• Proceedings of the Korea Institute of Fire Science and Engineering Conference
• /
• 2011.04a
• /
• pp.155-159
• /
• 2011

건축법에서 건축마감재료의 연소독성은 설치류(마우스)를 사용한 가스유해성시험으로 평가되고 있다. 최근 동물시험에 대한 최소화 및 대체시험개발의 필요성으로 인해 연소가스의 정량분석을 통한 독성지수연구가 요구되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 이미 철도차량에서 적용되고 있는 BS6853의 연소독성평가를 통해 기존 가스유해성시험결과의 상대적인 비교분석을 수행하여, 건축재료의 연소독성평가에 대한 다양한 가능성을 제시하고자 하였다.

• Fire Science and Engineering
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.35-41
• /
• 2011

Casualties due to toxic smoke products have been reported as major fire damage. There are various tests in order to evaluate toxic smoke from a fire at home and abroad, and KS F 2271 as a test of the gas hazard of building finish materials has been conducted in Korea. The current test of the gas hazard exposes rodent, laboratory rat, to smoke gases to evaluate combustion gas toxicity by measuring acting time of that. this study performed a test of the gas hazard for combustible polymer material, Urethane and rubber flooring, and determined gases with the FT-IR. Quantitative results compared with standard value defined in BS6853 and toxicity index (R) was calculated. Using relative comparison with animal test and the toxicity index, We tried a variety of toxicity evaluation by correlation analysis of two tests.

• Journal of the Korean Applied Science and Technology
• /
• v.29 no.4
• /
• pp.545-551
• /
• 2012

Due to the use of polymeric materials in construction materials, the fire combustion gases that occur in the fire are various. The one of combustion gases, HBr is measured to evaluate the toxicity of the combustion gases in the FTP Code Part 2, Standard NES 713 and Standard BS 6853. According to the MSDS, Inhalation of HBr gas especially cause burn, respiratory dysfunction, headache, etc. The people who are exposed to 50ppm of HBr gas, very irritant gas may also frequently result in both immediate death and post-exposure deaths due to pulmonary complications. In this paper, we conduct a research on the combustion toxicity of HBr gas hazardous test which is motility measurement of the mice exposed to the HBr standard gas comparing the biological analysis result.

• Proceedings of the KSR Conference
• /
• 2005.05a
• /
• pp.163-168
• /
• 2005

In case of rolling stock, SEMS is generally applied in the advanced countries, but is start stage in our country. SEMS is defined the system engineering management system in order to achieve the optimized train performance among the several client requirements aspect of technical engineering management during the design life cycle. And the fire engineering activities in hong kong EMU project are introduced aspect of SEMS in this paper. The fire engineering at rolling stock in view of SEMS controls to apply the satisfied interior material by the fire safety standards (regulation of the commute urban subway safety guideline by the MOCT, BS 6853, NFPA 130, NF F 16-101) and to minimize the fire load in order that passengers egress safe from the fired rolling stock. The rolling stock in the advanced countries is designed to stand for 15-20 minutes in considering the rolling stock to be fired in tunnel. For passenger fire safety, the passenger evacuation provision and progress is set up.

• Proceedings of the Korea Institute of Fire Science and Engineering Conference
• /
• 2012.04a
• /
• pp.373-376
• /
• 2012

건축 재료가 다변화됨에 따라 화재 시 발생되는 연소가스 또한 다양해지고 있다. 그중 HBr은 NES 713과 BS 6853에서 연소 가스의 독성 평가를 위해 측정되는 독성가스이다. 특히 산업안전물질보건자료(MSDS)에서는 HBr가스를 흡입할 경우 화상을 일으키며 호흡부전, 두통 등을 유발시킬 수 있고 50ppm의 HBr가스에 노출된 사람은 생명과 건강에 즉시 영향을 받을 수 있는 매우 유독한 연소가스이다. 본 논문에서는 HBr 표준가스를 사용하여 건축법에서 규정한 가스유해성 시험결과와 HBr가스에 노출된 mouse의 병리학적 관찰 결과를 비교 분석하여 HBr의 연소 독성에 관하여 연구를 진행하였다.

• Composites Research
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.41-48
• /
• 2004

"Phenolic composite", one of safety composites was chosen to build rolling stock in England while it was applied to building materials in London Underground facilities. This paper was written by Mr. Denver E. Brown. He emphasizes, from visibility and toxicity points of view, phenolic is the best and Mr. Forsdyke says, there is no question, passenger's lives are No. 1 issue, material recycling is not No.1! not No.1!