• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.133-144
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study was to investigate Home Economics(HE) teachers' stages of concern, levels of use, and needs about the practical reasoning instruction focusing on the Concerns Based Adoption Model(CBAM). Questionnaires were administrated to HE teachers who worked for middle or high school in Korea and used HE textbooks according to the revised 2007 HE curriculum through mailing and visiting HE teacher training centers. 350 data collected from the responses were finally analyzed using SPSS 12.0. The results of the study were as follows: First, HE teachers' stages of concern about the Practical Reasoning Instruction(PRI) were demonstrated by the following order: awareness stage 0(97.05%), informational stage 1(87.06%), personal stage 2(86.23%), management stage 3(79.85%), refocusing stage 6(63.22%), consequence stage 4(61.26%), and collaboration stage 5(60.12%). Second, HE teachers' levels of use for PRI were demonstrated by the following order: preparation level 2(30.3%), orientation level 1(18.30%), refinement level 5 (18.30%), mechanical level 3: (16.0%), routine level 4(10.09%), nonuse level 0(4.0%), integration level 6(1.70%), and renewal level 7(0.60%). Third, needs for HE teachers' practical reasoning process were shown as the following order: '(O)Outline and implement a plan for action'(1.89), '(A)Analyze choices and consequences'(1.75), '(N)Note the results of your action(s)'(1.57), '(E)Evaluate information needed to solve the problem'(1.44), '(R)Recognize the problem'(1.39), and '(S)Select the best choices'(1.36).

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.38 no.4
• /
• pp.541-553
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between epistemic goals, epistemic considerations and complexity of reasoning of science high school students in an open inquiry and to explore the context on how open inquiry compares with the characteristics of an authentic scientific inquiry. Two teams were selected as focus groups and a case study was conducted. The findings are as follows: First, the contexts, such as 'sharing the value for the phenomenon understanding, reflection on the value of the research, task characteristics that require collaboration and consensus, and sufficient communication opportunities,' promote epistemic goals and considerations. On the other hand, contexts such as 'lack of opportunity for critical review of related literature and environmental constraints' lowered epistemic sides. Second, epistemic goals and considerations influenced the reasoning complexity. The goal of 'scientific sense making' led to reasoning that pose testable hypotheses based on students' own questions. The high justification considerations led to purposely focusing attention to the control designs and developing creative experimental know-how. The high audience considerations led to defending their findings through argumentation and suggesting future research. On the other hand, the goal of 'doing the lesson' and the low justification considerations led to reasoning that did not interpret the meaning of the data and did not control the limit of experiment. The low audience considerations led to reasoning that did not actively defend their findings and not suggest future research. The results of this study suggest that guidance should provide communication and critical review opportunities.

• Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.213-224
• /
• 2005

To develop a cognitive system with the flexibility and breadth of human reasoning, it's very important to construct a large scale knowledge base which includes commonsense knowledge as well as expert knowledge. This paper introduces a cognitive system which provides a commonsense reasoning for everyday physical phenomena using qualitative reasoning. It is difficult to apply previous qualitative reasoning to commonsense reasoning since it provides reasoning based on abstract concepts which are apart from everyday real world concepts. Our research provides commonsense reasoning based on sketches and real world concepts by integrating qualitative reasoning and general large scale Cyc knowledge base. Our system has been implemented and tested on various examples.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.23 no.1
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2013

The primary purpose of this study is to survey multiplicative thinking levels and its characteristics of third graders in elementary school and to analyze how to use it when they solve the proportional problems. As results, the transition thinking ranked the highest among the four kinds of thinking levels when the $3^{rd}$ graders solved the multiplication problems. It means that the largest numbers of students still can not distinguish the additive and multiplicative situations completely and remain in the transition thinking, which thinks both additively and multiplicatively. In addition, the performance of solving proportional problems was distinguished from the levels of thinking. Through this study, we can give some implications of the importance of multiplicative thinking and instructional methods related to multiplication.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.23-49
• /
• 2017

This study examined two current learning models for covariational reasoning(Carlson et al.(2002), Thompson, & Carlson(2017)), applied the models to teaching two $9^{th}$ grade students, and analyzed the results according to the types of graphs(a quantitative graph or qualitative graph). Results showed that the model of Thompson and Carlson(2017) was more useful than that of Carlson et al.(2002) in figuring out the students' levels in their quantitative graphing activities. Applying Carlson et al.(2002)'s model made it possible to classify levels of the students in their qualitative graphs. The results of this study suggest that not only quantitative understanding but also qualitative understanding is important in investigating students' covariational reasoning levels. The model of Thompson and Carlson(2017) reveals more various aspects in exploring students' levels of quantitative understanding, and the model of Carlson et al.(2002) revealing more of qualitative understanding.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2019.10a
• /
• pp.60-62
• /
• 2019

지능형 IoT 애플리케이션들을 효과적으로 사용하기 위해서는 추론 엔진을 Edge device로 포팅하는 것이 필수적이다. 그러나 컴퓨팅 자원이 제한적인 Edge 환경에서 computational cost가 상당히 큰 CNN 추론을 실시간으로 하는 것은 쉽지 않다. 이에, CNN 추론의 하드웨어 가속화의 필요성이 제기되어 활발한 연구가 진행되고 있으며, Xilinx, Intel 등에서도 하드웨어 가속화를 도와주는 툴을 개발하여 지속적으로 업그레이드하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 CIFAR-10 데이터베이스의 테스트 이미지 10,000개를 Xilinx 사의 CNN 추론 엔진인 DPU를 사용하여 Zynq UltraScale+ 보드에서 추론해보고, DPU 아키텍처에 따른 결과를 비교·분석했다. 병렬처리 수준을 높게 한 DPU는 그렇지 않은 DPU보다 소비전력 및 자원 사용량이 3배 이상 높았지만, 1.65배 좋은 성능을 보여 Trade-off 관계를 확인할 수 있었다.

• Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2001

내진성능평가 시스템은 구조시스템의 합리적인 분류, 적절한 평가 기준, 그리고 종합적인 평가방법을 포함하여야한다. 외국의 현행 내진성능 평가방법은 데이터의 수집과 주요 평가 항목을 위한 약산식 그리고 평가 점수를 이용하여 전문가의 판단에 근거한 평가 방법을 제시하고 있다. 본 연구는 국내 건축구조물에 예비 내진평가 방법에 중점을 두고 퍼지추론 시스템에 근거한 내진평가방법의 전형을 개발한다. 평가항목의 위계는 건무의 수직, 수평방향을 불규칙성, 비대칭성, 여용성, 그리고 건물 연한을 포함한 전체적인 특성과 부재 단계에서의 상세한 평가 항목으로 구성한다. 퍼지추론방법에 대한 기존의 연구결과를 근허가혀 이용한 내진성능 평가방법에 적절히 적용하기 위하여 4가지 주요 모듈을 설정한다. (1) 퍼지 입력 (2) 퍼지에 근거한 규칙기반 (3) 퍼지추론, 그리고 (4) 퍼지출력으로 구성된다. 더욱이 개별적인 성능 수준에 종합적인 평가지수를 끌어내기 위하여 퍼지추론방법을 적용하였다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.37 no.6
• /
• pp.1015-1023
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to investigate the process of development of explanatory hypothesis being generated by middle school students and the factors that affect the process in water wave interference phenomena by analogy scaffolding. For this purpose, the processes on how explanatory hypotheses were generated, revised, and then elaborated by analogy scaffolding were investigated and analyzed. The subjects for the study were 60 eighth grades students in one middle school divided into 12 groups according to their cognitive level measured by GALT. The research findings are as follows: First, it was found that there is a regular pattern in development of explanatory hypothesis by students about water wave phenomenon; second, the cognitive level of the student affected apparently on the students' hypothesis development process, however, it was also observed that students with inferior cognitive level could form a scientific explanatory hypothesis in the second stage of the scaffolding; third, the analogy scaffolding actually helped the students in formulating hypothesis. In conclusion, analogical reasoning can be a meaningful and powerful strategy for secondary school students to formulate explanatory hypothesis.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.37 no.2
• /
• pp.299-327
• /
• 2023

In this study, we tried to find out the level of inductive reasoning ability and the aspects of visualization components shown in students in the class using exploratory software for the 'congruence and symmetry' unit in the second semester of the 5th grade of elementary school. To this end, classes using GeoGebra, one of the exploratory software, were conducted for a total of 19 students in one class of fifth graders in elementary school, and the results of the students' activities were analyzed. As a result of this study, the level of inductive reasoning ability of students remained at a similar level or developed, and it was shown that students inferred new properties of shapes using various functions of software inductively. In addition, in terms of visualization, students were able to quickly and easily draw shapes that met the conditions, and unlike the paper-and-pencil environment, using the 'measurement' and 'symmetry' functions, they transformed and manipulated complex yet precisely congruent and symmetrical external representations. Based on these analysis results, implications for the use of exploratory software in the area of figures were derived.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2020.11a
• /
• pp.984-987
• /
• 2020

최근 오픈 도메인 자연어 질문 응답 분야에서는 폭넓은 다중 문서들을 토대로 다중 홉 추론과 동시에 서로 다른 수준의 여러 문제들을 한꺼번에 해결해야 하는 다중 작업 질문 응답에 관한 관심이 높다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 다중 홉 추론과 다중 작업을 요구하는 복잡 질문들에 효과적으로 응답하기 위해, 계층적 그래프 기반의 새로운 심층 신경망 모델을 제안한다. 제안 모델에서는 계층적 그래프와 그래프 신경망을 이용해 다중 문서들로부터 서로 다른 수준의 맥락 정보를 얻어낸 후, 이들을 활용하여 뒷받침 문장들, 답변 영역, 응답 유형 등을 동시에 구해야 하는 다중 작업 문제에 관한 답들을 예측해낸다. 본 논문에서는 오픈 도메인 자연어 질문 응답 데이터 집합인 HotpotQA를 이용한 실험들을 통해, 제안 모델의 긍정적 효과를 입증한다.