• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.255-271
• /
• 2007

It is widely acknowledged that Chinese economy becomes a center of world economy and takes up a considerable portion of the trade in Northeastern Asia. Due to the investment and the logistics modernization strategy of Chinese government, recognizing the importance of logistics, the competitiveness of Chinese major ports is tending upward rapidly. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the competitiveness of Chinese major ports in order to develop the logistics strategy of Korea by cooperating or competing with Chinese ports. In this study, we analyzed the competitiveness of 10 major Chinese ports with Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA). Through the analysis, we could investigate the efficiency of 10 major Chinese ports and figure out the trend of the efficiency within recent 10 years. In order for Korea to achieve the national strategic goal, becoming a logistics hub in East Asia, it is obvious to understand the competitiveness of Chinese major ports which are major competitor and strategic partner at the same time. This study will be useful to understand the competitiveness of Chinese ports and to develop a logistics hub strategy of Korea.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.315-320
• /
• 2003

Since the beginning of open-door policy, China has been making rapid annual growth with an average 10% economic development. And due to this rapid growth, cargo volumes via ports have been also rapidly increased, and accordingly, current China government has intensively invested in port development. Further, this development project is significantly big scale, compared with those project which Korea and Japan have. Thus, China is beginning to threaten Korean ports, especially Busan port which try to be a hub port in Northeast Asia. For this reason, it has been very important issue for Korea and Busan port to investigate or analyze Chinese ports based on empirical data. Especially, although various studies related to Shanghai and Hong Kong have been conducted, the competitiveness of overall Chinese major ports has been little studied. In this paper, we analyzed competitiveness level of eight Chinese ports with capabilities as container terminal, based on reliable sources. From data analysis, eight Chinese ports were classified into four groups according to competitiveness level. Rankings among four clusters based on competitiveness level are cluster(Hone Kong), cluster C(Shanghai), cluster A(Qingdao, Tianjin, and Yantian) and cluster D(Dalian, Shekou, and Xiamen).

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제34권7호
• /
• pp.559-566
• /
• 2010

The container port industry has been variously studied by many researchers, because the contemporary container transportation and container port industries play a pivotal role in globalization of the world economy. For container terminals, the productivity, affected by many factors, is an important target in measuring container terminal performance. Under this background, finding the critical factors affecting the productivity is necessary. Regression analysis can be used to identify which independent variables are related to the dependent variable, and explore the relationships of them. The aim of paper is to evaluate the factors affecting the productivity of Chinese major terminals by using a regression statistical analysis modeling approach, which is to establish the variable preprocessing model (VPM) and regression analysis model (RAM), by means of collecting the major Chinese container terminals data in the year of 2008.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.107-116
• /
• 2018

Planning strategies to achieve higher competitiveness of ports are becoming increasingly important in business environment. Therefore, strategic competitive position and efficiency analysis needs to be performed to increase ports' effectiveness and competitiveness. This matches with one of targets of new concept e-Navigation to increase the agility and efficiency of ports. The purpose of this study was to apply Boston Consulting Group matrix to analyze competitive positioning of major ports in Korea and China in term of several main cargo types and then use a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis and Principal Component Analysis model to calculate efficiencies. Results show that, at the moment, Chinese ports are still on the top with high position and efficiency score for the representative-Shanghai port. However, result also points out that except container type, Korean ports have chance to compete in other cargo types. Moreover, Gwangyang port is regarded as efficient. It has better position time. It is believed that Gwangyang port together with Busan port can compete with Chinese port in the near future.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.277-284
• /
• 2004

This paper tries to draw some implications for Korean seaports in terms of management and development of ports with respect to attracting more transshipment container cargoes. For this the results of the Origin-Destination(O-D) analysis between major Korean ports and top 20 Chinese ports were presented. They also contained the O-D analysis between Chinese major ports and their inland hinterlands.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.85-101
• /
• 2015

본 논문의 목적은 동북아항만간 경쟁 입지변화와 경쟁관계 분석을 통해 광양항의 발전전략을 구축하는 것이다. 동북아 주요항만간 경쟁 입지 변화추정을 위해 수정 BCG매트릭스, 그리고 경쟁관계분석을 위해 Lotka-Volterra모형을 활용하였다. 연구결과 동북아지역에서는 중국항만의 경쟁력 및 영향력 확대, 부산항의 경쟁력 유지와 광양항 및 인천항의 경쟁력 정체, 그리고 일본항만의 경쟁력 실종을 확인했다. 또한 2007년 대비 2014년의 동북아 항만과 광양항간 관계에 따르면 환적물량기준 광양항은 부산항과 윈윈관계에서 약탈적 관계로 변화되었으며, 홍콩항과는 약탈적 관계를 유지하였다. 또한 상하이 및 닝보와는 약탈적 관계, 톈진과 순수경쟁관계, 그리고 칭다오 및 다롄과 윈윈관계를 형성하고 있다. 전체적으로 2007년 대비 2014년에는 광양항과 동북아 항만들간에 약탈적관계로 변화된 항만이 늘어나고 있다. 이에 대한 광양항의 대응전략은 약탈적 및 경쟁 관계의 항만들과는 협력적관계로, 그리고 윈윈 협력관계의 항만들과는 윈윈관계를 지속하는 전략을 구사할 필요가 있다.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.255-274
• /
• 2005

To acquire a port traffic, governments in North-East Asia have intensively invested port development. Furthermore, the major shipping company directly make a call at northern chinese ports like Qingdao, Dalian and Tianjin. Those changes of port environment will have a considerable effect on a port traffic in Korea. In order to prepare against those changes, it is necessary to estimate a port traffic in Korea A port traffic in Korea is estimated by the use of explanation variables like GDP of Korea, real effective exchange rate, world economic performances and the trade in China, et al. When GDP in Korea goes up 1%, it is estimated that container port traffic of all ports and Pusan Port is upward $1.0{\sim}1.2%$ and $0.8{\sim}0.9%$ respectively. When the trade in China goes up 1%, it is estimated that Container transshipment is upward $1.6{\sim}1.7%$ approximately.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.191-217
• /
• 2005

Ninety percent of an average Chinese manufacturer's time spent is on logistics. Therefore, logistics presents the greatest challenge for multinational companies conducting businesses in China. Although more than 18,000 registered logistics companies exist in China, 85 percent of their revenues are generated from basic trucking and storage services. These facts indicate that China will need increasing presence of high-quality foreign 3PL providers, who are able to provide sophisticated IT systems, industry/operational expertise, standardized operating processes, and international networks, compared to their Chinese counterparts. However, they are facing complicated array of laws and regulations as well as difficulty of finding qualified people to fulfill these needs. There are a number of foreign 3PL providers engaged in China's logistics sector to reap a huge opportunity. Nevertheless, many 3PL foreign providers are still cautious about making large investments. Thus they arelooking for alliances that can provide complementarities instead. Another salient feature of strategy is to take over the transportation assets and warehousing of major Chinese manufacturers and distributors.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제34권7호
• /
• pp.587-594
• /
• 2010

The positive and negative opinion to cargo demand of Incheon's SAMT in the near future remains cloudy. Considering port and shipping environmental changes and the logistics situation of China which explains the lack of facilities in Chinese airports, the creating of SAMT cargoes of the Incheon region could catches a favorable opportunity to be a logistics hub in the North-East Asia. On the other hand, as open-sky policy and direct-call service has been carried out between China and N.A.(North America), Incheon could cause a loss of competitiveness in SAMT because the enhancement in the aspect of the connectivity of Chinese airlines and shipping lines makes customer sent to last destination their cargoes whenever they want. In the same context, this paper analyses on conditions of domestic and international SAMT and proposes in this uncertainty future forecasting of SAMT of Incheon by scenario planning according to changes in integrated SAMT, measuring the likelihood of final scenario. This study shows the Sea & Air multi-transport volume will have either slight increase or decrease from the current condition. Consequently, RFS expansion and system & service improvement through strong ties with major cities in China will be required in a short run aspect. Nonetheless, we also need to take domestic & international transportation environment into account in the long run.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.159-178
• /
• 2012

최근 여러 나라에서 자본과 운영기술을 앞세운 GTO에게 항만 운영권과 개발권을 개방하고 있으며, 이들 GTO의 글로벌 네트워크 확충 전략은 각 국가의 항만 정책과 맞물려 항만의 발전에 큰 역할을 하고 있다. 근래 급성장하고 있는 중국의 항만 시장은 GTO에게 엄청난 기회로 부상하고 있다. 그러나 현재로서는 GTO의 해외 진출 시 어떤 요인이 주요하게 작용하는지에 대한 연구가 미비하고, 신규 터미널 후보지 선택에 대한 정형화된 방법론이 없는 실정이다. 이런 배경에서 본 연구에서는 GTO의 해외 진출 시 고려되는 요소들을 평가해보고 이들 평가요소들을 이용하여 중국항만을 대상으로 신규 터미널 후보지를 평가해 보고자 하였다. 먼저 선행연구를 토대로 항만의 발전 잠재력을 포함한 14개의 측정변수들을 선정하였고, 요인분석(factor analysis) 방법을 통하여 운영 및 화물 창출 능력, 항로 보유 및 교역량, 대형선 기항 가능성 및 연계성, 기존 인프라 활용가능성의 4가지로 추출할 수 있었다. 그리고 퍼지계층분석법을 통하여 각 평가요인 및 측정변수들의 가중치를 산정하였다. 그 결과 4개의 평가요인 중 운영 및 화물 창출능력(0.343)이 가장 중요한 요인으로 선정되었으며, 14개의 측정변수 중 항만의 발전 잠재력(0.107)이 가장 중요한 변수로 나타났으며, 다음으로 해당 항만의 환적화물 비중(0.104), 대형선박의 기항빈도(0.090), 다양한 항로의 보유(0.089), 항만의 교역량 정도(0.087) 순으로 파악되었다. 평가요소를 이용하여 중국 항만을 평가해 본 결과 상위 5위권 중국 항만 중 상하이항(0.307)로 가장 우수한 항만으로 확인되었다.