• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제11권
• /
• pp.77-116
• /
• 1984

Korean university libraries are increasing their library collection each year according to the standard set by the Ministry of Education. The standard states that all the university libraries are required to keep 3 books for newly enrolling students, 30 books for each enrolled student and 5, 000 books for each department. The increasing number of the university library collection brings many problems in the libraries. 1. The size of the library collection is not related to the satisfaction of the library user's requests. The satisfaction is usually related to number of the new publications received in the library. Z. The Korean publication is limited to a small number. It could not meet the university standard. Therefore, the number is filled with the foreign publications. But the use of them is not frequent. Even the number of the domestic and foreign new publications together could not meet all the requests of the university library users. Only cooperation with other libraries will be able to meet most of the diversified requests. 3. Most of the present library collection are not likely to be used in the future and they should be eventually discarded. Present library administration put too much emphasis on the size of library collection and only the aquisition of the material is main concern of the university librarians. They need to consider other factors in the aquistion of the library collection. They should make their collection development in accordance with user's requests in addition to meet the university standard.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제22권
• /
• pp.109-141
• /
• 1992

University library must have a substantial collection development policy, by which the short and long term plannings are set up to meet the goals of university education and to support university function. Only when university library organizes collection building based on the well-planned policy, can it establish the systematic collection building, which can satisfy users, support continuity of work, use budget efficiently, and solve the space problem by with-drawing the materials. But most Korean university libraries, contrary to many foreign cases, don't have proper systematic collection development policy or guideline that controls overall library work from planning the collection of materials to evaluating and preserving them. Questionaire on whether university library has collection development policy or guideline was answered positively by only 6 cases out of 57 cases, which is just 10.5 percent. Even in cases that they have a guideline, the content of the copied guideline they sent was confined to acquisition, which is just a part of collection development. Collection development is a statement needed to set up long and short term plannings in consideration of the aims of the library and the needs of users and to shape and manage the library collection systematically. With the above conception and definition, we try to make a proper collection development policy and guideline for the Korean university libraries. Here we must define the object of the university. Object of university is to have good curriculum, good courses, research activities on the part of the faculty, enlargement of graduate school, and establishment of various institutes, etc. And in guideline, selector, method of selection, level of selection and arrangement of budget, etc. must be described concretely in its contents. Since collection development policy and guideline of Korean university libraries should concern their situation, we must confer with the result of the survey and analysis on the matter of collection determination. Here the contents include the priority of materials to be collected, method of collecting materials, arrangement of budget, and others. The purpose of this study is to develop a tenative collection development guideline in reference to the Jeonju University Library by means of analyzing the guiding principle, contents of the guideline, and present conditions of the Korean university libraries. The systematic collection development based on the Guideline for Collection Development of the Korean University Library, can offer a satisfactory service to the users of the university community, and also contribute to the development of the university itself as well as the university library.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.133-152
• /
• 2013

대학도서관에 있어서 장서개발의 목적은 각 학문분야별로 구성된 장서의 강점과 균형은 유지하고 약점은 보완하여 장서구성의 체계성과 망라성을 유지하는 것이다. 그러나 우리나라 대학도서관들은 장서의 규모를 확충하는데 주력한 반면 그 품질을 제고하는 데에는 미처 관심을 갖지 못한 것이 사실이다. 이는 무엇보다 최적의 장서를 유지하기 위하여 필수적인 과정인 장서평가를 제대로 수행하지 못한데 기인하는데, 이러한 문제의식을 바탕으로 이 연구는 대학도서관에 소장된 특정 주제분야 장서를 중심으로 장서평가를 수행하였다. 구체적으로 표본 대학도서관의 정치학 장서를 대상으로 장서의 현황을 분석하고, 과연 장서가 학과의 학부 학생들과 대학원생의 학습 및 연구지원, 교수의 연구지원과 얼마나 밀접한 관련성을 맺으며 개발되고 있는지 분석하였다. 이를 위해 정치학 강의에서 사용된 교재 및 연구자들이 학술활동 과정에서 인용한 문헌의 리스트를 작성하고 이에 근거한 대학도서관의 장서 보유 현황을 조사함으로써 정치학 교육과 연구에 있어서 필요한 장서의 현황, 장서의 최적성 수준을 파악하고자 하였다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제21권
• /
• pp.1-55
• /
• 1994

The present survey aimed at analyzing factors influencing the development of the university library collection, with the special reference to the case of the Education Collection of the Pusan National University Library. For this, the present researchers have identified two areas of influencing factors, i.e.., library factors and user factors. Library factors included collection development policy, manpower, materials received as gift and budget. User factors included faculty and students. For analyzing the factors, the present researchers have relied on qualitative research techniques, using heavily documents produced within the case library, interviews librarians, faculty and students, and observation.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제25권
• /
• pp.215-232
• /
• 1993

The Long-Term Development Plan of the Pusan National University(PNU) has announced on 1991 in order to reach its roles and levels as an University with international standards, a Graduate School research-oriented and a core university in its community through accomplishment of this Plan. University libraries would be planned to support their universities' goals. Therefore the Library of PNU is facing on the task for supporting the Plan. The Collection for Korean Classical Materials (CKCM) is not limited in Korean Literature, Korean History, Korean Philosophy fields but covered the academic fields except a hightech science : Humanities, social science. pure science, applied science and arts etc. However, the Library of PNU does not have the organization, special librarian and budget for CKCM. Under this notion organization, budget and librarian for the collection would be followed. The CKCM contains the original editions, photography editions, copied issues. microform reproductions with comprehensive subjects in the fields of studies. Especially for the collection of treasure books the role of the Library of PNU induce to open individuals' collections or families' collections to public through the Library. The equipments for preserving rare books and treasure books are the conditioners for humidity and temperature, automatic extinguishment system. The reference materials, copy machine and reading room are requested for the user service of CKCM. The materials would be one of the most important thing in study and research. Therefore the Library of PNU need to pay attention to develop and preserve CKCM.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제8권
• /
• pp.183-207
• /
• 1981

Library standards have been the source of considerable controversy, whereas many problems are involved in developing stardard for university library collections. For evaluation purposes, standards should be precise, quantifiable and measurable. In the United States, however, standards for academic libraries are limited to qualitative statements and principles. Quantitative standards, when given, are ususally related to the number of population in the institution being served, or the prescribed quantitative objectives are often arbitrarily formulated by value judgements. The study in this paper attempts to explain the problems involved in developing quantitative standard for academic library collections. Two problems facing in the formulation of the optimal size of collection are identified. One is the theoretically faulty concept of adequacy of collection to meet the situations of diversity of university libraies, and the other is the difficulties in quantification and measurement, along with the lack of concept of adequacy of collection. However, quantification of adequate size of collection is proved to be useful on the pratical level, even though not valid theoretically. ACRL, Clapp/Jordan and Voigt developed formulas or models for setting the optimal size of a library collection for any particular university library. The main purpose of this study is the analysis of the above formulas. ACRL standard was drawn from obervation and analysis of statistcs in leading library collections. In academic field, this judgement appears to have been based on the assumption that a high-grade institution would be apt to have a good library collection. This study criticizes ACRL standard for its failure to include some determinants of measurements, and points out the limitations of the standard. In contrast. Clapp/Jordan developed a formula rather scientifically based upon bibliographical sources. This is similarly empirical but has the advantage of bringing into play the elements which make universities diverse in nature. Both ACRL and Clapp/Jordan formulas share two major defects. (1) the specific subject needs of the collection are not indiacted directly, and (2) percentage rate of growth is an indicator in measuring the potential utility of a collection. Thus both formulas failed to provide a basis for meaningful evaluation. Voigt further developed a model for determining acquisition rates for currently published materials based on bibliographic technique. Voigt model encourages experimentation with different programs and different allocations of input resources, designed to meet the needs of the library's particular population. Standard for university library collections can be formulated in terms of input(traditional indicator), or additionally, in terms of output(cost-effectiveness). Cost effectiveness is expressed as user satisfaction, ability to provide wanted materials within a reasonable time period. Thus simple quantitative method does not cover all the situations of diversity of university library collections, nor measures the effectiveness of collections. Valid standard could not be established without further research.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제43권1호
• /
• pp.201-219
• /
• 2012

클라우드 컴퓨팅에서 발생된 클라우드 컬렉션은 네트워크상의 또는 물리적 형태의 플랫폼을 통해 도서관간 중복된 장서를 공동 보존 활용함으로써 새로운 가치를 창출시키는 프레임�p을 의미한다. 전자책 시장 활성화와 인쇄본의 소급 디지털화 경향은 라이선스 기반의 전자책 서비스와 도서관 소장 도서의 공동 활용을 추구하는 새로운 장서 관리 패러다임을 예고하고 있다. 본 연구는 디지털 보존과 인쇄본 공동 보존이 상보적 역할을 수행할 수 있는 클라우드 컬렉션의 개념에 대해 논의하고, 한국 대학도서관의 클라우드 컬렉션 도입 방향을 전망해 본다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제47권4호
• /
• pp.125-142
• /
• 2013

이 연구는 정보환경의 변화와 대학도서관에 있어서 전자정보원의 비중 증가, 그리고 이용자 요구의 변화 등에 따라 대학도서관에서 그 중요성이 증가하고 있는 전자자원관리정책의 모형을 제안하고자 한 연구이다. 이를 위해 우선 전자자원의 정의와 유형 전자자원관리정책의 개념과 기능, 그리고 필요성을 정의하였다. 다음으로, 전자자원관리정책의 구성요소를 도출하였는데 이를 위해 국제도서관협회연맹(IFLA)의 전자자원개발정책 가이드라인과 미국의 대학도서관들이 실제로 수립, 공개하고 있는 전자자원관리정책 사례, 그리고 관련연구들을 바탕으로 구성요소를 선정, 취합하였다. 이 결과를 종합하여 전자자원관리정책의 구성요소별 우선순위를 정하고 가상의 대학을 대상으로 전자자원관리정책 모형을 제안하였다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제23권
• /
• pp.363-404
• /
• 1995

This study is to set up a model of minimum and optimum standards for college and university library building areas in Korea. The results of this study are summarized as follows: 1. minimum standards(proposal) At first, Areas needed by factors of space component are as follows: User space --- 0.45 $m^{2}$ per student. Collection space --- 0.0107 $m^{2}$ per volume Staff space --- 10.1 $m^{2}$ per person Space attached to user, collection and staff space --- 5% of the sum of user, collection and staff areas(0.041 $m^{2}$ per student). Nonassignable space --- 25% of the sum of user, collection and staff areas (0.21 $m^{2}$ per student). Next, the formula to calculate the total area of the college and university library building is as follows: N = 0.45T $m^{2}$(a) + 0.0107V $m^{2}$(b) + 10.1S $m^{2}$(c) + 0.05(a+b+c) $m^{2}$, NS = 0.25N $m^{2}$. 2. Optimum standards(proposal) At first, Areas needed by factors of space component are as follows: User spae --- 0.64 $m^{2}$) per student. Collection space --- 0.01 $m^{2}$ per volume Staff space --- 9.7 $m^{2}$ per person Space attached to user, collection and staff space --- 5% of the sum of user, collection and staff areas(0.073 $m^{2}$ per student). Nonassignable space --- 25% of the sum of user, collection and staff areas(0.38 $m^{2}$ per student). Next, the formula to calculate the total area of the college and university library building is as follows: N = 0.64T $m^{2}$(a) + 0.01V $m^{2}$(b) + 9.7S $m^{2}$(c) + 0.05(a+b+c) $m^{2}$, NS = 0.25N $m^{2}$.

• International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.39-49
• /
• 2020

Accurate and reliable Information improves decision making, reduces costs, and saves time. The ophthalmic Libraries supply quality ophthalmic information to the ophthalmologists to serve the patients in a better way and stimulate the growth of ophthalmic field. This paper aims to study the usage of library collection, services and assistance among the Ophthalmologists - Eye Doctors in India. A survey method is used to obtain the ophthalmologists' usage of library collection, services and assistance. Through convenient sampling method, a structured questionnaire is circulated to the ophthalmologists in India and 633 ophthalmologists are responded. Among the 633 ophthalmologist, 82.15% of the ophthalmologists use the library collection - book. 73.46% of the ophthalmologists use the online data / journals. 89.73% of the ophthalmologists seek assistance to locate books/articles/documents. There exists a significant difference between the ophthalmologists use of Library Service and gender (p value 0.001**). There exists a significant difference between the ophthalmologists use of Library Assistance / help and designation category (p value 0.000**). There exists a significant difference between the ophthalmologists use of Library Assistance / help and working experience (p value 0.017**). There exists a significant difference between Library Services (p value 0.009**), Library Assistance / help (p value 0.000**) and institution type. The study results will help the ophthalmic libraries to serve the user better.