliability and validity for further use in measuring successful person-centered care in long-term care facilities for older persons.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.473-485
• /
• 2001

This study is intended to develop a reliable and appropriate instrument of the clinical nursing education. This research consisted of 4 steps. First step is construction of the content validity by 1 Korean literature professor and 1 teaching professor in Ga Chon Gil College, the pilot study for the content validity by 14 professors and survey with four points Likert Scale, which includes from the point 'strongly valid' to the point of 'strongly non-valid', by 113 head nurses who guide and evaluate the students in clinical practice. The third step is the test of validity and reliability of the preliminary evaluation tool. The fourth step is the test of validity and reliability of the developmental evaluation tool. The data were collected from Sep. 10th, 2001 to Sep. 28th, 2001. This study was analyzed by SPSS PC+ for descriptive statistics, factor analysis and Cronbach's Co-efficient Alpha of the collected data. The results of these analysis are like as follows. 1. Evaluation tool of Clinical practice consists of 16 items including four categories : factor 1 was labeled 'desirable attitude'(5 items), factor 2 was labeled 'correctly judgement and nursing problem solving'(4 items), factor 3 was labeled 'adaptive ability of nursing knowledge and skill'(4 items), factor 4 was labeled 'desirable human relationship'(3 items) and these contributed 71.992% of the variance in the total score. 2. Cronbach's Co-efficient Alpha for internal consistency was .9128 for the total 16 items. For further research, it need to develop a variable and reliable instrument of the student self-evaluation and instrument that based on community.

• 대한공업교육학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.82-103
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study was to develop and present the accreditation criteria for engineering technology education programs in junior colleges. Research methods used in this study were review of related literature, experts discussion, and Delphi technique. Especially, Delphi technique was the major research method of this study. The Delphi surveys were taken for about seven weeks and three rounds at a higher level of expert participation. Major results of the study were as follows: 1. It proved that thirty six of total forty items had the content validity as the accreditation criteria of engineering technology education programs for junior colleges. CVR(Content Validity Ratio) of four items were below .33 and eliminated four items from the final accreditation criteria. 2. It proved that total Cronbach ${\alpha}$ was very high .9142 and reliability was very high all over items. It proved that six items made worse reliability, therefore it was desirable to exclude six items for increase of reliability. But the final accreditation criteria included six items, because they had a high validity as well as increasing rate of Cronbach ${\alpha}$ was very low with the exception of them. 3. Items of high importance were drawn out through analysis of importance. It proved that thirty of total forty items were more than 4.00 average in importance and ten items were less than average. 4. In conclusion, the final accreditation criteria were developed and presented through such analysis of validity, reliability and importance. The final accreditation criteria for engineering technology education programs in junior colleges were composed of seven domains of educational objectives, learning outcomes, curriculum, staff, facilities, institutional support, and student assessment.

• Nutrition Research and Practice
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.272-283
• /
• 2022

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Most child and adolescent food literacy measurement tools focus on nutrition and food safety. However, the importance of aspects related to the food system such as food distribution and food waste and their effects on environmental sustainability is growing. We therefore developed and validated a two-dimensional tool for children (8-12 years old) and adolescents (13-18 years old) that can comprehensively measure food literacy. The association of food literacy with diet quality and self-reported health was assessed. SUBJECTS/METHODS: First, we developed a food literacy conceptual framework that contains food system and literacy dimensions through a literature review, focus group interviews, and expert review. After a face validity study, we conducted the main survey (n = 200) to validate the questionnaire. Construct validity and reliability were assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: As a result of the Delphi study, content validity was confirmed for the remaining 30 items after two items were excluded (content validity ratio = 0.86). Eleven items were excluded from the EFA results, while the CFA results indicated appropriate fit indices for the proposed model (comparative fit index = 0.904, root mean square error of approximation = 0.068). The final food literacy questionnaire consisted of 19 questions and comprised 5 factors: production, distribution, selection, preparation and cooking, and intake. Food literacy was positively associated with diet quality, as assessed by the Nutrition Quotient score, in both children and adolescents and with self-reported health in adolescents.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.97-104
• /
• 2022

디지털 대전환 시대를 본격적으로 맞이하게 되면서 SW, AI, 빅데이터 등을 바탕으로 한 융합적인 사고력의 중요성이 높아져 가고 있다. 이러한 사회적 요구에 발맞추어 본 연구에서는 생명과학 분야의 멘델의 유전 원리를 몬테카를로 시뮬레이션 기법을 활용한 5차시 분량의 SW융합교육 프로그램을 개발하였다. 스크래치를 활용한 몬테카를로 시뮬레이션 기법으로 멘델의 유전 원리를 프로그래밍하여 구현해 봄으로써 융합적인 사고력 뿐만 아니라 관련 지식을 심화적으로 이해할 수 있도록 프로그램을 구성하였다. 개발한 교육 프로그램의 타당성을 검증 받기 위해 관련 영역의 전문가 11인을 대상으로 타당도 검정을 의뢰하였으며, Lawshe가 제시한 CVR 기준값인 0.59를 충족하여 타당성을 검증받았다.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.121-128
• /
• 2022

교육부에서 2021년 9월에 발표한 2022 개정 교육과정 총론 연구 결과에서는 기후·환경 교육이 소프트웨어 교육과 더불어 전면에 등장하는 등 환경 문제가 사회적으로 중요한 화두로 떠오르고 있다. 본 연구에서는 파이썬 몬테카를로 시뮬레이션을 적용하여 2022 개정 교육과정에서 강조하고 있는 환경교육과 소프트웨어교육을 융합한 고등학생 대상 프로그램을 개발하였다. 개발한 프로그램은 과학·환경·정보 교과 교육 전문가를 대상으로 프로그램의 타당성을 Lawshe의 내용타당도 비율(Content Validity Ratio: CVR)로 검증하였고, 검증 결과 프로그램은 개발 취지와 환경 및 정보 교과 성취기준에 적합한 것으로 나타났다.