• Digital Contents
• /
• 10호통권137호
• /
• pp.110-115
• /
• 2004

지금까지 BM 특허의 인정여부에서부터, 독점 배타적 효력이 있는 BM 특허권을 취득하기 위한 요건들, 그리고 BM 특허권의 권리범위에 대한 문제점까지 알아봤다. BM 특허권을 둘러싸고 존속기간이나 보호 범위에 부정적 의견이 있긴 하지만 일반 기술에 인정되는 특허권과 동일한 효력이 BM 특허에 인정되는 것은 주지의 사실이므로 BM 특허를 기업의 무기로써 어떻게 이용해야 하는지를 고민해야 할것이고 BM 특허가 미래에는 어떠한 모습으로 존재해야 하는가를 논해야 할 것이다. 기업의 전략으로서의 BM 특허와 미래를 논하기에 앞서, 기업의 이익에 큰 몫을 한 특허권 사례를 통해 다시 한번 특허권의 중요성을 강조하고자 한다. 이하는 저작권 보호 솔루션 업체인 인터트러스트(InterTrust)사의 DRM 특허 사례이다.

• Food Industry
• /
• 통권247호
• /
• pp.2-3
• /
• 2015

특허권을 지적재산권이라고 한다. 부동산처럼 타인에게 양도할 수 있으며, 두 사람 이상이 공유할 수도 있고, 빌려줄 수도 있다. 쉽게 말해서 특허권을 가지고 있으면 돈이 되는 것이다. 그렇기 때문에 특허권에 대한 관심이 증폭되고 있다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.127-152
• /
• 2017

China's utility model as a supplement to the invention patent, has short application duration, fast authorized speed, and has the same exclusive rights with patents, so companies can quickly dominate the market. But the utility model does not need to carry out substantive examination, so has lower stability, high frequency of invalid to accepted, so compare with the invention patent, difficult to be protected. In order to actively encourage the small and medium-sized enterprises to promote their inventions, and protect domestic patents, China established a protection policy of patent evaluation report for the utility model rights, especially the patent evaluation report can be used as evidence in a patent infringement trial, to provide judicial remedies for utility model patentee and the party of patent disputes. Many experts believe that the establishment of patent evaluation report system can improve the stability of the utility model patent right, and when the defendant request for invalidation of the patent right in the defense period, if there is no novelty, creativity lost or no other reason has not led to the stability of patent right given in a patent evaluation report of the utility model patents, the court may not suspend the trial, without having to wait for the Patent Reexamination Board makes the patent invalid declaration decisions, can improve the efficiency of the judicial process, accelerate the patentee's time. However, in practical patent infringement, the patent evaluation report system and invalidation system are in conflict. In this paper, through the analysis of the current China utility model system and compared with the South Korean utility model system, review the role and character of the patent evaluation report system, and through the actual cases of the utility model patent infringement litigation, analysis possible variates from the decision of patent evaluation report, to find out the reason of the patent evaluation report system being in conflict with the invalidation system, and research on the effectiveness for protecting Utility Model with China's Patent Evaluation Report.

• Journal of Service Research and Studies
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.82-100
• /
• 2024

Due to the intensifying global technological competition, the strategic and economic importance of intellectual property such as patents as intangible assets is increasing. The purpose of this study is to understand the current status of patent innovation in the service industry and to derive the characteristics and implications of patent innovation in the service industry. To this end, this study conducted an investigation and analysis to understand the characteristics of patent innovation in the service industry based on the data from the business activity survey. The proportion of patent companies in the service industry, characteristics of each service industry, proportion of each service industry, and the number of patent rights holdings were analyzed. In addition, the trend of patent changes in the service industry was investigated. The service industry was compared and analyzed with other industries based on the results of the analysis of patent innovation in the service industry. In particular, the service industry was divided into four types in terms of the rate of increase in the proportion of patent companies and the ratio of patent holing companies, and the types were derived. Based on the analysis results, the characteristics of patent innovation in the service industry were presented. As a result of the study, the proportion of patent holding companies in the service industry was lower than that of other industries, and the gap with other industries was widening, showing that the patent innovation of service companies is lower than that of other industries. The average number of patents held by service industry companies was lower than that of other industries, and the increase rate of the number of patent rights held was also lower than that of other industries, widening the gap. Patent innovation in the service industry can be divided into four quadrants in terms of the rate of increase in the proportion of patent holding companies and the proportion of patent holding companies, and it has been studied that the service industry needs policy support suitable for the characteristics of patent innovation in the quadrant to which the individual service industry belongs.

• Management & Information Systems Review
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.239-254
• /
• 2017

This study examines the relationship between R&D spending and patent rights, which are suggested by firms as a way to increase their firm value. Specifically, we examine the relationship between research and development costs and patent rights, and see if there are any differences in the influence of two variables on firm value. The period of this study is from 2005 to 2016, and the sample of companies used in the research including the patenting companies is composed of 333 companies in total. The results of the study are as follows. First, the cost of R&D expenditure and capitalized R&D expenditure showed a significant positive correlation with patents. Second, R&D spending did not show a significant relationship with firm value, but patent rights showed a significant positive correlation with firm value. However, firms that spend a large amount of R&D expenditure (RDD), such as research and development expenses, showed a significant positive (+) value and a patent dummy (PATD). Third, in the analysis of the difference between the dummy of research and development and the patent dummy, the enterprise value of a company that invested a lot of patents and research and development expenses was high. The contribution of this study is to examine the relevance of corporate value to R&D investment for patents. On the other hand, there are various variables that can be used as a sample of patents.

• 발명특허
• /
• 제34권10호
• /
• pp.50-57
• /
• 2009

• 발명특허
• /
• 제12권6호통권136호
• /
• pp.68-71
• /
• 1987

• Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.106-116
• /
• 2008

21 century is as time of infinite competition the knowledge base society where the creation knowledge and information become source of competitive power (Knowledge-based society) and the world-wide various nations leads and knowledge intensification of voice and existing industry of knowledge industry leadership grasp of competitive power high position security and world economy it concentrates a hazard national ability from new economic environment inside. Also, world economy the economic border collapsed with opening anger liberalization and the integration of world economy was accelerated and the restraint of advanced nation, pursuit of the late start developing country and competition from the enterprise for strategy helping each other back international market more were aggravating and information and knowledge with production element or the goods were wide in the economic whole and information knowledge revolution which circulates was developed and it followed hereupon and with the vitality where the knowledge base industry growth is new it rose to the surface.

• TTA Journal
• /
• 통권64호
• /
• pp.55-61
• /
• 1999

본 고는 표준화 추진시 갈등 문제를 가질 수 있는 지적재산권의 처리와 관련하여 국제 표준화 기구인 ISO(International Organization for Standardization)/IEC(International Electrotechnical Commission)의 지적재산권정책 내용을 분석하여 정리한 것이다. ISO/IEC의 지적재산권정책에 따르면 ISO/IEC의 국제 표준 발행 전$\cdot$후에 특허권과 관련된 조치는 첫째, 아무런 특허권이 관련되어 있지 않은 것으로 주지하고 발행하는 표준에 대한 처리 사항과, 둘째, 표준의 준비 과정 중에 나타나는 관련된 특허권에 대한 처리 절차와, 마지막으로 표준의 발행 후에 관련된 것으로 나타나는 특허권에 대한 대처 등 크게 세 가지로 나누어 분석할 수 있다. 본 고는 이러한 ISO/IEC의 특허권에 대한 처리 지침과 저자권에 대한 처리 규정 그대로 세부 내용을 분석, 소개함으로써 최근에 관심의 대상으로 더욱 부상하고 있는 특허 등 IPR과 표준화에 관한 연구와 관련 활동에 도움을 주고자 한다.

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• 제147호
• /
• pp.2-17
• /
• 2009