DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

서비스 산업의 특허권 혁신 특성에 대한 연구

A Study on the Characteristics of Patent Innovation in the Service Industry

  • 장병열 (계명대학교 산업공학과 )
  • Pyoung Yol Jang (Department of Industrial Engineering, Keimyung University)
  • 투고 : 2024.05.13
  • 심사 : 2024.06.13
  • 발행 : 2024.06.30

초록

글로벌 기술 경쟁의 격화로 인해 무형 자산으로서 특허 등 지식재산의 전략적, 경제적 중요성이 커지고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 서비스 산업의 특허권 혁신 현황을 파악하고 이에 기반하여 서비스 산업의 특허권 혁신 특성과 시사점을 도출하는 것이다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 기업활동조사 데이터를 바탕으로 서비스 산업의 특허권 혁신 특성을 파악하기 위한 조사와 분석을 수행하였다. 서비스 산업의 특허권 보유 기업 비율, 서비스 산업별 특징, 서비스 산업별 비중, 특허권 보유 건수 등을 분석하였다. 또한 서비스 산업 특허권 변화 추이를 조사하였다. 서비스 산업의 특허권 혁신 분석결과를 기반으로 타산업과 서비스산업을 비교·분석하였다. 특히 서비스 산업별 특허권 보유 기업 비율 증가율과 특허권 보유 기업 비율 관점에서 서비스산업을 4가지 유형으로 나누고 산업별 유형을 도출하였다. 분석 결과를 기반으로 서비스 산업의 특허권 혁신 특성을 제시하였다. 연구결과 서비스 산업 기업이 특허권을 보유한 비율은 타 산업의 보유 비율보다 낮았고 타 산업과의 격차가 확대 되고 있어 서비스 기업의 특허권 혁신 성과가 타 산업보다 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 전체 서비스 산업 중 특허권 보유 기업 비율이 상대적으로 높은 서비스 산업은 전문, 과학 및 기술 서비스업, 수도, 가스, 증기 및 공기조절 공급업, 정보통신업이었다. 특허권 보유 기업 비율 증가율이 높은 서비스 산업은 운수 및 창고업, 예술, 스포츠 및 여가관련 서비스업, 사업시설 관리, 사업 지원 및 임대 서비스업으로 나타났다. 서비스 산업 기업이 보유한 평균 특허 건수는 타 산업보다 낮았고 특허권 보유 건수 증가율도 타 산업보다 낮아 격차가 확대되고 있다. 서비스 산업의 특허권 혁신은 특허권 보유 기업 비율과 특허권 보유 기업 비율의 증가율 관점에서 4개 사분면 유형으로 구분할 수 있으며 서비스 산업은 개별 서비스 산업이 속한 사분면의 특허권 혁신 특성에 맞는 정책 지원이 필요한 것으로 연구되었다.

Due to the intensifying global technological competition, the strategic and economic importance of intellectual property such as patents as intangible assets is increasing. The purpose of this study is to understand the current status of patent innovation in the service industry and to derive the characteristics and implications of patent innovation in the service industry. To this end, this study conducted an investigation and analysis to understand the characteristics of patent innovation in the service industry based on the data from the business activity survey. The proportion of patent companies in the service industry, characteristics of each service industry, proportion of each service industry, and the number of patent rights holdings were analyzed. In addition, the trend of patent changes in the service industry was investigated. The service industry was compared and analyzed with other industries based on the results of the analysis of patent innovation in the service industry. In particular, the service industry was divided into four types in terms of the rate of increase in the proportion of patent companies and the ratio of patent holing companies, and the types were derived. Based on the analysis results, the characteristics of patent innovation in the service industry were presented. As a result of the study, the proportion of patent holding companies in the service industry was lower than that of other industries, and the gap with other industries was widening, showing that the patent innovation of service companies is lower than that of other industries. The average number of patents held by service industry companies was lower than that of other industries, and the increase rate of the number of patent rights held was also lower than that of other industries, widening the gap. Patent innovation in the service industry can be divided into four quadrants in terms of the rate of increase in the proportion of patent holding companies and the proportion of patent holding companies, and it has been studied that the service industry needs policy support suitable for the characteristics of patent innovation in the quadrant to which the individual service industry belongs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Byun, D. (2018), Survey of Service Industry Policy and Big Data Analysis of Core Technology in Preparation of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Journal of Service Research and Studies, 8(1), 73-87. 
  2. Chang, S., and Park, B. (2019), A Study on the Influence of R&D Investment and Patents on Firm Performance : Focusing on Korean Knowledge Service Companies, Korea International Commercial Review, 34(1), 163-179.
  3. Haque, F. (2023), Patents: Which Sectors Have Most?, Beauhurst. 
  4. KIIP (2022), A Study on the Economic Effects of the Intellectual Property Service Industry.
  5. Kim, B. (2022), Patent Creation and Utilization Strategy Using IP-R&D, Technology & Innovation, 454.
  6. Kim, H. (2016), A Study on Accelerating Service Economy by the 4th Industrial Revolution, Journal of Service Research and Studies, 6(3), 15-27.
  7. Koh D., Kim, S., Kim S., Park, J. and Cho, H. (2022), International Competitiveness Analysis of Digital Transformation-based Service Business Model Innovation and its Implications, KIET.
  8. Korean Statistical Information Service (www.kosis.kr) (2024), 2022 Business Activity Survey.
  9. KOTRA (2006), Overseas Intellectual Property Protection System and Response Case (2).
  10. Lee, H., Baek, C. and Lee, J. (2014), Analysis on Time Lag Effect of Firm's R&D Investment, Journal of Technology Innovation, 22(1), 1-22.
  11. Lee, J and Jung, J. (2014), Patent Production and Technological Performance of Korean Firms: The Role of Corporate Innovation Strategies, Journal of Technology Innovation, 22(1), 149-175.
  12. NSF (2017), U.S. Patent Applications and Patents Issued to Companies Located in the United States that Performed or Funded R&D, by Industry and Company Size: 2017. 
  13. OECD (2015), World Corporate Top R&D Investors: Innovation and IP bundles. 
  14. Oh, E., and Yun, J. (2023), Current Status and Technological Structure of Seoul Service Technology as a Patent. 
  15. Park, J. (2018), Function and Improvement of R&D Investment and Technological Innovation Policy as a Source of Intellectual Property Rights, KIIP.
  16. Presidential Advisory Council on Science & Technology (2024), Results of the 2022 Government R&D Patent Performance Survey and Analysis. 
  17. Presidential Council on Intellectual Property (2024), National Intellectual Property Implementation Plan for 2024.
  18. Presidential Council on Intellectual Property (2021), Third Basic Plan for National Intellectual Property.
  19. Schwab, K. (2016), The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Geneva: World Economic Forum. 
  20. Schwab, K. (2015), The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means and How to Respond, Foreign Affairs. 
  21. Sim, M., Jang, T. and Yu, K. (2013), The Role of Patent Utilization for Technology Innovation and Legal Improvement, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 16(3), 809-838.
  22. Statistics Korea (2023), 2022 Business Activity Survey Results.