DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Usage of Library Collection, Services & Assistance Among Ophthalmologists - An Opinion Survey

  • Govindarajan, R. (Aravind Eye Hospital & Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology) ;
  • Dhanavandan, S. (Central Library, Central University of Tamil Nadu)
  • Received : 2020.03.31
  • Accepted : 2020.05.01
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

Accurate and reliable Information improves decision making, reduces costs, and saves time. The ophthalmic Libraries supply quality ophthalmic information to the ophthalmologists to serve the patients in a better way and stimulate the growth of ophthalmic field. This paper aims to study the usage of library collection, services and assistance among the Ophthalmologists - Eye Doctors in India. A survey method is used to obtain the ophthalmologists' usage of library collection, services and assistance. Through convenient sampling method, a structured questionnaire is circulated to the ophthalmologists in India and 633 ophthalmologists are responded. Among the 633 ophthalmologist, 82.15% of the ophthalmologists use the library collection - book. 73.46% of the ophthalmologists use the online data / journals. 89.73% of the ophthalmologists seek assistance to locate books/articles/documents. There exists a significant difference between the ophthalmologists use of Library Service and gender (p value 0.001**). There exists a significant difference between the ophthalmologists use of Library Assistance / help and designation category (p value 0.000**). There exists a significant difference between the ophthalmologists use of Library Assistance / help and working experience (p value 0.017**). There exists a significant difference between Library Services (p value 0.009**), Library Assistance / help (p value 0.000**) and institution type. The study results will help the ophthalmic libraries to serve the user better.

Keywords

References

  1. Dhanavandan, S., & Tamizhchelvan, M. (2016). Availability of open access books in DOAB: an analytical study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 36(2), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.36.2.9440
  2. Gunasekera, C. (2010). Students usage of an academic library: A user survey conducted at the Main Library University of Peradeniya. Journal of the University Librarians Association of Sri Lanka, 14(1). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b223/b0361b36bc227043fd209351795c9f30919b.pdf
  3. Hiller, S. (2001). Assessing user needs, satisfaction, and library performance at the University of Washington Libraries. Library Trends, 49(4), 605. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/8375/library?sequence=1
  4. Kumar, B. R., & Phil, M. (2009). User education in libraries. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 1(1), 001-005. http://www.academicjournals.org/ijlis
  5. Perera, P. A. S. H. (2005). A study on the pattern of usage of library facilities at the Medical Library, University of Peradeniya. Journal of the University Librarians Association of Sri Lanka, 9. 41-61. http://doi.org/10.4038/jula.v9i0.312
  6. Portmann, C. A., & Roush, A. J. (2004). Assessing the effects of library instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(6), 461-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2004.07.004
  7. Walsh, J. (2008). The effects of library orientations on student usage of the library. Library Hi Tech News, 25(1), 27-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/07419050810877535