• Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.52-63
• /
• 2005

Korea has recently implemented two m메or policies on organic wastes, including food wastes. One is the Volume-Based waste Fee System (VBWFS). which went effect nationwide in January 1995, and the other is a ban on the landfill of organic wastes, such as food wastes. organic sludge, and animal manure, in accordance with the Waste Management Act. These two policies have brought about remarkable positive effects, including the reduction of organic wastes at source, and the development of technology for recycling food wastes into feed and compost. However, they have caused obstacles to carry out the policy on food wastes, in areas of legal and technological infrastructures for recycling. Therefore, this study intends to find problems of policies for recycling food wastes, and to suggest ways to resolve them.

• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.19 no.2 s.33
• /
• pp.179-195
• /
• 2006

의약학적존재화발전인소유내재인소(?約學的存在和發展因素有內在因素), 내재인소리유학문본신적특수이론계통(內在因素里有學問本身的特殊理論系統), 함유혼풍부적과학의의(涵有婚豊富的科學意義), 임상치료효과(臨床治療效果), 병인적신뢰등(病人的信賴等). 외재인소리유정치(外在因素里有政治), 정책(政策), 경제(經濟), 문화방면등등(文化方面等等). 저반인소중의학정책적영향시최직접화결정성적(著般因素中?學政策的影向是最直接和決定性的). 병차의학정책적직접인소리유의약방면유관적제도(幷且?學政策的直接因素里有?約方面有?的制度), 정책(政策), 법평등(法平等), 간접인소리유국가전장제도(間接因素里有國家典章制度), 국가방침화정책등(國歌方針和政策等). 재고대봉건사회상정책적개념시국가(在古代封建社會上政策的槪念是國家), 정당재특정역사시기상위료실현노선화임무(政?在特定歷史時期上爲了悉現路善和任務), 규정적행동준칙(規定的行動准則), 비여선황제적소(比如宣皇帝的沼), 령(領), 칙(勅), 유급정부적각중정령등(愉及政府的各?政領等). 본논문시대한한의학원전학회지상기고적(本論文是大韓韓?學原典學會指上寄稿的)[관우진한시기의정사연구(?于秦漢時基?政史硏究)]상여천명(上如闡明), 통과화중국량준교수공동연구적연속적연구결과(通過和中國梁畯敎授共同硏究的連續的硏究結果). 지우위진남북조시기적의정사(至于魏晉南北朝試期的?政史), 논자관우위진남북조정치개요(?者?于魏晉南北朝政治槪要), 의약정책(?約政策), 의정조직적초보구조(?政組織的初步柩?), 의약정책화의약발전관계(?約政策和?約發展關系), 관우의정평가와형성원인등분성오개방면후(?于?政?伽和形成原因等分成五介方面后), 진행연구병정리보고기결과(進行硏究幷整理報告基結果).

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.20 no.1_2
• /
• pp.3-77
• /
• 1998

경제위기 극복의 핵심과제는 '시장기구의 원활한 작동에 의존하는 경제의 틀'을 마련하는 것이며, 이를 위해서는 경제적 시장경제체제를 구축해야 한다. 이러한 견지에서 공정거래법 정책의 위상, 역할, 과제, 방향 등을 새로이 정립할 필요가 있다. 공정거래법 정책의 기초개념이 되어온 경제력(집중)과 경쟁의(불)공정성은 지나치게 포괄적이고 주관적이며 이에 대한 분석의 틀이 되는 이론체계도 없어 정책의 개념적 기반이 되기 어렵다. 공정거래법 정책은 독점력과 효율성의 개념 위에서 경제효율 증진이라는 목적을 추구해야만 정책의 일관성과 실효성을 높일 수 있다. 이는 대기업들의 독점력이 경제력집중 및 재벌구조와 형태상 제 문제의 근원(根源)이며, 독점력은 경제이론에 의해 정책방향과 기준이 제시되는 개념이기 때문이다. 공정거래법 정책은 시장구조와 형태를 실질적으로 경쟁화함으로써 경제효율을 극대화하는 데 주력해야 한다. 무엇보다도 경쟁 제한적 법령 제도 관행을 철폐하기 위한 규제개혁을 주도하고 경제구조조정과 재벌개혁의 기본원칙과 방법이 시장기능과 경쟁을 강화하는 방향으로 설정 시행되도록 하는 것이 긴요하다. 특히 대기업간 사업교환이나 인수 합병에 대하여 엄격한 경쟁정책적 검토와 규율을 적용해야 하며, 시장의 독과점화를 방지하면서 구조조정을 촉진하는 방향으로 기업결합 규제기준을 개선해나가야 할 것이다. 가격담합 등에 대한 당연위법 원칙의 확립, 입찰조작의 감시 적발체제 구축 등 카르텔 규제를 강화하고, 유통조직 활동의 효율화를 도모하면서 독점유지 강화행위를 엄격히 금지하여 다양한 유통경로와 업태가 출현 발전하도록 해야 한다. 산업조직적 조사 분석능력을 확충하여 경쟁정책적 시각에서 주요 사건을 선별 조사하고 법집행에 있어 사소(私訴)의 역할을 확대하기 위한 노력도 필요하다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2019.05a
• /
• pp.105-105
• /
• 2019

전세계적으로 스마트 항구 및 스마트 해상물류 시장의 패권을 장악하고자 EU, 싱가폴, 일본, 중국 등 범국가적으로 스마트 물류(해운, 내륙, 항공) 생태계 촉진을 위한 정책을 추진하고 있음, 이에 각 국의 스마트 해상물류 정책 동향과 향후 기술 개발 방향성을 전체적으로 조사하고 시사점을 공유하고, 특히, 네덜란드 로테르담 항만청와 로테르담 시는 전 세계 항만 시설 중에서도 체계적인 전략과 방법으로 혁신적 스마트 물류 시스템을 빠른 속도로 만들어 나가고 있기에 스마트 해상물류와 연관된 로테르담 항구의 혁신 (Innovation) 전략과 디지털화 (Digitalization)를 중심의 정책 현황과 ICT기술의 적용 전략과 주요 프로그램을 소개함.

• The Optical Journal
• /
• s.143
• /
• pp.78-85
• /
• 2013

올해 중소기업 정책자금 지원규모는 3조 8500억 원으로 지난해 3조 3330억 원에서 15.5% 증가한다. 중소기업청과 중소기업진흥공단은 정책자금의 우선순위를 일자리 창출에 두고 민간금융기관을 통해 자금 조달이 어려운 창업자와 기술개발기업에 전체 정책자금의 40.3%인 1조 5500억 원을 배분한다. 이에 창업기업지원자금이 지난해보다 200억 원, 개발기술사업화자금이 420억 원 늘어나며, 정책자금을 지원받은 기업이 일자리를 1명씩 늘릴 때마다 0.1%포인트씩 최대 1%포인트까지 금리를 인하해 일자리 창출 효과를 극대화 한다는 계획이다. 또한 중진공을 통한 직접 대출 비중이 기존 55%에서 70%로 확대되며, 개발기술사업화자금, 수출금융, 소공인 특화자금은 전액 직접대출로 운영되고 운전자금에 대한 보증서부 대출은 폐지된다. 반면 신용대출 규모는 20% 늘어나 중소기업의 담보 부담이 줄어들 전망이다. 변화하는 산업 구조에 맞춰 정책자금 구조도 바뀐다. 담보력이 부족한 창업 및 소기업의 자금 지원을 위해 기계기구, 재고자산, 매출채권의 담보 인정비율을 높인다. 하반기 중에는 지식재산권 담보대출이 새로 도입된다. 별도의 기술가치 평가 모형을 통해 특허기술의 경제적 가치를 평가하고 특허권을 담보로 대출을 시행한다. 자세한 사항 및 정책자금 신청 희망기업은 중소기업진흥공단 홈페이지(www.sbc.or.kr) '정책자금 융자도우미'를 통해 신청요건 및 추천자금 등을 자가진단 후 신청하면 된다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.20 no.12
• /
• pp.441-453
• /
• 2020

This study looked at the concretizing process of the Free Semester Policy(as is the FSP). The concretizing process of policy refers to the process in which the major components of policy idea are changing through the agenda setting and policy decision process. To this end, we collected major policy documents related to the FSP from the pledge of the presidential candidate to the implementation plan of the FSP and the oral data of key personnel of the FSP, and analyzed the concretizing process of the policy focusing on the policy objectives. As a result, it was found that the policy objectives of the FSP were presented in a more comprehensive and ambiguous form through the agenda setting and policy decision process. The emphasized direction of policy has also changed over and over. This phenomenon offers several implications for understanding education policy. First, it should be understood that the objectives of education policy presented at a specific point in time are provisional. Second, the change in policy objectives may have occurred in the process of securing the legitimacy of policy promotion. Third, it is necessary to pay more attention to the relationship between policy and politics. In order to properly promote an education policy based on the common sense and needs of the public, a mature education policy discussion culture is required.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.58 no.3
• /
• pp.341-370
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this paper is to classify and compare 21 OECD countries in regard to the level of support in parents' childcare and work. Several meaningful conclusions were suggested. First, examining the level of support in parents' childcare and work, 21 OECD countries can be classified into clusters different from the mainstream welfare state typology. Second, the level of parents' childcare and work support was high in socio-democratic countries such as Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Third, the level of parents' childcare right support is not necessarily positively related to that of parents' work in the labor market. As we have seen in the cases of France and Austria, although both countries have relatively high level of parents' childcare and work support, the level of work support in the labor market is low. These results have important implications for Korean family policy in that Korean society has to support both the parents' childcare right and the work right in the labor market.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.45-54
• /
• 2022

This study examines the actual operation and performance of the public participation platform by analyzing various public participation processes from 2018 to 2021, when 'Gwanghwamun 1st Street', a representative public participation platform operated by the Ministry of Public Administration and Security, was launched. Through this, the influencing factors that were able to successfully induce the process of policyization through public participation were derived as follows. First, online participation channels were diversified to encourage public participation. Second, it is also important that the public opinion contest and compensation for public review were implemented to encourage and expand public participation. Third, the participation of experts was encouraged to refine and refine the people's ideas. Through these research results, it is judged that the Korean government will be able to contribute to inducing the policyization process through continuous public participation. In deriving success factors for policyization through public participation in the future, how influencing factors such as the public participation process, communication through online channels, and collaboration with experts affect the public participation process using quantitative analysis techniques A study to prove it will have to be conducted subsequently.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.561-589
• /
• 2015

Up to present science and technology (S&T) policy in Korea has focused on producing academic papers and patents through the increase of investment on research and development (R&D). However, as the role of science and technology on boosting national economy has been emphasized and the current government has established 'creative economy' as a main policy agenda, 'technology commercialization' has been moving onto the center of S&T policy. Technology commercialization policy encourages R&D outcomes of public R&D institutions to be utilized in private firms for their new business development, and this concept is in line with out-bound open innovation, in the sense that it involves the flow of technological knowledge from public R&D institutions to private firms. Based on this understanding, this paper analyses government technology commercialization programs and attempts to suggest policy implications. The results suggest that future technology commercialization policy (1) be specialized in a way of reflecting the characteristics of each government ministry, (2) strongly support technology licensing-out, (3) strengthen the linkage between each programs, and (4) nurture expert groups, such as accelerators who can help and foster technology start-ups.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.310-333
• /
• 2007

This paper introduces a relative comparative advantage index and a composite concentration index of university research activity in science and technology. Three hypotheses were tested regarding differences of degree of concentration based on the size of government R&D fund, location of university, and source of foundation, respectively. T-test results imply that there are significant differences of concentration based on the size of R&D fund and source of foundation, while location of university does not show a significant difference. The paper generally suggests that the lesser size of government R&D fund would lead higher level of concentration, and public funded universities tend to maintain far higher concentration ratio. The paper contributes by introducing relevant indexes for analyzing university research competence, concentration and competitiveness, and hence by proposing policy direction and implication for university competitiveness policy.