• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.290-298
• /
• 1996

The effects of impression tray disinfection procedures on the bond strength of impression-material adhesive to two of types resin trays were evaluated with a tensile test. Autopolyme-rizing acrylic resin was formed into 1x1x1 cm cubes. A hook was attached to each cube with autopolymerizing acrylic resin. Perforated trays were fabricated with stops to maintain an even 3 cm of impression material over the resin block. Hook on the opposite side of the perforated tray permitted attachment of the metal plate to a mechanical testing machine. Before adhesive was applied, one third of the resin specimens were immersed in a 5% sodium hypochlorite solution : one third in a 2% glutaradehyde solution, and one third were kept in the "as fabricated" condition. Three products(Perfect ups, Exafine, and Exp-ress) of polyvynil siloxane impression material-adhesive system were evaluated. The resin-impression material-metal plate couples were attached to a mechanical testing machine and tensile forces were applied at a separation rate of 10 centimeters per second. The results were as follows; 1. Both disinfectant and adhesive had effects on bond strength values, but adhesive had more effect than disinfectant(p<0.01). However, there was no interaction between dinin-fectant and adhesive(p>0.01). 2. Mean bond strength values for the Perfect materials were about 85% less than that of the Exafine or the Express materials. However, there was no stastically significant difference between the mean bond strength values of the Exafine materials and the Express materials(p>0.05). 3. The use of disinfectants produced significant reduction in bond strength values(p<0.05). But there was no stastically significant difference between the mean bond strength values of the groups treated with disinfectants(p>0.05).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.575-586
• /
• 2000

In this study, adaptation of compomer to saliva contaminated dentin was evaluated with scanning electron microscope(SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscope(CLSM). For the SEM study, the occulusal surfaces of thirty two molar teeth were grounded to exposure dentin surfaces. The specimen were randomly assigned to control and three experimental groups with four samples in each group. In control group, Dyract and F-2000 compomer were bonded on the specimens according to the manufactures direction. Experimental groups were subdivided into three groups. They were contaminated with saliva on dentin surfaces ; Experimental group 1 : Saliva was dried with compressed air. Experimental group 2 : Saliva was rinsed with air-water spray and dried. Experimental group 3 : After polymerization of an adhesive, they were contaminated with saliva, and then saliva was rinsed with air-water spray and dried. Dyract and F-2000 compomer were bonded on saliva-treated dentin surfaces. The interfaces between dentin and compomer were observed with SEM. For the CLSM study, Class V cavities were prepared in buccal and ligual surfacess of thirty two molars. The specimens were divided into control and experimental groups. Class V cavities in experimental group were contaminated with saliva and those surfaces in each experimental groups received the same treatments as for the SEM study. Cavities were applied Prime & Bond 2.1 and F-2000 compomer primer/adhesive that were mixed with fluorescein, and then were filled with Dyract and F-2000 compomer. Specimens were embedded in transparent acrylic resin and sectioned buccolingual1y with diamond wheel saw, and then mounted on cover slide for CLSM study. The interface between cavity and compomer was observed by fluoresence imaging with a CLSM. The results were as follows : 1. In SEM exammination of Dyract group, control group, experimental group 2, 3 showed close adaptation to dentin and hybrid layer of $3{\sim}4{\mu}m$ diameter. Interfacial gap between compomer and dentin in experimental group 1 was wider than in control group. 2. In SEM examination of F-2000 group, adaptation to dentin of control group was closer than Dytact control group, but hybrid-like layer was not observed. Interfacial gap between compomer and dentin in experimental group 1 was wider than in Dyract experimental group 1. 3. In dissolution specimens of Dyract and F-2000 group, resin tags penetrated through dentinal tubules in control group and experimental group 1 and 3, but the penetration of resin tag was irregular and partial in experimental group 1. 4. In CLSM exammination of Dyract and F-2000 group, adhesive patterns of control and experimental groups showed same as in SEM. This result suggests the treatment methods, rinsing & drying, repeating all adhesive procedures, will produce good effect on adaptation of compomer to dentin if the dentin surface or polymerized adhesive is contaminated by saliva.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.317-322
• /
• 2015

PURPOSE. The aim was to evaluate the effect of curing mode and different dentin surface pretreatment on microtensile bond strength (${\mu}TBS$) of self-adhesive resin cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-six extracted human permanent molars were sectioned horizontally exposing flat dentin surface. The teeth were divided into 12 groups (3 teeth/group) according to the dentin surface pretreatment methods (control, 18% EDTA, 10% Polyacrylic acid) and curing mode (self-curing vs. light-curing) of cement. After pretreatment, composite resin blocks were cemented with the following: (a) G-CEM LinkAce; (b) RelyX U200, followed by either self-curing or light-curing. After storage, the teeth were sectioned and ${\mu}TBS$ test was performed using a microtensile testing machine. The data was statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Student T-test and Scheffe's post-hoc test at P<.05 level. RESULTS. For G-CEM LinkAce cement groups, polyacrylic acid pretreatment showed the highest ${\mu}TBS$ in the self-cured group. In the light-cured group, no significant improvements were observed according to the dentin surface pretreatment. There were no significant differences between curing modes. Both dentin surface pretreatment methods helped to increase the ${\mu}TBS$ of RelyX U200 resin cement significantly and degree of pretreatment effect was similar. No significant differences were found regarding curing modes except control groups. In the comparisons of two self-adhesive resin cements, all groups within the same pretreatment and curing mode were significantly different excluding self-cured control groups. CONCLUSION. Selecting RelyX U200 used in this study and application of dentin surface pretreatment with EDTA and polyacrylic acid might be recommended to enhance the bond strength of cement to dentin.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.289-296
• /
• 1992

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths and failure sites of metal brackets bonded with chemically cured adhesive and light-cured adhesive. 10 brackets were bonded on prepared enamel surfaces with $Transbond^{circledR}$ (Unitek/3M; U.S.A.) light-cured orthodontic adhesive and another 10 brackets were bonded with $Ortho-one^{\circledR}$ (Bisco:U.S.A.) chemically cured orthodontic adhesive. 24 hours after bonding, the Instron universal testing machine was used to measure the shear bond strengths. The failure sites were examined under streoscopic microscope. The results were as follows: 1 . The mean shear bond strength of metal brackets bonded with light-cured adhesive was lower than that of metal brackets bonded with chemically cured adhesive, but the difference was not statistically significant (p < 0.05). 2. Regardless of the type of adhesives, the brackets were failed primarily at the bracket base-adhesive interface. 3. Bonding of metal brackets with light-cured adhesive is considered to be clinically acceptable.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제35권5호
• /
• pp.321-334
• /
• 2010

연구목적: 본 연구는 상아질 접착제의 잔류 용매가 접착 효율에 미치는 영향을 평가하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 본 연구에서는 5세대 2단계 산부식형 접착제와 7세대 단일과정 자가부식형 접착제를 사용하였다. 상아질 접착제의 증발률과 전환률, 적용 후 용매의 공기건조 방법에 따른 미세인장결합강도를 측정하였으며 접착 계면을 FE-SEM을 이용하여 관찰하였다. 결과: 1. 시간에 따라 접착제의 증발률은 증가하나 접착제의 종류에 따라 증가 양상이 서로 달랐다. 2. 대부분 전환률은 증발률에 비례하는 경향을 나타내었다. 3. 공기건조 방법에 따라 결합강도는 대부분 under군, control군, over군 순으로 증가하는 양상을 나타내었다. 4. FE-SEM에서 아세톤을 용매로 사용하는 접착제는 공기건조 방법에 따라 droplet이나 gap이 관찰되었다. 결론: 상아질 접착제의 잔류 용매는 접착 효율에 부정적인 영향을 미치기 때문에, 상아질 접착제의 선택과 사용 시 용매의 종류와 특징에 대한 적절한 이해가 필요할 것이다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.365-376
• /
• 2007

본 연구의 목적은 3종의 전체산부식 상아질 접착 시스템에서 적절한 산부식 시간과 접착제의 침투 능력에 대해 규명하고자 하였다. 우식이 없는 54개의 제3대구치의 상아질 표면을 5, 15, 25초 동안 산부식하고 산부식형 접착제 3종 (Scotchbond multipurpose, Single Bond, One Step) 을 도포한 후 복합레진을 충전하였다. 각 시편은 0회 (대조군) 또는 2000회 열순환 ($5^{\circ}C\;-\;55^{\circ}C$) (실험군) 후 미세인장강도를 측정하고 파단면을 관찰하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 실험군은 대조군에 비하여 결합강도가 감소하였으며, 특히 25초 산부식한 SM 및 SB군에서는 통계학적 유의차를 나타내었다. 2. 열순환 처리한 SM군과 SB군의 경우, 25초 간 산부식한 군이 5초 간 산부식한 군과 15초 간 산부식한 군에 비해 유의성 있게 낮은 결합강도를 나타냈다 (p < 0.05). 3. OS군의 경우, 산부식 시간 및 열순환 여부에 따른 유의성 있는 차이가 나타나지 않았다 (p > 0.05). 상아질 접착의 내구성은 접착제의 용매와 산부식 시간에 의해 영향을 받으며 특히, ethanol-based adhesive를 사용할 때 과도한 산부식은 유의해야 한다.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.165-172
• /
• 2019

이 논문의 목적은 기능성 모노머를 함유한 8세대 접착제의 적용시간 감소와 인산 산부식 여부가 유치에서 접착능에 미치는 영향을 평가하는 것이다. 80개의 우식이 없는 유구치를 선정하였고, 접착제의 종류에 따라서 2그룹으로 분류하였다(G-premio bond, Single bond universal). 각 그룹은 적용 시간와 인산 산부식 여부에 따라서 그룹당 10개씩, 총 4개의 하위그룹으로 추가 분류하였다. 각 하위그룹은 절반으로 나누어, 5개의 시편은 전단결합강도 측정 후 주사전자현미경을 촬영하여 파절양상을 확인하였고, 다른 5개의 시편은 미세누출을 측정하였다. G-premio bond는 적용시간와 인산 산부식 여부에 따른 결합강도와 파절양상, 미세누출의 유의한 차이가 관찰되지 않았다. Single bond universal은 적용시간을 길게 한 경우가 적용시간이 짧은 경우에 비해서 유의하게 높은 전단결합강도를 보였다(p = 0.014). 모든 그룹에서 나타난 전단결합강도는 임상적으로 허용 가능한 전단결합강도인 17 MPa 보다 높았다. G-premio bond는 인산 산부식 없이 적용시간을 줄여서 사용하는 방법이 가능하다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.226-233
• /
• 2013

PURPOSE. This study evaluated the adhesion of 10-MDP containing self-etch and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin with and without the use of etch-and-rinse technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Human third molars (N=180) were randomly divided into 6 groups (n=30 per group). Conventional (Panavia F2.0, Kuraray-PAN) and self-adhesive resin cements (Clearfil SA, Kuraray-CSA) were bonded to dentin surfaces either after application of 3-step etch-and-rinse (35% $H_3PO_4$ + ED Primer) or two-step self-etch adhesive resin (Clearfil SE Bond). Specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test using the universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). The failure types were analyzed using a stereomicroscope and quality of hybrid layer was observed under a scanning electron microscope. The data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. Overall, PAN adhesive cement showed significantly higher mean bond strength ($12.5{\pm}2.3-14.1{\pm}2.4$ MPa) than CSA cement ($9.3{\pm}1.4-13.9{\pm}1.9$ MPa) (P<.001). Adhesive failures were more frequent in CSA cement groups when used in conjunction with two-step self-adhesive (68%) or no adhesive at all (66%). Hybrid layer quality was inferior in CSA compared to PAN cement in all conditions. CONCLUSION. In clinical situations where bonding to dentin substrate is crucial, both conventional and self-adhesive resin cements based on 10-MDP can benefit from etch-and-rinse technique to achieve better quality of adhesion in the early clinical period.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.233-238
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of immediate or delayed composite resin filling on dentinal microtensile bond strength (${\mu}TBS$) after applied the adhesive. The coronal dentin of human third molars was exposed. Single-Bond or One-Step was applied on the dentin surfaces. and composite resin were constructed immediately (group 1) or 5min., 10min., 15min., 20min. and 30min. (groups 2-6) after an adhesive was applied. The specimens were sectioned and made bar-shaped. Each surface area of them was about $1\textrm{mm}^2$. The ${\mu}TBS$ test was performed by EZ test. The results were analysed by One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 95% significance level. The results suggested that the ${\mu}TBS$ of Single-Bond to dentin was decreased when the composite resin was constructed 20min. and 30min. after Single-Bond was applied. But the ${\mu}TBS$ of One-Step was not affected by delayed composite resin filling.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.633-640
• /
• 1994

The tensile bond strength to dentin was measured for three glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations: two light-curing glass-ionomer cements(Vitrebond and XR - Ionomer) and one traditional glass - ionomer cement(Ketac - Bond), two adhesive systems(Scotchbond, and XR - Bonding System), and a corresponding composite resin. The bond strength of this "sandwich" was also compared with that of the same cements used in bulk. Vitredbond showed a significantly higher bond strength in bulk than did the other two cements. Of the sandwiches, the XR - Iomomer and XR - Bond combination showed a bond strength significantly higher than that of the Vitrebond and Scotchbond or Ketac- bond and Scotchbond combination. The fracture of the bond was mainly adhesive for Vitrebond, cohesive for XR - Ionomer when used in bulk and adhesive - cohesive when used in a sandwich, and cohesive for Ketac-Bond.