• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2008.03a
• /
• pp.4-4
• /
• 2008

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2002.10a
• /
• pp.353-357
• /
• 2002

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2001.03a
• /
• pp.20-21
• /
• 2001

외상성 견관절 전방 불안정성에 대한 치료로서 관혈적 Bankart 복원술은 기존의 치료 결과들과 마찬가지로 만족스러운 결과를 일관되게 보여주는 우수한 술식으로 사료된다.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.115-118
• /
• 2009

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.70-76
• /
• 2006

Purpose: This study presents 5 patients who had metallic anchor protrusion on glenoid after Bankart repair in anterior shoulder instability and reviewed the cause, clinical feature and arthroscopic removal technique. Method and Materials: 5 male with average age of 22 years (range 19 to 25 years) were included. 4 patients had arthroscopic Bankart repair and 1 patient had open repair for anterior shoulder instability. They had protruded metallic suture anchors on glenoid and the protruded suture anchors were removed arthroscopically using larger suture anchor empty inserter. Results: 4 patients had painful clicking sound with motion of abduction and external rotation and 1 patient showed shoulder instability. The ROM showed normal except mild degrees loss of external rotation. The position of protruded metallic anchor was 2, 3 and 5 O'clock in three patients and 4 O'clock in 2 patients. In 2 patients, the metallic suture anchor was malpositioned about 5mm off on the medial side from the anterior glenoid edge. All had Outerbrige classification Grade II-III chondral damage on humeral head and 1 patient showed glenoid cartilage destruction. None had shoulder instability after 2 years of follow-up. Constant score was 65 preoperatively and 89 postoperatively. ASES score was 67 preoperatively and 88 postoperatively. Conclusion: Symptoms of protruded suture anchor are not combined with instability. Most of symptoms were revealed from the rehabilitation period and confused with postoperative pain. Prompt diagnosis and early arthroscopic removal or impaction of protruded metallic suture anchor is recommended because of serious glenohumeral cartilage destruction. This is easy and simple and reproducible method to remove protruded metallic suture anchor arthroscopically.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.1 no.2
• /
• pp.154-158
• /
• 2002

Purpose: To compare the results of open and arthroscopic method in recurrent anterior should erinstability. Materials and Methods: The 68 patients who have been taken the open or arthroscopic Bankartrepair for the period of Jan. 1995 to April. 2000. One group (23 patients) had elected an arthroscopic Bankart repair, the other group (45 patients) had chosen open stabilization. Patients were followed up12 to 63 months (ave. 34 months) after surgery. Results: We found 2 cases of subluxation out of open repair group, and then treated by conservative method. There were another 2 cases of dislocation and 2 cases of subluxation out of arthroscopicrepair group, and we have taken out 1 case of reoperation by open method. Using the functional scales by Rowe, the patients who have taken the open method posted at the average point of 87, while the arthroscopic method posted 85 points. Patients satisfaction points were 84.6 and 72.5 respectively. There were no criteria of statistically significant except stability and motion score. Conclusion: Open Bankart repair would be better in stability, and arthroscopic method in ROM gain. Proper patient selection based on physical examination and arthroscopic inspection to optimize the indications contributed to successful treatment.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2006

견관절 전방 불안정성의 관절경적 치료는 환자 개개인의 병리 상태를 잘 파악하여 적절한 복원술을 시행함으로써 보다 좋은 결과를 기대할 수 있다. 현재 관절경적 Bankart 복원술시 봉합 나사못이 가장 이상적인 봉합기구로 알려져 있으며 여러 병리 상태를 고려하여 관절경적 복원술을 시행한 결과 여러 학자들이 과거에 비해 좋은 결과를 보고하고 있다(Table 2). 따라서 술기상으로 보다 숙련된 술식을 통해 재발율을 낮출 수 있으며 보다 좋은 결과를 얻기 위하여 수술 후 적극적인 재활 프로그램이 요할 것으로 생각된다.

• 대한관절경학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.04a
• /
• pp.23-28
• /
• 2008

1. 손상받은 조직을 보호하면서 동시에 주위 조직과의 유착을 방지하고 soft tissue의 pliability를 유지시켜 관절 운동 범위를 향상하기 위해 통증을 유발하지 않는 범위 내에서 부드러운 수동 관절 운동을 먼저 실시한다. 2. 모든 재활 프로그램은 환자의 개개인의 특성에 맞춰 운동 내용과 시기를 조정해야 한다. : Important to individualize rehab. program. 3. 능동적 관절운동 (active ROM)은 수술한 조직이 치유될 충분한 시간이 경과되었거나 환자가 통증없이 독립적인 견관절 운동이 가능할 때 실시한다. 4. Strengthening of the dynamic stabilizer(muscles around shoulder joint) 가 모든 shoulder instability 재활에 가장 기본적인 요소이다.

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2005.11a
• /
• pp.198-205
• /
• 2005

1. Many design features including suture type, anchor size and geometry, and anchor material, play a role in the overall strength of the anchor. In addition, technical considerations such as implant orientation, pattern, and location may affect the ultimate success of the repair. 2. Multiple fixation points provide a biomechanically sounder construct in Bankart repair. The size of the glenoid and its rim make anchor size a critical consideration in implant selection and implementation.

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.104-109
• /
• 2007

외상성 전방탈구의 경우 일차성 탈구이거나 일상생활에 큰 불편을 호소하지 않는 불안정성이 있을 경우 및 비외상성 다방향 불안정성의 경우 보존적 치료가 바람직하며, 10대 및 20대의 재탈구로 인한 불안정성이 유발될 경우 관절경적 혹은 개방성 Bankart 술식을 통하여 관절순의 해부학적 정복 및 술 후 잘 조절된 재활치료를 시행할 경우, 좋은 결과를 얻을 수 있다. 치료 방법의 선택 시 가장 중요한 요소는 환자의 원하는 결과를 만족 시켜줄 수 있는 치료 방법을 선택하는 것이며, 이는 불안정성의 원인, 정도, 탈구의 횟수, 환자의 활동도 및 재활 의지등을 종합적으로 감안하여 결정되어야 한다.