• Social Workers
• /
• no.3 s.47
• /
• pp.10-13
• /
• 2006

지난해는 본격적인 지역사회 중심의 사회복지서비스 시대의 원년이라는 수식어가 따라다닐 만큼 사회복지서비스 영역에 중대 변화를 예고했던 몇 가지 일들이 있었다. 사회복지서비스 관련 사업의 지방이양과 그에 따른 재정분권, 사회복지사업법 개정에 따른 지역사회복지체계의 구축, 지역복지계획의 수립, 사회복지사무소의 설치 등이 바로 그것이다. 이미 2001-2002년에 전국 15개 지역을 대상으로 지역사회복지협의체 시범사업이 실시되었고, 2003년 6월 사회복지사업법을 개정하여 2005년8월부터 전국234개 기초자치단체를 대상으로 지역사회복지협의체(이하 협의체)를 구성, 운영하도록 하였다.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.16 no.5
• /
• pp.75-84
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to analyze the regional distribution of the number of social welfare facilities per 100,000 population by using the concentration index(CI) and to evaluate the relationship with the local welfare environment. The results of the analysis are as follows. First, the distribution of social welfare facilities between urban and rural area were distributed in rural areas. And concentration of rural area was gradually decreasing. Second, the concentration index of the social welfare institution was calculated as the negative index. Therefore, social welfare facilities are concentrated in rural areas. However, the absolute value of concentration index decreased. Finally, there are many social welfare facilities in areas with poor economic conditions, low incomes, low welfare budget input, and poor social demolition indicators. In the future, the relationship between inequality of regional distribution of welfare resources and the relationship between local welfare environment should be continuously monitored.

• Social Workers
• /
• no.8 s.52
• /
• pp.24-26
• /
• 2006

1821년 국내 최초로 태화기도교사회복지관이 우리나라에 설립된지 벌써 85년이 흘렀다 그간 사회복지관들은 지역 주민들의 복지증진을 위한 여러 가지 사업개발과 저소득 계층을 위해 지원해 왔으며 후원 및 자원봉사자들을 개발 발굴하여, 지역사회 운동 등의 다양한 활동을 전개해 오고 있다. 2007년 현재 전국에 395개의 지역사회복지관이 다양한 전문 복지프로그램을 개발운영하고 있으며, 이러한 지역사회복지관에 대한 지역 주민들의 관심은 나날이 증가하고 있는 실정이다. 과거 지역사회복지관이라는 단어는 경제적으로 어려운 저소득 소외계층을 위한 기관으로 빈민 구제등의 사업을 실시해왔으나 현재는 지역주민들의 욕구가 다양화 되면서 지역주민들을 위한 다양한 사업들을 전개해오고 있다.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.56 no.1
• /
• pp.181-201
• /
• 2004

It has been said that there were many problems in a social welfare institution. Community welfare in Japan is being presented as an alternative solving these problems and underlying theories are deinstitutionalization, normalization, and community care. Recently, in Korea, these alternatives are connected with the logic that social welfare institutions are useless. But if we think the inborn duty of the social welfare institution, we can know the logic problem of these theories. Also, 'the socialization theory of social welfare institutions' has been presented as a solving method. But studies in Korea are having a partiality only to opening to community and are researched separately from community welfare. Under these problem perceptions, this study examined the construction contents of the community welfare in Japan, the relation of community welfare and social welfare institutions, the relation of the community welfare and the socialization theory of social welfare institutions, and the concept and content of the socialization theory of social welfare institutions. This study investigated the discussions in Japan, for studies in Korea are generally based on those of Japan and the domestic community welfare policy has been influenced immensely by Japan. The result of this study is as follows. Firstly, not the social welfare institution in a category of community welfare is excluded, but is prescribed as an essential post, a premise condition, and a composition post of the community welfare. Secondly, the socialization theory of social welfare institutions is also discussed in a category of the community welfare and in the side of community welfare development. Thirdly, the socialization theory of social welfare institutions is presented in the side of not only opening to community, but also a basic practice theory of the social welfare institution reformation including that.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.52
• /
• pp.301-324
• /
• 2003

This study is designed to investigate social worker's experience in community practice at community welfare centers. Especially this study is conducted to identify the question; how do social workers experience community practice? For the study, data is collected from 11 social workers by depth interview. Using the Grounded theory, the data is analysed by open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. Finally the core category is become known that community practice is the piled up process of developmental experience throw willful efforts and various strategies under poor circumstances. The findings are as follows: (1) the experienced social workers seriously consider residents, community, social workers, and community welfare centers as the core participant in community practice. (2) the experienced community practitioners use various strategies on the whole process. (3) a system needs to be built to train community practitioners based on the cooperation of universities and community centers.

• Social Workers
• /
• no.2 s.46
• /
• pp.11-13
• /
• 2006

재정자립도 지자체장의 복지마인드에 따라 사회복지 서비스 방향이 큰 차이를 보이고 있다. 또 지역별 보조금 지원의 격차로 인해 종사자의 처우에 심한 격차가 발생하고 지역별 종사자간의 위화감 및 처우가 좋은 지역으로 사회복지 인력의 편중 및 기피 지역발생이 우려된다. 이에 따른 문제점을 알아보고 우리의 역할은 무엇인지 알아본다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.17 no.9
• /
• pp.159-172
• /
• 2017

This study examined the predisposing, enabling and need factors, based on Andersen's behavioral model, affecting intention to use community organizing services at a community welfare center. 725 people aged 20 and older who lived in Gwang-jin-gu participated in this study and multiple linear regression analyses were utilized to analyze the deputation. The results demonstrate that intention to use is primarily affected by predisposing factors, age and duration of education. Female and more educated people were significantly associated with the intention to use community organizing services. Enabling factors, reputation and image of the community welfare center significantly affect intention to use community organizing services. People are more likely to use community organizing services when there is higher reputation of the community welfare center and better image of the community welfare center. Finally, intention to use is primarily affected by welfare consciousness, a need factor. People who have liberal welfare consciousness are more likely to use community organizing services. These findings provide implications and suggestions for increasing intention to use community organizing services at a community welfare center.

• Social Workers
• /
• no.7 s.51
• /
• pp.16-19
• /
• 2006

실제 지역사회복지계획 수립은 곳곳에서 허점을 노출하며 시작부터 삐걱거리고 있다. 2004년 지역사회복지계획 및 지역사회복지협의체 구성과 운영 방법 등을 골자로 한 사회복지사업법 개정안 을 발표할 당시엔 올 6월말까지 각 지자체가 복지계획을 수립해 제출토록 했으나, 현재 8월말까지로 2개월 늦춰졌다. 보건복지부 사회정책기획팀 관계자는 “기한을 맞추는게 중요한 게 아니라, 부실을 예방하는 게 더 중요하기 때문에 계획제출 기한을 늦춘 것”이라 설명했다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.262-269
• /
• 2009

The public and private sectors have quite different views on the operation of community welfare alliance. Their understanding of the issues has a vast difference, which may lead to twisted operation of the community welfare alliance. In fact, there are many areas that have troubles in the operation of the alliance. This study systematically analyzes limitations that the alliance has and it goals to draw out improvement policies to overcome them. As a study method, a survey is conducted on the leaders of community welfare alliance to suggest an AHP analysis model on the issue awareness and improvement policy. Concentrated on the analyzed results and implications entailed through the analysis, this study suggests improvement policies to overcome such limitations that the community welfare alliance has.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
• /
• v.47 no.4
• /
• pp.93-120
• /
• 2016

This study aims to elaborate differences of demand and supply in welfare service delivery upon regions. For this purpose, in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 welfare bureaucrats from Dong offices among largest and smallest portions of recipients in Seoul. The results indicated that there were significant differences in the proportion of welfare bureaucrats versus welfare recipients (11-450 households) of the National Basic Livelihood Guarantee System, the amount of available private sector resources, and the difficulty of providing visitation counseling upon regions. Research implications were discussed further to address regional disparities of welfare services.