• 치과방사선
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.235-243
• /
• 1998

Cementifying fibroma is an odontogenic tumor of periodontal ligament origin, consisting of a proliferation of fibrous tissue that forms cementum. Cemento-ossifying fibroma, cementifying fibroma and ossifying fibroma are difficult to distinguish on clinical and radiographic exmination, and on histopathology. However, when the calcified product is represented by ovoid or curvilinear deposits, the lesion is often referred to as cementifying fibroma. Cementifying fibromas of the jaws are well-circumscribed, generally slow-growing lesions. Although most lesions appear to be limited to the tooth-bearing areas, a few have extended into the angle-ramus area or encroached on the maxillary sinus. Radiographically, the cementifying fibroma could present as a radiolucent, radiopaque or mixed density lesion, depending on the degree of maturity. We have observed two cases of cementifying fibroma occurred in the left maxillary premolar-molar area of 38-year-old woman and 35-year old man. We obtained that two cases were shown the followed results; 1. Clinically, main clinical symptom was facial swelling and pain at palpation 2. Radiographically, well-circumscribed radiolucent lesion and radiolucent lesion with radiopaqu e foci were seen on the left maxillary premolar-molar areas. Loss of lamina dura and root resorption or divergency were also seen. 3. Histopathologically, many cementum-like calcifications were observed in the hypercellular connective tissue.

• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.559-563
• /
• 2000

Cementifyng fibroma is one of the fibro-osseous lesions. All fibro-osseous lesions containing cementum are considered to be of periodontal membrance origin and is most common in the maxilla and mandible. Rarely, cementifying fibromas are seen in other craniofacial bone except jaw lesion. A diligent search in the available world literature show only two documentation of cementifying fibroma in the fronto-orbital bone. This case is third case but first in the frontal bone beyond orbit. The authors report a case of cementifying fibroma of the frontal bone in 12-year-old female patient.

• 치과방사선
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.161-172
• /
• 1997

The purpose of this study was to know the proper diagnosis and to establish the treatment plan of cementifying and ossifying fibroma in the jaws through the clinical, raiological, and histopathologic considerations. The authors compared and analyzed the c1inicoradiologic features of the thirteen cases of cementifying and ossifying fibroma, diagnosed at the Dental college hospital in Yonsei university, Seoul, Korea, during the period from 1980 to 1995. The obtained results were as follows : 1. Cementifying and ossifying fibroma occured in the mean age, 44 years, ranged from 29 to 65 years and the male to female ratio was approximately 1:5. 2. Swelling was the most common frequent presenting complaints. Other reported symptoms included pain, tooth mobility and asymptom. 3. The frequency of the lesions was twelve cases in the mandible and one case in the maxilla. And eleven of thirteen cases were distributed on the premolar and molar region. 4. Radiologically, eight of thirteen cases were well defined lesions, five cases were relatively well defined lesions. And nine of thirteen cases were mixed lesions, three cases were radiopaque lesions, and only one case was purely radiolucenct lesion. 5. Histologically, seven of thirteen cases were classified ossifying fibroma, four cases were cemento-ossifying fibroma, and two cases were cementifying fibroma.

• 치과방사선
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.113-126
• /
• 1986

This study was undertaken to document and better define this condition to help clarify this clinical and radiographic appearances by the analysis of clinical and radiographic features of cementoma. A study was made of a series of 104 cases with cementoma. This investigation of cementoma revealed the following features: 1. The female occurred in 73% of periapical cemental dysplasia and benign cementoblastoma, and 80% of cementifying fibroma. 2. 40% of periapical cemental dysplasia occurred in the fifth decades, and 73% of benign cementoblastoma during the second and third decades, while there was no age predilection in the cementifying fibroma. 3. 63% of periapical cemental dysplasia occurred in the mandibular anterior region. 91% of benign cementoblastoma and 80% of cementifying fibroma occurred in the mandibular premolar and/or molar region. 4. There were no cases complaining the associated clinical signs and subjective symptoms in the periapical cemental dysplasia, however the patient complained the pain in 36% of benign cementoblastoma and 40% of cementifying fibroma. 5. There were no cases expanding the cortical plates in the periapical cemental dysplasia, however 73% of benign cementoblastoma and all of 5 cases of cementifying fibroma showed the expansion of cortical plates. 6. Several radiographic features of the periapical cemental dysplasia were shown: a. 29% of the cases had multiple lesions. b. 53% of the cases were in the mature stage. c. During the osteolytic stage, the alveolar lamina dura was lost in 89% of the cases.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제20권4호통권155호
• /
• pp.305-305
• /
• 1982

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.148-157
• /
• 1990

The cementomas are derived from the periodontal ligament and a diversified group of nonrelated lesions producing cementum-like material. The diagnostic term, Cementoma, has encompassed several unrelated lesions : periapical cemental dysplasia, benign (true) cementoblastoma, cementifying fibroma and familial multifle (gigantiform) cementoma. The authors treated one case of benign cementoblastoma & the other of cementifying fibroma by conservative enucleation & curettage. By follow up check of the patient, We obtained of good result without any signs of recurrence of the lesions.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.177-184
• /
• 1991

저자등은, 치온부의 종괴를 주소로 내원한 10세 남아의 하악 우측 골체부에서, 동일한 부위에 함께 발생한 골내성 거내세포 육아종과 백아질 섬유종으로 진단된 증례로, 수술시 비교적 작은 크기의 백아질 섬유종은 골내성 거대세포 육아종과 비교적 경계가 잘 지워져 있었고, 두 병소의 발생기원이 서로 다른 점으로 미루어 이들 두 병소는 서로 독립하여 동일 부위에 발생한 것으로 사료되며, 임상적인 관점에서, 거대세포 육아종은 어린나이에 비교적 병소가 크고, 제1 제2 대구치의 치근 흡수 및 피판의 천공 소견을 보여 aggressive type으로 판단되어, 소파술과 전기 소작술을 이용하여 두 병소를 만족스럽게 치험하고, 1년이 지난 현재까지 수술에 따른 후유증이나 재발의 소견을 나타내지 않기에 문헌고찰과 함께 보고하는 바이다.

• 치과방사선
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.43-48
• /
• 1982

Since the fibro-osseous lesion is not a specific diagnostic term, the author studied clinically and radiologically 44 cases which had been diagnosed as fibro-osseous lesion in SNUDH (1972- 1981. 12).The obtained results were as follows. 1. Clinico-radiologically, the cases of fibro-osseous lesions were divided into two groups. 2. The first group was fibrous dysplasia (21 cases). 3. The second group was tumors of periodontal ligament origin, including ossifying fibroma, cementifying fibroma and cemento-ossifying fibroma (23 cases). 4. In most cases the chief complaint was painless swelling of the jaw and the mean age of the fibrous dysplasia (24.6 yrs) was a little younger than that of the periodontal ligament origin lesions (29.2 yrs). 5. In fibrous dysplasia, maxilla was more often involved and showed ground-glass or smoke pattern radiologically. 6. The tumors of periodontal ligament origin occurred more in female, mandible and radiologically showed varying amounts of radiopaque foci in well-circumscribed osteolytic lesion.

• 치과방사선
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.367-373
• /
• 1992

저자들은 양측 하악체부위의 종창을 주소로 경북대학교병원 치과에 내원한 35세 남자에서 임상ㆍ방사선학적 검사와 조직병리학적 검사를 통해 양측성 백악질섬유종을 진단하고 아래와 같은 사항을 관찰하였다. 1. 임상적으로 하악체 양측부위의 점진적 종창으로 인한 안모변형이 관찰되었다. 2. 방사선학적으로 양측 하악체부위에 각각 방사선불투과성 괴를 가진 방사선투과성의 병소가 관찰되었으며, 협설측 피질골의 비박, 팽윤과 병소에 인접한 치아들의 치조백선 소실과 치근 흡수가 관찰되었다. 3.조직병리학적으로 섬유아세포 및 백악질아 세포들이 조밀하게 분포된 결체조직으로 구성되었고 내부에 원형 또는 난원형의 호염기성의 백악질양 괴가 다수 산재하였다.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.297-308
• /
• 1989

저자동은 약 1년전 모 병원에서 하악과 상악에 각기 안모변형과 골팽창을 동반한 병소에 대해 수술을 재발한 치주인대에서 기인한 양성 섬유골성 병소를 치험하였으며 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 본증례 1은 32세 남자의 우측 하악 골체부에서 술후 약 1년만에 재발된 백악질골섬유종이었고 증례 2는 72세 여자의 상악 전치부에서 술후 약 5개월만에 재발소견을 보인 골섬유종이었다. 2. 방사선학적 소견에서 증례 1은 방사선 투과상의 병소내에 방사선불투과상의 석회화 물질이 함유된 혼합기의 상태였고 증례 2는 비교적 불명확한 경계를 가졌으나 방사선 투명대에 의해 치밀한 방사선 불투과상의 병소가 둘러싸여 있는 성숙기의 상태였다. 3. 조직병리학적 소견으로 두 증례 모두 조골세포의 부연이나 규칙적인 골소주 구조 및 기절내 세포성분의 증가를 관찰할 수 있었으나 증례 1에서는 골성분외에 백악질소적과 같은 석회화물질이 관찰되었고 증례 2에서는 층판골만이 관찰되어 증례 1은 백악질골섬유종, 증례 2는 골섬유종의 특징을 지닌 양성 섬유 골성 병소였다. 4. 재발된 병소이므로 증례 1은 하악 우측 제 1소구치부터 우각부까지 하악골 절제술과 장골 및 하치조신경 이식술을, 증례 2는 정상 인접골을 포함한 종물의 적출술을 시행하였다. 5. 술후 1년이 경과한 현재까지 정기적인 임상 및 방사선 검사결과 재발증상 없이 양호한 치유 경과를 보여주고 있다.