• Title/Summary/Keyword: 평가 준거

Search Result 324, Processing Time 0.027 seconds

Latent Profile Analysis Method Application in the Job Satisfaction Types and Predictive Factors of Social Welfare Institution Workers (잠재프로파일 분석방법 적용을 통한 사회복지시설 종사자의 직무만족도 유형과 예측요인)

  • Hyoung-Ha Lee
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
    • /
    • 2023.01a
    • /
    • pp.177-179
    • /
    • 2023
  • 본 연구에서는 사회복지시설 종사사의 직무만족도 유형을 살펴보고 유형별 예측변인과의 영향관계를 검증하였다. 이러한 연구목적을 검증하기 위해 보건복지부의 '사회복지시설 실태조사'(2014년) 데이터에서 직무만족도 변인에 모두 응답한 11,660명을 최종 분석하였다. 잠재프로파일 분석결과, 사회복지사의 직무만족도 유형은 4집단으로 나타나 '최상 직무만족도집단', '중상 직무만족도집단', '중간 직무만족도집단', '최하 직무만족도집단'으로 명명하였다. 다항로지스틱 분석결과, CLASS4(최상 직무만족도집단)를 준거집단으로 하여 CLASS1(최하 직무만족도집단)과 비교해 노동강도대비 보수수준 평가, 타직종대비 보수수준 평가, 시설안전도, 인권보장도를 높게 인식할수록 CLASS4(최상 직무만족도집단)에 속할 확률이 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 다만, 이직의사는 낮을수록 CLASS4(최상 직무만족도집단)에 속할 확률이 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. CLASS4를 준거집단으로 하여 CLASS2집단, CLASS3집단도 비교분석 하였다.

  • PDF

미국 대학입학시험(ACT)의 평가내용과 개발과정

  • Lee, Jong-Seung
    • 대학교육
    • /
    • s.76
    • /
    • pp.64-74
    • /
    • 1995
  • 최근 새로운 교육개혁안이 확정 발표되면서부터 새삼 대입전형의 준거로 대학수학능력시험의 비중이 증대되고 있다. 우리의 수능시험과 유사한 SAT나 ACT는 미국의 각 대학에서 신입생 선발을 할 때, 중요한 전형자료의 하나로 사용하는 검사이다. 이 두 검사는 대등한 정도로 널리 이용되고 있으나 그 교육철학적인 배경은 상이하며, 또 후자는 우리에게 별로 알려져 있지 못한 실정이다. 따라서 여기에서는 ACT의 평가내용, 검사개발과정, 결과활용 등을 소개하고 우리의 대학수학능력시험과 관련하여 그 시사점을 논의하였다.

  • PDF

An implementation of performance assessment system based on academic achievement analysis for promotion of self-directed learning ability (자기주도적 학습능력 촉진을 위한 학업성취도 분석 기반의 수행평가 시스템 구현)

  • Kim, Hyun-Jeong;Choi, Jin-Seek
    • Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education
    • /
    • v.13 no.3
    • /
    • pp.313-323
    • /
    • 2009
  • The objective of this paper is an implementation of analysing and predicting functions to promote self-directed learning for student's performance assessment system in programming subjects. By adapting Rubric model, the proposed functions inform a student of the assessment criteria and level to be carried out with respects to two-way specifications such as rational ability, problem solving ability and creativity. The proposed system also provides a graphical results of each ability instead of assessment result, for better understanding and analyzing himself/herself based on to the performance assessment and the result. Moreover, the proposed system contains a method to predict future achievement result with moving average technique. Therefore, an academic achievement can be precisely determined by himself/herself to estimate self-directed learning. The teacher can provide different level of educational resources such as supplement learning, problem explains and private instructor etc., in order to maximize efficiency of education.

  • PDF

A Plan of Effective the Performance Assessment in elementary ICT Education (초등 정보통신기술교육에 대한 효율적인 수행평가 방안)

  • Park, Jong-Seung;Kim, Young-Gi
    • 한국정보교육학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2004.08a
    • /
    • pp.111-118
    • /
    • 2004
  • 제7차 교육과정에서는 세계화 정보화, 다양화를 지향하는 교육체제의 변화이다. 이와 같은 변화에 맞추어 2001학년도부터 재량활동을 통해 ICT 교육을 1,2학년에 한하여 실시하고 2002학년도에는 3,4학년으로 2003년에는 5,6학년까지 그 범위를 확대하여 실시되고 있다. 정보통신기술교육은 지식평가나 능력위주의 평가대신에 실습위주로 이루어지며 컴퓨터를 바르게 이해하고 활용하도록 도와준다. 타 교과에서는 수행평가를 영역별로 실시하지만 정보통신기술교육에서는 영역별 수행평가를 실시하지 않고 전반적인 평가를 하고 있다. 컴퓨터교과도 수행평가를 실시하여야 바람직한 평가가 될 것으로 생각되어 현재 일선학교에서의 컴퓨터 평가실태를 분석하고 그 문제점을 제시해 본다. 정규교과로 되기 위해서는 컴퓨터영역별로 세분화 된 평가준거 및 문항 등이 평가의 밑바탕이 되어야 한다. 따라서 본 연구자는 교육현장에서의 초등 정보통신기술교육에 대한 효율적인 수행평가방안에 대하여 연구하고자 한다.

  • PDF

Design of Web-Based Evaluation System for Project Learning in Elementary Schools (웹기반 프로젝트 학습 평가 시스템의 설계)

  • Park, So-Young;Kho, Dae-Ghon
    • 한국정보교육학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2005.08a
    • /
    • pp.153-160
    • /
    • 2005
  • 프로젝트 학습은 구성원간의 협동을 통해 문제를 해결해 나가는 학습형태로 학습자의 문제해결력을 높일 수 있는 방법이며, 프로젝트 학습에서의 평가는 교사의 조언과 지도를 통해 학생의 학습 능력을 향상시키는데 도움을 준다. 그러나, 협동학습에서는 일명 '무임승차'라는 문제점이 발생할 수 있어 오프라인 상태에서의 학습활동시 교사가 학생 개개인의 프로젝트 학습 능력을 측정 및 관리하기가 정확하게 이루어지기에 한계가 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 웹상에서 이루어지는 프로젝트 학습시, 학습자에게 효과적으로 조언과 지도를 통하여 학습수행능력을 향상시킬 목적으로 개별 학습자의 프로젝트활동을 효과적으로 평가할 수 있는 평가시스템을 설계하고자 한다. 평가는 프로젝트 중 평가와 프로젝트 후 평가로 이루어지며, 단계별 평가 기준 관점은 Chard가 제시한 프로젝트 활동 평가 준거를 참고하여 정하였고, 루브릭 평가 방법을 도입하여 세 가지 단계로 제시하였다.

  • PDF

The effects of performance, legitimacy, and reference group on strategic positional change - Evidence from North American Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas Industry - (성과 피드백, 정당성, 그리고 준거집단 성과가 리포지셔닝에 미치는 영향 - 북미 원유 및 천연가스 산업 분석을 중심으로 -)

  • Choi, Sung-Ho
    • Management & Information Systems Review
    • /
    • v.36 no.3
    • /
    • pp.17-35
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study investigates the determinants of strategic positional change. Specifically, the study suggests performance feedback affects to a firm's strategic repositioning. Performance feedback is a concept that a firm decides whether success or not by comparing its performance relative to its aspiration level. Prior studies successively discover diverse behaviors. The study suggests three unexplored relationships between performance gaps and strategic positioning. First, when a firm's performance is below relative to its aspiration level, that firm's strategic position will be deviate from the industry norm. Second, as the degree of industrial density increases, the tendency that a firm's strategic position becomes deviate from the industry norm decreases. Third, when the degree of reference group's performance decreases, the tendency that a firm's strategic position becomes deviate from the industry norm decreases. For empirical analysis, this study examines data of 538 firms that in North America crude petroleum and natural gas industry. The result reveals that the direction of a firm's strategic change is shaped when firms' performance is below relative to aspiration level. Also, this relationship is moderated as industrial density changes or when reference groups' performance decreases. This study contributes to the current literature by explaining how a firms' strategic position is decided. Also, this study reveals that reference groups' performance could affect to organizational choice.

  • PDF

A Case Study on Science Teachers' Implementation of NOS Assessments in 'Scientific Inquiries in the History' of Science Inquiry Experiment (과학탐구실험의 '역사 속의 과학 탐구'에서 과학교사의 NOS 평가 실행에 대한 사례 연구)

  • Minhwan Kim;Haerheen Kim;Jisu Jang;Taehee Noh
    • Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
    • /
    • v.43 no.3
    • /
    • pp.191-207
    • /
    • 2023
  • In this study, we comprehensively investigated the cases of science teachers who implemented NOS assessments in Science Inquiry Experiment. Two science teachers working at high schools located in Seoul who taught and assessed NOS in Science Inquiry Experiment according to the 2015 revised curriculum participated in the study. We collected lesson and assessment materials and observed NOS lessons and assessments. We also conducted interviews. Based on the collected data, we analyzed the processes of the teachers' NOS assessments. The analyses of the results revealed that the teachers constructed the assessments by themselves due to a lack of NOS assessment experience and related materials. They had difficulties in selecting an appropriate assessment method and constructing assessment questions and criteria. Both teachers found it difficult to assess an understanding of NOS because it concerns the subjective views of individual students. Therefore, they had difficulties in setting detailed assessment criteria, which also led to difficulties in the overall assessment process. There was a difference in the reflective level of the assessments between the two teachers. In the reflective activities of low levels, the assessments were not properly enacted because it was difficult to infer students' understanding. Orientation toward teaching NOS influenced the perceptions of NOS assessment and overall lessons, resulting in a difference in NOS assessments. Finally, the absolute evaluation of Science Inquiry Experiment also affected teachers' NOS assessments. Based on the above results, implications for effective NOS assessments in schools are discussed.

A Study on Authentic Assessment Model and Example Tools Development of Mathematics Teaching and Learning (수학교육의 교수-학습 참평가 모형 및 예시 도구 개발 - 프로젝트법을 중심으로 -)

  • Son, Jung-Hwa;Kang, Ok-Gi
    • School Mathematics
    • /
    • v.14 no.1
    • /
    • pp.109-134
    • /
    • 2012
  • The purpose of this study is to develop authentic assessment model and example tools of mathematics teaching and learning. By reviewing literature researches, we set up the definition of authentic assessment in mathematics education, checked the criterian of authentic assessment tasks and mathematical activities. We searched various assessment models of mathematics teaching and learning, project assessment proceeding model, and criterian of project assessment, and checked various project tasks of the authentic assessment. And we developed authentic assessment model and example tools of mathematics teaching and learning. The model is applied project tasks in the form of being integrated with class to high school students, with high school mathematics especially. Furthermore, we carried the test of content validity for a validity of developed tasks for experts in studies of mathematics education. The result is that authentic assessment model and example tools of mathematics teaching and learning has an significance in mathematics education and can be used to judge whether students are doing 'real' mathematics or not, keeping the applicability in the form of being integrated with class.

  • PDF

The Effect of Peer Review to the Improvement of Gifted Elementary Science Students' Open Inquiry (동료평가가 초등과학영재의 개방적 탐구 개선에 끼치는 영향)

  • Kim, Sue-yeon;Jhun, Youngseok
    • Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
    • /
    • v.36 no.6
    • /
    • pp.969-978
    • /
    • 2016
  • The purpose of this study is to figure out gifted elementary science students' improvement in performing open inquiry after peer review. In this study, gifted fifth-grade students performed open inquiry and review of each other as peers after the inquiry. Students' inquiries were evaluated and the influences of the feedback from the peer reviews were analyzed in relation to the inquiry performances. As a result of this study, three key points were discovered: First, the evaluation score increased with frequent feedback or long discussions. On the other hand, with less feedback, the evaluation score didn't rise. Second, there were three types of improvement in inquiry related to peer review: No. 1 was improvement after feedback given by themselves. No. 2 was reflection of feedback given to other groups. As a last type, No. 3 was that the students learned from other groups' presentation without any feedback and improved their inquiry. Third, there were five kinds of giving feedback; (1) feedback understanding the inquiry correctly, (2) insufficiency of peer's inquiry without deep thought. (3) on the usefulness of the inquiry, (4) on the scientific and logic validity through critical thinking, and (5) how to develop the inquiry. In these kinds of feedback, the fourth kind of feedback (4) occurred most frequently but the fifth (5) occurred rarely. It means peer review helps students develop their critical thinking ability and teachers should encourage students to give peers feedback of the fifth kind.

Examining Psychometric Properties of the Brief Symptom Inventory(BSI-18) in Korean People with Mental Disorders (정신장애인에 대한 Brief Symptom Inventory-18의 신뢰도와 타당도에 관한 연구)

  • Hoe, Maanse;Lee, Soonhee
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare
    • /
    • v.66 no.3
    • /
    • pp.253-276
    • /
    • 2014
  • The purpose of the present study was to examine psychometric properties of the BSI-18 in Korean adults with mental disorders. This study examined internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and a factor structure of the BSI. The sample consisted of 180 adults with mental disorders, who enrolled in mental hospitals and in a day hospital. Data was analysed using reliability analysis, correlation analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. Major findings were as follows. The Korean version of the BSI showed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, as well as excellent convergent validity. The original three-factor structure of the BSI-18, proposed by Derogatis, 2001, fitted to the data. These findings indicate that the BSI-18 is a reliable and valid measure as a psychiatric assessment tool and a treatment outcome measure.

  • PDF