An Analysis of the Living Arrangement of Australians for Cross-Cultural Study with Korean Immigrants in Melbourne, Australia

호주인과 호주 교민의 주거문화 비교를 위한 기초 연구(II) - 호주인의 주공간 및 주생활 분석을 중심으로 -

  • 이영심 (성균관대학교 건축학과) ;
  • 이상해 (성균관대학교 건축학과)
  • Published : 2005.10.01

Abstract

Many ethnic groups have different cultural backgrounds and each culture has developed with its own traditions. The interaction between different cultures is getting more active through acculturation and cultural contact. The purpose of this study was to provide basic data about the domestic living of Australians in order to compare with Korean immigrants in the form of a Cross-Cultural study. For this, usage of domestic space and seating style of 53 Australian households in Melbourne were analyzed. Ethnographic research with questionnaire was used. The results of the research were as follows. 1. The open plan type combining the kitchen, dining and tying areas was the most popular one for Australians and they are very satisfied with that type. 2. The laundry room has been planned traditionally and Australians demand to be able to dry their laundry and do ironing in there additionally. Most of Australians were satisfied with separated toilet and bathroom. h drain hole on the floor of the bathroom was not essential for most Australians. 3. Australians were doing various activities in the living areas and they also enjoy gelling together in the kitchen and dining areas. 4. The seating style of Australians was generally the chair-seating style. However, they sometimes made a bed for guests on the floor and watched TV and treated guests with both chair seating style and floor seating style. 5. Australians were satisfied with using carpet presumably for its warmth.6. Many Australians took off their shoes inside of the house for hygienic reason. Most people organized the shoes in the cabinet of the bedroom. 7. The most popular heating system was ducted heating for Australians and they were very satisfied with it because it was suitable for the weather in Melbourne. 8. The living room was the most important one for Australian families and they thought that it should be decorated well for entertaining guests. It was also considered that brightness of the light was enough for most Australians.

Keywords

References

  1. 박선희(2003). 캐나다 교민의 주거아이덴티티에 관한 연구. 한국주거학회논문집, 14(3), 109-118
  2. 유태용(1999). 문화란 무엇인가. 서울: 학연문화사
  3. 윤택림(2004). 문화와 역사 연구를 위한 질적연구방법론. 아르케
  4. 아모스 라포포트, 이규목 역(1985). 주거형태와 문화. 열화당
  5. 이도영(1988). 한인이민가정의 주거조절: 가설검증을 통한 이론적 해석. 대한건축학회논문집, 14(10), 11-17
  6. 이도영(1998). 미국내 한인이민가정들을 대상으로 한 주거조절연구. 대한건축학회논문집 ,14(8), 31-40
  7. 이영심, 이상해(2005). 호주인과 호주교민의 주거문화 비교를 위한 기초 연구(I)- 호주 교민의 주생활 분석을 중심으로 - 한국가정관리학회지, 23(2), 107-125
  8. 이현정(1992). 재미교포의 주거아이덴티티에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  9. 이희봉(1988). 재미교포 주거건축을 통한 사용자 문화 현장연구: 광역 아틀란타 시를 중심으로. 대한건축학회논문집, 14(11), 103-114
  10. 정무웅(1988). 건축문화와 전통성에 관한 연구: 환경변 화에 따른 공간적응성을 중심으로. 단국대학교논문집 22
  11. 제임스 스프래들리, 이희봉 역(1988). 문화탐구를 위한 참여관찰방법. 대한교과서주식회사
  12. 조성희(1996). 문화접변에 따른 주양식의 지속과 변용에 관한 행태적 연구. 대한건축학회논문집, 12(9), 79-91
  13. 伊東理悪(리에 이토)(1993). アメリカに居住における 日本人の履床様式, 家庭學硏究, 39(2), 47-56
  14. 今井範子(이마이 노리코)(1986). 住樣式がらみた住宅平面にする研究. 京都大學位論文
  15. 今井範子(이마이 노리코)(1986). 起居様式の問題. 家庭科教育, 67(9), 94-110
  16. 任喜敬, 今井範子(임희경, 이마이 노리코)(1995). 韓國 都市集合住宅における洗濯慣習と洗濯關聯空間 の檢討. 家庭學研究, 41(2), 55-65
  17. Bechtel, R. B. (1989). Behavior in the house: A Cross-Cultural Comparison using Behavior-setting methodology. Housing culture and design. ED. Setha M. Low and Erve Chambers. Universityof Pennsylvania press
  18. Brochures of Housing plans of Devine (2004). Devine Building Company. Melbourne
  19. Ciddor, Anna (1999). Australian houses and buildings. Macmillan education Australia Pty Ltd
  20. Galster, G. C., & Hesser, G. W. (1981). Residential satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 13(6), 735-758 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581136006
  21. Ian Evans (1985). The Australian home. The Flannel flower press Sydney
  22. John Archer (1987). The great Australian dream: The history of the Australian house. Angus & Robertson, 43
  23. Kim Dovey (1992). Model Houses and Housing Ideology in Australia. Housing Studies, 7(3), 177-188 https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039208720734
  24. Melbourne in Fact 2001 (2003). 2001 Census Statistics for local Government Areas. Department of Sustainability and Environment
  25. Peter Cuffley (1989). Australian houses of the '20 & '30. The five mile press
  26. Peter Cuffley (1993). Australian houses of the forties and fifties. The five mile press
  27. Ritsuko Ozaki (2002). Housing as a reflection of Culture: Privatised living and privacy in England and Japen. Housing studies, 17(2), 209-227 https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030220123199
  28. Robin Boyd (1961). Australia's home. Melbourne University press
  29. Roderick J. Lawrence (1982). Domestic space and society: A cross-cultural study. Comparative Studies in Society and history, 24(1), 104-130 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500009804
  30. Setha. M. Low, & Erve Chambers (1989). Housing, Culture and Design: A comparative perspective. University of Pennsylvania press
  31. WonPil Kim, & KiHyun Lee (2003). A-Cross- Cultural Comparative study on the Personalization of living space through childhood emotional experience. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 15(1)