• Architectural research
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.13-21
• /
• 2011

Since 2002, Architecture Schools in Korea was changing long traditional architectural education system from 4 years generalized architectural engineering curriculum to 5 years professional architecture program. Until 2010, 76 architecture schools have changed their program to 5 years course which was focused to design studio education. It was a very rapid change and there was not much time develop their own system which could represent institutional identity, character of students and local environment. Korea joined as a regular member of Canberra Accord in 2010 and it is meaningful to compare Korean architecture program contents to another country education contents. US architecture programs were selected for this comparison study. The goals of this study are to create a comparable understanding the form of contents of Architectural Education in US and Korea and to verify the substantial equivalence of these systems. To achieve above goals, three public institutes of each country were selected and analyzed with general information, history, resources, curriculum and the matrix of Student Performance Criteria for quantitative comparison. For qualitative comparison education context of programs were analyzed with program missions, the way of advising, professional connection and distribution of faculty loads.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.47-58
• /
• 2020

Kunsan National University obtained accreditation for its Architecture & Building Engineering Program from the Accreditation Board for Engineering Education in Korea (ABEEK) in 2004 and has offered an ABEEK-accredited degree pathway ever since. Then, in 2018, the university introduced the course-embedded outcomes assessment system as per ABEEK's KEC2015 accreditation criteria. One year into its implementation, the new system allows the measurement and assessment of 10 program outcomes covering 19 curricular modules and 1 non-curricular licensing examination. The system incorporates the four areas of specialization within architectural engineering as well as the three course categories of the math, science, and computer; liberal arts; and engineering core modules under the accreditation scheme. It also takes the students' academic years into account, especially for the mandatory modules offered to all students. Its rubric clarifies the performance criteria, performance level, assessment tools, objectives, and modules. The 2018 course-embedded outcomes assessment system is an ever-evolving structure with regular CQI: Continuous Quality Improvements along the circular process of system establishment → implementation → evaluation as per the virtuous cycle model required for an accredited engineering program.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.69-77
• /
• 2011

공학인증 운영 프로그램에서는 프로그램 학습성과를 달성하기 위한 도구로서 교과과정과 비교과과정을 운영하고 있다. 교과과정의 경우 프로그램 소속 학생들이 많은 시간을 할애한다는 점에서 이를 통한 프로그램 학습성과가 달성되기를 기대한다. 하지만, 교과과정만으로 이를 달성하기는 어려운 일이다. 따라서 비교과과정 운영을 통해 교과과정에서 달성도가 떨어지는 학습성과의 달성도를 높이려는 움직임들이 있다. 본 연구에서는 프로그램 학습성과 운영 및 평가 시 교과과정만으로는 달성하기 어려운 소프트 스킬에 대한 대체로서 비교과과정 운영에 대한 사례를 조사 분석하였다. 국내 40개 인증 프로그램의 비교과과정 운영 현황을 조사한 비교과과정 운영 사례를 바탕으로 총 30개의 비교과과정을 발굴 정리하고 각 과정별 학습성과 평가단위와 가중치를 제안하였다.