• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.36 no.4
• /
• pp.1-22
• /
• 2005

Appraisal is one of the most important record management tasks. Appraisal is the process of evaluating business activities to determine which records need to be captured and how long the records need to be kept to meet business, the requirements of organizational accountability and community expectations. Appraisal, therefore, is concerned with deciding both what records should be created to document a business activity and how long those records should be retained. This paper attempts to review the appraisal policies of four national archives in UK, USA, Canada, Australia, which have managed public records systematically and to compare appraisal policies in the following five parts such as 1) purpose, 2) appraisal objectives, 3) appraisal values, 4) procedures for appraisal, and 5) special considerations. Finally, the paper suggests the important items required when the Korean National Archives and Records Services develops their own appraisal policies.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2009.05a
• /
• pp.76-78
• /
• 2009

정부는 중소기업의 정보화를 촉진시키기 위하여 지난 수년간 여러 종류의 정책자금을 지원하였다. 정부가 지원하는 정보화 지원 자금의 성격은 대부분 무상 지원으로 중소기업에게는 좋은 기회가 되어 왔다. 또한 정부는 지원하는 정책의 결과에 대한 성과도 관리하고자 노력하고 있다. 본 연구는 정부가 그동안 지원한 정보화정책에 대한 평가를 어떠한 단계로 하는 것이 타당한지 실증적 연구를 하였다. 실증 연구는 상관분석을 실시하였으며 측정에 활용한 요인 간의 상관관계 결과는 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 정보화지원 정책을 통한 성과평가 시점에 대한 결과는 조직 전략 분야의 평가가 Step3(장기적), 내부 운영 분야의 평가는 Step2(중기적), 지원과정의 평가는 Step1(단기적)의 평가 단계로 나타났다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2019.05a
• /
• pp.410-410
• /
• 2019

기후변화는 전 지구적인 환경문제 중 하나이며 IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 4차 평가보고서에서는 인류가 직면한 최대 위협이라고 하였다. 또한, IPCC는 현재 기후변화에 의한 영향은 명백히 나타나고 있으며 향후 기후변화에 의한 기상이변 예측과 적응 정책 및 조치가 중요하다고 권고하였다. 적응 정책 및 조치를 위한 기후변화의 영향분석은 우리나라에서도 많이 진행하고 있으나 개별 및 분류의 선형의 순차적 관계에 따라 개발 및 적용되고 있다. 기후변화는 자연생태계와 인간 활동의 복잡한 상호작용에 의해 발생하기에 개별적 연구 보다는 타 부문의 영향 및 결과가 환류되고 반영되어야 한다. 따라서 기후변화 영향평가는 농업, 물, 산림, 생태, 건강 등 다양한 부문 내/간 상호작용을 고려할 수 있는 통합 평가 방법이 필요하다. 통합 평가를 위해 플랫폼 개발은 필수적이며, 신속한 분석을 위해서는 개별 부문의 상세모델을 모방한 메타모델이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 미래 기후변화에 따른 영향을 통합적으로 평가하기 위한 메타모델을 개발하고, 상호 연결을 통해 다양한 연계양상을 평가하고자 한다.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.35 no.5
• /
• pp.1123-1133
• /
• 2015

This study proposed an evaluation method of mobile emissions reduction strategies for air quality management. The proposed method was considered Travel Demand Model (TDM) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), while an existing method was focused on quantitative factors. AHP of the evaluation indices of mobile emissions reduction strategies show that quantitative evaluation indices such as air pollutants and greenhouse gas reduction are more important than the political evaluation indices (Consistency with an upper plan, Policy applicability, Technical applicability and feasibility) and each weight of air pollutants and greenhouse gas reduction are found to be 0.373 and 0.218. The early scrapping policy of decrepit diesel vehicle is the best policy in the proposal method using TDM and AHP but this result differs from evaluated result by TDM or AHP respectively. These results are limited to the basic assumption and range of reduction scenarios but are expected to contribute to establish more reasonable and effective mobile emission reduction strategies.

• Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science
• /
• v.97 no.3
• /
• pp.255-265
• /
• 2008

This study is aiming at providing the useful information for successful implementation of the forest resource promotion policy through analyzing the impacting factors and their relationships on policy accomplishment and policy effectiveness in executing the forest resource promotion policy. Interview survey was conducted on the stake-holders such as government officers and civilians who have direct or indirect influences on the establishment and execution of the forest resource promotion policy. The forest resource promotion policy was heuristically analyzed by using the LISREL (Linear Structural RELations) Model. The policy accomplishments of forest resource promotion significantly showed the positive relations with the suitability of problem recognition, the suitability of policy decision-making and rationality of policy execution, while the degree of policy support and the policy accomplishments were having significant impacts upon the policy effectiveness. Since the path coefficients between the latent variables and observed variables and among the latent variables mostly showed the positive relations significantly, the forest resource promotion policy was evaluated very successful in terms of policy accomplishments and policy effectiveness.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.18 no.11
• /
• pp.317-326
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to develop an AHP model to evaluate the relative importance and priorities of multi-cultural policies under bounded Rationality. The results of the study are as follows. First, in the evaluation elements for each measurement area, the following are the stable social settlement support policy (1rank), social capability development policy of multi-cultural family second generation (2rank), socio-economic activity policy (3rank), collaborative governance policy enforcement(4rank). Second, the priority of the measurement element is as follows. social settlement service target expansion policy was proved to be the top priority project stable social settlement support policy aspect and social capacity development policies of the second generation of multi-cultural families, social support policy was most important evaluated. Active economic activity support policy was as the top priority project socio-economic activity policy, and construct cooperation system of policy practice main agents was proved to be the top priority collaborative governance policy enforcement. These results will contribute to explain the reality of multi-cultural policy.

• 한국정책학회보
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.91-122
• /
• 2012

국가 재정사업을 평가하는 재정사업 자율평가제도는 2005년에 도입되어 2010년까지 두 번의 평가주기가 완료되었다. 본 연구는 이러한 시점에서 2차 평가주기(2008년~2010년) 동안 평가된 재정사업을 대상으로 평가결과에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 검토하였다. 본 연구는 1차 평가주기(2005년~2007년)의 평가결과를 분석한 기존 연구의 확장연구로서, 이전 연구결과를 재확인하고 일반화 가능성을 보다 제고할 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 이전 연구결과와의 비교를 통해서 평가제도의 변화가 평가결과의 변화를 가져왔는지를 검토할 수 있다는 점에서 의의가 있다. 또한 2차 평가주기가 완료된 시점에서, 향후 제도 개선을 위한 정책적 시사점을 줄 수 있다는 점에서 의의가 있다. 본 연구의 주요 분석결과 및 정책적 함의는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 1차 평가주기에 비해서 2차 평가주기의 평가결과가 향상되었다는 점에서 사업의 성과향상 또는 제도에 대한 실무자들의 이해가 보다 증진된 것으로 해석할 수 있다. 둘째, 성과계획항목이 평가결과에 지나치게 강한 영향력을 준다는 측면에서, 이에 대한 제도적 보완이 요구된다. 성과지표의 설정 및 목표치의 결정은 집행 이전에 적절히 이루어져야 할 부문이기에 이를 계획수립 시 사전적으로 지도할 필요가 있다. 셋째, 집행항목과 성과항목 간 부(-)의 관계를 가지므로 이에 대한 적절한 제도적 보완이 필요하다. 넷째, 제도의 타당성을 저해할 수 있는 비평가요인이 총점에 영향을 미치고 있다는 점을 감안할 때, 이에 대한 제도적 보완이 필요하다.

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.6 no.6 s.87
• /
• pp.32-38
• /
• 1996

• Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
• /
• v.10 no.5
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2005

Policies of the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark were compared and analyzed on risk assessment of contaminated sites. These countries were chosen from a feasible preliminary analysis of 18 countries of the European Union and the U. S. All the countries selected met two major criteria : I) implementation of risk assessment to determine the soil contamination and remediation targets of contaminated sites, ii) use of soil guidance values and risk assessment as complementary measures to determine soil contamination. Suggested policy improvements to Korea regarding these issues include i) legislation of a rational risk assessment methodology of contaminated sites, and ii) enactment of collaboration of risk assessment with the soil guidance values. To establish effective risk assessment legislation, additional in-depth research on social, economic and long-term effects of the proposed risk assessment methodologies, as well as the mutual consent of all parties including academia, industry, and administration will be necessary. Linking risk assessment with soil guidance values would be applicable to a site contaminated where the contaminant concentration exceeds a certain soil guidance value. In parallel, application of risk assessment to a site where a contaminant concentration is naturally different such as mining sites would be plausible. The policy suggestions above are not yet conclusive due to a lack of policy implementation, and simulation. Thus, additional research on developing risk assessment methodology is needed. Nevertheless, initiation of the suggested policy would increase the efficacy of Korean policy regarding the survey and remediation of contaminated sites.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.19 no.8
• /
• pp.89-100
• /
• 2021

The National Cyber Capability Assessment(NCCA) could be used as meaningful information for improving national cyber security policy because it provides information on the elements necessary for strengthening national cyber capabilities and the level of each country. However, there were few studies on improving cyber capabilities using the NCCA result in Korea. Therefore, we analyzed the result of National Cyber Power Index(NCPI) conducted by Belfer Center of Harvard Univ. by applying modified-IPA method to derive cybersecurity policy agendas for Korea. As a result, the need to set agendas on surveillance and offensive cyber capability and improve the effectiveness of policy implementation for intelligence and defense was drawn. Moreover, we suggested need for in-depth study of each policy agenda deduced from preceding research data as a future tasks. And it is expected to increase practical use of NCCA for domestic policy analysis by developing and using our own NCCA model which considered analysis framework proposed in this study.