• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.25 no.6
• /
• pp.1333-1343
• /
• 2014

Hansen and Lund (2005) documented that a univariate GARCH(1,1) model is no worse than other sophisticated GARCH models in terms of prediction errors such as MSPE and MAE. Here, we extend Hansen and Lund (2005) by considering multivariate GARCH models and incorporating risk management measures such as VaR and fail percentage. Our Monte Carlo simulations study shows that multivariate GARCH(1,1) model also performs well compared to asymmetric GARCH models. However, we suggest that actual model selection should be done with care in light of risk management. It is applied to the realized volatilities of KOSPI, NASDAQ and HANG SENG index for recent 10 years.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.25 no.6
• /
• pp.1171-1180
• /
• 2014

We considered saddlepoint approximations to VaR (value at risk) and ES (expected shortfall) which frequently encountered in finance and insurance as the measures of risk management. In this paper we supposed univariate and multivariate skew-normal distributions, instead of traditional normal class distributions, as underlying distribution of linear portfolios. Simulation results are provided and showed the suggested saddlepoint approximations are very accurate than normal approximations.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.27 no.4
• /
• pp.959-967
• /
• 2016

Distributional assumptions on equity returns play a key role in valuation theories for derivative securities. Elberlein and Keller (1995) investigated the distributional form of compound returns and found that some of standard assumptions can not be justified. Instead, Generalized Hyperbolic (GH) distribution fit the empirical returns with high accuracy. Hu and Kercheval (2007) also show that the normal distribution leads to VaR (Value at Risk) estimate that significantly underestimate the realized empirical values, while the GH distributions do not. We consider saddlepoint approximations to estimate the VaR and the ES (Expected Shortfall) which frequently encountered in finance and insurance as measures of risk management. We supposed GH distributions instead of normal ones, as underlying distribution of linear portfolios. Simulation results show the saddlepoint approximations are very accurate than normal ones.