• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.54 no.1
• /
• pp.325-341
• /
• 2020

This study used the Unpaywall API, one of the open tools to track the OA version, to empirically identify the OA of 3,905 papers that have been published by Korean corresponding authors since 2015 in international journals. As a result, the following facts were found. First, less than 30% of papers have been open accessed, and more than half of them were bronze OA. Secondly, the archiving site of the Green OA papers was found not to be domestic but mainly subject repositories or institutional repositories of overseas universities to which co-authors belong. Third, only 19.6% of research fund granted papers were open accessed and half of them were in the medical field. In contrast to the international trends in which the OA papers showed higher citations, the analyzed OA papers showed no higher citations than the non-OA papers.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.51 no.2
• /
• pp.273-294
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study is to provide an in-depth analysis on the publication patterns of the 1,029 journal articles by the Life Sciences' faculty at the K University, for the years 2004-2017 and to investigate any difference between their publication patterns and the citedness for the years 2004-2018. Among the three funding agency types, the research publications supported by foreign funding received the more citations than publications by other types of funding, and the study also found a statistical difference in the citedness (F = 10.467, p < .000***). In addition, the internationally co-authored publications received more citations than three other types of co-authored publications in terms of the immediacy index per publication and the average citations per publication.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.48 no.1
• /
• pp.77-97
• /
• 2017

With reference management tool based on web, we could understand not only impact about non-author, such as hand-on worker, educator, who are out of academia, but also trace the subject fields of readers and their status. This study by analyzing mendeley, understand what kinds of subject fields and status of readers read library and information science field articles. As a result of analyzing the status and the major of the reader, readers were distributed in the fields of business administration, education and so on, and according to the reader's major, there was a significant difference (p = .000) between the subject area of relatively read a lot. By the way, as the result of relational analysis between citation rate and numbers of mendeley readership about medeley saved articles, correlation coefficient shows 0.585, however as the result of relational analysis limiting the groups, in case of author group who tends to read the articles for citing, correlation coefficient shows 0.619. On the other hand, non-author group shows 0.384.

• The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences
• /
• v.7 no.6
• /
• pp.1353-1362
• /
• 2012

Many studies have demonstrated that articles from international collaborations are more cited than articles from domestic collaborations. However, difference between the citation impact of international and domestic co-authored papers is supposed to be widened due to the collaboration strategy adopted by individual institute. In short, each institute will show the significantly different citation impact between international and domestic co-authored papers. In this paper, we applied the index of Incremental Ciation Impact(ICI) to identify the different value of citation impact between international and domestic co-authored papers for research institutes of KRCF, results of which will be understood under the strategy of international research collaboration.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2014.08a
• /
• pp.11-15
• /
• 2014

과학기술 학술활동은 원천기술 확보의 기반인 기초연구를 강화하기 위한 핵심요소이다. 논문과 학술지는 학술 커뮤니티에서 사전 연구기획과 사후 결과 활용의 핵심 수단으로써 중요한 기능을 담당하며 과학기술과 함께 발전해 왔다. 따라서 학술지 종수와 논문 발표 건수, 피인용 현황은 해당 주제 분야의 동향을 파악하는데 매우 중요하다. 이 연구에서는 최근 11년간 JCR 과학기술 주제분야(176개)별 논문 편수와 피인용도 증감 변화를 조사하여 새로운 주제분야(학문)의 생성과 성장가능성을 살펴 보았다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2014.08a
• /
• pp.31-36
• /
• 2014

이 연구는 한중일 3개국의 해양분야 대표학술지 3종(OSJ, CJOL, JO)을 대상으로 편집위원단, 저자, 피인용도 및 국가간 연구협력 현황을 분석하였다. 이 결과, 편집위원단의 연구실적은 CJOL이 가장 뛰어나며, 3개 학술지 모두 동아시아 지역 연구자의 논문 투고율이 높았다. OSJ는 서아시아와 서남아시아에서, JO는 동아시아 중에서 한국과 중국이 높은 투고율을 보였고, CJOL은 중국(자국) 연구자의 비율이 가장 높았다. 평균 피인용 횟수는 5년이 경과하면 JO가 OSJ와 CJOL에 비해 상대적으로 급증하는 경향을 보였다. 국가간 연구협력 현황에서 JO는 일본을 중심으로 미국, 중국, 대만, 한국과의 연구교류가 활발하고, CJOL은 미국 외 국가와의 협력은 미미하다. 그리고 OSJ는 일본, 미국, 인도와의 연구협력이 활발한 것으로 나타났다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2012.08a
• /
• pp.115-119
• /
• 2012

본 연구의 목적은 이학분야 국내학술지 중 DOI를 기반으로 하여 인용정보를 제공하고 있는 학술지를 대상으로 피인용정보를 분석하고 WoS, Scopus와 비교를 통해 유사점과 차이점을 찾는 것이다. DOI를 등록하고 있고 WoS, Scopus에 공통으로 등재되어있는 5종의 이학분야 학술지의 CrossRef 피인용정보를 분석한 결과 논문수가 많은 2개 학술지의 인용률이 높았으며 모두 낮은 자기인용률을 보이고 있다. 전체적으로 CrossRef의 고유논문은 논문수와 인용수가 가장 큰 학술지 1종만이 11%이고 나머지 4종의 학술지는 5% 미만으로 대부분 WoS, Scopus 논문에 포함되었다. DB별 비교를 위해 3년간(2008~2010) 발행된 논문의 피인용도를 확인한 결과 모든 학술지에서 WoS의 인용률이 가장 높았고 CrossRef의 경우 레코드 수는 많지만, 전문색인DB가 아니고 참고문헌 등록이 모두 이뤄지지 않아 인용률이 가장 낮았다. 하지만 CrossRef 고유논문비율이 11%인 학술지의 경우 Scopus 보다 인용률이 높은 것으로 나타났다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.392-403
• /
• 2010

This paper analyzes the international impact of the scientific research of major countries by scientific field and examines its meaning. To this end, we select the highly cited papers (HCP) from scientific papers that are regarded as the output of scientific research, and then measure and compare the level of major countries' scientific impact, considering the input factors (GDP, R&D expenditure, and researchers) of scientific research. Based on the results of the analysis, we draw the conclusion and implications, and finally present the limitations of research and further research in this field.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.52 no.3
• /
• pp.149-169
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to provide an in-depth analysis on the research productivity and the research performance of the School of Biological Sciences' faculty at the S University by their co-authorships and further to identify any difference in the citedness by their co-authorships. For the years 2004-2013, a total of 1,135 publications, published by thirty-nine faculty members, were collected and their publication patterns were analyzed by co-authorships. For the years 2004-2016, the citations to the 1,135 publications were analyzed by co-authorships. Among the four co-authorship types, the total number of publications by the domestic and international co-authorships amounted to 832(73.3%), and the study also found a statistical difference in the citation performance, i.e., the average number of citations per paper by co-authorships (F =4.830, $p=0.003^{**}$).

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.46 no.1
• /
• pp.65-81
• /
• 2015

Altmetircs is the new method to measure social impact of research result which couldn't be found by traditional way, through measuring how much research result is reacting to social media. As academic communication has been diverse and OA repository which can preserve diverse type of article has been activated, New paradigm that measure impact of articles through multifaceted and complex way has been started. This study considers background, status of application, pros and cons about altmetircs. And by using Impactstory which is open source based tool, analyses the research output about digital library of Korea, china and japan which is published in international journal. Besides, analyses correlation between Altmetricss and citation rates. As results, "saved" shows higher than "cited" in library research analysis, it means that even though articles are not cited by followed study, there are a lot of articles that has saved in reference management tool. And positive correlation(r = 0.718) exists between "saved" and "cited", it can be inferred that Altmetricss complement the bibliometrics based evaluation system. Meanwhile, Korean researches are saved more in reference management tool than other countries.