• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.443-450
• /
• 2011

Purpose: This study was a descriptive correlation study to increase understanding of, and relationships among critical thinking disposition, clinical decision making and job satisfaction of cancer center nurses. Method: The participants in this study were 150 nurses working in one cancer center located in Gyeonggi Province. The statistic program, SPSS WIN17.0 was used for data analysis and data were analyzed using t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation. Results: The critical thinking disposition of the participants showed statistically significant differences according to areas of practice (F=4.426, p=.005), and current position (F=9.346, p=.000). For clinical decision making of the participants, statistically significant differences were found according to current position (F=10.667, p=.000). Furthermore, for job satisfaction, there were statistically significant differences according to income (F=6.779, p=.002), length of career (F=2.701, p=.033) and current position (F=5.423, p=.005). There were significant positive correlations for critical thinking disposition with clinical decision making, and with job satisfaction. Conclusions: The results of the study indicate that to improve clinical decision making and job satisfaction of cancer center nurses, it is necessary to increase critical thinking disposition. To make this change, appropriate programs are needed to increase critical thinking and clinical decision making of general cancer center nurses.

• 근관절건강학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.48-57
• /
• 2023

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine nurses' critical thinking disposition and knowledge sharing activity and professional work environment on clinical decision-making ability. Methods: The data collection period for this study was from May 24 to May 31, 2021. The data were collected from 167 nurses who consented to participate in this study and have worked for more than one year at general hospital in Seoul. The data were analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 25.0 program. Results: A significant positive correlation was found between clinical decision-making ability and critical thinking disposition, knowledge sharing activity, and a professional work environment. Critical thinking disposition (β=.32, p<.001), knowledge sharing activitiy (β=.24, p=.002) and professional work environment (β=.20, p=.006) had a significant effect on clinical decision-making ability. These factors explained 35.5% of clinical decision-making ability (F=24.22, p<.001). Conclusion: Therefore, in order to develop the critical thinking disposition of nurses, development of systematic educational programs and strategies for practical application are needed. Through this, nurses can improve the professional decision-making ability and clinical performance ability.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.301-314
• /
• 2001

The main purpose of this research is to describe comprehensively the processes of clinical decision making in novice critical care nurses through clinical experience. This research was an exploratory, longitudinal study using a fieldwork approach incorporating "think-aloud" method and in-depth interviews with the study participants. The study participants consisted of 5 novice nurses assigned to critical care units at a tertiary medical center located in Seoul, among a group of 27 novice nurses who started at the same period at this hospital. The data were collected from March 1999 to April 2000. The major findings of the study is that the novice nurses followed the analytic linear model of clinical decision making in the beginning, but were changed increasingly to follow the comprehensive, integrated model of clinical decision making. Through repeated experience that resulted in increasing repertoire of clinical schema and familiarity of task environments of clinical practice the novice nurses expanded their ability to arrive at comprehensive integration of information and to arrive at accurate and time-efficient decisions. Both the analytic, linear model mostly used at the beginning period and the comprehensive, integrated model that seems to be the mode significantly dependent upon experience seem to have strengths and weaknesses as decision making processes in clinical situations. Hence, it is imperative to develop an effective orientation and training program for novice nurses through the use of clinical preceptors. In addition, students should be exposed to the process of clinical decision making early in their nursing education through an appropriate clinical experiences and clinical assignments.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.391-402
• /
• 2009

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to describe the decision making experience of VIP ward nurses in the clinical practice adjustment process. The research question was about "how nurses adjust their clinical practice to nursing situations and develop decision making process in a VIP ward." Method: The methodology of collecting and analyzing the data was based on the grounded theory of Strauss and Corbin(1998). The data was collected through in-depth interviews with 10 nurses from July to November, 2007. Results: The core category of nursing care decision making process was named as "adjusting with flexibility and deepened insight." The clinical practice adjustment process in nursing care decision making has progressed through four preceding interlocking phases: 1) dependent phase, 2) defensive phase, 3) independent phase, 4) integrative phase. These phases were classified by the level of nurses' dependency, proactivity, presupposition and integration. Conclusion: The result of this study indicated that nurse's decision making depended on their experiences and the nature of social context in which nursing occurs. Therefore, it is important to elaborate an effective training program for nurses to develop the phases of nursing care decision making.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제19권7호
• /
• pp.463-473
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 간호간병통합서비스 병동간호사를 대상으로 전문직 자율성, 역할갈등, 임상적 의사결정능력과의 관계와 함께 임상적 의사결정능력에 영향을 미치는 영향요인 파악을 목적으로 한 서술적 조사연구이다. 본 연구에서는 D시와 G시에 근로간호사 234명을 편의 표집하여 조사하였다. 자료수집은 2017년 10월 12일부터 11월 30일 사이에 D시와 G시에 소재하는 4개의 종합병원의 234명을 대상으로 연구 참여에 서면 동의한 간호사에게 자가 보고식 설문조사지를 사용하여 자료를 수집하였다. t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's coefficients와 단계적 회귀분석으로 자료를 분석하였다. 연구결과에서 임상적 의사결정능력은 평균평점 $3.38{\pm}0.78$점으로 중간수준으로 나타났다. 임상적 의사결정능력은 전문직 자율성과 양의 상관관계(r=.40, p<.001)를 보였으나, 역할갈등과는 음의 상관관계(r=-.21, p<.001)가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 임상적 의사결정능력에 미치는 영향은 근무경력, 교육수준, 전문직 자율성과 역할갈등이었으며, 임상적 의사결정능력에 대한 설명력은 38.7%였다. 임상적 의사결정 능력을 개선하기 위해 중요한 변수인 전문직 자율성과 역할갈등을 통해 간호사의 직무를 결정할 수 있는 임상적 의사결정능력을 향상시킬 필요가 있다. 그러므로, 본 연구 결과가 간호사의 임상적 의사결정능력 향상 프로그램 개발의 근거자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대하며, 개발된 교육프로그램의 타당성과 효과성을 분석하는 중재연구의 필요성을 제안하는 바이다.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.769-777
• /
• 2022

본 연구의 목적은 요양병원 간호사의 임상의사결정능력에 미치는 영향요인을 규명하기 위함이다. 2021년 10월 11일부터 12월 10일까지 G도 소재 요양병원 간호사 174명을 대상으로 조사하였다. 수집된 자료의 분석은 SPSS 23.0을 이용하여 서술통계, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation, stepwise multiple regression으로 분석하였다. 연구결과 연구대상자의 임상의사결정능력은 비판적 사고성향(r=.494, p<.001), 간호근무환경(r=.451, p<.001)과 양의 상관관계를 나타내었으며, 비판적 사고성향과 간호근무환경이 임상의사결정능력을 33.1% 설명하였다. 간호사의 핵심능력인 임상의사결정능력의 향상을 위해서는 비판적 사고성향을 높이는 교육과 바람직한 간호근무환경 조성이 필요하다. 추후연구에서는 요양병원 간호사의 임상의사결정능력에 영향을 미치는 다양한 변수를 확인하는 연구와 임상의사결정능력 향상을 위한 프로그램 개발 및 효과를 위한 연구를 제언한다.

• International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.27-35
• /
• 2023

This study was a cross-sectional descriptive survey study that confirms the effect on subjects that prefer clinical practice in order to prepare basic data for efficient clinical practice guidance for nursing college students. The study participants were 201 students attending C University, and the data collection period was from October 1 to October 15, 2022. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 as descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, Chi square test, ANOVA test, and Multiple regression test. As a result of the analysis, it was found that clinical decision-making and critical thinking were correlated under the statistical significance level (r=.730, p<0.01). The most favorite clinical practice department was community nursing, and male students preferred community nursing the most (Male=45.6%, χ²=.000), female students were found to prefer similar levels of practical subjects with child nursing , adult nursing, and maternal nursing(χ²=000).Clinical decision-making was found to be higher in students who preferred community nursing at a statistical significance level than those who preferred child nursing (F=4.91, p<0.01). Critical thinking was higher among students who preferred adult nursing than those who preferred other subjects (F=4.65, p<0.01). Through the analysis results, it was found that general characteristics vary, but clinical decision-making ability and critical thinking affect the preference of clinical practice subjects. Therefore, based on the results of this study, the professor of clinical practice suggests the development of a program to foster clinical decision-making and critical thinking to make students interested in clinical practice subjects.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제40권6호
• /
• pp.863-871
• /
• 2010

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of case-base learning (CBL) using video on clinical decision-making and learning motivation. Methods: This research was conducted between June 2009 and April 2010 as a nonequivalent control group non-synchronized design. The study population was 44 third year nursing students who enrolled in a college of nursing, A University in Korea. The nursing students were divided into the CBL and the control group. The intervention was the CBL with three cases using video. The controls attended a traditional live lecture on the same topics. With questionnaires objective clinical decision-making, subjective clinical decision-making, and learning motivation were measured before the intervention, and 10 weeks after the intervention. Results: Significant group differences were observed in clinical decision-making and learning motivation. The post-test scores of clinical decision-making in the CBL group were statistically higher than the control group. Learning motivation was also significantly higher in the CBL group than in the control group. Conclusion: These results indicate that CBL using video is effective in enhancing clinical decision-making and motivating students to learn by encouraging self-directed learning and creating more interest and curiosity in learning.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.275-288
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 간호사를 대상으로 임상적 의사결정능력에 미치는 영향을 파악하고자 시도되었다. G도 병원에 근무하는 156명을 자료수집 하였다. IBM SPSS WIN/25.0을 이용하여 t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient, Multiple regression을 사용하였다. 대상자의 임상적 의사결정능력에 가장 영향을 미치는 요인은 간호연구 '매우관심', 비판적 사고성향, '석/박사', 총 임상경력 '20년1개월 이상', 도덕적 행동, 간호연구 '중요하다', '미혼', 총 임상경력 '5년1개월-10년', 부서근무경력 '3년1개월-5년' 순이었다. 설명력은 51.4%이었다. 간호연구에 관심과 중요성, 도덕적 행동과 학력, 경력이 임상적 의사결정능력에 영향을 미치는 변수임을 확인하였다는 점에서 의의가 있었다. 본 연구결과는 프로그램 개발 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다. 또한, 윤리적 딜레마 상황에서 임상적 의사결정능력을 높일 수 있는 교육 프로그램을 개발하여 적용하고 그 효과를 검증할 것을 제언한다.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.51-60
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between self-esteem, self- efficacy and clinical practice performance, academic achievement, decision making of major field in clinical practice . The study subjects consisted with 244 students from G. junior nursing college that will adapt a new majoring program of clinical nursing practice funded by Ministry of human and resources development. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and t-test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression. The results of this study were summarized as follows: 1. The students were relatively performed well in clinical practice setting (total M :3.78). The item of student's personal relationship between patients, patient's family, and professional staff showed high score (M=3.96). However students did not feel comfortable to communicate with patients, patient's family and professional staffs in clinical setting(mean=3.56). 2. Students who had experiences of temporal absence from school showed significant difference in the variable of academic achievement and decision making of major field in clinical practice Students who entered to nursing school with self-motive revealed statistically significant difference in the variable of clinical practice performance, academic achievement, self-esteem, self-efficacy, and decision making of major field in clinical practice. 3. There was a significant correlation between self-esteem and clinical practice performance, (r=.512, p<.000). And the relation between self-esteem and decision making of major field in clinical practice was significantly correlated(r=.377, p<.000). Self-efficacy and clinical practice performance(r=.567, p<.000), and decision making of major field in clinical practice (r=.441, p<.000) showed significant correlations. Also relation between academic achievement and self-esteem reveled a significant correlation(r=.129, p<.05) but correlation between self-efficacy and academic achievement was not significant. 4. Correlation between clinical practice performance and decision making of major field in clinical practice also identified a significant relation(r=.498, p<.000). 5. Self-esteem and self-efficacy variables predicted clinical practice performance and explained 37.7% of clinical practice performance. 6. Aptitude and personal interests(m=4.07) reveled important factor affecting to select majoring area in clinical practice, and advice from parents reflected low percentage on selecting places(m=2.42). In conclusion, the variables of self-esteem and self-efficacy showed significant correlations with the variables of student's clinical practice performance, academic achievement, and decision making of major field in clinical practice. Thus it is recommended that student's affective domain of self-esteem and self-efficacy should be developed by nursing intervention before clinical nursing education.