• Title/Summary/Keyword: Axiom A

Search Result 147, Processing Time 0.019 seconds

Analysis and Design of a Main Starting Valve Using Independence Axiom (독립공리를 이용한 메인 스타팅 밸브의 분석 및 설계)

  • Bae, Tae-Sung;Park, Soo-Chul;Park, Sang-il;Lee, Kwon-Hee
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Process Engineers
    • /
    • v.9 no.5
    • /
    • pp.7-13
    • /
    • 2010
  • Main starting valve is one of the main parts in the control system of diesel engines, purposed for starting main engines. It is composed of ball valve, check valve, actuator, etc. The design axioms provide a general framework for design methodology. Two axioms are independence axiom and information axiom. These axioms can be applied to all design process in a general way. The first axiom is introduced to analyze and evaluate the design of a main starting valve. The design parameters(DPS) are determined sequentially by considering the independence axiom. For the structural design of a main starting valve, the strength is calculated by using finite element method. In addition, the strength of its actuator piston is evaluated.

Pythagorean Theorem II : Relationship to the Parallel Axiom (피타고라스의 정리 II : 평행공리와의 관계)

  • Jo, Kyeonghee;Yang, Seong-Deog
    • Journal for History of Mathematics
    • /
    • v.32 no.5
    • /
    • pp.241-255
    • /
    • 2019
  • The proposition that the parallel axiom and the Pythagorean theorem are equivalent in the Hilbert geometry is true when the Archimedean axiom is assumed. In this article, we examine some specific plane geometries to see the existence of the non-archimidean Hilbert geometry in which the Pythagorean theorem holds but the parallel axiom does not. Furthermore we observe that the Pythagorean theorem is equivalent to the fact that the Hilbert geometry is actually a semi-Euclidean geometry.

Wittgenstein on the Axiom of Reducibility (비트겐슈타인과 환원 가능성 공리)

  • Park, Jeong-il
    • Korean Journal of Logic
    • /
    • v.20 no.1
    • /
    • pp.69-96
    • /
    • 2017
  • Wittgenstein criticizes explicitly Russell's theory of types and, in particular, his axiom of reducibility in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. What, then, is the point of Wittgenstein's criticisms of Russell's theory of types? As a preliminary study to answer this question, I will examine how Wittgenstein criticized Russell's axiom of reducibility. Wittgenstein declares that Russell's axiom of reducibility is not a logical proposition, that if it is true it will be so mere by a happy chance and that "we can imagine a world in which the axiom of reducibility is not valid." What, then, is the ground for that? I will endeavor to show that by explicating the ideas of Wittgenstein's 1913 letter to Russell, those ideas decisively influenced on Ramsey's and Waismann's model which intended to show that the axiom of reducibility is not valid.

  • PDF

Zermelo 이후의 선택공리

  • 홍성사;홍영희
    • Journal for History of Mathematics
    • /
    • v.9 no.2
    • /
    • pp.1-9
    • /
    • 1996
  • This paper is a sequel to [26]. We investigate how the Axiom of Choice has been accepted after Zermelo introduced the Axiom in 1904. The response to the Axiom has divided into two groups of mathematicians, namely idealists and empiricists. We also investigate how the Zorn's lemma (1935) has been emerged. It was originally formulated by Hausdorff in 1909 and then by many other mathematicians independently.

  • PDF

A CORRECTION OF KELLEY'S PROOF ON THE EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN THE TYCHONOFF PRODUCT THEOREM AND THE AXIOM OF CHOICE

  • Kum, Sangho
    • Journal of the Chungcheong Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.16 no.2
    • /
    • pp.75-78
    • /
    • 2003
  • The Tychonoff product theorem is one of the most fundamental theorems in general topology. As is well-known, the proof of the Tychonoff product theorem relies on the axiom of choice. The converse was also conjectured by S. Kakutani and Kelley [1] then resolved this conjecture in his historical short note on 1950. However, the original proof due to Kelley has a flaw. According to this observation, we provide a correction of the proof in this paper.

  • PDF

ON THE AXIOM OF CHOICE OF WEAK TOPOS Fuz

  • Kim Ig-Sung
    • Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.21 no.2
    • /
    • pp.211-217
    • /
    • 2006
  • Topos is a set-like category. In topos, the axiom of choice can be expressed as (AC1), (AC2) and (AC3). Category Fuz of fuzzy sets has a similar function to the topos Set and it forms weak topos. But Fuz does not satisfy (AC1), (AC2) and (AC3). So we define (WAC1), (WAC2) and (WAC3) in weak topos Fuz. And we show that they are equivalent in Fuz.

A Structural Design of Multilevel Decomposition and Mapping (다층 중첩 및 매핑에 의한 구조적 설계)

  • Lee, Jeong Ick
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engineers
    • /
    • v.22 no.1
    • /
    • pp.100-106
    • /
    • 2013
  • This paper describes an integrated optimization design using multilevel decomposition technique on the base of the parametric distribution and independent axiom at the stages of lower level. Based on Pareto optimum solution, the detailed parameters at the lower level can be defined into the independent axiom. The suspension design is used as the simulation example.

MEXS Extracting and Storing for Ontology Debugging (온톨로지 디버깅을 위한 MEXS 추출 및 저장 기법)

  • Kim, Je-Min;Park, Young-Tack
    • Journal of KIISE:Software and Applications
    • /
    • v.35 no.6
    • /
    • pp.366-373
    • /
    • 2008
  • The web ontology language(OWL) has been used by ontology designers to construct ontology. In order to derive hidden information(concept subsumption, concept satisfiability and realization) of OWL ontology, a number of OWL reasoners have been introduced. But most reasoners simply report these information without process for any arbitrary entailment and unsatisfiable concept derived from a OWL ontologies. In this paper, we propose Minimum Expression Axiom Set(MEXS) detection and storing for debugging unsatisfiable concepts in ontology. In order to detect MEXS, we need to find axiom to cause inconsistency in ontology. Therefore, our work focused on two key aspects: given a inconsistency ontology, identifying the roots of axioms to occur unsatisfiable and derived axioms from among them; and extracting MEXS. Our results can be applicable to all application, which is at the basis of the description logic.