• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.19-47
• /
• 2015

International arbitration is an increasingly popular means of alternative dispute resolution for cross-border commercial transactions. The primary advantage of international arbitration over court litigation is enforceability. An international arbitration award is enforceable in most countries in the world. Especially, statistics indicate of ASEAN such as Malaysia and Singapore that the vast majority of defeated companies comply with the terms of international arbitral awards against them or settle soon after the award is rendered. Unlike Malaysia and Singapore, in Indonesia, there are several grounds for refusal of enforcement of an award including where both the nature of the dispute and the agreement to arbitrate do not meet the requirements set out in the Arbitration Law. Because Indonesia does not acknowledge decisions of foreign courts, theoretically they could enforce an international arbitral award which was set aside by the court in the seat of arbitration. This paper introduces the legal system and cases of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in ASEAN, especially Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia. Secondly, by comparing their law and cases, the paper emphasized the international suitability and global fitness in involved in recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.53-76
• /
• 2017

Korean businesses, and their legal representatives, have observed the improvements of enforcement of commercial judgments through arbitration over traditional collections litigation in U.S. Courts-due to quicker proceedings, exceptional cost savings and more predictable outcomes-in attaching assets within U.S. jurisdictions. But how are the 2016 interim measures implemented by the Arbitration Act of Korea utilized to avoid jurisdictional and procedure pitfalls of enforcement proceedings in the Federal Courts of the United States? Authors examine the necessary prerequisites of the U.S. Federal Arbitration Act as adopted through the New York Convention, to which Korea and the U.S. are signatories, as distinguished from the Panama Convention. Five common U.S. arbitration institutions address U.S. "domestic" disputes, preempting U.S. state law arbitrations, while this article focuses on U.S. enforcement of "international" arbitration awards. Seeking U.S. recognition and enforcement of Korean arbitral awards necessitates avoiding common defenses involving due process, public policy or documentary formality challenges. Provisional and conservatory injunctive relief measures are explored. A variety of U.S. cases involving Korean litigants are examined to illustrate the legal challenges involving non?domestic arbitral awards, foreign arbitral awards and injunctive relief. Suggestions aimed toward further research are focused on typical Korean business needs such as motions to confirm foreign arbitration awards, enforce such awards or motions to compel arbitration.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.3-35
• /
• 2023

The Korean government has enacted the Arbitration Industry Promotion Act, which aims to foster the arbitration system as an industry, strengthen national competitiveness, and systematically provide government support so that the arbitration industry can become a future growth engine, and has been in effect since June 28, 2017. In accordance with Article 3 of the Arbitration Industry Promotion Act, the Minister of Justice must establish and implement the Basic Plan for the Promotion of the arbitration industry every five years to promote the arbitration industry. Accordingly, the Ministry of Justice established the "Basic Plan for the Promotion of the Arbitration Industry" (2019-2023) at the end of 2018, which has been in effect since January 1, 2019. This study first reviews and evaluates the domestic arbitration sector performance of the first basic plan, then reviews and evaluates the international arbitration sector performance of the first basic plan, and finally suggests what tasks to focus on when establishing the second basic plan for Promotion of Arbitration Industry.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.245-258
• /
• 2010

South and North Korean fisheries cooperation has not been attained since 1950's political situation, and the major fishery resources of Korean peninsula also has not been cooperatively managed by South and North Korea. Furthermore, the species inhabiting the Korean peninsula region with commercial value are usually maintaining the single ecosystem which requires for cooperative management of fishery resources for continuous fishery. Therefore, in order for South and Korean fishery industry to develop the political situation to a rational direction, present condition of North's fishery industry must be accurately understood and acknowledge in its point of issues, also as level to prepare for future unification, reform and reaction of long-termed and well organized South and North's fisheries program must be arranged.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제17권5호
• /
• pp.163-178
• /
• 2017

최근 드론(drone)의 활용영역이 군사 및 보안 분야에서 뿐만 아니라 상업, 스포츠 등 일상생활 영역으로 확대되고 있으며, 민간경비업무에 드론을 활용하는 문제에 대해서도 관심이 커지고 있다. 본 연구는 민간경비(private security)에서의 드론의 활용유형과 경비업법과 항공안전법 등 관련 법규에서의 드론 관련 규정, 그리고 경비업법 수용시의 주요 쟁점을 검토하는데 논의에 초점이 있다. 첫째, 경비업법이 정하는 민간경비의 업무범위를 중심으로 드론의 활용유형을 감시업무, 정보수집업무, 안내 및 경고업무, 대피유도업무, 수색 및 관련 물자수송업무, 드론의 위협에 대한 대응업무 등으로 구분하였다. 둘째, 민간경비업무에서의 드론활용을 위한 관련 법규로는 경비업법과 항공안전법이 있는데, 이중 경비업법은 현재 드론에 관련한 내용을 규정하고 있지 않으며, 항공안전법에 의해 드론의 활용이 규제되고 있다. 셋째, 경비업법에 경비원의 자격과 권한범위를 조정하여야 하고, 드론을 경비장비의 한 유형으로 수용하여야 하며, 드론을 이용한 위협형태에 대한 대응책을 경비업법에서 어떻게 수용하여야 하는가에 대한 고민이 이루어져야 한다.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.167-175
• /
• 2011

This study analyzed the ways of expressing materials to create visual perception spaces in "commercial spaces". The result is as follows. First, it has been discovered that expressing materials in commercial spaces plays an important role in creating various visual perception spaces as well as discriminative spaces, in commercial spaces. Hence, it will be necessary to make a multilateral study on how you can express materials to create visual perception spaces. Second, by referring to earlier studies, four types of space have been deduced as visual perception spaces. These are: "expansion", "central", "borderline" and "decoration" spaces. Third, by considering the space types and characteristics as well as the expressing materials, the criteria for the ways of expressing materials to create visual perception spaces in commercial spaces. Finally, looking at these expression methods, images of "expansion" spaces have most commonly been expressed indistinctly by using the materials and patterns. The profound images of "central" spaces were displayed using the materials and their symbolic images have been shown using the materials and colors. In the "borderline" spaces, the areas have been distinctly segmented or expressed in limited spaces by using the materials and colors. Visual designs were displayed in the "decoration" spaces by using materials from other space fields. All these phenomena have demonstrated that various new materials are being used to create various distinctive designs in commercial spaces. The result of this study shall act as basic reference materials in devising visual designs needed in creating various visual perception spaces.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.67-86
• /
• 2014

상사중재는 문제를 해결하고 사업 파트너간 분쟁에 대한 해결책을 찾는 신속하고 효과적인 방법이다. 상사중재 발전을 위해 이론 뿐 만 아니라 실무차원에서 중재연구의 접근이 필요하다. 본 논문은 파키스탄 국내 중재법과 파키스탄에서 적용되는 국제상사중재제도에 대한 상황과 접근방법 등을 제시하였다. 파키스탄에서 새롭게 정비된 2009년 중재법은 국내중재, 국제상사중재, 외국 중재판정의 집행뿐 만 아니라 국제투자분쟁의 해결에 관한 법률을 통합하는 것을 목표로 한다. 더 나아가 2011년에 파키스탄 투자자의 신뢰를 회복하기 위해 외국인 투자자를 보호할 수 있는 법을 도입하기도 하였다. 본 논문은 파키스탄의 중재법의 과거부터 현재까지 진전된 관계를 설명하고 새로운 법령에 의해 적용된 변경사항을 설명하고 중재계약 및 판정을 다루는 파키스탄 중재 법률, 규칙 및 절차를 실무차원에서 포괄적으로 제시하였다. 잠재시장인 파키스탄관련 통상정보가 부재한 상황에서 한국무역학자들에게 파키스탄 상사중재제도에 관한 실무적 이해를 돕기 위하여 작성되었다.

• 한국지역지리학회지
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.159-171
• /
• 1996

본 연구는 심각해지는 토지문제를 해결하기 위해 최근에 시행되고 있는 여러가지 토지제도들이 효과적으로 운용되도록 지가를 정확히 산정하고자 하는 움직임에 대한 기초 연구로서, 다른 토지이용에 비해 월등 높은 지가를 보이고 중은 범위에서도 그 변동폭이 큰 상업지를 택하여, 상업지지가의 지역적 차이가 왜 발생하는지 알아보고자 하였다. $1989{\sim}1996$ 동안의 상업지역의 확산은 시 외곽에 빠르게 조성되고 있는 고밀도 아파트 단지를 배후지로 하여 주요 간선도로변을 따라 활발하게 이루어지고 있는 반면, 도심부는 영세한 부지규모 및 노후화한 건물들로 말미암아 급변하고 있는 상업환경의 변화에 능동적으로 대응하지 못하므로서 지가하락 현상을 보이고 있다. 상업지지가와 관련이 있으리라고 예상되는 6개 변수를 이용하여 중다희귀분석을 적용한 결과 보행자 통행량과 도심으로부터의 거리 등 두 변수가 상업지지가 변화량의 65% 정도를 설명해 주었다. 설명되지 않은 35%의 해명을 위해 잔차분석을 행한 결과 도심부의 과소예측, 시 외곽의 과대 예측을 읽을 수 있었는데 이는 광주시의 단핵구조적 특성의 반영일 뿐만 아니라 이 모델이 갖고 있는 한계이다.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.75-101
• /
• 2012

As the Reublic of Korea revised the Commercial Code including 40 articles of air transport enacted newly on May 23, 2011, so Korea became first legislative examples in the Commercial Code of the developed and developing countries. I would like to explain briefly the main contents of my paper such as (1) history of enacting newly Part VI (air transport) in the Korea's revised commercial law, (2) legal background enacting newly Part VI (air transport) in the Korea's revised commercial law and the problems on the conditions of air transport, (3) every countries' legislative examples on the civil liability of aircraft's operator, (4) unlawful Interference Convention and general risk convention of 2009, (5) main contents and prospects of the revised Commercial Code for the liability of aircraft's operator etc as the followings. Meanwhile as the Aviation Act, Commercial Code and Civil Code in Korea and Japan did not regulated at all the legal basis of solution on the disputes between victims and offender for the amount of compensation for damage due to personal or property damage caused by aircraft accidents in Korea and Japan, so it has been raised many legal problems such as protection of victims, standard of decision in trial in the event of aircraft accident's lawsuit case. But the Korean Revised Commercial Code including Part VI, air transport regulations was passed by the majority resolution of the Korean National Assembly on April 29, 2011 and then the South Korean government proclaimed it on May 23 same year. The Revised Commercial Code enforced into tothe territory of the South Korea from November 24, 2011 after six month of the proclaimed date by the Korean Government. Thus, though Korean Commercial Code regulated concretely and respectively the legal relations on the liability of compensation for damage in the contract of transport by land in it's Part II (commercial activities) and in the contract of transport by sea in its Part V (marine commerce), but the Amended Commercial Act regulated newly 40 articles in it's Part VI (air transport) relating to the air carrier's contract liability on the compensation for damage caused by aircraft accidents in the air passengers and goods transport and aircraft operator's tort liability on compensation for damage caused by the sudden falling or collision of aircraft to third parties on the surface and so it was equipped with reasonable and unified system among the transport by land, marine and air. The ICAO adopted two new air law conventions setting out international compensation and liability rules for damage caused by aircraft to third parties at a diplomatic conference hosted by it from April 20 to May 2, 2009. The fight against the effects of terrorism and the improvement of the status of victims in the event of damage to third parties that may result either from acts of unlawful interference involving aircraft or caused by ordinary operation of aircraft, forms the cornerstone of the two conventions. One legal instrument adopted by the Conference is "the Convention on Compensation for Damage to Third Parties, Resulting from Acts of Unlawful Interference Involving Aircraft" (Unlawful Interference Convention). The other instrument, "the Convention on Compensation for Damage Caused by Aircraft to Third Parties" (General Risk Convention), modernizes the current legal framework provided for under the 1952 Rome Convention and related Protocol of 1978. It is desirable for us to ratify quickly the abovementioned two conventions such as Unlawful Interference Convention and General Risk Convention in order to settle reasonably and justly as well as the protection of the South Korean peoples.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.3-19
• /
• 2020

With the advent of the Free Trade Agreement between Korea and the U.S. and an increase in trade volume between the two countries, the possibility of commercial disputes has escalated among international merchants. It has been well-known that arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution is an efficient way to resolve international commercial disputes. When arbitral awards are enforced in the judicial system, the court will inevitably have to be involved with the enforcement procedures. The court is a typical legal entity to confirm arbitral awards. Through a confirmation process, the winning party obtains the same legal status of final judgment rendered by the court. However, a winning party in arbitration will have to overcome a legal hurdle in the enforcement process of arbitral awards. This article aims to investigate how the courts control the arbitration practices and what the basic legal issues in the enforcement of arbitral awards are. The US Federal Arbitration Act is investigated, while relevant cases are reviewed and updated for legal analysis.