• 제목/요약/키워드: 중증도 분류 간호사

검색결과 18건 처리시간 0.031초

전산화된 임상 데이터에 기반한 환자 분류 체계 및 간호 인력 관리 방안 : 일개 종합병원 분석 사례 (Patient Classification Technique based on Computerized Clinical Data and Nursing Workforce Management : Analysis case of a general Hospital)

  • 김경옥;박경순;서창진
    • 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
    • /
    • 제13권3호
    • /
    • pp.287-298
    • /
    • 2013
  • 본 연구는 전산화된 임상 데이터를 이용하여 환자 중증도를 분별하는 기법을 고안하고 간호사가 작성한 분류 점수와 비교 분석하여 타당성을 검증하기 위하여 일개 종합병원의 7개 병동 재원환자 348명에게 하루동안 간호사가 수행한 행위를 근거로 환자분류(KPCS-1: Korean patient classification system for nurses) 점수를 간호사가 작성하고, 병원정보시스템에 저장되어 있는 임상 데이터를 이용하여 산정, 수집한 점수와 비교하였다. 간호사가 작성한 점수와 임상 데이터를 이용한 환자 중증도 점수 모두 진료과 및 환자유형에 따라 점수 분포를 비교한 결과 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타나 환자분류의 타당성이 동일하게 검증되었으며, 두 방법 간 에는 상관계수 0.96(p<.001)의 높은 상관성이 있었다. 임상 데이터 기법이 다소 높은 점수를 보였으나 일부 영역의 보완을 거친다면 간호사가 환자분류를 작성하지 않고, 병원정보시스템에 저장된 임상 데이터에 연동하여 자동으로 환자 중증도를 분별하는 시스템 개발이 가능하고 이를 간호인력의 성과관리 및 수급계획 등에 활용 할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

중증도 분류자 직종에 따른 중증도 분류 결과의 차이 비교 (Comparison of KTAS(Korean Triage and Acuity Scale) results by Triage Classifier)

  • 허영진;오미라;김세형;한소현;박윤숙
    • 융합정보논문지
    • /
    • 제10권4호
    • /
    • pp.98-103
    • /
    • 2020
  • 본 연구에서는 KTAS(Korean Triage and Acuity Scale) 결과가 분류를 시행한 주체의 직종에 따른 차이가 있는지를 알아보고자 한다. 2016년 1월 1일부터 2017년 12월 31일까지의 응급의료기관으로 내원한 환자 자료 중, 국가응급진료정보망으로 전송된 자료 총 10,960,359건을 분석하였다. 분류자 직종은 전문의, 전공의, 인턴, 일반의, 간호사, 응급구조사였다. 최초 중증도 분류와 최종 중증도 분류 결과의 일치율은 일반의가 98.9%로 가장 높았고, 인턴이 80.2%로 가장 낮았다. 과대 분류에서는 일반의가 0.6%로 가장 낮았고, 인턴은 16.0%로 가장 높았다. 또한 과소 분류는 전문의와 응급구조사가 0.4%로 가장 낮았고, 인턴이 3.8%로 가장 높았다. 중증도 분류 결과는 직종별 유의미한 차이가 있었다(p<0.001). 중증도 분류는 환자의 예후에 영향을 미치는 요인 중 하나로 직종별, 숙련도에 따라 그 결과가 달라져서는 안 된다. 때문에 정확한 중증도 분류를 위한 분류자의 역량 강화가 필요하다.

응급실 중증도 분류 간호사의 의사결정과정에 나타난 사고전략: 소리내어 생각하기 (Thinking Strategies of Triage Nurses' Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Think Aloud Study)

  • 문선희;박연환
    • 중환자간호학회지
    • /
    • 제9권1호
    • /
    • pp.15-26
    • /
    • 2016
  • Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify thinking strategies in the complicated decision-making process based on real patient-based data of triage nurses in the emergency department (ED). Methods: This study used the 'think aloud' method to collect data from 8 triage nurses from one general hospital ED in South Korea. The data were analyzed with protocol analysis using thinking strategies. Results: The triage process was divided into three stages. The first stage consisted of 8 thinking strategies, including searching for information. They used intuition based on directly observed concepts for identifying a crisis. The second stage consisted of 17 thinking strategies related to the decision-making process. They assessed patients and generated a hypothesis to try to understand their health problems through analytic thinking. The third stage consisted of 10 thinking strategies, including qualifying. They considered the situation of the ED and properly triaged the patients. During the triage process, they frequently used judging the value and searching for information on 17 thinking strategies. Conclusions: Triage nurses demonstrated various connected thinking strategies for each stage. Based on our results, further studies should be done to develop a triage education program.

  • PDF

한국형응급환자분류도구를 적용한 응급실에서 소아 환자의 중증도 분류 정확성 (Triage Accuracy of Pediatric Patients using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale in Emergency Departments)

  • 문선희;심재란
    • 한국산학기술학회논문지
    • /
    • 제19권11호
    • /
    • pp.626-634
    • /
    • 2018
  • 본 연구는 한국형응급환자분류도구(Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: KTAS)를 사용한 소아 중증도 분류의 정확성을 파악하기 위한 후향적 조사연구이다. 연구자료는 2016년 10월부터 2017년 9월까지 1개 권역응급의료센터, 1개 지역응급의료센터에 방문한 소아환자의 자료 중 무작위로 추출한 250건의 간호초진기록지와 진료결과였다. 수집된 자료를 검정된 전문가가 분석하여 true-triage를 정하였다. 중증도 분류 정확도는 응급실간호사의 중증도 분류 결과와 전문가의 true-triage결과와의 일치도로 평가하였다. 전문가 의견에 따라 중증도 분류 오류의 원인이 분석되었고, KTAS 등급과 퇴원, 체류시간, 진료비와의 연관성이 비교되었다. 연구결과 전문가와 응급실 간호사의 중증도 분류 등급은 높은 일치도를 보였다(weighted kappa=.77). 중증도 분류 불일치의 원인 중 활력징후 결과를 KTAS 알고리즘 기준에 잘 못 적용한 경우가 가장 많았다(n=13). KTAS 1,2 등급과 같이 중증도가 높을수록 퇴원이 적었다(${\chi}=43.25$, p<.001). 연령을 보정했을 때 KTAS 등급에 따라 체류시간(F=12.39, p<.001)과 진료비(F=11.78, p<.001)는 차이가 있었다. 본 연구결과 KTAS는 국내 응급실에서 높은 정확도를 보였으므로, 새로 개발된 중증도 분류 도구가 국내 응급실에 잘 적용되고 있다고 할 수 있다.

응급실 간호사의 중증도 분류 역량에 대한 개념분석 (Concept Analysis of Triage Competency in Emergency Nursing)

  • 문선희;박연환
    • 중환자간호학회지
    • /
    • 제10권3호
    • /
    • pp.41-52
    • /
    • 2017
  • Purpose : This concept analysis identified attributes and defined triage competency among emergency nurses. Method : Walker and Avant's approach was used to guide the concept analysis. A literature review was completed including 26 studies, 5 reports of related associations, and 5 books. Results : The concept of triage competency in emergency nurses was identified as five attributes: clinical judgment, expert assessment, management of medical resources, timely decision, and communication. Antecedents of the concept were triage education and emergency room experience. The consequences of the concept were efficiency of care, patient rating, and safety. Triage competency in emergency nurses was defined as the comprehensive ability to prioritize patients' urgency and allocate limited medical resources. Conclusion : This study is meaningful since it clarified triage competency among emergency nurses. The attributes and empirical indicators of this study will likely lay the foundation for development of triage competency metrics.

  • PDF

중증도 분류 간호사에 의한 응급환자 중증도 분류 신뢰도 측정 연구: Emergency Severity Index Version 4를 중심으로 (Reliability of the Emergency Severity Index Version 4 Performed by Trained Triage Nurse)

  • 최희강;최민진;김주원;이지연;신선화;이현정
    • 중환자간호학회지
    • /
    • 제5권2호
    • /
    • pp.61-71
    • /
    • 2012
  • Purpose: The aim of this study was to measure the inter-rater reliability of Emergency severity index (ESI) version 4 among triage nurse. Methods: This study was carried out from August 11, 2010 to September 7, 2010 in a regional emergency department. Data collection was done by ten triage nurses who trained ESI v.4. Two research nurses and ten triage nurses scored the ESI version 4 to the patients as references, independently. We calculated the weighted kappa between the triage nurses and research nurses to evaluate the consistency of the ESI v.4. Results: A total of 233 patients were enrolled in this study. Classification of ESI level was as follows - level 1 (0.4%), level 2 (21.0%), level 3 (67.8%), level 4 (9.4%), and level 5 (1.3%). Inter-rater reliability by weighted kappa was 0.79 (95% Confidence Interval= 0.74-0.83) and agreement rate was 87.1%. Under-triage rate by triage nurse was 6.0% and over-triage rate was 6.9%. Conclusion: For this study, inter-rater reliability was measured good level between triage nurses and research nurses in Korean single ED.

  • PDF

중증도 분류간호사의 비판적 사고성향, 문제해결능력과 중증도 분류역량 (Emergency Nurses' Critical Thinking Disposition, Problem Solving Ability, and Triage Competency)

  • 박재형;배선형
    • 근관절건강학회지
    • /
    • 제29권2호
    • /
    • pp.124-132
    • /
    • 2022
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships among critical thinking disposition, problem solving ability, and triage competency in nurses working in Emergency Rooms (ERs). Methods: This cross-sectional study, conducted in August and September 2021, involved 118 ER nurses from three hospitals in the Gyeonggi-do metropolitan area. The data were analyzed using t-test, ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson correlation coefficients, and multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS for Windows version 25.0. Results: The mean score of triage competency among ER nurses was 87.63±15.65. In the regression model, age, ER experience, triage experience, critical thinking disposition, and problem solving ability predicted 52% of the triage competency. Both critical thinking disposition and problem-solving ability were noted to be significant (β=.32, p<.001; β=.36, p<.001, respectively). Conclusion: Critical thinking disposition and problem solving ability of ER nurses were identified as major factors in triage competency. To improve ER nurses' triage competency and enhance critical thinking disposition and problem solving ability, a systematic and ongoing program should be developed and implemented.

응급실 초진 간호사의 한국형 응급 환자 분류도구 수행능력에 영향을 미치는 요인 (Factors Influencing Triage Nurses' the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale Performance Ability)

  • 이은경;김지수
    • 임상간호연구
    • /
    • 제24권1호
    • /
    • pp.94-102
    • /
    • 2018
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine triage nurses' the Korean triage and acuity scale(KTAS) performance ability, perception of importance, education needs and identify the factors influencing triage nurses' the KTAS performance ability. Methods: A descriptive correlational study was conducted among 146 emergency nurses working in 13 hospitals from March to May, 2017. Data were collected utilizing a questionnaire developed to measure performance ability, perception of importance, and educational needs of 192 items of the KTAS. Statistical analysis included t-test, analysis of variance, correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis. Results: The triage nurses' the KTAS performance ability was rated as 3.3/4.0 points, perception of importance as 3.2/4.0 points, and education needs as 3.1/4.0 points. Factors influencing the KTAS performance of the participants were perception of importance, education needs, and work experience at the emergency department, explaining 26.7% of total variance. Conclusion: The KTAS performance ability of triage nurses could be improved through training programs designed to enhance their perception of importance and provide knowledge about the KTAS. Nurses' emergency department work experience needs to be considered as an important factor for the KTAS performance ability.

한국형 응급환자 분류도구의 간호사 간 신뢰도 평가 (Inter-rater Reliability of Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) among the Research Nurses and the Triage Nurses)

  • 양정은;이은자
    • 동서간호학연구지
    • /
    • 제26권1호
    • /
    • pp.91-99
    • /
    • 2020
  • Purpose: The study aims to assess the inter-rater reliability of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale between the research nurses and the triage nurses. Methods: Interrater reliability was measured on 400 adult (≧15) and 400 pediatric (<15) patients who visited the emergency medical center from January 4 to June 30, 2018. Results: The study result showed that the inter-rater reliability of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale was substantial, with κ=.73 (95% Confidence interval= .68-.78) and 77.0 percent agreement. The inter-rater of Pediatric Korean Triage and Acuity Scale was also substantial, with κ=.76 (95% Confidence interval= .71-.82) and 83.8 percent agreement. Conclusion: Although the inter-rater reliability of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale was acceptable, the percent agreement was lower than the desirable level (<80.0%). It was confirmed that Pediatric Korean Triage and Acuity Scale had an acceptable level of inter-rater reliability and percent agreement for clinical use. Efforts should be made to improve the reliability in the future.

웹기반 한국형 중증도 분류 체계 학습프로그램이 응급실간호사의 중증도 분류에 대한 자기효능감 및 수행능력에 미치는 효과 (Effects of a Web-Based Korean Triage and Acuity Scale Learning Program on Triage Self-Efficacy and Triage Performance Ability for Nurses in Emergency Department)

  • 김효진;강희영
    • 대한간호학회지
    • /
    • 제49권2호
    • /
    • pp.171-180
    • /
    • 2019
  • Purpose: The Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) is a tool used to classify the severity and urgency of emergency department (ED) patients, focusing on their symptoms. In consideration of the importance of the KTAS, a web-based learning program has emerged as a new mode of education; it enables ED triage nurses to access it anytime and anywhere, and according to their own learning abilities. This study aimed to develop a web-based KTAS learning program and evaluate its effects on self-efficacy and triage performance ability in ED nurses. Methods: A quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest was used. The conceptual framework was Bandura's self-efficacy theory. There were 30 participants in the experimental group and 29 in the control group. The experimental group attended an orientation and 4 sessions of a web-based KTAS learning program. The learning program lasted 280 minutes over five weeks, consisting of 40 minutes of orientation and four 60-minute sessions. Results: The scores of self-efficacy, triage performance ability in KTAS level, and chief complaints significantly increased in the experimental group compared to the control group. In addition, the numbers of under-triage in KTAS significantly decreased in the experimental group in comparison to the control group. Conclusion: The results suggest that the learning program was effective in improving ED nurses' level of self-efficacy and triage performance ability (KTAS level and KTAS chief complaint). Accordingly, the web-based KTAS learning program can be applied as an education intervention to improve ED nurses' triage skill.