• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 9th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.18-24
• /
• 2022

State highway agencies (SHAs) typically apply a competitive procurement procedure to select contractors for their design-bid-build projects. Since the level of competition affects construction bid prices and project outcomes, the Federal Highway Agency (FHWA) suggests SHAs seek ways to improve competition among contractors continuously. However, they rarely conduct an empirical assessment of the current competition level necessary to identify room for improvement. Besides the number of bidders on a project, other factors such as winning or losing rates among the contractors in previous projects can also indicate the degree of competition; only a few contractors may have won the majority of the projects in a specific region. However, few studies have investigated such factors. This paper proposes a network analysis-based approach to evaluating contractor competition levels of highway projects using historical bid tabulation data. The proposed method provides insights into overall competition levels, the determination of competitive contractors, and winning rate distribution among contractors.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.25-47
• /
• 2005

This study wishes to analyze that affect in purchasing decision in Telecommunication operation company's international competitive bidding. When submit a tender laying stress on international competitive bidding of the Telecommunication operation companies among specially various international competitive bidding, I wish to investigate game theory enemy by bid method through access method about bid form affecting in buyer's purchasing decision.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.52-60
• /
• 2018

우리나라의 공공건설공사는 입찰을 통해 공사를 발주하고 있으나 하지만 입찰의 특성상 참여자들간의 담합이 발생할 수 있다. 이에 따른 입찰담합은 발주자에게 손해를 가하는바, 이를 배상할 수 있도록 적절한 가상경쟁가격을 산정해야 한다. 이와 관련하여 계량경제학적 방법이 일반적으로 활용되고 있으나 건설공사, 특히 설계 시공일괄입찰의 특성상 여러 한계와 쟁점이 발생할 수밖에 없다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 설계 시공일괄입찰에서 합리적인 가상경쟁가격을 추정할 수 있는 방안을 제안한다. 이는 입찰 참가자가 제출한 설계도서로부터 한계비용을 도출하고, 입찰 참가자의 기술 수준과 경쟁업체의 기술 수준 및 입찰 형태에 따라 입찰율에 따른 요인을 검토하여 가상경쟁가격을 추정하는 방법이다. 본 연구에서 제안한 방법을 토대로 설계 시공일괄입찰 낙찰자 결정 방식의 특성이 반영된 합리적인 가격이 도출될 수 있으며, 답함에 따른 손해액 산정뿐만 아니라 실제 입찰 과정에서의 참고자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이라 판단된다.

• 대한전기학회논문지:전력기술부문A
• /
• 제52권10호
• /
• pp.610-615
• /
• 2003

With the growing competitive pressure from market participants, utilities, consumer and government, analyses of existing competitive electricity market become more important. The presence of congestion in the transmission system can significantly increase the potential of exercising market power. Since the congestion in the network depends on the several factors, the market power cannot be simply analyzed through the existing indices. This paper presents a systematic analysis on local market power under uniform pricing scheme and provides determining approach of the level of price cap as mitigation measure of the strategic market power.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.49-56
• /
• 2011

Competitive bidding in construction is concerned with contractors making strategic decisions in respect of determination of bid price if contractors opt to bid. This study presents a strategy model for deciding optimum tender price with reflecting appropriate profit in competitive bidding using Bayesian regression analysis (BRA). The purpose of the developed model is to help contractors to secure suitable profitability by predicting the actual profit based on key variables. They may affect construction cost at bidding phase, ultimately which help contractors to secure high quality output. The model was tested empirically by application to a bidding dataset collected from a large South Korea contractor. BRA allows contractors to estimate more accurate actual profit by reflecting not only objective information but also subjective experiences and judgments. Consequently, the model can contribute to improvement of decision-making process for setting an optimum tender price.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.89-102
• /
• 1994

This paper is to survey the major results of the game-theoretic models and recent research directions of the literature on auctions and competitive biddings. This paper classifies the auctions and competitive biddings into the following four major types:(i) English auction, (ii) Dutch auction, (iii) the first-price sealed-bid auction, (iv) the second-price sealed-bid auction. In order to survey the major ideas related to auctions and competitive biddings, we use two representative theoretical models developed under the game-theoretic framework : (i) the independent private value model are summarized as follows ; (1) The Dutch auction and the first-price auction are strategically equivalent, and so are the English auction and the second-price auction. (2) At the symmetric equilibria, the expected selling price is the same for all four types of auction. Meanwhile, the major results of the general model are as follows ; (1) When bidders are uncertain about their value extimate, the English and second-price auctions are not equivalent, but the dutch and the first-price auctions are still strategically equivalent. (2) The English auction generates the higher expected prices than the second-price auction. Also, when bidders are risk-neutral, the second-price auction generated higher average prices than the Dutch and the first-price auctions.

• 대한전기학회논문지:전력기술부문A
• /
• 제52권6호
• /
• pp.333-339
• /
• 2003

Competition among electric generation companies is a major goal of restructuring in the electricity industry. In electricity market, a huge volume of commodities will be traded through competitive bidding. The choice between uniform and pay-as-bid pricing for electricity auction has been one of most important issues in deregulated electricity market. This paper proposes a constrained Bertrand model for analyzing the electricity auction market of price competition model. The issue of the two pricing rules of uniform and pay-as-bid is studied from the viewpoint of consumer's benefit. This paper also shows that transmission congestion depends on the pricing mechanism. Pay-as-bid pricing gives less possibility of transmission congestion by price competition, and less burden to consumers in the simulation results.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제38권5호
• /
• pp.741-749
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 건설공사 입찰담합으로 인한 손해액 산정에 대하여 합리적이고 과학적인 산정모델을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 입찰담합 손해액 산정에 대한 선행 연구 및 판결 사례 등을 검토한 결과, 대표적인 문제점으로 낙찰자 결정기준 등의 특성에 대한 충분한 고려가 부족하고 부적정한 비교표준시장의 선택, 가상경쟁가격 영향 인자의 적정성 검토 부족 및 산정모델에 대한 검증의 결여 등이 나타났다. 이러한 문제점을 개선하기 위하여 대안입찰공사를 대상으로 한 손해액 산정모델을 제시하였다. 산정모델은 첫째, 낙찰자 결정기준 등에 부합하는 표준시장을 선정하고 둘째, 가상경쟁가격의 영향 인자에 대한 상관관계를 분석 적합인자를 선택하였으며 셋째, 선택 인자의 회귀분석을 활용하여 모델을 도출하였다. 마지막으로, 제시한 모델에 대한 적합성, 유의성 및 정규성 등의 검증과 실제 담합 사례를 적용하여 실증하였다. 본 연구에서 제시한 산정모델을 통하여 소송 당사자 일방에게 부당한 손해액 부담의 문제점을 해소하고 분쟁을 조기에 해결하게 하여 관계자 모두의 기회손실 등을 방지하는데 기초가 되고자 한다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.41-53
• /
• 2017

Recently, due to the economic recession and increase of ITO (IT Outsourcing), bidding in software industry has been recognized as more competitive and the importance of software bid evaluation for corporate selection is being increased. This study aims to analyze and prioritize influential factors in the software bid evaluation criteria which is adopted as the main evaluation model of national software businesses by Ministry of Science. The priority was developed by AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) through pair-wise comparison. For the analysis, this study developed analysis model for AHP and conducted survey of experts who have work experience for more than 10 years in the IT industry. As the result of analysis, weighted factors in the evaluation criteria were deduced and differences of priority factors between purchaser and bidder were investigated. The analysis showed differences of view point in the bidding process. With these results, this study suggests how to write a proposal strategically and effectively in perspective of the purchaser. It is expected that priority factors will be adopted in strategic proposals in both bidder and purchaser. For purchaser, the priority will be adopted to select reliable bidder. So, we expect that the priority factors will be used to get more values for both bidder and purchaser in their business atmosphere.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 5th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.479-487
• /
• 2013

State Highway Agencies (SHAs) have started utilizing cost-plus-time bidding (A+B bidding) since Federal Highway Agency (FHWA) declared it operational on May 4, 1995. Although this technique has successfully accelerated many projects by incorporating construction time in the bidding competition, a framework to illustrate the interactions of incentive/disincentive (I/D) rates on the competitiveness of contractors participating in the bid competition is yet to be developed. In a previous research, authors indicated that for each bid competition there is an efficient cap for I/D rates which are dictated by the capabilities of contractors in project acceleration. However, the results of previous study were based on the assumption that there is a statistically significant relationship between cost and time. In this study, the entire cost-plus-time projects implemented by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) were investigated. Then the significance of relationship between cost and time were analyzed for each contractor utilizing Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) technique, and the price-time function of each contractor was determined by regression analysis. The results of the analysis indicate that there is a significant relationship between cost and time for the majority of contractors. However, a quadratic relationship is not always significant and for some contractors a linear price-time relationship is significant. The results of this project can be used not only by ODOT to optimize the incentive/disincentive rates but also by contractors to determine the most competitive strategies of other bid participants.