• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2006.11b
• /
• pp.411-416
• /
• 2006

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 1999.11c
• /
• pp.547-553
• /
• 1999

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2016.05a
• /
• pp.521-531
• /
• 2016

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2016.05a
• /
• pp.105-114
• /
• 2016

• 한국IT서비스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.210-215
• /
• 2007

본 연구는 한국증권선물거래소 유가증원시장에 상장된 정보통신제조업체를 대상으로 기술혁신 결정요인을 분석하였다. 연구모형은 Romer(1990)에서 시작되는 내생적 경제성장 모험의 지식생산함수를 이용하였으며, 기술혁신의 측정은 특허청의 기업별 특허출원수를 활용하였다. 분석결과 연구개발집약도, 기술수준, 수출비중, 자본집약도는 기술혁신에 양(+)의, 반면 관계사 매입.매출비중은 기술혁신에 음(-)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 특히 관계사 매출비중보다 매일비중이 자사의 기술혁신에 보다 나쁜 영향을 미침을 확인하였다. 이는 경영자에게 자사의 기술혁신을 위해 무엇보다 관계사 매입비중을 감소시킬 것을 보여준다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.334-360
• /
• 2007

This paper presents an emerging concept, professional mobility in S&T innovation system, that focus on the utilization of highly qualified researchers without recruiting. In this paper we divided the utilization of external researcher into four types: (1)visiting/post-Doc/guest researcher, (2)collaborating research student, (3)part-timer or trainee and (4)foreign researcher. From 2002 to 2005 in 19 Korean government-funded research institutes, while total researchers have increased by 13.3%, external researchers have decreased from 39.2% to 35.7%. In 2005, visiting and foreign researchers were only 6.5% of total external researchers. It may indicate that the innovation capability of Korean research institutes is on the quite limited situation compared to foreign research institutes. The financial and institutional support programs for promoting the professional mobility are also insufficient in Korean S&T innovation system.

• Management & Information Systems Review
• /
• v.32 no.2
• /
• pp.193-212
• /
• 2013

Despite widespread availability of communication media supported ICT(Information & Communication Technology), the influence factors and its role to the communication interaction is not clear. The main objective of this research is to examine the factors that affect to the efficient and effective means of communication interaction. The investigation focuses on the effect of four different factors such as ICT communication media characteristics, personal innovativeness, and ICT media attitude. The hypotheses have been tested with the survey of 159 smart phone users. The research summarized in this paper decomposes the influence of the characteristics of ICT media, IT personal innovativeness, and the attitude of ICT usage to the efficient and effective communication interaction.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.808-841
• /
• 2007

Recently some researchers started to discuss the fundamental limitations of geographical innovation clusters. With the rapid development of information and telecommunication technologies, a new concept of virtual innovation cluster is emerging in the advanced countries an alternative to overcome the limitations of geographical clusters. In this context, this study is designed as a pilot study to verify limitations of and issues with geographical innovation cluster through a survey and review the possible application of virtual innovation cluster as an alternative to geographical innovation cluster. Topics covered in this study include; 1) What are the limitations and/or issues with geographical clusters? 2) Can these limitations of and issues with geographical innovation cluster be overcome with virtual innovation cluster? 3) What is the government policy direction to ensure effective utilization of virtual innovation clusters? To answer these questions, this study adopted various research techniques including literature reviews, surveys, case studies, and expert interviews. Especially, a survey was conducted to diagnose the limitations of geographical innovation cluster policy and to understand the possibility of applying virtual innovation clusters. Finally, the significances and limitations of the study are discussed.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.124-139
• /
• 2010

This study analyzes determinants of innovation in Korea manufacturing industries from 2005 to 2007. In order to do this, we use raw data from 'Korea Innovation Survey 2008: Manufacturing Sector' conducted by STEPI, and also collect financial statement data from Korea Investors Service. As an analytical method for the empirical test, we utilize Probit model. Empirical results show that firm size and market concentration have positive relationship with firm's innovation activities. These support the ‘Schumpeterian hypothesis’. This would be the most distinguished feature of this study compared to previous literatures.Our study also shows that R&D personnel ratio, R&D intensity, and advertising intensity have positive effects on firms' innovation. Thus, we can say that R&D activities and consumer orientation are the main determinants of innovation. However, profit ratio and growth rate do not have any statistically significant effect on firms' innovation.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.25-48
• /
• 2016

With the drastic changes toward open innovation, there have been many studies focusing on analyzing the characteristics of open innovation and fostering the open innovation. The most prominent research in open innovation literature is related to the partner selection. In partner selection process, what is important is to identify the expected performance when conducting open innovation with this partner. Therefore, this study suggests an integrative framework of BSC-AHP to support the effective partner selection. The aim of this study is to select the most desirable partner which maximize the performance of the firm after conducing open innovation. This paper employs BSC framework to prepare and characterize relevant decision criteria for the partner selection, and employs AHP to evaluate the partner alternatives under the prepared decision criteria.