1 |
MOE(Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development). (2007). 2007 Science Curriculum for Middle School Students. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Daehangyogwaseo, Inc.
|
2 |
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
|
3 |
Park, C. J., & Cha, H. Y. (2017). Considerations and Scientific Argumentation Level in Argumentation to Conceptualize the Concept of Natural Selection of Science-Gifted Elementary Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 565-575.
DOI
|
4 |
Park, J. W. (2009). Discussions for preparation and types of mentorship for scientifically gifted students. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 1(3), 1-19.
|
5 |
Rivera Maulucci, M. S., Brown, B. A., Grey, S. T., & Sullivan, S. (2014). Urban middle school students’ reflections on authentic science inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1119-1149.
DOI
|
6 |
Sandoval W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656.
DOI
|
7 |
Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (2009). Student behavior and epistemological framing: Examples from collaborative active-learning activities in physics. Cognition and Instruction, 27(2), 147-174.
DOI
|
8 |
Wickman, P. O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88(3), 325-344.
DOI
|
9 |
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Method(4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
|
10 |
Berland, L. K., & Crucet, K. (2016). Epistemological trade-offs: accounting for context when evaluating epistemological sophistication of student engagement in scientific practices. Science Education, 100(1), 5-2.
DOI
|
11 |
Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012a). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68-94.
DOI
|
12 |
Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012b). Students' framings and their participation in scientific argumentation. In M. Khine(Eds.), Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation(pp. 77-93). Dordrecht: Springer.
|
13 |
Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082-1112.
DOI
|
14 |
Cho, H. C. (2011). A comparison of epistemological beliefs between Korean scientifically gifted and regular middle school students. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 10(1), 5-26.
|
15 |
Burgin, S., & Sadler, T. D. (2013). Consistency of practical and formal epistemologies of science held by participants of a research apprenticeship. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2179-2206.
DOI
|
16 |
Bybee, R. W. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science(pp. 20-46). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
|
17 |
Charney, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Sofer, W., Neigeborn, L., Coletta, S., & Nemeroff, M. (2007). Cognitive Apprenticeship in Science through Immersion in Laboratory Practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29(2), 195-213.
DOI
|
18 |
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623-654.
DOI
|
19 |
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
DOI
|
20 |
Corbin, J., Strauss, A., & Strauss, A. L. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research. California: Sage.
|
21 |
Crawford, B. A. (2012). Moving the essence of inquiry into the classroom: engaging teachers and students in authentic science. In: Tan K., Kim M (Eds.), Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research (pp. 25-42). Dordrecht: Springer.
|
22 |
Dolan, E., & Grady, J. (2010). Recognizing Students’ Scientific Reasoning: A Tool for Categorizing Complexity of Reasoning During Teaching by Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(1), 31-55.
DOI
|
23 |
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer, and P. R. Pintrich(Eds.), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
24 |
Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two Views About Explicitly Teaching Nature of Science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2109-2139.
DOI
|
25 |
Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554-567.
DOI
|
26 |
Fusco, D. (2001). Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 860-877.
DOI
|
27 |
Jeong, S. H., Choi, H. D., & Yang, I. H. (2011). Analysis on the Complexity of Scientific Reasoning during Pre-service Elementary School Teachers' Open-Inquiry Activities. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(3), 379-393.
|
28 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or"doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792.
DOI
|
29 |
Kang. E. J., Kim, S. J., & Park, J. W. (2009). Analysis of Features Related to Authentic Science Inquiry Appear in Open-ended Activities of the Elementary Science-gifted Students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 19(3), 647-667.
|
30 |
Kapon, S. (2016). Doing research in school: Physics inquiry in the zone of proximal development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(8), 1172-1197.
DOI
|
31 |
Kim, M. K., & Kim, H. B. (2007). The Effects of Authentic Open Inquiry on Cognitive Reasoning through an Analysis of Types of Student-generated Questions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(9), 930-943.
|
32 |
Lee, M. J., & Kim, H. B. (2016). Science High School Students' Shift in Scientific Practice and Perception Through the R&E Participation: on the Perspective of Legitimate Peripheral Participation in the Community of Practice. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 371-387.
DOI
|
33 |
Kim, S. J., & Chung, Y. L. (2015). Structural Relationships Among the Epistemological Beliefs, Metacognition, Science Inquiry Skills, and Science Achievement of High School Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(6), 931-938.
DOI
|
34 |
Kuhn, D. (2004). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? In U. Goswami (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
|
35 |
Kwon, J. S., & Kim, H. B. (2016). Exploring Small Group Argumentation Shown in Designing an Experiment: Focusing on Students' Epistemic Goals and Epistemic Considerations for Activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 45-61.
DOI
|
36 |
Lim, S. C., Kim, J. H., & Jeong, J. W. (2013). Analysis of the Scientific Reasoning Ability of Science-Gifted 2nd Middle School Students in Open-Inquiry Activities. Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 323-337.
DOI
|
37 |
Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 57-68.
DOI
|
38 |
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2007). Middle school students' use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations. In M. C. Lovett., & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with Data (pp. 233-265). NJ: Erlbaum.
|
39 |
Merriam, S. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
|