• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.293-312
• /
• 2016

이 연구는 지자체의 자치법규에서 정보공개제도와 기록물관리의 상관성을 규명하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위해 자치법규정보시스템(ELIS)과 국가법령정보센터를 통해 지자체의 정보공개와 관련된 자치법규를 전수 조사하여, 337개의 자치법규를 분석하였다. 그 결과, '기록 유지(회의록 작성)', '이관된 기록물에 대한 정보공개 절차'와 '청구 접수부서'의 측면에서 '공공기록물법'과의 상관성을 찾을 수 있었다. '기록물유지(회의록 작성)'는 자치법규와 공공기록물법의 항목이 유사했으며, '청구 접수부서'는 '기록관리부서'로 기술되었다. 그러나 '청구 접수부서'는 부서명만 보면 민원부서의 성격이 강했으며, '회의록 작성'의 측면에서는 '공공기록물법'의 조항이 명시되지 않았고, '다른 법령과의 관계'에서는 '정보공개의 비대상'만 기술하고 있다.

• 해양환경안전학회지
• /
• 제28권6호
• /
• pp.928-936
• /
• 2022

국내에서 일어난 해양사고 발생 현황을 보면 평균적으로 약 8.5% 정도 사고 발생건수가 증가하는 추세를 보이고 있으며, 부선, 예인선, 유·도선 및 부유식해상구조물에서도 동일한 경향을 나타내고 있다. 본 연구에서는 국내 부유식해상구조물을 종류에 따라 분류하고, 선박안전법, 어선법, 낚시 관리 및 육성법 등 관련 국내법을 참고하여 부유식 구조물의 종류에 따른 기준체계와 적용 범위를 검토하고자 하였다. 아울러 해상 환경을 고려하여 국내 규정을 적용함에 있어 구조적으로 취약한 부분과 안전상의 사각지대에 놓인 위험 요소를 조기 발굴하고, 발굴된 위험 요소에 대해서 효과적인 개선 방안을 도출하고자 하였다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.71-97
• /
• 2021

The meaning of the amendment to the Media Arbitration Act in our society is not limited to media companies. And it's not just a problem for a specific group. It expresses public value because it is an issue that can affect members of society as a whole and furthermore, it becomes a bill that can infringe or strengthen individual freedom guaranteed by the Constitution, but makes different arguments. Freedom of speech is not achieved in a day and should not be easily lost by someone. Although it is not a frequent problem, fatal threats arising from wrong media reports take away an individual's present and future. It is because of this problem that the responsibility is important. Freedom of speech and control are heading in different directions, but they are the same as the front and back of the coin. The freedom pursued is different, but it consists of one body. If freedom and responsibility of speech made up of one body criticize or ignore each other, the results are scattered into a distorted On the other hand, the flexion of responsibility without freedom serves as a speaker that conveys the ideology of some classes or represents the interests of a particular group. The fact that the media should act as the air of society means that it should represent the interests of the majority, make them aware of the rights of unfair or marginalized members, and be their strength.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제63권
• /
• pp.185-207
• /
• 2014

There are over 20 administrative rules related to Korea Foreign Trade Act including Export and Import Notification, Consolidated Notification, Notification for Strategic Materials and so on. The purpose of this research proposes to reform some administrative rules related to Korea Foreign Trade Act. First, the administrative rules are a little many and hidden in part, so the effort need for simplification and publication. Especially Export and Import Notification is no need more, and some articles can be transfer to the similar notification. Second, the prohibited or regulated items are only 135, and the reason is cooperation to world trade policy and Korea trade purpose. The item number of trade limitation are decreased sharply compare to several decades, but we still effort to decrease. Third, There are 2 tracks trade regulation both Korea Foreign Trade Act and 57 specific acts. The number of trade limitation item is over 5,000, so it is impossible to control by Consolidated Notification. The role of Consolidated Notification is the just guides for Export and Import, so trader has to use the specific trade-related law.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제16권6호
• /
• pp.57-67
• /
• 2016

Purpose: Laws and regulations of land use are enormous, and the appliance of regulations is overlapped redundantly. Therefore, there are many problems such as time consuming in the process, limiting individual property rights, and interrupting enterprises' economic activities. This study will discuss problems of redundant regulations of land use and its improvement by figuring out current regulations of land use in Gyeonggi-do, one of provinces which applies the most various regulations of land use. Method: This study reviews laws on national land-use planning system and characteristics of land-use regulation in Korea. The extent of the review is limited to "framework act on the regulation of land use" with categories of national land, urban planing, architecture, etc. Through case studies in Gyeonggi-do, the status and problems of redundant regulations of land use are defined. For example, it is overlapped in "Seoul Metropolitan Area Readjustment Planning Act", Development Restriction Zone, Paldang Special District, and so on. It is mainly referred to 2015 Gyeonggi-do land-use restriction map. Result: First, Gyeonggi-do confronts many problems related to the development restrictions and the financial increasement for environmental management by redundant regulations. The development restrictions include supplying additional land for industrial use, relocating colleges, and height limitation relating to military facilities. Second, in order to organize redundant regulations, it is required to combine similar regulations and adjust through communication system among other departments. Third, regulations should consider unique local condition of each district. Lastly, efficient application of regulations is necessary so as to maximize the function of land, protect individual property rights, and stimulate local development.

• 정보화정책
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.48-60
• /
• 2022

이 연구는 미국 연방통신품위법 230조의 개정 논의를 신제도주의의 관점에서 분석하였다. 지금까지 내구력을 유지하며 미국 인터넷 내용규제의 기본틀을 구성해왔던 연방통신품위법 230조의 면책 조항은 오늘날 중대한 전환에 직면해 있다. 이 조항을 개폐하려는 정치적 시도들이 초당적인 협력으로 진행되고 있기 때문이다. 역사적 제도주의의 관점으로 연방통신품위법 230조의 개폐 논의를 분석한 결과, 미국 인터넷 내용규제 레짐의 변동은 가짜뉴스나 개인 정보 유출과 같은 외생적 사건과 함께, 행위자 간의 경쟁과 갈등이라는 내생적 요인이 복합적으로 작용해 발생한 것으로 여겨진다. 이상의 분석은 한국의 인터넷 내용규제 거버넌스의 제도개선과 방향성에 대해서도 함의를 지닐 수 있다.

• 자원리싸이클링
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.82-91
• /
• 2016

2016년 5월, 제19대의 마지막 정기 국회에서 "자원순환기본법"이 제정되었다. 본 법은 향후 우리나라의 자원순환 정책의 큰 방향성을 제시하여야 할 최상위의 기본법이므로 그 파급력을 고려하였을 때 법의 취지, 주요 내용, 정책적 방향성을 심도있게 분석하고 이해할 필요가 있다. 특히, 2018년 1월부터 본 법이 시행될 예정이므로 이 법의 원래 취지인 자원순환사회로의 전환을 효율적으로 지원할 수 있도록 법률 체계 및 내용을 제대로 갖추고 있는지 살펴볼 필요가 있다. 또한, 하위법령 제정 시 그 내용이 편향되지 않도록 이해관계자들의 적극적 참여를 통한 심도있는 협의가 이루어져야 할 것이며, 조항별 구체화된 법안들이 도출되어야 할 것이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 자원순환기본법의 체계 및 주요내용 검토를 통해 문제점을 파악하고, 법률의 실효성을 극대화하기 위해 하위법령 제정과정에서의 주요 조항별 논점과 구체적 시행방향에 대해 검토, 제시하고자 한다.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.77-84
• /
• 2007

This study was planned to investigate what the main factor of the regulation compliance of inspection on harmful machine, instrument and equipment by industrial safety and health act is. This study subject was composed of three groups as employers, employees of manufacturing and using the harmful machine and safety inspectors. Manufacturing workplace were 236 places, using workplace were 201 places and the safety inspectors were 100 people. The study subject was sampled by stratified random sampling considering the type of harmful Machine. Data for analysis is collected from each sample using interview with structured questionnaires. Compliance is measured by 2, 3, and 4 point scale composed by 8 sub items such as general perception, understanding, clearness, necessity, relevancy, implementation, penalty, and general compliance of the regulation. The level of 8 items of employer's compliance are not differentiated among three groups. The determining factors for inspection observance of the workplace using the harmful Machine were understanding, penalty and cognized compliance. The determining factors for inspection observance of the workplace manufacturing the harmful Machine were understanding and object conformity. These results show that the strategy to adapt the regulated group to inspection regulation will be the elevation of understanding for regulation first of all.

• 한국언론정보학보
• /
• 제44권
• /
• pp.180-222
• /
• 2008

본 연구는 시장지배적지위 남용 규제체계를 관련시장의 획정, 시장지배력의 존부에 대한 판단, 남용행위 여부에 대한 판단, 제재 조치 등의 단계를 통해 살펴보고 남용행위의 유형을 법률적 측면과 개념적 측면에서 검토하였다. 이를 바탕으로 그 동안 공정거래위원회의 시장지배적지위 남용행위 사건 처리 과정에서 나타난 미디어산업 관련 심결례를 검토하여 여러 유목으로 분류하여 설명하였으며 심결사례의 특징을 살펴보았다. 관련시장의 획정, 시장지배력 판단과 시장지배적 사업자 추정, 시장지배적지위 남용행위의 유형 등과 관련한 문제점을 정리하고 개선방안을 살펴보았으며 독과점 규제 및 미디어산업 규제와 관련된 함의를 도출하였다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.169-205
• /
• 2003

Arbitration means the procedure that a party inquires a third party arbitrator for a resolution on the dispute on certain matters of interest to follow through with the commitment of the arbitration, and a series of procedures performed by the arbitrator of the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board. Arbitration is implemented in accordance with the procedure determined by the Arbitration Act and Arbitration Regulations. In the event the parties reach to the reconciliation during the process of arbitration, the reconciliation is recorded in the form of arbitration award(decision), and in the event a reconciliation is not made, the arbitrator shall make the decision on the particular case. The arbitration award(decision) for reconciliation during the arbitration procedure (Article 31 of Arbitration Act, hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') or the mediation under the Arbitration Regulation of the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (Article 18 of the Arbitration Regulations) shall have the same effectiveness with the decision rendered by a court that, in the event a party does not perform the obligation, the enforcement document is rendered under the Rules on Enforcement Document on Mediation Statement of various dispute resolution committees of the Supreme Court to carry out the compulsory enforcement. However, in the event that the party to take on the obligation to perform under the arbitration award (decision) rendered by the arbitrator (Article 32 of the Act) does not perform without due cause, a separate enforcement decision in accordance with the procedure determined under the Civil Enforcement Act shall be obtained since the arbitration award(decision) cannot be the basis of enforcement under the Civil Enforcement Act. And, in order to enforce the judgment compulsorily in accordance with the regulations under the Civil Enforcement Act under the foreign arbitration judgment (Article 39 of the A.1), it shall fulfill the requirement determined under the Civil Litigation Act (article 217 of Civil Litigation Act) and shall obtain a separate enforcement decision in accordance with the procedure determined under the Civil Enforcement Act (Article 26 and Article 27 of Civil Enforcement Act) since the arbitration judgment of foreign country shall not be based on enforcement under the Civil Enforcement Act. It may be the issue of legislation not to recognize the arbitration award(decision) as a source of enforcement right, and provide the compulsive enforcement by recognizing it for enforcement right after obtaining the enforcement document with the decision of a court, however, not recognizing the arbitration award(decision) as the source of enforcement right is against Clause 3 of Article 31 of the Act, provisions of Article 35, Article 38 and Article 39 that recognized the validity of arbitration as equal to the final judgment of a court, and the definition that the enforcement decision of a court shall require the in compulsory enforcement under Clause 1 of Article 37 of the Act which clearly is a conflict of principle as well. Anyhow, in order to enforce the arbitration award(decision) mandatorily, the party shall bring the litigation of enforcement decision claim to the court, and the court shall deliberate with the same procedure with general civil cases under the Civil Litigation Act. During the deliberation, the party obligated under the arbitration award(decision) intended to not to undertake the obligation and delay it raises the claim and suspend the enforcement of cancelling the arbitration award(decision) on the applicable arbitration decision within 3 months from the date of receiving the authentic copy of the arbitration award(decision) or the date of receiving the authentic copy of correction, interpretation or additional decision under the Regulation of Article 34 of the Act (Clause 3 of Article 36 of the Act). This legislation to delay the sentencing of the enforcement and then to sentence the enforcement decision brings the difficulties to a party to litigation costs and time for compulsory enforcement where there is a requirement of an urgency. With the most of cases for arbitration being the special field to make the decision only with the specialized knowledge that the arbitrator shall be the specialists who have appropriate knowledge of the system and render the most reasonable and fair decision for the arbitration. However, going through the second review by a court would be most important, irreparable and serious factor to interfere with the activation of the arbitration system. The only way to activate the arbitration system that failed to secure the practicality due to such a factor, is to revise the Arbitration Act and Arbitration Regulations so that the arbitration decision shall have the right to enforce under the Rules on Enforcement Document on Mediation Statement of various dispute resolution committees of the Supreme Court.