The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Adhesion of 10-MDP containing resin cements to dentin with and without the etch-and-rinse technique

  • Turp, Volkan (University of Istanbul, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics) ;
  • Sen, Deniz (University of Istanbul, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics) ;
  • Tuncelli, Betul (University of Istanbul, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics) ;
  • Ozcan, Mutlu (University of Zurich, Dental Materials Unit, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science)
  • Received : 2012.12.06
  • Accepted : 2013.08.07
  • Published : 2013.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study evaluated the adhesion of 10-MDP containing self-etch and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin with and without the use of etch-and-rinse technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Human third molars (N=180) were randomly divided into 6 groups (n=30 per group). Conventional (Panavia F2.0, Kuraray-PAN) and self-adhesive resin cements (Clearfil SA, Kuraray-CSA) were bonded to dentin surfaces either after application of 3-step etch-and-rinse (35% $H_3PO_4$ + ED Primer) or two-step self-etch adhesive resin (Clearfil SE Bond). Specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test using the universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). The failure types were analyzed using a stereomicroscope and quality of hybrid layer was observed under a scanning electron microscope. The data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. Overall, PAN adhesive cement showed significantly higher mean bond strength ($12.5{\pm}2.3-14.1{\pm}2.4$ MPa) than CSA cement ($9.3{\pm}1.4-13.9{\pm}1.9$ MPa) (P<.001). Adhesive failures were more frequent in CSA cement groups when used in conjunction with two-step self-adhesive (68%) or no adhesive at all (66%). Hybrid layer quality was inferior in CSA compared to PAN cement in all conditions. CONCLUSION. In clinical situations where bonding to dentin substrate is crucial, both conventional and self-adhesive resin cements based on 10-MDP can benefit from etch-and-rinse technique to achieve better quality of adhesion in the early clinical period.

Keywords

References

  1. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:265-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820160307
  2. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res 1995;74: 1168-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740050501
  3. van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001;6:119-44.
  4. van Meerbeek B, de Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28: 215-35.
  5. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, de Munck J, van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003
  6. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, de Munck J, van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300604
  7. van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, de Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007; 28:3757-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044
  8. van Landuyt KL, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, Snauwaert J, de Munck J, Okazaki M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res 2008;87:757-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700804
  9. Wang T, Nikaido T, Nakabayashi N. Photocure bonding agent containing phosphoric methacrylate. Dent Mater 1991; 7:59-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90029-X
  10. Chigira H, Yukitani W, Hasegawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Hayakawa T, Debari K, Wakumoto S, Hisamitsu H. Selfetching dentin primers containing phenyl-P. J Dent Res 1994;73:1088-95.
  11. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994;73: 1212-20.
  12. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NR, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent 2004;32:55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.003
  13. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Limited decalcification/diffusion of self-adhesive cements into dentin. J Dent Res 2008;87:974-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808701012
  14. Madina MM, Ozcan M, Badawi MF. Effect of surface conditioning and taper angle on the retention of IPS e.max Press crowns. J Prosthodont 2010;19:200-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00547.x
  15. Melo RM, Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Galhano G, Amaral R, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Bond strength of two resin cements on dentin using different cementation strategies. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010;22:262-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00349.x
  16. Fujita K, Ma S, Aida M, Maeda T, Ikemi T, Hirata M, Nishiyama N. Effect of reacted acidic monomer with calcium on bonding performance. J Dent Res 2011;90:607-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510397837
  17. Ozcan M, Mese A. Adhesion of conventional and simplified resin-based luting cements to superficial and deep dentin. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1081-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0594-z
  18. van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00070-X
  19. Toledano M, Osorio R, Perdigao J, Rosales JI, Thompson JY, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA. Effect of acid etching and collagen removal on dentin wettability and roughness. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;47:198-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199911)47:2<198::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-L
  20. Erhardt MC, Cavalcante LM, Pimenta LA. Influence of phosphoric acid pretreatment on self-etching bond strengths. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00448.x
  21. Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of selfetching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater 2005;21:895-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.001
  22. Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Osorio R, Casucci A, Toledano M, Ferrari M. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on self-adhesive cements bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 2008;24:1156-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.005
  23. de Munck J, Vargas M, van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20:963-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.002
  24. Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:327-35.
  25. Pisani-Proenca J, Erhardt MC, Amaral R, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, Del Castillo-Salmeron R. Influence of different surface conditioning protocols on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:227-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60037-1

Cited by

  1. Análise comparativa da resistência de união de um cimento convencional e um cimento autoadesivo após diferentes tratamentos na superfície de pinos de fibra de vidro vol.45, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.18615
  2. Development of a Cavity Disinfectant Containing Antibacterial Monomer MDPB vol.95, pp.13, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516663465
  3. Interfacial microscopic examination and chemical analysis of resin-dentin interface of self-adhering flowable resin composite vol.6, pp.2046-1402, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12306.2
  4. Interfacial microscopic examination and chemical analysis of resin-dentin interface of self-adhering flowable resin composite vol.6, pp.2046-1402, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12306.3
  5. Interfacial microscopic examination and chemical analysis of resin-dentin interface of self-adhering flowable resin composite vol.6, pp.2046-1402, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12306.1
  6. Tooth surface treatment strategies for adhesive cementation vol.9, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.2.85
  7. Interfacial microscopic examination and chemical analysis of resin-dentin interface of self-adhering flowable resin composite vol.6, pp.2046-1402, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12306.4
  8. Effect of a filled adhesive as the desensitizer on bond strength of “Self-Adhesive Cements To” differently severity of fluorosed dentin vol.81, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23039
  9. Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis vol.43, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e29
  10. Bone-Adhesive Materials: Clinical Requirements, Mechanisms of Action, and Future Perspective vol.6, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201802021
  11. Evaluation of the adaptation of dental polymers using cross-polarization optical coherence tomography vol.5, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aafbad
  12. Comparação da resistência de união ao cisalhamento de dois diferentes sistemas adesivos: estudo in vitro vol.8, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-510x.2019.v8i1.3065
  13. Effect of Sonic Application of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements on Push-Out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Posts to Root Dentin vol.12, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12121930
  14. Effect of Immediate Dentin Sealing on the Bond Strength of Monolithic Zirconia to Human Dentin vol.44, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2341/18-198-l
  15. Shear bond strength of zirconia to resin: The effects of specimen preparation and loading procedure vol.11, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.313
  16. Micromorphology of the Adhesive Interface of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Enamel and Dentin vol.14, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14030492
  17. Bond Strength Stability of Different Dual-Curing Adhesive Cements towards CAD-CAM Resin Nanoceramic: An In Vitro Study vol.11, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093971
  18. Effect of Sonic Activation on Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber Post: An In Vitro Study vol.14, pp.17, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175038