• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.16 no.11
• /
• pp.8021-8029
• /
• 2015

This study obtains design assessment indexes that should be considered in order to improvements of the public space was to analysis the importance in the public officials/academics and practitioners side. Obtained assessment topics in accordance with characteristic of public space through previous research to them and after a detailed selection indicators was so lead through the FGI. Derived surface was subjected to the significance analysis AHP through the survey expert. For this study, the importance of the public space are working professionals usability, publicness, environment, connectivity, identity, spatiality the order, public officials/academics usability, environment, connectivity, identity, spatiality, publicness the order. In addition, professionals working in the comprehensive analysis of the most important priority was to recognize safety, public officials/academics of the most important element appeared to have cleanliness. The results obtained in this study will be used as an index that can be used in planning and evaluation for consideration of the next improvement of public space.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2010.06b
• /
• pp.126-131
• /
• 2010

IT 자원의 상호운용성 및 재활용성 등의 장점 통하여 새로운 비즈니스 환경변화에 가장 빠르게 대응할 수 있는 최적의 대안으로 서비스 지향 아키텍처(SOA : Service Oriented Architecture)가 최근 각광받고 있다. 그러나 구현의 복잡성 및 그에 따른 낮은 ROI(Return on Investment) 평가와 같은 SOA의 문제점들을 보완하기 위해 웹 지향 아키텍처(WOA: Web Oriented Architecture)가 제안되었다. 하지만 WOA 또한 보안 및 안정적인 메시지 전달 등의 문제점들을 안고 있다. 본 논문에서는 SOA와 WOA 구현의 핵심 개념을 연구하고, SOA 또는 WOA를 이용하여 서비스를 구현할 경우 중요한 핵심 개념의 복잡도를 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 기법을 통하여 평가하였다. 이를 통하여 SOA 또는 WOA 구현 시 요구되는 핵심 요구사항의 중요도를 평가하고 개발자에게 미치는 구현 복잡도를 측정할 수 있다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.20 no.12
• /
• pp.287-300
• /
• 2020

The present study applied the IPA(Importance-Performance Analysis) to derive several practical alternatives for the improvement of Chuncheon Silver Orchestra program using IPA(importance-performance analysis). Most importantly, this work performed a comparative study using sample data collected from two groups of silver member(N=53) and program operator(N=32). A careful literature review leaded to the development of six types of evaluation sectors, including 'connection with the local community', 'budget operation', 'program operation', 'manpower operation', 'public relations strategy' as well as 'environment for program operation'. This work further devised twenty-two evaluation items. The results indicated that silver member group rated 'manpower operation' the highest in their both perceived importance and performance. Program operator group rated 'budget operation' and 'manpower operation' rated the highest in their perceived importance and performance, respectively. The results form IPA matrix analysis provides an important implication that much efforts and interests should be sustainably given from the perspective of the silver member group and the program operator group coupled with four types of IPA quadrant, accordingly.

• Information Systems Review
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.189-203
• /
• 2010

Is presenting guidance of information performance measurement as government PRM version 2.0 these common reference models in public sector. Government PRM is consisted of assessment classification system and standard line of sight and performance management standard form. Through this, is sorting performance element and define cause-and effect. Government PRM is supplying measurement categories at assessment classification system, but relative importance for application standard by measurement categories is not presenting. In this study, importance for government PRM's measurement categories been applying by commonness Test of information performance measurement of public sector wishes to deduce estimation and priority. Research model used Fuzzy QFD, and designed so that can reflect well PRM's development purpose. I applied Fuzzy AHP and FPP method that graft together fuzzy theory to minimize uncertainty and ambiguity in that expert opinion. Is drawn to element that "Standard model offer for information department and management" is the most important in government PRM's development purpose. "Quality of service" is showing the highest priority in customer results in measurement category. Importance for government PRM's measurement categories can offer common valuation basis in government and public institution. Hereafter if examine closely quantitative cause-and effect for structure model of measurement classification system when study government PRM more objective and efficient reference model become.

• 한국HCI학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.02a
• /
• pp.292-297
• /
• 2008

유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅 서비스 환경은 사용자와 시스템간의 상호작용성이 매우 중요하며, 이러한 상호작용성을 사용자 중심의 시각에서 평가하기 위한 새로운 평가 기법의 개발이 필요하다. 본 연구는 유비쿼터스 서비스의 특성이 반영된 사용자 중심의 상호작용성 평가 metric 개발을 목표로 한다. 이를 위하여 첫째, 기존의 유비쿼터스 서비스 평가방법론을 검토하여, 유비쿼터스 서비스 평가를 위한 평가 속성을 정의하였으며, 둘째, 대인 서비스 평가기법, 사용성 평가기법, 정신측정학 기반의 평가기법 등의 기존의 서비스 평가방법론의 한계를 극복할 수 있는 사용자중심의 상호작용성 평가 metric 을 개발하였다. 그리고 본 연구에서 제안된 평가 metric 을 u-home 서비스의 평가에 실제로 적용하여 그 유효성을 검증하고 각 지표별 중요도를 구해보았다. 본 연구에서 제안한 상호작용성 평가 metric 은 유비쿼터스 서비스 상호작용성 수준을 평가함으로써 잠재 서비스 사용자들을 분석하고, 제안된 프레임워크의 서비스 개발단계에서의 잠재 서비스 사용자에 대한 요구사항 수렴 및 수준 파악에 유용하게 활용될 수 있다.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
• /
• v.13 no.9
• /
• pp.1737-1744
• /
• 2009

This study calculated the relative importance between evaluation factors of websites focused on culture and tourism in J region by 3C_D_T evaluation model of website. That is, this paper was analyzed by AHP (analytic hierarchy process) and calculated the relative weights and preference. In conclusion, this study showed that content was the most important factor and proposed the improvement planning through sensitivity analysis.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.43 no.3
• /
• pp.295-306
• /
• 2023

In this study, we explored science teachers' perceptions of adaptive practice in terms of importance and practice. For this purpose, an adaptive practice questionnaire was developed targeting secondary science teachers, and the responses of 128 science teachers were analyzed. The results of this study were as follows: First, the science teachers responded that all 17 items regarding adaptive practice were important. In particular, items related to 'addition of examples', 'adjustment of the level/range of concepts', and 'encouragement of student participation' showed high importance and performance levels. Second, the results of the IPA concerning adaptive practice showed that the items needing intensive improvement due to high importance but low performance were 'encouraging students' self-directed learning' and 'monitoring and responding to individual differences'. The science teachers identified a lack of time and uniform curriculum as the reasons for the low level of practice despite the high importance of these items. Third, regarding the IPA of the adaptive practice items, the items located in the fourth area, an excessive area, concerned 'pace control', 'modifying activities', and 'metaphor use'. More specifically, considering that 'metaphor use' was the only item with a higher level of performance than importance, it is necessary to reconsider whether problems are caused by excessive use. Fourth, analyzing the responses regarding the reasons for the difference in importance and performance revealed that the factors related to teachers included teachers' lack of knowledge or ability, and the tendency to implement as planned. As for student factors, an excessive number of students, differences in the levels of students, and a tendency to prefer classes centered on entrance exams were identified. As environmental factors, a uniform curriculum, conditions for experiments, evaluation systems, and external demands were mentioned. Finally, the implications of the results of this study for science education were discussed.

• Archives of design research
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.131-138
• /
• 2000

The evaluation of design is one of the most important steps in design process. However, because in most cases, design evaluation has been disregarded in comparison with other steps and has been performed by designer's subjective judgment. there are few studies for the development of systematic methodology. In this study, we developed the method of design evaluation using the fuzzy theory and the multi-criteria dedsion making model. This method consists of two steps. The first step is to obtain relative importance weights of design evaluation criteria, and the second step is to obtain and integrate scores for design evaluation criteria. AHP(analytic hierarchy process) and fuzzy theory were applied to the first and the second step, respectively. We applied the developed method to the sensible evaluation of cellular phone design. As the result, we verified that the developed method could be effectively used in the evaluation of product design.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.14 no.4
• /
• pp.1595-1603
• /
• 2013

This study uses the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) on viewing motivation for the revitalization of Korean creative musicals. The IPA is the evaluation techniques to simultaneously compare and analyze relative importance and achievement of each attribute for multi-attribute models. This analysis uses the discerning method by displaying the matrix that includes the factors about which customers care and customer satisfaction on each factor. The customer satisfaction is determined by customer expectation for each attribute and its implementation level. This study, through this method, exams the importance and satisfaction level on attributes of viewing motivations for Korean creative musicals.

• Culinary science and hospitality research
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.338-347
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to evaluate student's perception of their high school foodservice in the Busan and Kyungnam area. For this study, questionnaires were distributed to 254 students in 6 high schools in the Busan and Kyungnam area. The students assessed the importance and performance of school foodservice at 3.90/5.00 and 3.25/5.00 respectively. The importance mean scores of students were showed significantly(p<0.001) higher in sanitation and freshness of food items than any other factor while showed lowest in the frequency of dessert offering and the diversity of dessert items. The analysis result revealed that two factors, the diversity of dessert items and the harmony of main dishes and desserts, should be urgently improved. This result is expected to provide a school foodservice management team with useful information in its food service operation.