• 지역사회간호학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.11-20
• /
• 2018

Purpose: To test the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Person-centered Climate Questionnaire-staff version (KPCQ-S) in long-term care institutions. Methods: A total of 297 staff in long-term care institutions including nine nursing homes (NHs) and 4 long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) were included. The KPCQ-S was developed following the WHO guidelines of the process of translation and adaptation of instruments. An internal consistency using Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ was tested for reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to examine the construct validity. Convergent and discriminant validity were examined using Pearson correlation. Results: EFA demonstrated the construct validity of the 14-item KPCQ-S with three-factor solutions, specifically three factors (safety, everydayness, and community) in NHs and four factors (safety, everydayness, community, and comprehensibility) in LTCHs. Convergent validity was found in the correlation with the work satisfaction (r=.55). The KPCQ-S showed satisfactory internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's ${\alpha}=.91$). Conclusion: The KPCQ-S is found to be a reliable and valid tool for measuring staff perceptions of the person centeredness of long-term care environments.

• Human Ecology Research
• /
• 제53권2호
• /
• pp.169-177
• /
• 2015

The PRQ instrument is parental perspectives of the parent-child relationship. It measured parent-child dimensions that include attachment and involvement. Also, it provides additional information on parenting style, parenting stress and satisfaction with the child's school. This study tested reliability and validity of the Korean version of Parenting Relationship Questionnaire-Child (K-PRQ-C). The K-PRQ-C was administered to parents of 713 elementary school children including 362 boys and 351 girls. They were from 1st to 6th grade children who were recruited form 4 elementary schools in Korea. Reliability was tested through internal consistency. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis. Moreover, scale inter-correlation was conducted for validity test. Discriminant validity conducted through administration to the parents of clinical children with emotional and behavior disorders. Construct validity was also examined through Korean version of the Parenting Sense of Competence. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the similar factor structures exist for PRQ-C and K-PRQ-C. The results showed a high level of internal consistency as well as construct and discriminant validity. These results showed valid psychometric properties for the K-PRQ-C. The K-PRQ-C provides a reliable and valid means of gathering information about the parent-child relationship. We discussed Implications for the use of the K-PRQ-C as a clinical tool and as a research instrument.

• 한국영재학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국영재학회 2003년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.109-126
• /
• 2003

본 연구는 학동기 시각예술영재성의 구성요인으로서 동기요인을 측정하는데 사용할 수 있는 검사도구를 개발하는데 목적이 있다. 연구는 문헌연구를 통해 시각예술영재성의 특성을 추출하여 유목화한 후 측정변인으로 규정하였으며, 각각의 측정변인별로 문항을 개발하여 예비검사 과정을 통하여 최종적으로 27문항으로 구성된 검사도구를 제작하였다. 무작위로 표집된 초등학교 1학년에서 6학년 679명을 연구대상으로 본 검사를 실시하였다. 검사도구의 신뢰도와 타당도를 경험적으로 검증한 결과 .93의 높은 신뢰도를 확보하였다. 한편 초등교육학 전문가, 영재교육 전문가, 시각예술전문가, 교육통계전문가 4인의 내용 타당도를 확보하였으며, 주성분 요인 추출방법으로 요인을 추출하여 Varimax방법으로 직각회전을 한 구인타탕도 검증에서는 흥미/태도/취미 요인, 인내/열중 요인, 호기심/상상력/민감성 요인, 심미적 요인이 추출되었다. 공인타당도면에서는 Barren-Welsh 검사와의 상관에서 .76의 상관을 나타냄으로써 공인타당도가 검증되었다. 따라서 본 연구에서 개발한 학동기 시각예술영재성 동기요인 검사도구는 신뢰도와 타당도가 양호하게 검증되었다고 볼 수 있다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.290-302
• /
• 2015

본 연구의 목적은 대학생들을 대상으로 수정된 스트레스 평가 도구(Revised Stress Appraisal Measure, RSAM)를 우리나라 실정에 맞게 번역하고, 타당도와 신뢰도를 검증하는 것이다. IBM SPSS Statistics 21과 AMOS 21 program을 이용하여 내적 일관성 신뢰도, 구성타당도, 준거타당도 검사를 하였다. 자료 수집은 G시와 C 지역 소재의 5개 대학교에 재학 중인 296명의 대학교 4학년 학생을 임의로 표출하였다. 한국어판 RSAM은 5개 요인으로 분류되었으며, 전체 변량은 68.4%를 설명하였다. 5개의 하위요인은 확증적 요인분석에 의해 타당성이 입증되었다(p<.001, Goodness of Fit Index, Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index, Normed Fit Index, Comparative Fit Index >.08, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=.056). 준거타당도에서, 척도의 점수는 한국어판 Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)와 유의한 상관관계가 있었다. 신뢰도 계수는 .73에서 .89까지였다. 한국어판 RSAM 은 구성타당도와 준거타당도, 그리고 내적 일관성 신뢰도에서 만족할 만한 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 본 도구는 한국 대학생들의 스트레스 평가를 측정하는데 적합한 도구가 될 수 있을 것이다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제51권5호
• /
• pp.617-629
• /
• 2021

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the self-efficacy for managing chronic disease 6-item scale (SECD-6-K). Methods: The English version of the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-item Scale first underwent forward and backward translation procedures. The SECD-6-K was then used to collect data from 350 adults diagnosed with chronic diseases. Content, construct, convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity were all evaluated. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α. SPSS 25.0 and the data were analyzed using AMOS 26.0 software. Results: The SECD-6-K consists of six items in two domains: disease management and health behavior. The results for construct, convergent, and discriminant validity were good. Exploratory factor analysis produced eigen values between 2.27 and 3.28, with factors total explained cumulative variance of 91.1%. Confirmatory factor analysis supported goodness of fit and reliability for the modified SECD-6-K model. The criterion validity also showed significant correlation with both the Patient Health Questionnaire and 12-item Short-Form Health Survey version 2. Finally, reliability was found to be excellent. Conclusion: This study identified the high reliability and validity of SECD-6-K. The SECD-6-K is an appropriate tool for determining Korean patients' self-efficacy in managing their chronic conditions. Therefore, this scale may be used in clinical settings as well as in educational and research settings.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제19권8호
• /
• pp.293-302
• /
• 2019

이 연구의 목적은 Stroke Impact Scale 3.0(SIS 3.0)의 신뢰도와 타당도를 조사하는 것이었다. 연구에서 SIS 3.0은 125명의 뇌졸중 환자를 대상으로 측정하였다(평균 = 62.7, 표준 편차 = 9.43). SIS 3.0 하위 영역들 간에 상관 분석을 통해 구성타당도를 확인하였고, MBI(Modified Barthel Index)와 K-MMSE(Mini-Mental State Examination-Korean)간의 상관을 분석하여 수렴타당도를 조사하였다. 각 항목의 특성은 고전적 문항 이론을 바탕으로 내적 합치도와 문항 변별도를 분석하였다. 이 연구를 통해 SIS 3.0의 구성타당도와 수렴타당도가 확인되었다. 감정 영역에 포함된 i 항목은 문항 변별도가 낮았지만 이 항목을 제외하고는 모두 변별도가 높았다. 하위 영역의 문항내적합치도는 0.858~0.941로 나타났다. 이 연구는 지역사회에 거주하는 뇌졸중 환자를 대상으로 임상 현장에서 SIS 3.0 사용을 위한 신뢰도와 타당도를 확인하였다는데 그 의의가 있다.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제57권3호
• /
• pp.279-287
• /
• 2024

Objectives: This study validated the Vietnamese version of the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale (DARS) for use in vulnerable communities in Vietnam. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study involving 595 adults from 2 identified communities. The original DARS assessment tool was translated, and the validity and reliability of the Vietnamese version of DARS (V-DARS) were assessed. The internal consistency of the overall scale and its subscales was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega reliability coefficients. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to evaluate its construct validity, building upon the factor structure identified in exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Construct validity was assessed based on convergent and discriminant validity. Results: Following the established criteria for EFA, 8 items were removed, resulting in a refined V-DARS structure comprising 35 items distributed across 5 distinct factors. Both alpha and omega reliability coefficients indicated strong internal consistency for the overall scale (α=0.963, ω=0.963) and for each of the 5 sub-scales (all>0.80). The CFA model also retained the 5-factor structure with 35 items. The model fit indices showed acceptable values (RMSEA: 0.072; CFI: 0.912; TLI: 0.904; chi-square test: <0.01). Additionally, the convergent and discriminant validity of the V-DARS were deemed appropriate and satisfactory for explaining the measurement structure. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the V-DARS is a valid and reliable scale for use within vulnerable communities in Vietnam to assess adaptive responses to natural disasters. It may also be considered for use in other populations.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제10권1호통권19호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 1992

The purpose of this study was to validate the Elementary HOME(Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment) with korean elementary children. Subjects were 536 mothers 1st-5th graders in the elementary schools in the Seoul. Pearson's r, pearcentage(%), phi($\phi$/), Cronbach's $\alpha$/ ware conducted for the statistical analysis. The major findings were as follows. 1) The item pass rate(percentage) were ranged 16~98. 2) The discriminant coefficients($\phi$/) of the item were ranged 0.06~0.58. 3) The reliability coefficients of the scale were that the split-falf was 0.84, and Cronbach's $\alpha$/ was 0.88. Considering the length of the scale, these reliability estimates appear to be at an acceptable level 4) The factor analysis and the correlations between HOME and SES indices and children's school schievement to test construct validity were conducted to test construct validity. Eight factors were extracted from the factor analysis and coefficients(r) were ranged 0.16~0.45 and -0.08~0.37.

• 한국생활과학회지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2005

This study has a purpose of developing a scale to evaluate maternal beliefs on preschool children's education. The subjects were 307 mothers of preschool children in Gwang-ju. The methods for data analyses included a factor analysis for construct validity, Pearson correlations between beliefs and learning-related activities for construct validity, and Cronbach's a for reliability. 4 factors were found, through literature review, in parental beliefs: passive learning, active learning, instruction, and expectation for academic-related skills acquisition. Factor analysis revealed that the 4-factor solution is the best fit. Correlations between beliefs and learning-related activities were statistically significant. Cronbach's a ranged from .65 to .87 for 4 sub-scales. It was concluded that the maternal beliefs scale is acceptable for use.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.141-157
• /
• 1997

The structure and dimensionality of the User Information Satisfaction (UIS) construct is an important theoretical issue that received considerable attentions. The acceptance of UIS as a standardized instrument requires confirmation that it explains and measures the user information satisfaction construct and its component. Based on a simple of 670 respondents who participated in dealing with the Public Management Information System (PMIS), this research used a confirmatory factor analysis to test the alternavtive models of underlying factor structure and assessed the reliability and validity of these factors and items in the PMIS. The result provided a support for a revised UIS model with four first-order factors and one PMIS The result provided a support for a revised UIS model with four first-order factors and one second-order (higher-order) factor in PMIS. To cross-validata these results, the author reexamined two prior data sets. The results showed that the revised model provides better model-data fit in all three data sets.