• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.254-260
• /
• 2015

With the advancement of shoulder arthroscopy, use of biodegradable suture anchors in the surgical repair of rotator cuff tears has increased. Because of the radiolucency of these anchors, radiography is not appropriate for early detection of anchor failure. Ultrasonography is an advantageous modality in visualizing biodegradable, radiolucent anchors on a real-time basis without risk of radiation exposure. We report on two cases of displacement of a biodegradable suture anchor diagnosed on ultrasonography during the postoperative follow- up, which has not been previously reported. Because this displacement could be missed in the postoperative follow up ultrasonography, we describe the ultrasonographic features of the displaced biodegradable anchors. Surgeons and radiologists should pay special attention to the possibility of displacement of the suture anchor in patients who underwent rotator cuff repairs using suture anchors.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.158-164
• /
• 2008

Purpose: We compared the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair using metal and biodegradable anchor fixation. Materials & Methods: We reviewed 26 patients with anterior shoulder instability treated by arthroscopic Bankart repair from October, 2006, to March, 2007, 15 patients with metal anchors and 11 patients with biodegradable anchors. The average age was 27.4 years old (range: 17~55) and mean follow-up was 14 months (range: 12~17 months). Functional outcome was evaluated using the Korean Shoulder Score for Instability (KSSI), Rowe's Bankart Grading scale (RBGS), ASES score, and UCLA scores. Results: In the metal-anchor group, the improvements of mean KSSI, ASES, UCLA score, and RBGS were 20.6, 24.0, 4.0, and 45.5, respectively. In the biodegradable anchor group, improvements of mean KSSI, ASES, UCLA score, and RBGS were 21.0, 23.6, 4.6, and 48.9. The improvements in final outcomes were not significantly different (p>.05). One metal problem and one traumatic redislocation occurred in the metal group. Conclusion: Both techniques produced satisfactory outcomes in the treatment of traumatic anterior instability. The biodegradable anchor group could also avoid problems with metal anchors.

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2008.03a
• /
• pp.94-94
• /
• 2008

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2008.03a
• /
• pp.3-3
• /
• 2008

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.8-15
• /
• 2012

Purpose: The object of this study was to investigate the difference in torque and pullout strength between the standard anchor insertion (5.0 mm) with a small awl (3.7 mm) and larger anchor insertion (6.5 mm), with a standard awl (5.0 mm) in osteoporotic humeral head. Materials and Methods: The embalmed 24 paired cadaveric shoulders were assigned to either Group A or B. After measuring the bone mineral density (BMD) of the ROI (region of interest) in the humeral head, 5.0 mm suture anchors were inserted using a 3.7 mm awl in Group A1, and the same 5.0 mm anchors were inserted using a 5.0 mm awl in Group A2. The 5.0 mm anchors were inserted using a 5.0 mm awl in Group B1, and 6.5 mm anchors were inserted using a 5.0 mm awl in Group B2. We measured the torques at the time of the anchor insertion and pullout strengths. Results: There was no significant difference in the BMD between the groups. The torque of A1 (20.6 $cN{\cdot}m$) was significantly higher than that of A2 (13.2 $cN{\cdot}m$), and the torque of B2 (20.8 $cN{\cdot}m$) was significantly higher than that of B1(12.1 $cN{\cdot}m$). However, the difference in the increased torque between group A and B was not significant. The pullout strength of A1 (204.2 N) was significantly higher than that of A2 (152.9 N), and the pullout strength of B2 (210.9 N) was significantly higher than that of B1 (149.5 N). However, the difference in the increased pullout strength between Group A and B was not significant. Conclusion: In severe osteoporosis, the use of a larger suture anchor with a standard awl increased the torque and pullout strength significantly, in comparison to the use of the same sized suture anchor and awl. If there is an inadequate interval between the anchors on the greater tuberosity, the use of a 3.7 mm awl and 5.0 mm anchor will be beneficial compared to that of a 5.0 mm awl and 6.5 mm anchor, considering that an increase in the pullout strength does not depend on the awl size.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.141-147
• /
• 2006

Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiological results of anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction using hamstring autograft and tibialis tendon allograft. Materials and Methods: Twenty four ACL reconstructions using hamstring autograft and 30 using tibialis anterior tendon altograft were followed up at least 1 year. We performed femoral tunnel fixation with Ligament Anchor(LA) screw and tibial tunnel fixation with biodegradable interference screw. Evaluations included Lysholm knee(LK) score, Tegner activity scale, Lachman test, Pivot-Shift test, Quardriceps atrophy, incision site numbness, anterior knee pain and instrumented anterior laxity with $Telos^{(R)}$ device. Results: Preoperativ mean LK score was $60.3(18{\sim}82)$ in autograft group and 61.2(25-80) in allograft group. Mean LK score improved to $91.6(68{\sim}100)\;and\;92.6(77{\sim}100)$ respectively. Activity level, using Tegner activity scale, slightly decreased compared with that of Preinjury state in both groups. Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Quadriceps atrophy, anterior knee pain, incision site numbness, and anterior drawer test using $Telos^{(R)}$ device showed no significant difference between two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: In performing the ACL reconstruction, there was no statistically significant difference between hamstring autograft group and tibilis anterior allograft group in clinical or in radiological results.