• Title/Summary/Keyword: Bootstrap(BCa) method

Search Result 6, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Interval Estimations for Reliablility in Stress-Strength Model by Bootstrap Method

  • Lee, In-Suk;Cho, Jang-Sik
    • Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.6 no.1
    • /
    • pp.73-83
    • /
    • 1995
  • We construct the approximate bootstrap confidence intervals for reliability (R) when the distributions of strength and stress are both normal. Also we propose percentile, bias correct (BC), bias correct acceleration (BCa), and percentile-t intervals for R. We compare with the accuracy of the proposed bootstrap confidence intervals and classical confidence interval based on asymptotic normal distribution through Monte Carlo simulation. Results indicate that the confidence intervals by bootstrap method work better than classical confidence interval. In particular, confidence intervals by BC and BCa method work well for small sample and/or large value of true reliability.

  • PDF

Uncertainty Analysis for Parameter Estimation of Probability Distribution in Rainfall Frequency Analysis Using Bootstrap (강우빈도해석에서 Bootstrap을 이용한 확률분포의 매개변수 추정에 대한 불확실성 해석)

  • Seo, Young-Min;Park, Ki-Bum
    • Journal of Environmental Science International
    • /
    • v.20 no.3
    • /
    • pp.321-327
    • /
    • 2011
  • Bootstrap methods is the computer-based resampling method that estimates the standard errors and confidence intervals of summary statistics using the plug-in principle for assessing the accuracy or uncertainty of statistical estimates, and the BCa method among the Bootstrap methods is known much superior to other Bootstrap methods in respect of the standards of statistical validation. Therefore this study suggests the method of the representation and treatment of uncertainty in flood risk assessment and water resources planning from the construction and application of rainfall frequency analysis model considersing the uncertainty based on the nonparametric BCa method among the Bootstrap methods for the assessement of the estimation of probability rainfall and the effect of uncertainty considering the uncertainty of the parameter estimation of probability in the rainfall frequency analysis that is the most fundamental in flood risk assessement and water resources planning.

Bootstrap Analysis of ILSTS035 Microsatellite Locus in Hanwoo Chromosome 6

  • Lee, Jea-Young;Lee, Yong-Won;Kim, Mun-Jung
    • Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.15 no.1
    • /
    • pp.75-81
    • /
    • 2004
  • We selected, in previous research, a major DNA Marker 235bp of ILSTS035 microsatellite locus in progeny test Hanwoo chromosome 6. We apply a major DNA Marker 235bp to perormance valuation Hanwoo chomosome 6. We use bootstrap BCa method and calculate confidence interval. A major DNA Marker 235bp is verified that it does not have environmental effect but affects primely economic trait factor.

  • PDF

A Major DNA Marker of BM4311 Microsatellite Locus in Hanwoo Chromosome 6 using the Bootstrap BCa Method

  • Lee, Jea-Young;Kim, Mun-Jung;Lee, Young-Won
    • Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.15 no.1
    • /
    • pp.41-47
    • /
    • 2004
  • DNA marker 95bp and 100bp are selected as major DNA markers of the BM4311 microsatellite locus in progeny test Hanwoo chromosome 6 linkage map. This document is tried to know whether DNA marker 95bp and 100bp are also major DNA markers in Hanwoo performance valuation in chromosome 6 linkage map. The bootstrap BCa method will be used to calculate confidence interval for DNA markers.

  • PDF

Comparison of Parametric and Bootstrap Method in Bioequivalence Test

  • Ahn, Byung-Jin;Yim, Dong-Seok
    • The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
    • /
    • v.13 no.5
    • /
    • pp.367-371
    • /
    • 2009
  • The estimation of 90% parametric confidence intervals (CIs) of mean AUC and Cmax ratios in bioequivalence (BE) tests are based upon the assumption that formulation effects in log-transformed data are normally distributed. To compare the parametric CIs with those obtained from nonparametric methods we performed repeated estimation of bootstrap-resampled datasets. The AUC and Cmax values from 3 archived datasets were used. BE tests on 1,000 resampled data sets from each archived dataset were performed using SAS (Enterprise Guide Ver.3). Bootstrap nonparametric 90% CIs of formulation effects were then compared with the parametric 90% CIs of the original datasets. The 90% CIs of formulation effects estimated from the 3 archived datasets were slightly different from nonparametric 90% CIs obtained from BE tests on resampled datasets. Histograms and density curves of formulation effects obtained from resampled datasets were similar to those of normal distribution. However, in 2 of 3 resampled log (AUC) datasets, the estimates of formulation effects did not follow the Gaussian distribution. Bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) CIs, one of the nonparametric CIs of formulation effects, shifted outside the parametric 90% CIs of the archived datasets in these 2 non-normally distributed resampled log (AUC) datasets. Currently, the 80~125% rule based upon the parametric 90% CIs is widely accepted under the assumption of normally distributed formulation effects in log-transformed data. However, nonparametric CIs may be a better choice when data do not follow this assumption.

The Analysis of the Number of Donations Based on a Mixture of Poisson Regression Model (포아송 분포의 혼합모형을 이용한 기부 횟수 자료 분석)

  • Kim In-Young;Park Su-Bum;Kim Byung-Soo;Park Tae-Kyu
    • The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-12
    • /
    • 2006
  • The aim of this study is to analyse a survey data on the number of charitable donations using a mixture of two Poisson regression models. The survey was conducted in 2002 by Volunteer 21, an nonprofit organization, based on Koreans, who were older than 20. The mixture of two Poisson distributions is used to model the number of donations based on the empirical distribution of the data. The mixture of two Poisson distributions implies the whole population is subdivided into two groups, one with lesser number of donations and the other with larger number of donations. We fit the mixture of Poisson regression models on the number of donations to identify significant covariates. The expectation-maximization algorithm is employed to estimate the parameters. We computed 95% bootstrap confidence interval based on bias-corrected and accelerated method and used then for selecting significant explanatory variables. As a result, the income variable with four categories and the volunteering variable (1: experience of volunteering, 0: otherwise) turned out to be significant with the positive regression coefficients both in the lesser and the larger donation groups. However, the regression coefficients in the lesser donation group were larger than those in larger donation group.