• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.75-82
• /
• 2015

Although the government has revised the child welfare act, institutionalized the establishment of local children's centers, and given financial support for them, there are a number of problems with respect to their operation. Specifically, one of main problems is their limited space. Diverse problems that go with the arrangement of limited space and usability have occurred, however there are only a few strategies to use limited space flexibly. This study assumed variability as one of the methods to solve spatial problems. As a basic research for the assumption, Analyzing the variable method and characteristics of domestic and foreign child-care facility guidelines was performed trying to take advantage of as a basic data in order to seek a variable scheme of local children centers' indoor space. For this purpose, study analysed the methods and characteristics of variability centering on aspects related to variability which are environmental design elements required by local children's centers as suggested in previous studies. The results are as follows. First, the variability of space should be planned according to activity and time, and consider the methods of division, storage, and other facilities necessary. Second, methods of variability in space can be classified into creating areas and structures that are variable. Third, as a result of analysing the environmental design elements required by local children's centers, this study discovered the following characteristics: multi-purpose usability through a combination of variable devices, transition through a variable space medium and setting up areas and expansion of indoor variability assuming usability through internal and external connections.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.3-14
• /
• 2016

According to Plato's ontology, we lead our lives by establishing a relationship with others in the society. However in rapidly changing era, our lives was gradually moving towards personal tendency. Even for the relationship with family, not with others. Thus, awareness about owning properties has changed due to the sociocultural factors and increase number of single-person households. So in this study, the considerations for single-person housing were perceived through preceding research, and the elements making spatial boundary of shared housing were drawn to make rational space sharing based on the boundary with others and of the living environment. With overall analysis based on the spatial boundary features of planned shared housing, the plan characteristics according to the spatial boundary of the current shared housing is to be drawn and analyzed. Third, The expressive and structural features of spatial boundary as above appear with mutual flexible connectivity, And the result shows that the modularity was the highest. Among them variable coupling modularity of shows how it is possible to combine efficiently and variously the private and public spaces with regularity of 'space of optimal unit'. This study drew plan characteristics from more detailed space border of shared housing. Therefore, The basic framework of the characteristics spin for the cases that newly emerge later on.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.45-52
• /
• 2007

The demographic profile of the households will shift towards the 'older elderly'. There are need upgrading existing housing and new housing in aspect of floor plan, accessories, facilities and so on. The government should prepare the policy and standards of housing design for the aged and disabled in order to improving the residents' housing conditions. The purpose of this study is to compare Korean to foreign guidelines related to residential design for the elderly and disabled and find out the characteristics of our standards. It was accomplished by literature research. The results were as follows. There is disagreements between domestic standards over the clear door opening, the clear hallways and handrails at entrance. And the foreign standards are based on their wheelchair size, ours are founded on it's size which specified only maximum overall dimensions. So ours are seem to be lack of accuracy. Our standard of stairs is in details in comparison with other space components. But ours don't go into details than foreign ones over length of hand-rails, riser etc. And for recommendations denoting minimum and maximum height of various component, it should be preceded the specific survey on limits of reaching ability for the elderly and disabled.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제35권5호
• /
• pp.407-414
• /
• 2011

플로팅건축물은 최근 지구온난화에 따른 해수면의 상승, 소득 증대 및 관광행태 변화에 따라 급증한 해양 레포츠 수요에 대응하는 효과적인 건축물이다. 국내 플로팅건축은 이미 전문회사들이 등장한 유럽과 비교하여 초보적인 도입기 이다. 플로팅건축은 프로그램, 형태, 건축규모, 층수, 위치, 접근방법, 이동성, 에너지 자립도 등 8가지 기준에 따라 유형 구분이 가능하다. 또한 시공된 주거시설을 대상으로 분석 한 결과 플로팅건축의 디자인 특성은 (1) 2층 규모, (2) 면적 비율이 높은 데크, (3) 장방형의 균형감 있는 매스, (4) 조망 극대화, (5) 친수공간 확보, (6) 공간의 통합적 사용 및 합리적 면적 배분의 평면계획, (7) 수면 반사를 고려한 단면계획, (8) 모듈화 및 유닛화 등으로 정리할 수 있다.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2003년도 학술대회지
• /
• pp.333-336
• /
• 2003

본 연구의 목적은 국내 맞춤주택(아파트)에 있어 주거욕구충족을 위한 주택수요자의 요구사항을 분석하는데 있다. 연구의 진행은 국내 맞춤주택의 현 입주자와 잠재수요자들을 대상으로 설문조사론 실시, 이룰 분석하는 것으로 이루어졌다. 이와 같은 과정을 통하여 도출된 결론을 요약하면 다음과 같다 : 1) 맞춤주택에 있어 수요자가 가장 많이 필요로 하는 사항은 공간과 마감재의 다양한 선택인 것으로 나타났다. 2) 마감재의 경우, 수요자들이 인하는 선택의 최소 폭은 $4\~6$가지 종류인 것으로 나타났다.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.107-125
• /
• 2005

Each ethnic group has a different cultural background and has developed its own culture in the name of a tradition. The interaction between different cultures is ever increasing through the process of acculturation or culture contact The purpose of this study is to provide baseline information about domestic living of Korean immigrants in Australia and Australians for a larger cross-cultural study project. As the first step, the usage of domestic space and seating styles of 52 Korean households in Melbourne were analyzed. Ethnographic research was conducted, utilizing a questionnaire. The findings of this research are as follows: 1. The most popular type of Living-Dining-Kitchen arrangement was the one which the kitchen is separated from the living and dining area. The level of satisfaction was the highest when the living room, dining room, and kitchen were all separated. 2. A laundry room was indispensable for Koreans in Australia, and they wanted to dry laundry and do ironing in there. Most people were satisfied with the toilet separated from the bathroom A drain hole on the floor of the bathroom was not indispensable for most Korean-Australians. 3. Korean-Australians tend to engage in various activities in their individual rooms, and they estimated that the size of most rooms were small. They also wanted to renovate the house to expand the rooms. 4. The seating style of Korean-Australians was mostly chair-seating. Yet, they often made beds on the floor for guests, and made kimchi sitting on the floor. Also, when they were relaxing, they were using both chair-seating and floor-seating. 5. Korean-Australians were not very satisfied with the use of floor carpets because of the dust collected on the carpets, and the difficulty to clean. It may be related to their preferred floor seating style, as well. 6. Almost all Korean-Australians take off their shoes inside of the house for hygienic reasons. They had a shoes cabinet at the entrance inside of the house. 7. The most popular heating system was ducted heating. The level of satisfaction about this was moderate because hot air contains lots of dust and it makes rooms very dry. Many were using electric blankets and their desired heating system was Ondol (heated floor). 8. Korean-Australians thought that the living room was the most important place for the family, and believed it should be decorated well to entertain guests. They also pointed out that the lighting was not bright enough in general.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.159-179
• /
• 2006

Each ethnic group has different cultural backgrounds and each culture has developed with its own traditions. The interaction between different cultures is getting more active through acculturation and cultural contacts. The purpose of this study was to compare domestic living of Korean immigrants with Australians in the form of a Cross-Cultural study. For this, usage of domestic space and seating style of 52 Korean households and 53 Australian households in Melbourne were analyzed. Ethnographic research with questionnaire was used. The results of the research were as follows. 1. The most popular type of Living-Dining-Kitchen arrangement was L+ K. D for Koreans and L. D . K for Australians. 2. A laundry room was indispensable for both and they all wanted to do ironing in there as well as dry. Both were satisfied with the type which toilet was separated from the bathroom Drain hole on the floor of the bathroom was not indispensable for most Koreans and Australians. 3. Koreans and Australians were doing various activities in living area and both were getting together around kitchen(dining) area. The particular thing of Koreans was that they were using the main bedroom with multiple purpose. 4. The seating style of Koreans and Australians belong to chair-seating style generally. But Koreans were using floor seating style in making bed for the guest and making Kimchi. Koreans and Australians were using mixed style of floor seating and chair-seating in relaxing time with watching TV, treating guest or so. 5. Koreans were not satisfied with using carpet cause of dust but Australians were satisfied with the carpet cause of warmness. 6. Most Koreans and Australians were take off shoes inside of the house. Koreans were organize shoes around the front door of the house usually and Australians were organize shoes in bedroom usually. 7. The most popular heating system was ducted heating for both. The level of satisfaction about ducted heating was low for Koreans because they though that it could contaminate air. Australians were satisfied with ducted heating because they though that this one was fit on the weather of this area. 8. Living room was the most important one for Koreans and Australians and they also thought it should be decorated well for entertaining guests. Most Koreans were estimate that the brightness of the light of the house was not enough but it was estimated to moderate for Australians on the contrary.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제43권9호
• /
• pp.143-162
• /
• 2005

Many ethnic groups have different cultural backgrounds and each culture has developed with its own traditions. The interaction between different cultures is getting more active through acculturation and cultural contact. The purpose of this study was to provide basic data about the domestic living of Australians in order to compare with Korean immigrants in the form of a Cross-Cultural study. For this, usage of domestic space and seating style of 53 Australian households in Melbourne were analyzed. Ethnographic research with questionnaire was used. The results of the research were as follows. 1. The open plan type combining the kitchen, dining and tying areas was the most popular one for Australians and they are very satisfied with that type. 2. The laundry room has been planned traditionally and Australians demand to be able to dry their laundry and do ironing in there additionally. Most of Australians were satisfied with separated toilet and bathroom. h drain hole on the floor of the bathroom was not essential for most Australians. 3. Australians were doing various activities in the living areas and they also enjoy gelling together in the kitchen and dining areas. 4. The seating style of Australians was generally the chair-seating style. However, they sometimes made a bed for guests on the floor and watched TV and treated guests with both chair seating style and floor seating style. 5. Australians were satisfied with using carpet presumably for its warmth.6. Many Australians took off their shoes inside of the house for hygienic reason. Most people organized the shoes in the cabinet of the bedroom. 7. The most popular heating system was ducted heating for Australians and they were very satisfied with it because it was suitable for the weather in Melbourne. 8. The living room was the most important one for Australian families and they thought that it should be decorated well for entertaining guests. It was also considered that brightness of the light was enough for most Australians.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제9권6호
• /
• pp.79-89
• /
• 2009

과밀 도심의 주거공간 확보 해결책으로 2000년 초부터 도심지내 토지의 효율적 이용을 위한 초고층 건축물의 건설이 급격히 증가하고 있으며, 새로운 주거유형의 하나로 자리매김해 나가고 있다. 도심 주거시설로써 초고층 건축물의 필요성은 과밀화 현상의 해결 효과와 함께 도시의 상징을 표현하는 랜드마크로서의 의미가 높다. 그러나 무분별한 초고층 건축물의 시공은 거주자의 생활환경을 보장해주지 못하며, 설계, 시설기준 등이 명확하게 규정되지 않는 한 위험요소를 항상 내포하고 있음을 간과해서는 안된다. 이제 초고층 건축물은 단순한 이미지와 상징성을 떠나 미래의 주거공간을 구성하는 도시의 새로운 대안으로서 도시와 건축의 유기적인 상호관계에서 다루어져야 한다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 초고층 건축물의 거주환경성능을 정량적으로 평가하기 위하여 AHP 분석을 통해 각 영역/범주별 평가항목 및 평가지표를 정립하고, 향후 초고층 건축물 계획시 거주환경성능 개선을 위한 기초자료를 제시하고자 하였다.

• 한국화재소방학회논문지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.29-36
• /
• 2017

가연물의 열발생률에 근거한 설계화원은 성능위주설계의 화재안전성 평가에 매우 중요한 영향을 줄 수 있다. 그러나 현재 성능위주설계에서는 국내 가연물의 화재정보의 부족으로 인하여 제한된 외국 문헌정보가 추가 검증이 없이 적용되고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 성능위주설계의 신뢰성을 확보하기 위하여 다양한 주거 및 사무공간 가연물을 대상으로 열발생률 및 화재성장률에 관한 정보를 제공하는 것이다. 이를 위해 총 14가지의 단일 및 다수 가연물에 대한 화재실험이 수행되었다. 본 연구에서 고려된 가연물의 최대 열발생률은 36 kW~1,092 kW의 범위를 갖는 것으로 측정되었다. 화재성장률은 주거용 가연물이 $0.003kW/s^2{\sim}0.0287kW/s^2$이고, 사무용 가연물이 $0.003kW/s^2{\sim}0.0838kW/s^2$ 범위를 갖는다. 특히 소파는 최대 열발생률 및 화재성장률의 관점에서 가장 높은 화재 위험성을 갖는다. 마지막으로, 다양한 가연물들의 최대 열발생률과 노출 표면적의 상관관계 분석을 통해 공간 내의 최대 열발생률을 산출하는 방법론이 제안된다.