• Title/Summary/Keyword: ASD(Allowable stress design)

Search Result 42, Processing Time 0.028 seconds

A comparative study on optimum design of multi-element truss structures

  • Artar, Musa
    • Steel and Composite Structures
    • /
    • v.22 no.3
    • /
    • pp.521-535
    • /
    • 2016
  • A Harmony Search (HS) and Genetic Algorithms (GA), two powerful metaheuristic search techniques, are used for minimum weight designs of different truss structures by selecting suitable profile sections from a specified list taken from American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). A computer program is coded in MATLAB interacting with SAP2000-OAPI to obtain solution of design problems. The stress constraints according to AISC-ASD (Allowable Stress Design) and displacement constraints are considered for optimum designs. Three different truss structures such as bridge, dome and tower structures taken from literature are designed and the results are compared with the ones available in literature. The results obtained from the solutions for truss structures show that optimum designs by these techniques are very similar to the literature results and HS method usually provides more economical solutions in multi-element truss problems.

Optimum Design of I-Type Girders in Steel Bridges by LRFD and ASD (하중-저항계수 설계법과 허용응력 설계법에 의한 강교량 주부재의 최적화 설계)

  • 안성욱;신영석
    • Proceedings of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute Conference
    • /
    • 1998.10a
    • /
    • pp.183-190
    • /
    • 1998
  • In this study, I-type girders, main members of a steel composite bridge, are designed by Load and Resistance Factor Design method as well as Allowable Stress Design method. The width, height web thickness and flange thickness of main girders are set as design variables. The design program connects optimization program ADS, which is coded with FORTRAN, and a main program coded with $C^{++}$. In this study, it is shown that in this particular steel composite bridge, the design by The Load and Resistance Factor Design method is more economical than that by The Allowable Stress Design method.d.

  • PDF

Comparison of Stability Evaluation Methods using ASD and LRFD Codes for Girders and Towers of Steel Cable-Stayed Bridges (사장교 거더와 주탑의 안정성 검토를 위한 ASD와 LRFD 설계법 비교)

  • Choi Dong-Ho;Yoo Hoon
    • Proceedings of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute Conference
    • /
    • 2006.04a
    • /
    • pp.1001-1008
    • /
    • 2006
  • The main objective of this paper is to compare economical effectiveness of typical methods for checking stability in principal components of steel cable-stayed bridges. Elastic and inelastic buckling analyses are carried out for frame-like numerical models of cable-stayed bridges. The axial-flexural interaction equations prescribed in AASHTO Allowable Stress Design (ASD) and AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) are used in order to check the stability of principal components. Parametric studies are performed for numerical models which have the center span length of 300m, 600m, 900m and l200m with different girder depths. Peak values of the interaction equations are calculated at the intersection point between girders and towers. These peak values are considered as a major factor to design of principal components of cable-stayed bridges. As a result, more economical design for girders and towers can be feasible using the inelastic buckling analysis. In addition, LRFD codes are more economical about 20% on the average than ASD codes for all numerical models of cable-stayed bridges.

  • PDF

Comparison of Safety Margin of Shallow Foundation on Weathered Soil Layer According to Design Methods (설계법에 따른 풍화토 지반 얕은기초의 안전여유 비교)

  • Kim, Donggun;Hwang, Huiseok;Yoo, Namjae
    • Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
    • /
    • v.17 no.12
    • /
    • pp.55-64
    • /
    • 2016
  • In this paper bearing capacity and safety margin of shallow foundation on weathered soil ground against shear failure by using current design method of allowable stress design (ASD), load resistance factor design (LRFD) based on reliability analysis and partial safety factor design (PSFD) in Eurocode were estimated and compared to each other. Results of the plate loading test used in construction and design were collected and analysis of probability statistics on soil parameters affecting the bearing capacity of shallow foundation was performed to quantify the uncertainty of them and to investigate the resistance bias factor and covalence of ultimate bearing capacity. For the typical sections of shallow foundation in domestic field as examples, reliability index was obtained by reliability analysis (FORM) and the sensitivity analysis on soil parameters of probability variables was performed to investigate the effect of probability variable on shear failure. From stability analysis for these sections by ASD, LRFD with the target reiability index corresponding to the safety factor used in ASD and PSDF, safety margins were estimated respectively and compared.

A Case Study on the Design of Drilled Shaft on Soft Ground in Vietnam (베트남 연약지반에서의 현장타설말뚝 설계 사례)

  • Seo, Won-Seok;Cho, Sung-Han;Choi, Ki-Byung
    • Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
    • /
    • 2008.10a
    • /
    • pp.591-604
    • /
    • 2008
  • In this study, two design examples of drilled shafts on soft ground in Ho-Chi-Minh City, Vietnam are introduced. One is for a 27-story apartment and the other is for a Arch bridge over Saigon river. Unlikely the normal cases in Korea, all of the bored pile foundations are supposed to be placed on soil layers. Therefore, skin friction between pile and ground is the most crucial design parameter. Three methods using SPT N value of sandy soil -Korean Road Bridge Code(1996), Reese and Wright (1977), and O'Neill and Reese (1988)- were adopted to obtain an ultimate axial bearing capacity. In order to verify the calculated bearing capacity, 3 sets of static load test and a Osterberg Cell test were performed at an apartment site and a bridge site respectively. LRFD (Load Resistance Factored Design) method was compared with ASD (Allowable Stress Design) method. On application of ASD method, safety factor for skin friction was adopted as 2 or 3 while safety factor for end bearing was 3. The design bearing capacities from ASD method matched well with those from LRFD method when safety factor for skin friction was adopted as 2.

  • PDF

Design Comparison of Composite Girder Bridges Designed by ASD and LRFD Methods (허용응력설계법 및 하중저항계수설계법에 의한 강합성 거더교 설계결과 비교)

  • Cho, Eun-Young;Shin, Dong-Ku
    • KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.29 no.5A
    • /
    • pp.447-456
    • /
    • 2009
  • The design comparison and flexural reliability analysis of continuous span composite plate girder bridges are performed. The girders are designed by the methods of allowable stress design (ASD) and load and resistance factor design (LRFD). For the LRFD design, the design specification under development mainly by KBRC, based on AASHTO-LRFD specification in case of steel structures, is applied with the newly proposed design live load which has been developed by analyzing domestic traffic statistics from highways and local roads. For the ASD based design, the current KHBDC code with DB-24 and DL-24 live loads is used. The longest span length for the 3-span continuous bridges with span arrangement ratio of 4:5:4 is assumed to be from 30 m to 80 m. The amount of steel, performance ratios, and governing design factors for the sections designed by the ASD and LRFD methods are compared. In the reliability analysis for the flexural failure of the sections designed by two methods, the statistical properties on flexural resistance based on the yield strength statistics for over 16,000 domestic structural steel samples are applied.

A Comparison of Design Strength Equations between Steel and Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites Columns (철골 및 섬유보강 폴리머(FRP) 복합 기둥의 설계강도식에 관한 비교 연구)

  • Choi, Yeol;Pyeon, Hae-Wan
    • Journal of Korean Association for Spatial Structures
    • /
    • v.3 no.3 s.9
    • /
    • pp.85-93
    • /
    • 2003
  • Steel, concrete and their combination materials are the most 6commonly used materials for civil engineering structural systems such as buildings, bridge structures and other structures. Recently, however, fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites, a relatively new composite material made of fibers and polymer resins, have been gradually used in structural systems as an alternative structural material. This paper describes a comparison of design strength equations for steel column and FRP composite column based on design philosophies. The safety factors used in allowable stress design (ASD) are relatively higher in FRP structural design than steel structural design. Column critical stress equations of FRP composites column from an experimental study can be represented by Euler elastic buckling equation at the long-range of slenderness, and an exponential form at the short-range of slenderness as defined in Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) of steel column. The column strength of steel and FRP composite columns in large slenderness is independent of material strength, this result verified the elastic buckling equation as derived by Eq. (15) and Eq. (5).

  • PDF

Economic Evaluation Method by Design Method ASD and LRFD of Aluminum Curtain wall (알루미늄 커튼월의 ASD/LRFD설계방법에 따른 경제성 평가 방법)

  • Moon, Sang-Deok;Ock, Jong-Ho
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
    • /
    • 2014.05a
    • /
    • pp.16-17
    • /
    • 2014
  • The curtain wall construction applied on high-rise building facades in Korea became generalized, but specialty of the CMr(Construction Manager) who needs to perform economical project management with specialty in the curtain wall construction is still lacking. Therefore, this study analyzed the structure design standard of the curtain wall, researched economical design alternatives. Based on the research results, if the ratio of dead load against wind load is less than 0.1256, LRFD will be more economical.

  • PDF

A Study on the two span preflex composite girder bridges with LRFD (LRFD에 의한 2경간 Preflex 합성형교에 관한 연구)

  • 구민세;박영제;오석태
    • Proceedings of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute Conference
    • /
    • 1999.10a
    • /
    • pp.95-102
    • /
    • 1999
  • Preflex beams are prestressed by the predeflection technique, which enables the use of concrete-encased high strength steel beams where deflection or cracking of concrete, or both, would otherwise be excessive. This study presents the analysis of the two span preflex composite girder bridges with Load and Resistance Factor Design(LRFD), which is most widely used design nile in the advanced states. The results show that the comparison of LRR with Allowable Stress Design(ASD) according to span length.

  • PDF

Methods for wooden structural design- A comparative research between deterministic design and probability based design (목구조 설계를 위한 확정론적 구조 설계법과 확률 기반 구조 설계법의 비교 연구)

  • Park, Moon-Jae;Kim, Gwang-Chul
    • Journal of the Korea Furniture Society
    • /
    • v.20 no.4
    • /
    • pp.358-373
    • /
    • 2009
  • Probability based design(PBD)method has some advantages against current design methods. First, it can provide the quantitative values for the structural safety or capacity through the reliability index, $^{\beta}$. That presented the certainty on the corresponding structure for the designer or user, also that permitted the broad consideration in the safety of structures. In addition, it can give the quantitative lifetime of the related structure in the calculation process of target reliability index. Also, incidental economical efficiency can be expected because decrease of required structural material can be obtained by using the practical material data. Unlikely current deterministic structural design methods, main advantage is the reflection of real condition in the structural design process by application of the data with not small clear specimen but structural size material. Advanced countries, namely America, Canada, Europe, Australia and New Zealand already converted from allowable stress design(ASD) method to PBD method and used as a standard wooden structures code in the late 1980s and 1990s. Other domestic constructions standards such as the steel or concrete constructions accepted and used the PBD methods already. Accordingly, wooden structural design method also should be converted from deterministic ASD to probabilistic LRFD(Load and resistance factor design) in order to keep pace with worldwide demands for PBD. Hence, to suggest the reason of introduction the PBD in domestic wooden structural design and analysis, a brief example was used to show the different reliability index by using the different design methods. Definition, merits and demerits of deterministic ASD and probabilistic LRFD were followed. Also the three examples were presented to show the similarity and differences between ASD and LRFD. Finally, connection problems that might cause a disputation in wooden structural design and analysis were broadly examined.

  • PDF